Once again, soundingjoy, even if humans are your only consideration, it is in our best interest to preserve lives, and help ourselves in the process. The astounding biology of this video is not unique to humans, nor is the sanctity of life on this planet.

Like I mentioned, there are ongoing long-term studies of humans, which indicate significant health benefits and longevity resulting from life-sustaining dietary practices.

I agree with you Rhemes1582, well said. When Adam and Eve sinned, death came to all things, including the earth. Earth was made for man, not man for earth. While we must be responsible about tending the earth, saving the lives of unborn children, and the souls of men are much more important to God, I assure you. It seems the cart is before the horse. Should we then use the aborted fetuses to fertilize your ecosystems? Nature, while created by God, is not God. He alone places above all, man, … [Altro]

This is about human development, and I am saying that human development does not occur independently of all other life on this planet.

Like I said, humans will live longer and healthier lives by not killing and processing billions of other sentient beings each year.

Mr. rhemes1582, can you read the whole thing, or do you stop after finding a word that you can pounce on?

Other than ignoring my point, you are clearly harping on the semantics of two words which you are taking out of context, … [Altro]

Correction, I meant to say sentient instead of sentinent, as I said before with links:

Conception is a miracle for all sentient beings, just as it is for us. Humans today can save more lives each year than the entire human population on earth (while maintaining ecosystems and our health in the process). We should look at the quality of life beyond birth for all, because we are the only ones who have these choices to make. The issue of pro-life must become universal to matter.

While I am … [Altro]

I can also restate my original remark with more positive semantics, for the sake of conveying optimism:

Conception is a miracle for all sentinent beings, just as it is for us. Humans today can save more lives each year than the entire human population on earth (while maintaining ecosystems and our health in the process). We should look at the quality of life beyond birth for all, because we are the only ones who have these choices to make. The issue of pro-life must become universal to matter. [Altro]

The positive outcome would be for people to stop destroying lives and wrecking ecosystems. How can you miss such an obvious conclusion? Instead you are saying that it is my fault for pointing out that negative behavior causes negative consequenses. Well, it does. Everyone knows this. We just didn't always know what to do. Now it is becoming apparent that so much destruction is only counterproductive, yet it is not being talked about in this context, so I am bringing it up. This is a positive … [Altro]

First of all, you are putting words in my mouth and then criticizing them with your own bias, as well as taking points I have made elsewhere out of context (ad hominem). My comment on this topic means what it says. Furthermore, my point was that the human race would be better off if it was universally pro-life for all sentient beings throughout our life-spans, because long term studies show that people live longer without eating animals, and that it takes more natural resources to kill and … [Altro]

It isn't just us, but all sentient beings for which conception is a miracle. Humans destroy more lives each year than the entire human population on earth (while wrecking ecosystems and our health in the process). We should look at the quality of life beyond birth for all, because we are the only ones who have these choices to make. The issue of pro-life must become universal to matter.

I love these big brained guys. This is a great post.