Fr. Kramer BOMBSHELL: Benedict's Renunciation "Lost in Translation" Facebook 8-16-17
《After having repeatedly examined my conscience before God, I have come to the certainty that my strengths, due to an advanced age, are no longer suited to an adequate exercise of the Petrine ministry.》
Here's what he really said: Conscientia mea iterum atque iterum coram Deo explorata ad cognitionem certam perveni vires meas ingravescente aetate non iam aptas esse ad munus Petrinum aeque administrandum.
He does not say his strengths are "no longer suited to an adequate exercise of the Petrine ministry"; but, "no longer suited to the adequate administration of the munus Petrinum". He makes the critical distinction between the munus and its administration. This key distinction is lost in the poor translation.
《I am well aware that this ministry, due to its essential spiritual nature, must be carried out not only with words and deeds, but no less with prayer and suffering.》
What he really said: Bene conscius sum hoc munus secundum suam essentiam spiritualem non solum agendo et loquendo exsequi debere, sed non minus patiendo et orando.
He says that due to the essentially spiritual nature of the munus, it is not only carried out by words and deeds (i.e. "the active exercise of the ministry" - 27/02/2013); but no less by suffering and prayer.
He said on the 19th of April 2005 he received the commitment from the Lord, which is for always ("Qui permettetemi di tornare ancora una volta al 19 aprile 2005. La gravità della decisione è stata proprio anche nel fatto che da quel momento in poi ero impegnato sempre e per sempre dal Signore. Sempre); and that the "always" is "for always", "there is no return to the private life: " (Il “sempre” è anche un “per sempre” - non c’è più un ritornare nel privato.)
He states explicitly his intention to continue carrying out the the munus, "in the service of prayer in the enclosure of St. Peter" (ma nel servizio della preghiera resto, per così dire, nel recinto di san Pietro); and that his "decision to renounce the active exercise of the ministry does not revoke this." ("La mia decisione di rinunciare all’esercizio attivo del ministero, non revoca questo.") Thus, his intention to continue carrying out the exercise of the Petrine munus in the "service of prayer", is not revoked by his decision to renounce the administration of the munus, i.e. "the active exercise of the ministry".
《Quapropter bene conscius ponderis huius actus plena libertate declaro me ministerio Episcopi Romae, Successoris Sancti Petri, mihi per manus Cardinalium die 19 aprilis MMV commisso renuntiare》
Pope Benedict XVI is the true Pope and endtimes Pope to flee Rome. Francis is a true antipope
tradcatknight.blogspot.ro/…/fr-kramer-bombs…
August 13, 2017 Fr Kramer: Benedict XVI Did Not Renounce The Munus Petrinum
tradcatknight.blogspot.ro/…/fr-kramer-bened…
Facebook 8-13-17
" Even in the Vatican, many quietly reject him...."
Pope Benedict XVI did not renounce the munus petrinum; and therefore, the question is, who is the true pope, Francis or Benedict? I have systematically analyzed (as did far more systematically and thoroughly, Canon Law Professor Fr. Stefano Violi) Benedict's own words, in which he very carefully states his intention to renounce only the petrine ministry, but NOT the petrine munus. Benedict stated explicitly that he received his committment to serve (i.e. the munus) on 19 April 2005, which he said was "for always" and added, "my decision to renounce the active exercise of the ministry does not revoke this."
Thus it is clear that Benedict XVI did not validly resign the papacy, since to validly resign the office, the pope must correctly express his intention to renounce his munus: Can. "332 § 2 - Si contingat ut Romanus Pontifex muneri suo renuntiet, ad validitatem requiritur ut renuntiatio libere fiat et rite manifestetur, non vero ut a quopiam acceptetur." Not only did Benedict not correctly express any intention to renounce his munus, but he expressly stated that his renunciation of the ministry does not revoke his munus. Therefore, he erroneously stated that his renunciation vacates the chair -- an invalidating substantial error: "Can. 188 — Renuntiatio ex metu gravi, iniuste incusso, dolo vel errore substantiali aut simoniace facta, ipso iure irrita est."
This "substantial error" has created the appearance that two men in papal attire with papal names, and who address each other as "Your Holiness", share the petrine munus; and therefore it is PATENTLY ABSURD for , the Bergoglians to claim that the election and subsequent "unanimous acceptance", which resulted from an election conditioned on a defect of intention and an invalidating substantial error; and which is not exclusive, but includes both mens' claim on the papacy, somehow proves that Bergoglio is the true pope! A plain and simple application of the cited canons proves beyond all shadow of doubt that Benedict's resignation was invalid, and consequently, he is still the only reigning pope. Bergoglio is the heretic-antipope foretold in the secret of Fatima; and according to the Secret of Fatima, the heretic-antipope will lead the stampede into apostasy.