Lisi Sterndorfer

New FSSP Parish: Our Lady of Sorrows, Springdale AR - Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter

A new FSSP parish has been established in Springdale in northwest Arkansas. As of March 19th, Fr. Joshua Passo, FSSP has taken over as pastor of …
Ultraviolet
Once again, GTV's idiots ruin a positive post by topic-shifting in the comments. Protip: @salliperson This isn't Texas and those "mask" policies in Fort Worth were set by Bishop Olson, not the local parish pastor. You complained to the wrong person and now you're blaming the FSSP for your own ignorance.More
Once again, GTV's idiots ruin a positive post by topic-shifting in the comments. Protip: @salliperson This isn't Texas and those "mask" policies in Fort Worth were set by Bishop Olson, not the local parish pastor. You complained to the wrong person and now you're blaming the FSSP for your own ignorance.
salliperson
The FSSP does give one a false sense that they are Traditional. For us, the most recent example, the fraternity parish in Fort Worth will throw you out of Mass if you are not wearing a mask or are not properly wearing one. We wrote to the head to make a complaint and basically we were told that this is how things are being done today.
Defeat Modernism
When will they reject the new mass and the heretical Vatican II? They are no better than the priests who said the Latin Mass in union with the Communists in Mexico, the priests who made an agreement with the Freemasons during the French Revolution or with the Communists in China who join the 'patriotic church.' They are wolves in sheep's clothing, they compromise the faith and give Catholics the …More
When will they reject the new mass and the heretical Vatican II? They are no better than the priests who said the Latin Mass in union with the Communists in Mexico, the priests who made an agreement with the Freemasons during the French Revolution or with the Communists in China who join the 'patriotic church.' They are wolves in sheep's clothing, they compromise the faith and give Catholics the false impression that they are Traditional when the accept the very doctrines and heretical new mass that has destroyed the faith of millions. What good is dressing up in traditional vestments and saying the Latin Mass when you accept clearly heretical teachings? And in doing so you disobey the dogmas of the Council of Trent forbidding the new mass and sacraments?!
Ultraviolet
"When will they reject the new mass and the heretical Vatican II?"

The FSSP offers the Latin Mass exclusively. Go be ignorant somewhere else.

"What good is dressing up in traditional vestments and saying the Latin Mass when you accept clearly heretical teachings?"

The Church decides what is heresy, you don't. What good is pretending to be a traditionalist when you reject the Chruch's tradit…More
"When will they reject the new mass and the heretical Vatican II?"

The FSSP offers the Latin Mass exclusively. Go be ignorant somewhere else.

"What good is dressing up in traditional vestments and saying the Latin Mass when you accept clearly heretical teachings?"

The Church decides what is heresy, you don't. What good is pretending to be a traditionalist when you reject the Chruch's traditional authority?

"They're no better than...(insert a lot of historical irrelevancies)"

pic related.
Defeat Modernism
They accept the New Mass, they signed on the dotted line. You are have no idea what you are talking about. The Church already condemned them, and the new mass. Session 7 Canon 13 of the Council of Trent. Read it!
Ultraviolet
"They accept the New Mass, they signed on the dotted line."

That explains why they refuse to practice it.

"You are have no idea what you are talking about."

Sure thing, bunky. We'll revisit that statement in a moment.

"The Church already condemned them,"

Protip: The FSSP didn't exist at the time of the Council Of Trent... You just discredited yourself again.

...and your understanding …More
"They accept the New Mass, they signed on the dotted line."

That explains why they refuse to practice it.

"You are have no idea what you are talking about."

Sure thing, bunky. We'll revisit that statement in a moment.

"The Church already condemned them,"

Protip: The FSSP didn't exist at the time of the Council Of Trent... You just discredited yourself again.

...and your understanding of the council's teachings isn't any better than "la verdad's" understanding of "apostasy". Go be stupid somewhere else.
Defeat Modernism
You really have no idea what you are talking about. They accepted the new mass and Vatican II which is why they are 'allowed' to be part of the Modernist Sect. It is very clear. And yes the Church has already condemned the New Mass, the New Sacraments in Session 7 Canon 13 of the Council of Trent. Here it is, read it slowly perhaps that will get through your thick, modernist mind:

CANON XIII.-…More
You really have no idea what you are talking about. They accepted the new mass and Vatican II which is why they are 'allowed' to be part of the Modernist Sect. It is very clear. And yes the Church has already condemned the New Mass, the New Sacraments in Session 7 Canon 13 of the Council of Trent. Here it is, read it slowly perhaps that will get through your thick, modernist mind:

CANON XIII.-If any one saith, that the received and approved rites of the Catholic Church, wont to be used in the solemn administration of the sacraments, may be contemned, or without sin be omitted at pleasure by the ministers, or be changed, by every pastor of the churches, into other new ones; let him be anathema.
Ultraviolet
Thei irony of you being patronizing when you didn't read your own source closely enough. :D Pathetic. The Council of Trent forbade "the ministers" and "every pastor of the churches" from making changes. Vatican Council II wasn't instituted by a local "pastor of the churches" or "the ministers" of their parishes, was it?

That's a yes or no question, bucko.. ;-) Since the correct answer is "no …More
Thei irony of you being patronizing when you didn't read your own source closely enough. :D Pathetic. The Council of Trent forbade "the ministers" and "every pastor of the churches" from making changes. Vatican Council II wasn't instituted by a local "pastor of the churches" or "the ministers" of their parishes, was it?

That's a yes or no question, bucko.. ;-) Since the correct answer is "no it was not", that citation you're so proud of quoting is irrelevant.

"They accepted the new mass..."

You said that already and you still haven't shown how refusing to practice something is acceptance. You fallacy is:
Defeat Modernism
You misread the Council. The Council Forbid anyone from changing the 'receiving and approved rites' of the sacraments which is my it says EVERY PASTOR
Ultraviolet
Misread??? I quote the Council verbatim. You, by contrast, must "interpret" the Council's words (i.e. change them) to suit your failed argument.

Like you did right over here: "Anyone" (what you said) and "every pastor" (what the Council said) are not the same. The Council was explict on forbidding "the ministers" and "every pastor of the churches" from making changes.

The governing assemb…More
Misread??? I quote the Council verbatim. You, by contrast, must "interpret" the Council's words (i.e. change them) to suit your failed argument.

Like you did right over here: "Anyone" (what you said) and "every pastor" (what the Council said) are not the same. The Council was explict on forbidding "the ministers" and "every pastor of the churches" from making changes.

The governing assembly of Vatican Council II vastly outranked "every pastor of the churches". That's why your citation from the Council of Trent does not apply.

Simply put the Council of Trent did not say what you are trying to make it say That's why I quote what they said and the best you can do is interpret what they said into something else.
AlexBKaiser shares this
287
Petrusbruderschaft eröffnet neue Pfarrei in den USA