Cardinal Wuerl, Pope Unleashed Second Vatican Council

With Pope Francis “all that Pentecostal energy that the [Second Vatican] Council unleashed is now being felt”, said Washington Cardinal Donald Wuerl (76) to cruxnow.com. According to Wuerl Francis wants to do “something” with this energy. Wuerl didn't even try to prove his claims from the texts of the Council.

Further he tried to downplay opposition to Francis and to the controversial Amoris Laetitia, saying that this is “not a very large group” and called the discussion about it "esoteric”.

Picture: Donald Wuerl, #newsUjjfdcnmhz

LikeShare

GJA Taylor

Jul 11, 2017

what an old blether he really is.

Lionel L. Andrades

Jul 10, 2017

Since how can INVISIBLE FOR US Lumen Gentium 16 etc be considered visible and excluding the baptism of water and an exception to EENS ?

Lionel L. Andrades

Jul 10, 2017

He also refers to Vatican Council II and the Holy Spirit.There are two interpretations of Vatican Council II. Vatican Council II(Cushingite) and Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).He and Pope Francis only know Vatican Council II (Cushingite). Vatican Council II(Cushingite) cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit. Since it has false philosophical reasoning.There are objective errors and it violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.
Wuerl was the head of the USCCB Doctrinal Committe in the Fr.Peter C.Phan case. He assumed that there were visible cases of the baptism of desire etc which were objective exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
This was the objective error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case. The magisterium assumed invisible people were visible exceptions to all needing to be members of the Church for salvation.
This was the philosophical reasoning at Vatican Council II. The passages which mention the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance (AG 7, LG 14) in Vatican Council II are superfluous. They should not have been there in the Council text.
They are there since the Council Fathers, like Cardinal Richard Cushing placed them there.He used a false premise(invisible baptism of desire are visible). His new theology was false( invisible cases are visible exceptions to the traditional interpretation on exclusive salvation in the Church), this is expressed in LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc. He violated the Principle of Non Contradiction ( how can people in Heaven be visible exceptions on earth? ).His conclusion was false. Since how can INVISIBLE for USA LG 16 etc be considered visible and excluding the baptism of water?So Vatican Council II becomes a break with Tradition, in particular the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite) and the Syllabus of Errors?
Obviously Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) is different.It is without the false premise and conclusion of Cardinal Wuerl. It would be a different Vatican Council II.It would be traditional and not a rupture with Tradition. It would affirm the teachings of the Church, over the centuries, guided by the Holy Spirit.
Of course Card Wuerl will not be comfortable with this interpretation of Vatican Council II.

en.news

Cardinal Wuerl, Pope Unleashed Second Vatican Council

GJA Taylor

Lionel L. Andrades

Lionel L. Andrades

mccallansteve

charisma

Petrusik