05:53
Arthur
21K
Lila Rose discusses the SEXED Investigation with Bill O'Reilly. Air date: July 23, 2014 Watch the footage they are talking about here: www.plannedparenthoodexposed.comMore
Lila Rose discusses the SEXED Investigation with Bill O'Reilly.

Air date: July 23, 2014 Watch the footage they are talking about here: www.plannedparenthoodexposed.com
elisabethvonthüringen
😲 🤨
Acyutananda
Regarding the Live Action presentation on the O'Reilly Factor:
What is wrong with BDSM?* Lila Rose called it "destructive," and called the PP counseling "dangerous." "Dangerous" seems to refer to the fact that it has led to some injuries and deaths. I may not be well-informed, but aren't deaths and serious injuries quite rare?
It seems to me that the real issue, and the real sense in which BDSM …More
Regarding the Live Action presentation on the O'Reilly Factor:

What is wrong with BDSM?* Lila Rose called it "destructive," and called the PP counseling "dangerous." "Dangerous" seems to refer to the fact that it has led to some injuries and deaths. I may not be well-informed, but aren't deaths and serious injuries quite rare?

It seems to me that the real issue, and the real sense in which BDSM could be destructive, is this:

Society is being sold the idea that to go through life with a sexually superheated brain is the best life has to offer. I don't think this is sound psychology. Suppose you come to believe, as you are being told, that sex is salvation. After trying a constant diet of hook-ups, you will naturally develop a tolerance for them. The pleasure threshold (amount of stimulation needed to keep feeling the same pleasure) will go up, and it's only natural that you will feel the need for something more exotic.
ame Acyutananda, code 2000

I think that sound psychology involves in part the right amount of restraint and discipline. I think that true happiness is to be found within, and I don't mean just in what the nervous system can do.

And what else?

1. Suppose you trust in sex as your strategy for happiness in life, or one of your main strategies. (By the way, I think we would find the same futility in many other strategies for happiness, such as getting rich or being photographed with celebrities.)

2. After a simple quantitative approach for a while (more sex = more happiness), you encounter diminishing returns because, as mentioned, the pleasure threshold has gone up.

3. If you don't change your basic strategy (sex), you are forced into a constant quest for new kinds of variety or some kind of quantitative increase.

(A person who is successful in being happy in life in other ways and sometimes happens to have sex, is not going to encounter these problems.)

4. Suppose a person likes being whipped, or whipping others, and this kind of thing continues to be an important part of their strategy for happiness in life, and the pleasure threshold goes up. What will this lead to?

5. Studies have shown that, for instance, in people who do Buddhist compassion meditation for years, the compassion area of their brain grows in size (neuroplasticity). Suppose somebody is regularly walked like a dog for many years -- what will happen to their brain?