BrotherBeowulf
BrotherBeowulf

The 'Payoff Chart'

Immaculate Heart of Mary

Cut off all payments until the Homosexual Network Strangling the Church is gone from Cupich Tobin McElroy Zubik & Gregory as well as most of the Usccb here (Stateside) all the way to Maradiaga Zanchetta Ricca et alia ad infinitum in Rome including of course the cery chief of said Network:

Francis
BrotherBeowulf

Cardinal Pell, Scapegoat | Matthew Schmitz

I’m thirsty not for blood but rather for justice. If it’s so ludicrous why didn’t His Eminence take the stand and say so. . . .

Happy Feast of the Immaculate Heart!
BrotherBeowulf

The devil is not a person

And as his compadre Antipope Francis teaches:

“There is no Hell,” either.

Cardinal Pell & The Mafia

While it is true that Cardinal Pell's economic reforms threatened to reveal threats to Friends of Francis, that doe not mean he is innocent of what he was actually convicted of.

Pell lashes out after gays refused communion

Ballarat (eg 'Fr.' Gerald Ridsdale--Australia's Geoghan/McCarrick, Cardinal Pell's friend) was already Aussie Child-Rape Central by 1993, as well as Pell's former parish as pastor. By 2002 charges against Pell had already circulated. WARNING: EXPLICIT: www.youtube.com/watch .

Poor Cardinal Pell is not a martyr at all, much less to the gay lobby. Rather there is a very strong case that he is …More
Ballarat (eg 'Fr.' Gerald Ridsdale--Australia's Geoghan/McCarrick, Cardinal Pell's friend) was already Aussie Child-Rape Central by 1993, as well as Pell's former parish as pastor. By 2002 charges against Pell had already circulated. WARNING: EXPLICIT: www.youtube.com/watch .

Poor Cardinal Pell is not a martyr at all, much less to the gay lobby. Rather there is a very strong case that he is part and parcel of it within the Church, specifically: the priestly Homosexual Network Strangling the Church ('conservative' wing--think Maciel), in the memorable phrase of Archbishop Vigano. If he were not, Antipope Francis would never have admitted him to the Gang of Nine.

And I note again the Cardinal refused to testify in the face of the horrifying charges at his trial. While a jury may not draw a legal inference from that fact, you and I are permitted to do so, gentle reader.

'Hello George': Melbourne Archbishop uses radio interview to send Pell a message of support

'Nother ridiculous theory.

Gay Mafia in the Vatican

Far more likely they fear and are aiming at--not to mention obsessing over--Archbishop Vigano'. After all, it is Archbishop Vigano' who has named and exposed the Homosexual Network Strangling the Church. He also identified its chief: Francis.

Dissenting judge in Cdl. Pell’s appeal: Evidence should ‘lead inevitably to acquittal’

The man is a convicted pederast going to jail with dozens of other priests and brothers who also molested children.

What of the innocent children in Australia whom he forsook by shielding the Homosexual Network Strangling the Church—in the words of Archbishop Viganò—not to mention those whom he indirectly, through the hands of ‘priestly’ predators he protected, and directly abused.

The ‘martyr’…More
The man is a convicted pederast going to jail with dozens of other priests and brothers who also molested children.

What of the innocent children in Australia whom he forsook by shielding the Homosexual Network Strangling the Church—in the words of Archbishop Viganò—not to mention those whom he indirectly, through the hands of ‘priestly’ predators he protected, and directly abused.

The ‘martyr’ who wouldn’t testify in his own defense was convicted by a jury.

What normal man accused of so vile and base a crime does not protest??

An appellate panel affirmed his conviction. Conservatives can be pederast rapist predators. Look at Maciel—another ‘great conservative.’

The Australian Disgrace | George Weigel

J—Thank you for asking. Bottom line two years f three upheld the jury verdict. The dissent lights in to the victim, but like Weigel does not think to apply the same scrutiny to the defense witnesses. Pell’s Shills as I call them.

I haven’t read the entire dissent so cannot say more. I’ll note the irony of Pell shipping out to the Paedophile prison, as a prominent Australian columnist noted, “…More
J—Thank you for asking. Bottom line two years f three upheld the jury verdict. The dissent lights in to the victim, but like Weigel does not think to apply the same scrutiny to the defense witnesses. Pell’s Shills as I call them.

I haven’t read the entire dissent so cannot say more. I’ll note the irony of Pell shipping out to the Paedophile prison, as a prominent Australian columnist noted, “where Pell will know so many of the priests and brothers there.”

How many of them were beneficiaries of his protection, largesse and cover as auxiliary bishop, bishop and Cardinal-Archbishop of Australia, not to
mention as parish priest shielding Fr. Gerald Ridsdale in Ballarat, Ground Zero of the Pederasty Crisis in the Catholic Church in Australia.

Pell is to be blunt a traitor to his flock, his church and his Lord, our Lord Jesus Christ. There tragically is blood on his hands.

Our Lady of Fatima pray for us.

Vatican Licks Bottom Of Australia’s Injustice System

Pell didn’t deny the accusation in court. He did not testify. Under the law that may not be an admission but it’s a rather weak denial from the horse’s mouth, if it is a denial at all.

The jury judged the credibility of the witnesses for the State (or Crown)—there were more than one—as well as the witnesses for the defense. The latter were found not credible.

As VoxCantoris just asked today—“…More
Pell didn’t deny the accusation in court. He did not testify. Under the law that may not be an admission but it’s a rather weak denial from the horse’s mouth, if it is a denial at all.

The jury judged the credibility of the witnesses for the State (or Crown)—there were more than one—as well as the witnesses for the defense. The latter were found not credible.

As VoxCantoris just asked today—“What if Pell is guilty?”

The Australian Disgrace | George Weigel

Thanks for the lesson in humility o holy one.

The Australian Disgrace | George Weigel

Like OJ right. You as a legal beagle inferred innocence from that tactic too I presume.

The Australian Disgrace | George Weigel

Yes. The dozens of not hundreds of kids raped by pederasts on Pell’s watch.

Further. A judge, jury and appellate panel of judges who—unlike us and the talking heads like Der Weigel—who actually heard all the witnesses including this for Pell. They and only they weighed the credibility—and that of Pell’s were deemed unconvincing.

The Australian Disgrace | George Weigel

That's he's lying through his teeth. "Pell's Tells," I call them. Look at his remarks to the Foster family! Their child's blood (actually two children, plus innumerable others raped by priests Pell protected, either moving them himself or knowing of same) is on his hands; and he knows it; and he doesn't give a darn.

I find his friendship with and defense of Ridsdale Sr. the Molester highly revea…More
That's he's lying through his teeth. "Pell's Tells," I call them. Look at his remarks to the Foster family! Their child's blood (actually two children, plus innumerable others raped by priests Pell protected, either moving them himself or knowing of same) is on his hands; and he knows it; and he doesn't give a darn.

I find his friendship with and defense of Ridsdale Sr. the Molester highly revealing as well.

The Australian Disgrace | George Weigel

'Does.' Is he himself credible or not? And why would he not testify at trial if he's the innocent martyr?

The Australian Disgrace | George Weigel

Yes. Have you watched them? If so, what's your 'verdict,' on them. Doe the Cardinal appear truthful to you? What are you afraid of, friend.

The Australian Disgrace | George Weigel

Mr. Weigel's reasoning is based on the fallacy that eye-witness evidence--both for and against--is not evidence.

If anyone cares to learn more about Cardinal Pell and his sordid past involving pederasty and child-abuse cover-up, including direct past allegations against the Cardinal himself, please see the following. These exposes dating from 2002 and 2015 corroborate the charges against him.
More
Mr. Weigel's reasoning is based on the fallacy that eye-witness evidence--both for and against--is not evidence.

If anyone cares to learn more about Cardinal Pell and his sordid past involving pederasty and child-abuse cover-up, including direct past allegations against the Cardinal himself, please see the following. These exposes dating from 2002 and 2015 corroborate the charges against him.
www.youtube.com/watch
www.youtube.com/watch
Eyewitness testimony is also evidence. The judge jury and appellate judges heard the evidence and found it compelling. None of the critics or George-the-Martyr crowd have actually heard the witnesses, both for and against. The former were found credible; the latter in the Cardinals defense were not.

Vatican Licks Bottom Of Australia’s Injustice System

If @Raff or anyone else cares to learn more about Cardinal Pell and his sordid past involving pederasty and child-abuse cover-up, including direct past allegations against the Cardinal himself, please see the following exposes from 2002 and 2015. He knwoingly moved predators, and didn't care about the subsequent innocent victims. That is criminal, apart from what he was vconvicted of but related …More
If @Raff or anyone else cares to learn more about Cardinal Pell and his sordid past involving pederasty and child-abuse cover-up, including direct past allegations against the Cardinal himself, please see the following exposes from 2002 and 2015. He knwoingly moved predators, and didn't care about the subsequent innocent victims. That is criminal, apart from what he was vconvicted of but related and corroborative.
www.youtube.com/watch
www.youtube.com/watch
Eyewitness testimony is evidence. The judge jury and appellate judges heard the evidence and found it compelling. None of the critics or George-the-Martyr crowd have actually heard the witnesses, both for and against. The former were found credible; the latter in the Cardinals defense were not.

The Australian Disgrace | George Weigel

If anyone cares to learn more about Cardinal Pell and his sordid past involving pederasty and child-abuse cover-up, including direct past allegations against the Cardinal himself, please see the following.

www.youtube.com/watch

www.youtube.com/watch

Eyewitness testimony is evidence. The judge jury and appellate judges heard the evidence and found it compelling. None of the critics or …More
If anyone cares to learn more about Cardinal Pell and his sordid past involving pederasty and child-abuse cover-up, including direct past allegations against the Cardinal himself, please see the following.

www.youtube.com/watch

www.youtube.com/watch

Eyewitness testimony is evidence. The judge jury and appellate judges heard the evidence and found it compelling. None of the critics or George-the-Martyr crowd have actually heard the witnesses, both for and against. The former were found credible; the latter in the Cardinals defense were not.

Vatican Licks Bottom Of Australia’s Injustice System

Don’t look at the source alone. Ad Hominem fallacy. Judge the credibility of the witness. See what Pell says. To David Ridsdale and the Foster family.

The man is guilty.