Francis Tries to Sell Heresy As “Authentic Magisterium”

The Acta Apostolicae Sedis, the official gazette of the Holy See, not only published Pope Francis’ approval of a heretic interpretation of Amoris Laetitia but even labels it as “authentic magister…
Write a comment mentioned this post in Three Kazakhstan Bishops Confront Pope Francis.
JTLiuzza As for the second dilemma of your comment. Presently, there are 2 positions which reason why Francis is not the pope: 1. sedevacantist or 2. attribution of munus to other person (pope Benedict XVI). Cardinal Caffara included the fact of their existence in his last letter to Francis which they do not hold. The highest legislator as I have mentioned before can not be removed by anyone but … More
JTLiuzza The knowledge of the 4 conditions for ex-cathedra to occur are widely known. Not only to canonists but for canonists, theologians to analyze . You aimed to polarize V I with Card. Bergoglio not being a pope after formal heresy by law of classical non-contradiction. However, you confused formal heresy as the direct result of an infallible statement containing heresy which in its textual … More
BrTomFordeOFMCap In order to understand what I tried to convey one should understand legal positivism and its first content which deprives this school of thought from morals. In consequence, a study of a scientist or scholar, whether biologist, theologian or canonist without ethical consideration and influence of morals in surrounding reality may reduce findings to commandments over humans. … More
Rafał_Ovile The you will realise that he is not nuancing anything but pointing out that the Law has not changed. In fact putting the letter in the Acta is trying to bolster up an unstable situation. It seems to me that they have not changed the Law and they have not changed the teaching but they wish to give the appearance of having done so.
BrTomFordeOFMCap yes I have read it and the conclusion doesn't direct to a solution. Although it secures the priests with canon 915 to bar reception of HC to adulterers but at the same time excludes the real danger of Francis' decision that will put constant pressure on parish priests and undermine 915 in pastoral practice. Both by juridical pressure and from adulterers themselves. My friend … More
Uncle Joe
Basically, is it any wonder that the Catholic Church is in such disarray with the leadership that currently is in place?
BrTomFordeOFMCap one of many attempts to nuance and confuse the matter that is simple and obvious to many Catholic hearts.
The [Dictator] Pope has decided, and so it is done.
Dr Edward Peters over at deals with these issues. It seems that even at the top they are confused about what they can and cannot do.
The Pope's use of term "authentic magisterium" is no doubt intended to demand "religious submission" of Burke and others against the truth of Christ
Libor Halik
Francis is not the authentic Catholic Pope. Francis‘ “authentic magisterium“ directly contradicts the “authentic Magisterium” of the Catechism, that states in number 1650 “in fidelity to the words of Jesus Christ”, that the new union of divorced and remarried Catholics “cannot be recognized as valid if the first marriage was”. And, “If the divorced are remarried civilly, they find themselves … More
Rafal_Ovile That's for canonists to put forth, which I'm sure they will do within a matter of days. I'm aware that "authentic magisterium" does not rise to the level of infallibility. I hope the whole Catholic world will be made aware of that as well.
JTLiuzza What conditions are required for a pope to speak EX CATHEDRA in accordance with V I? (To other of your statements I will try to reply in my following comment)
Rafal_Ovile: "we teach and define as a divinely revealed dogma that when the Roman Pontiff speaks EX CATHEDRA, that is, when, in the exercise of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, in virtue of his supreme apostolic authority, he defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the whole Church, he possesses, by the divine assistance promised to him in blessed Peter, … More
JTLiuzza What does VI precisely state about papal infallibility?
What of Papal infallibility? Either Vatican I was in error in declaring the doctrine of Papal infallibility, or Jorge Bergoglio is not Pope. It has to be one or the other. I think it's clear which is the case.
It means that, in his own way, Francis finally answered oficially to the so-called dubia.
Anty_modernista likes this. 
I do believe Tesa, that this is a 'checkmate' move for the new book coming out: "The Dictator Pope" which is even preselling by storm on kindle! The Vatican has tried very hard to suppress it but to no avail. His 'humbleness' is showing us just who is BOSS MAN.
For all the doubters, Francis has now made himself perfectly clear as to who he is and what he believes
Roberto 55 likes this. 
Our Lady of Sorrows
Archbishop Fulton Sheen was prophetic when he said
Who is going to
save our Church? Not our bishops, not our priests and religious. It is up to you, the people. You have the minds, the eyes, the ears to save the Church. Your mission is to see that your priests act like priests, your bishops, like bishops, and your religious act like religious.--Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen, 1972.
Do not expect something different...
Everything that was predicted has to be FILLED OUT !
You be servant of God i His Holy Trinity.
You be servant of Maria Immaculate !
Cardinal Müller, will you maintain your ostrich strategy in face of this?
Ignore this Pope as he has ignored the Popes before him. "Submission of will and intellect" to the teaching of Satan. Go back to hell with that....
CarolineA03 likes this. 
Our Lady of Sorrows likes this. 
They are rushing. If they'd been patient Amoris could have been allowed to fester. But Francis' hurry makes the contradictions obvious.
Jim Dorchak likes this. 
De Profundis
The Vatican tries hard to undermine orthodox interpretations of Amoris
Jim Dorchak likes this. 
Jim Dorchak
“in fidelity to the words of Jesus Christ”
“in fidelity to the words of Jesus Christ”
“in fidelity to the words of Jesus Christ”
FIRST. Second. Third, and last.
Don Reto Nay likes this. 
View 5 more likes.