SSPX interprets the Nicene Creed, EENS and Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism as a philosophy and theology and doesn't have a clue to it

Comments  from The Eponymous Flower
dmdrew
I agree with you.
The SSPX interprets the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism.
They interpret the Nicene Creed with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism.
They interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism as a philosophy and theology.
https://eponymousflower.blogspot.it/2017/08/bishop-schneider-personally-very-sad.html

____________________________________________


Bishop Schneider has got it wrong on Vatican Council II.

AUGUST 14, 2017
Vatican hides the Leonard Feeney secret from secular newspapers : CDF made an objective error
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/vatican-is-hiding-leonard-feeney-issue.html

_______________________________________________




Unknown,
All the 'ofshoots' of the SSPX are interpreting Vatican Council II with Cushingism when there is a rational alternative available.
They can switch to Vatican Council II interpreted without an irrational premise and their conclusion will change. The Council will no more be a rupture with Tradition.
For example LG 16, LG 8, LG 14, UR 3, GS 22, NA 2 etc can be interpreted as referring to personally known people saved outside the Church.
Or they can be interpreted as being hypothetical cases known only to God and so they are not exceptions to the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
So we have two premises and two conclusions.
Do you know any one saved outside the Church this year?
No.
So there can be only one rational interpretation and this one is not being affirmed by the SSPX or the magisterium or the sedevacantists.
_______________________

Anonymous
There can be two interpretations of Vatican Council II, Cushingism and Feeneyism.Cushingism is irrational and it is supported by the Left.When the SSPX does not accept Vatican Council II(Cushingite) the left cries Schism! Now it is important for the SSPX to affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) which is traditional. In this way they will not be rejecting the Council and so the Left cannot say they are schismatics.At the same time they would not be rejecting Vatican Council II.
They instead could tell the Left that their interpretation of the Council is irrational, non traditional and heretical as compared to theirs. They could say that the Left are in an irregular situation for not accepting Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and that Vatican Council II (Cushingite) is a rupture with Tradition.
_____________________

Constantine,
It is not about Natural Law.There can be two interpretations of Vatican Council II and one of them is irrational and heretical. The other is not.
________________________

Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reasoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogmaextra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.It is practical. There obviously are no known cases of the baptism of desire (BOD),baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) in 2017.So there are no practical exceptions to EENS.Neither was BOD,BOB and I.I an exception to Feeneyite EENS in 1949 when the Letter of the Holy Office was issued to the Archbishop of Boston. The cardinals made an objective mistake. Mentioning BOD and I.I in Vatican Council II (AG 7,LG 14) along side the traditional teaching on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church was superfluous.

Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning.It assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/when-will-rorate-caeili-learn.html


_____________________________________________



Marie,
We now know more about Vatican Council II. It can be interpreted with the Cushingism or Feeneyism and the conclusion changes.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/when-will-rorate-caeili-learn.html


____________________________________________



AUGUST 16, 2017
Bishop Athanasius Schneider does not proclaim the Catholic Faith honestly in Kazhkistan
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/bishop-athanasius-schneider-does-not.html


AUGUST 17, 2017

Bishops Fellay, Schneider are not proclaiming the Social Reign of Christ the King supported by Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite)
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/bishops-fellay-schneider-are-not.html


___________________________________________


Wendy,
This is not true.We now know there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II, Cushingism and Feeneyism. Every one is using the irrational interpretation of Cushingism.Once the SSPX switches to Feeneyism the game plan changes. The reconciliation talks change.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/for-sacred-heart-major-seminary-detroit.html
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/sspx-italy-is-not-affirming-vatican.html