언어
댓글 쓰기…
alica111
Silence... is not an answer.
I have to only agree with this.
The Pope should be justified in public. But what if it's not allowed?
provivoe
Only God (and we ourselves) judges, but "I suppose" is not the right way. Assisi III was a public humiliation of Jesus Christ, putting Our Lord on the same level as devlish religions and their idols. So if he repents he must do it publicly. Silence... is not an answer. But once again, the judgment is with God. We only can describe what we see and have to undergo.
alica111
Don't forget he organised Assisi III without repent...It´s thrue, but we do not know what is happening now in the Vatican. Perhaps , in these years, when the Pope is "in exile" and praying every day - these years are years his repentance... . Only God knows...my English is bad sorry.
provivoe
Don't forget he organised Assisi III without repent
Benedict XVI could have interpreted Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), in March 2016 with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism.If he chose Feeneyism ( no visible exceptions to EENS, invisible baptism of desire is not visible in 2016) then Vatican Council II could not have 'evolved', there would not be ' a development'.However with Cushingism as the new theology, LG … [더보기]