Breaking News

BREAKING – Over 150,000 people including 600 children have died due to the Covid-19 Vaccines in the USA

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Scientists have concluded that the Covid-19 vaccines have killed at least 150,000 people in the USA alone after conducting in-depth scientific research on publicly available data, and are now calling for the medical community to oppose mandatory Covid-19 vaccination as their findings prove that it is not justifiable.

Jessica Rose PhD, studied Immunology at Memorial University in Newfoundland and Labrador, gaining a Master of Science and Medicine in 2006. She then went on to study Computational Biology at Bar Ilan University, gaining a PhD in 2013.

From 2016 to 2020 she worked in Biochemistry / Protein Biology at the Technion Institute of Technology, and has published several papers such as ‘Kinetic modelling of Hepatitis B Virus: the relationship between HBeAg and viral kinetics.’ and ‘Kinetics of Chronic Human Viruses – Comparative Analysis of Bio-Mathematical Models and their Clinical Implications.

Now, in an in-depth analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) alongside data available from multiple scientific studies, including the Pfizer clinical trial studies, Jessica Rose PhD has concluded using a modest calculation that at least 150,000 Americans have been killed by the Covid-19 Vaccines.

In a paper which can be read in full here, titled ‘Estimating the number of Covid vaccine deaths in America’, Jessica Rose PhD states that she and her team determined the VAERS under-reporting multiplier by using a specific serious adverse event that should always be reported – anaphylaxis.

Anaphylaxis after COVID-19 vaccination is rare and occurs in approximately 2 to 5 people per million vaccinated in the United States based on events reported to VAERS according to the CDC report on ‘Selected Adverse Events Reported after COVID-19 Vaccination’.

However, a scientific study conducted at Mass General Brigham, published March 8th 2021 on JAMA, found “severe reactions consistent with anaphylaxis occurred at a rate of 2.47 per 10,000” people fully vaccinated.

This implies that VAERS is receiving reports of anaphylaxis between 50 – 123 times less than what is actually occurring among the vaccinated population, despite it being a well known side effect that doctors are required to report.

Jessica Rose PhD concludes in her paper that after the JAMA study was published doctors were more careful to assess vaccine recipients for prior history of anaphylaxis, so to calculate the true under-reporting multiplier she and her team decide to assess the VAERS database figures that were reported before the Mass General Brigham study was published, and calculated the underreporting rate to be 41 times less than what has and is occurring in the vaccinated population.

The rate was calculated by taking the number of vaccinated people from the beginning of the Covid-19 vaccine roll-out to the end of March 2021 in the US, and the number of reports of anaphylaxis reactions submitted to VAERS in the same time frame.

‘Our World in Data’ shows that 97.5 million Americans had received a single dose of a Covid-19 vaccine by March 31st 2021.

Whilst the VAERS database shows that 583 reports of anaphylaxis were submitted to VAERS up to 31st March 2021.

Bases on the results of the JAMA study which found anaphylaxis was occurring due to the Covid-19 vaccines at a rate of 2.47 per 10,000 people, the true number of anaphylaxis reports to VAERS should have totalled 24,082.

The calculation is as follows:
97.5 million (people vaccinated) ÷ 10,000 (JAMA per rate) = 9,750
9,750 x 2.47 (JAMA rate of occurrence) = 24,082.5
24,082.5 + 583 (VAERS reports of Anayphlyaxis) = 41.3 (underreporting rate)

Using the conservative underreporting rate that they calculated, Jessica Rose PhD and her team were then able to calculate the number of people the Covid-19 vaccines have killed in the USA using a variety of methods.

One of those methods was to use the data available in VAERS. As of August 27th a search of the VAERS database shows that there had been 7,149 deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines in the USA.

Using the underreporting rate of 41 times calculated, this would mean that 293,109 Americans have been killed by the Covid-19 vaccines up to the 27th August 2021. However, Jessica Rose PhD explains in her paper that the number of average background deaths must be subtracted in order to calculate the true number of people that have been killed by the Covid-19 vaccines.

To calculate the number of average background deaths, Jessica Rose PhD used the results of a study published on ‘Research Gate’, titled ‘Analysis of COVID-19 vaccine death reports from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) Database Interim: Results and Analysis. The study found that 86% of deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines up to April 2021 were consistent with the vaccine being causal for the death.

Therefore the number of deaths reported to VAERS up to 27th August 2021 that were consistent with the vaccine being causal for the death equates to 6,149, which is 86% of the 7,149 deaths reported. This means, according to the Scientific research conducted by Jessica Rose PhD and her team, the true number of people killed by the Covid-19 vaccines by the end of August 2021 could be as high as 252,109.

Jessica Rose PhD also used a number of other methods to calculate the true number of Americans that have been killed by the Covid-19 vaccines. One of those methods used estimates made by Dr Peter Schirmacher, one of the world’s top pathologists, for the percentage of deaths examined by autopsy within two weeks of having the vaccine that were clearly caused by the vaccine.

This equated to 60% of all deaths being caused by the Covid-19 vaccine, allowing Jessica Rose PhD and her team to calculate that 175,865 Americans may have been killed by the Covid-19 vaccine up to August 27th 2021.

The other methods used to calculate the number of deaths due to the Covid-19 vaccines, in the scientific study conducted by Jessica Rose PhD, are explained in full in her paper which can be found here. The results of these methods found the true number of Americans that have been killed by the Covid-19 vaccines up to the 27th August 2021 to be no lower than 147,960, with the average number of deaths equating to 182,000.

Jessica Rose PhD and her team were also able to calculate the true number of children over the age of 12 who have been killed by the Covid-19 vaccines in the USA. Data published by the CDC on July 30th 2021 shows that there had been 345 cases of myocarditis and 14 deaths among 12 – 17 year-olds due to the Covid-19 vaccines.

By using the underreporting rate, calculated as being 41 times less than what is occurring in the vaccinated population, Jessica Rose PhD states in her paper that 574 children over the age of 12 were killed by the Covid-19 vaccines up to July 16th.

Meaning 222 more children had been killed by the Covid-19 vaccines in a few months than had died with Covid-19 from January 1st 2020 to August 14th 2021, a total of 361 according to CDC data.

Jessica Rose PhD summarised her findings in her scientific research as follows –

“Using the VAERS database and independent rates of anaphylaxis events from a Mass General study, we computed a 41X under-reporting factor for serious adverse events in VAERS, leading to an estimate of over 150,000 excess deaths caused by the vaccine. The estimates were validated multiple independent ways.

“There is no evidence that these vaccines save more lives than they cost. Pfizer’s own study showed that adverse events consistent with the vaccine were greater than the lives saved by the vaccine to yield a net negative benefit. Without an overall statistically significant all-cause mortality benefit, and evidence of an optional medical intervention that has likely killed over 150,000 Americans so far, vaccination mandates are not justifiable and should be opposed by all members of the medical community.

“Early treatments using a cocktail of repurposed drugs with proven safety profiles are a safer, more effective alternative which always improves all-cause mortality in the event of infection and there are also safe, simple, and effective protocols for prophylaxis.”

Share this page to Telegram
4 8 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
51 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
kiwi
kiwi
2 years ago

this is just the begining, there will be lots more

Sarah
Sarah
2 years ago

Well done, Dr Rose! A terrific piece of careful and scrupulous research.
And look, not a single flu death in 2020-2021! Very revealing.

Jared
Jared
2 years ago

How is this still up. Misinformation like this is part of the reason so many people are not taking covid seriously and dying as a result.

Jared
Jared
Reply to  Jared
2 years ago

Making subjective judgement calls about what you think and then basing your extrapolations off of those is not science, it’s not math, it’s not anything that should hold merit. Certainly not when lives are at stake. Stick to viral kinetics and leave statistics to statisticians.

Sobieskis
Sobieskis
Reply to  Jared
2 years ago

You’re playing the fool. You had a chance to make clear exacrtly where the authors went wrong, but NOOOOO…, you chose instead to leave the your bare-arsed declaration standing unclothed by the slightest shred of fact. Are you expecting people to believe you on the basis of your say-so? Such a child.

John Barker
John Barker
Reply to  Jared
2 years ago

Facts don’t care about upur feelings, snowflake.

trackback
2 years ago

[…] Source: BREAKING – Over 150,000 people including 600 children have died due to the Covid-19 Vaccines in th… […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] EXPOSÉ ON SEPTEMBER 22, 2021 • ( 5 […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] 1, 2021November 1, 2021 by admin BREAKING – Over 150,000 people including 600 children have died due to the Covid-19 Vaccines i… Facebook Twitter Pinterest […]

victor
victor
2 years ago

You simpy can’t use VAERS to estimate the number of deaths.Even from an “independant researcher”. This has been completely debunked.Let’s see if Jessica Rose can get this paper published in a peer-reviewed scientific paper.

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-usa-idUSL1N2R00KP

John Barker
John Barker
Reply to  victor
2 years ago

This is true. Millions are dead globally from the gene manipulation shot

doctorcam@yahoo.com
doctorcam@yahoo.com
2 years ago

You can’t just use ONE study from one institution (even if it is Harvard – Mass General Hospital) to reach a conclusion about adverse events on a novel virus which is being treated with novel vaccine technology on a pandemic scale in which the scene is constantly changing. Just because Mass Gen estimated the adverse event rate at 2.47 per 10,000 in that ONE study DOES NOT make it absolutely true. Another study at another “reputable” institution could just as well publish a rate tomorrow of 2.47 per 100,000 persons which would drop Dr. Rose’s calculated underreporting rate from 41 to 4.1. Data from studies are only reliable when things are in a static state, not a dynamic state such as this. Furthermore, you can’t make public policy from just ONE scientific study. In all likelihood Mass Gen and VAERS’ data are both wrong. It is ridiculous to take the discrepancy of these two studies (which are probably both way off) and come up with a formula to assess the “true” number of people (in theory) that have died from this vaccine. Dr. Rose is presenting us with a THEORY and that’s ALL that it is. To make a life or death decision or public health policy based on her article is outrageous. I normally don’t read this publication but someone told me today that he would not take the vaccine because he read on the Internet that 300,000 people have died as a result of the COVID-19 vaccine. In my outrage I started a Google search which led me here. I consider disinformation a “side effect” of the Internet. Thanks Mark Zuckerberg!! What would the world be without Facebook (FYI it would be JUST fine). You know we would have probably had a very difficult time eradicating Smallpox (yes we ERADICATED it!!) from the face of this planet had the Internet and Social Media existed back then. It’s ironic that the Internet first started out as a tool that only scientists used to share technical information and now those same scientists are struggling to do damage control for the disinformation that is leaked on here. Regarding the vaccine safety, if you want to look at numbers then just look at these basic numbers… There are approximately 350,000,000 persons in the US. About 70% of them have had at least 1 dose of the Vaccine (about 60% have had 2 doses and “fully vaccinated”). So use 70% and multiply that by 350,000,000 to get 245,000,000 Americans received the vaccine (approximately). There have been 7,000 reported fatalities (deaths) from the Vaccine . So 245,000,000 / 7,000 = 35,000. That means your risk of fatality (death) from this vaccine is 1 in 35,000. That’s pretty Damn LOW!!. On the other hand, about 700,000 Americans have died from COVID. There are around 350,000,000 persons in the US so your absolute risk of death from COVID is 700,000 / 350,000,000 = 500. That means 1 in 500 Americans have already died from COVID. That’s high enough for it to be a major concern for EVERYONE. Compare the numbers guys. 1 in 35,000 vs. 1 in 500. Which looks better to you? Of course these are Absolute Risk (AR) values and not Relative Risk (RR) values and I think THAT is where the whole problem stands. Many people are arrogant and narcissistic. They may accept that 700,000 Americans have died from COVID but believe that their own Relative Risk is low (or non-existent) because they are “Healthy”, and they do “CrossFit”, and they “Eat Clean Bro”, and they are “Strong” and this virus only kills Fat and Old people…. Okay if that’s what you want to believe then so be it. You might as well add in there that the virus will also kill STUPID people…. and what I mean by that is the people who refuse to protect themselves using modern science and medicine. Shame on Dr. Rose for not putting things in full context.

John Barker
John Barker
Reply to  doctorcam@yahoo.com
2 years ago

Push your vaxxer doctrine elsewhere snowflake

John Barker
John Barker
Reply to  Richard
2 years ago

Nobody wants your vaxxer doctrine, snowflake.

John Barker
John Barker
2 years ago

Of course it’s killed hundreds of thousands. Globally I bet it’s killed 50 million minimum. That’s the idea, global depopulation. In 5 years there will be a billion dead minimum.

Deborah
Deborah
Reply to  John Barker
1 year ago

Yes, it is the plan. As the eminent scientist Bill Gates said, “if we do a good enough job with vaccines, we can reduce the population.”

trackback
2 years ago

[…] It is however important to note that not all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. In fact the CDC has admitted just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the system. But a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose Phd accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least 41.3. See here. […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] It is however important to note that not all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. In fact the CDC has admitted just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the system. But a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose Phd accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least 41.3. See here. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] It is however important to note that not all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. In fact the CDC has admitted just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the system. But a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose Phd accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least 41.3. See here. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] It is however important to note that not all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. In fact the CDC has admitted just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the system. But a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose Phd accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least 41.3. See here. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] It is however important to note that not all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. In fact the CDC has admitted just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the system. But a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose Phd accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least 41.3. See here. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] It is however important to note that not all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. In fact the CDC has admitted just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the system. But a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose Phd accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least 41.3. See here. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] It is however important to note that not all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. In fact the CDC has admitted just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the system. But a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose PhD accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least 41.3. See here. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] It is however important to note that not all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. In fact the CDC has admitted just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the system. But a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose PhD accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least 41.3. See here. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] Il est toutefois important de noter que tous les effets indésirables ne sont pas signalés au VAERS. En fait, le CDC a admis que seulement 1 à 10% des effets indésirables sont effectivement signalés au système. Mais une brillante analyse menée par Jessica Rose Phd estime avec précision que le facteur de sous-déclaration est d’au moins 41,3. Voir ici. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] It is however important to note that not all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. In fact the CDC has admitted just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the system. But a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose Phd accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least 41.3. See here. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] Il est toutefois important de noter que tous les effets indésirables ne sont pas signalés au VAERS. En fait, le CDC a admis que seulement 1 à 10% des effets indésirables sont effectivement signalés au système. Mais une brillante analyse menée par Jessica Rose Phd estime avec précision que le facteur de sous-déclaration est d’au moins 41,3. Voir ici. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] It is however important to note that not all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. In fact the CDC has admitted just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the system. But a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose Phd accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least 41.3. See here. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] Sin embargo, es importante señalar que no todos los acontecimientos adversos se notifican al VAERS. De hecho, los CDC han admitido que sólo entre el 1 y el 10% de los acontecimientos adversos se notifican realmente al sistema. Pero un brillante análisis de Jessica Rose Phd estima con precisión que el factor de infradeclaración es de al menos 41,3. Vea aquí. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] It is however important to note that not all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. In fact the CDC has admitted just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the system. But a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose Phd accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least 41.3. See here. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] It is however important to note that not all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. In fact the CDC has admitted just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the system. But a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose Phd accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least 41.3. See here. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] It is however important to note that not all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. In fact the CDC has admitted just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the system. But a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose Phd accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least 41.3. See here. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] Es ist jedoch zu beachten, dass nicht alle unerwünschten Wirkungen an VAERS gemeldet werden. Die CDC hat zugegeben, dass nur 1 bis 10 % der unerwünschten Wirkungen tatsächlich an das System gemeldet werden. Eine brillante Analyse von Jessica Rose, Phd, schätzt die Dunkelziffer jedoch auf mindestens 41,3. Siehe hier. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] Es ist jedoch zu beachten, dass nicht alle unerwünschten Wirkungen an VAERS gemeldet werden. Die CDC hat zugegeben, dass nur 1 bis 10 % der unerwünschten Wirkungen tatsächlich an das System gemeldet werden. Eine brillante Analyse von Jessica Rose, Phd, schätzt die Dunkelziffer jedoch auf mindestens 41,3. Siehe hier. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] Sin embargo, es importante tener en cuenta que no todas las reacciones adversas se informan al VAERS. De hecho, los CDC han admitido que solo del 1 al 10% de las reacciones adversas se informan al sistema. Pero un brillante análisis realizado por Jessica Rose Phd estima con precisión que el factor de subregistro es de al menos 41.3. Ver aquí. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] 然而,值得注意的是,并非所有的不良反应都报告给VAERS。事实上,CDC已经承认实际只有1-10%的不良反应被报告给该系统。但杰西卡·罗斯(Jessica Rose)博士进行的一项出色的分析,准确地估计出少报的因素至少是41.3。请看这里:https://expose-news.com/2021/09/22/over-150000-people-have-died-due-to-the-covid-19-vaccines-in-the-… […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] 然而,值得註意的是,並非所有的不良反應都報告給VAERS。事實上,CDC已經承認實際只有1-10%的不良反應被報告給該系統。但傑西卡·羅斯(Jessica Rose)博士進行的一項出色的分析,準確地估計出少報的因素至少是41.3。請看這裏: […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] It is however important to note that not all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. In fact, the CDC has admitted just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the system. But a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose Phd accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least 41.3. See here. […]

Brian
Brian
1 year ago

Where’s the link to Dr Rose’s study?

trackback
1 year ago

[…] It is however important to note that not all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. In fact the CDC has admitted just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the system. But a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose Phd accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least 41.3. See here. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] It is however important to note that not all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. In fact the CDC has admitted just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the system. But a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose Phd accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least 41.3. See here. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] It is however important to note that not all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. In fact the CDC has admitted just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the system. But a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose Phd accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least 41.3. See here. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] It is however important to note that not all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. In fact, the CDC has admitted just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the system. But a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose Phd accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least 41.3. See here. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] It is however important to note that not all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. In fact, the CDC has admitted just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the system. But a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose Phd accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least 41.3. See here. […]

trackback
11 months ago

[…] It is however important to note that not all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. In fact, the CDC has admitted just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the system. But a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose Phd accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least 41.3. See here. […]

trackback
9 months ago

[…] Cu toate acestea, este important de reținut că nu toate reacțiile adverse sunt raportate la VAERS. De fapt, CDC a admis că doar 1 până la 10% dintre reacțiile adverse sunt de fapt raportate sistemului. Dar o analiză strălucitoare realizată de doctoratul Jessica Rose estimează cu exactitate factorul de subraportare la cel puțin 41,3. Vedea Aici. […]

trackback
9 months ago

[…] It is however important to note that not all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. In fact, the CDC has admitted just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the system. But a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose Phd accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least 41.3. See here. […]

trackback
9 months ago

[…] It is however important to note that not all adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. In fact, the CDC has admitted just 1 to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the system. But a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose Phd accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least 41.3. See here. […]

trackback
9 months ago

[…] a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose Ph.D. accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least […]

trackback
9 months ago

[…] a brilliant analysis conducted by Jessica Rose Ph.D. accurately estimates the underreporting factor to be at least […]