POPE LEO BRINGS POLARIZATION WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL AND UNETHICAL: HE MUST AVOID THE FALSE PREMISE
POPE LEO BRINGS POLARIZATION WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL AND UNETHICAL: HE MUST AVOID THE FALSE PREMISE
It is the false premise chosen to interpret Vatican Council II which causes the polarization and not Vatican Council II per se. Halt the false premise and you halt polarization. All the Councils, Catechisms and Creeds return to Tradition only.
The books of Pope Leo, Archbishop Fischella and Fr. Spadero cause polarization since they interpret Vatican Council II with a fake premise, producing a liberal conclusion. This is a break with Tradition. It is heretical and schismatic.
Instead if my writings on line on Vatican Council II etc, wEre made into a book there would not be polarization. Since I interpret the Council in harmony with Tradition. There is no rupture with Tradition.
It is the fake premise which creates liberalism and polarization in the writings of Roberto dei Mattei and Cardinal Walter Kasper – traditionalist and liberal.
Pope Paul VI chose to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and so brought polarization into the Catholic Church, with new doctrines.
Cardinal Ratzinger excommunicated Archbishop Lefebvre for not accepting the irrational version of Vatican Council II. He supported the polarization.
The Bible, Vatican Council Ii and the Catechism of the Catholic Church can only be interpreted rationally by Pope Leo. Then he does not support the polarization, in the Church.
Pope Leo’s writings and talks on Vatican Council II are as obsolete as that of Romano Amerio, Plineo Correa D’Oliveira, Attila Guimares and Fr. Nicholas Gruner. They all use the false premise to interpret the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms to create polarization in the Church. We now have a rational option.
But for me EENS has no exceptions. I interpret the baptism of desire as being hypothetical and invisible always. So it cannot be an exception for EENS.
Vatican Council II is rational and traditional.
The Nicene Creed is traditional and not liberal.
There are two versions of Athanasius Creed now , one with the false premise and the other without it.
The false premise is 1) invisible people are visible in the present times, 2) LG 8, 14, 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to visible cases in 2025 3) we can meet and see non Catholics saved with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance since 1965.These are all false premises.
For me the rational premise is 1) invisible people are invisible in 2025, 2) LG 8, 14, 16 are invisible and hypothetical cases only and 3) I cannot see or meet someone saved with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance in Rome this month.
–Lionel Andrades
09.12.2025
POPE LEO’S INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II PRODUCES POLARIZATION : GERMAN MEDIA NOT CORRECTED
POPE LEO’S INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II …