Clicks2.3K
en.news
12

Pontifical Secret? All Details of Francis' Election Revealed

Gerard O’Connell’s book “The Election of Pope Francis" (2019) contains all "secret" details about Francis' election.

After the first ballot the race was between Bergoglio and Scola. The Bergoglio supporters were: Gracias, Kasper, Monswengo Pasinya, Rodríguez Maradiaga, Tauran, Turkson.

The second ballot:
Bergoglio 45
Scola 38
Ouellet 24

The third ballot:
Bergoglio 56
Scola 41

At this point, Scola asked his supporters Bagnasco, Betori and Caffarra to elect Bergoglio.

Ortega y Alamino received Bergoglio’s pre-conclave speech exclaiming, “Now, I have a text of the new pope!”

Maradiaga and Santos Abril asked Bergoglio about his lung surgery. Bergoglio assured them that he was healthy. Hummes told Lehmann that Bergoglio was not involved in Argentinean politics.

The fourth ballot:
Bergoglio 67
Scola 32
Ouellet 13

The fifth ballot:
Bergoglio 85
Scola 20
Ouellet 8

Bergoglio embraced Scola whom he would later treat like an enemy.

Picture: © Mazur/catholicnews.org.uk, CC BY-NC-SA, #newsFdoxhiorbz
Could we now query the result of the 1958 Conclave? .... Fr Malachi Martin and a few others claimed Cardinal Siri was elected and then forced to resign under threats from Communists within the Conclave who sought to seize control of the Church and nullify all that Christ had hoped He would prevent by His Holy Mother's appearance to the little Shepherd Children at Fatima.

Read "How Satan Falsifie…More
Could we now query the result of the 1958 Conclave? .... Fr Malachi Martin and a few others claimed Cardinal Siri was elected and then forced to resign under threats from Communists within the Conclave who sought to seize control of the Church and nullify all that Christ had hoped He would prevent by His Holy Mother's appearance to the little Shepherd Children at Fatima.

Read "How Satan Falsified the 1958 Conclave" by Ken Gordon

For ease I've attached it as a JPG

Isn't THIS the same situation that we find ourselves in again. A presumed TRUE Pope - resigns and a probable false Pope is elected instead?

This post by Ken Gordon states that a false Pope was DELIBERATELY placed on the See in 1958 so that agents of Satan could act freely to destroy Her from within, since the Church was no longer under the guidance and protection of the Holy Ghost, as a false resignation of a TRULY elected Pope happened back in 1958 also.

The comment makes fine reading anyway .

God Bless everyone who reads Gloria TV.

(if people want to read the original) it's a comment by Ken Gordon which can be found exactly half way down the page linked (using the scroll bar on the right hand side of your computer screen

strobertbellarmine.net/viewtopic.php
Fr. Gregory Hesse once told his audience not to trust Fr. Malachi Martin...
Lalanz
The enemies of God and his remnant church will not win. The new world order will come very close to controlling everything. Just when it seems as if all hope is lost, God will step in and chastise the world. Unfortunately the good will have to suffer, but for real Catholics, we will enjoy the pain, because we want to suffer physically and spiritually for our beloved Jesus!!!!
All corrupt cardinals. All excommunicated according to cannon law.
So, Scola told his supporters, “Vote for Bergoglio”.
advoluntas@aol.com likes this.
There is no penalty, because they know the Conclave was uncanonical in the first place, since Benedict never resigned the petrine munus as per canon 332 §2, see ppbxvi.org for more info.
I read the article by Maike Hickson. What it seems is that an old friend of Bergoglio is trying to deceive, to make us believe that there was no campaign to elect Bergoglio and that he didn't know anything about it. Why? Because, if he did know, he is excomunicated latae sententiae. Remember the Ana Katherine Emmerich's prophecies about the two popes, one of them false, in whose election took …More
I read the article by Maike Hickson. What it seems is that an old friend of Bergoglio is trying to deceive, to make us believe that there was no campaign to elect Bergoglio and that he didn't know anything about it. Why? Because, if he did know, he is excomunicated latae sententiae. Remember the Ana Katherine Emmerich's prophecies about the two popes, one of them false, in whose election took part a bunch of cardinals that were excomunicated and didn't know it (because of the excomunication latae sententiae), and the machnations of german heterodox prelates... She spoke of the devil in Moscow, in the building with the steeples... And she spoke of the devil unleashed around 1940, forma 100 years...
When are we informed about an official excommunication of the "whistleblowers"?
The author also mentions that Cardinal Danneels said during the pre-Conclave gathering that the new Pope will set up a council of cardinals counseling the Pope.-
The kingmakers of Pope Francis, as described in this book, are especially Cardinals Murphy-O'Connor, Maradiaga and Kasper.
CatMuse
What? No explicit Gallen Mafia input just a few low life apostates from south America? Nothing from the apostates from Germany, France or England who conspired to put this deformed soul on the throne of St Peter? And this is supposed to represent a full expose? I think not!
eticacasanova and 2 more users like this.
eticacasanova likes this.
Ultraviolet likes this.
Jim Dorchak likes this.
The author adds information to this diary that he later learned from many different sources...

Anonymous sources who stories cannot be verified?

No thanks.
--------------------------------------
During a conclave the only people present—the cardinals and a very few other officials—are sworn to secrecy. The oath that they take, set forth by Pope Benedict XVI in 2012, is both clear …More
The author adds information to this diary that he later learned from many different sources...

Anonymous sources who stories cannot be verified?

No thanks.
--------------------------------------
During a conclave the only people present—the cardinals and a very few other officials—are sworn to secrecy. The oath that they take, set forth by Pope Benedict XVI in 2012, is both clear and solemn:
I, N.N., promise and swear that, unless I should receive a special faculty given expressly by the newly-elected Pontiff or by his successors, I will observe absolute and perpetual secrecy with all who are not part of the College of Cardinal electors concerning all matters directly or indirectly related to the ballots cast and their scrutiny for the election of the Supreme Pontiff…

I declare that I take this oath fully aware that an infraction thereof will make me subject to the penalty of excommunication latae sententiae, which is reserved to the Apostolic See.
-----------------------------------------------


If some cardinals violated their sacred oaths, and other cardinals accept the violation quietly, as if it were a matter of routine, how can this bunch ever expect to regain the confidence of the faithful?
Alex A and 2 more users like this.
Alex A likes this.
Ultraviolet likes this.
charisma likes this.