Fr.Alessandro M.Minutella needs to point out that Vatican Council II (Cushingite) is responsible for 'the false Church' and 'the mystical body of the AntiChrist'
I have mentioned in a previous blog post that I believe all non Catholics are oriented to Hell unless they enter the Catholic Church as members and that this is not just a personal view but the teachings of the Catholic Church according to Vatican Council II and pre-Vatican Council II Church documents. It is a magisterial teaching of the Catholic Church according to magisterial documents. So I do not reject Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1995).I don't have to.However I interpret all of them with the theology of Feeneyism and not the common theology of Cushingism.
So I affrm magisterial documents including Vatican Council II with rational Feeneyism but I do not affirm the present 'magisterium of people' at the Vatican, since they reject magisterial documents interpreted with Feeneyism and interpret them instead with irrational and non traditional Cushingism.
SHE AFFIRMS CATECHISM WITH CUSHINGISM AND I WITH FEENEYISM
Today morning I was speaking to a religious sister and she said that she accepted the Catechism of the Catholic Church which was very clear for her.So I told her that I too accept the Catechism of the Catholic Church which was very clear for me too. However she interprets the Catechism with Cushingism and I do so with Feeneyism.So I do not have to reject the Catechism(1995) while I still affirm the old ecclesiology based on extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Feeneyite).
We were talking about Don Alessandro M. Minutella of the diocese in Palermo who interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism and rejects the conclusion.Of course the conclusion would be non traditional and heretical.I do not have to reject Vatican Council II. Since Vatican Council II (Feeneyite), which is the only Vatican Council II I know, does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Feeneyite).So there is no change in ecumenism, inter-religious dialogue and the old ecclesiology in the Church for me, before and after Vatican Council II.
ALL NON CATHOLICS ORIENTED TO HELL IS MAGISTERIUM OF CHURCH DOCUMENTS
So I was telling this nun from Abruzzo,Italy who studies at an Instituto Superiore Scienze Religiosa in Rome that when I meet a non Catholic on the streets of Rome I know that he or she is on the way to Hell since the Catholic Church teaches it.It is not a personal opinion.
CHURCH TEACHES MOST PEOPLE ON THE WAY TO HELL
I told her that I believe that most people on earth are on the way to Hell since they are not members of the Catholic Church.Ad Gentes 7,Vatican Council II says all need 'faith and baptism' for salvation.So it is the Church which teaches that most people are oriented to Hell. This is also mentioned in the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1995).It cites the Bible.Jesus says enter through the narrow gate for the way to Hell is wide and most people take it.
So she said that she does not believe that most people go to Hell.I reminded her that this was her personal view, her compassion and sensitivity. This was not the teaching of the Catholic Church.
She said that she could not accept that when she met a non Catholic he or she would be going to Hell since who was she to judge them.It is possible she said that there could be a non Catholic who is living a good life and he would go to Heaven. Since the Holy Spirit was acting also outside the boundaries of the Catholic Church.
So I said that even I could accept that there is a possibility of a non Catholic being saved outside the Church, but it would only be a possibility known to God. It would be a hypothetical case.She agreed.For me this hypothetical case would be followed by the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.
ORDINARY WAY OF SALVATION IS FAITH AND BAPTISM AND NOT A GOOD CONSCIENCE
So I said that the ordinary way of salvation according to the Catholic Church is 'faith and baptism' the ordinary way of salvation is not a good conscience.
The ordinary way of salvation is the baptism of water and Catholic faith the ordinary way of salvation is not being saved in invincible ignorance.
THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE IS NOT THE ORDINARY WAY OF SALVATION
In general every one needs to be a member of the Church with faith and baptism and the baptism of desire was not the general way of salvation.
She agreed on this point.
I mentioned that Jesus said that those who do not believe will be condemned. Jesus was referring to baptism in the community of that time which was the Catholic Church.There was no independent and isolated baptism of water. Jesus said that every one needa the baptism of water for salvation (John 3:5).
CUSHINGITES MIX UP ORDINARY WAY OF SALVATION
So when a Catholic suggests that conscience, invincible ignorance or being saved with the baptism of desire or blood,all without the baptism of water is the ordinary way of salvation, it is a personal opinion.It is not the teaching of the Catholic Church.It is the teaching of what Fr.Minutella would call 'the false' church' within the Catholic Church.
So I was affirming the magisterial teachings of the Church when I told her that I believe all Hindus, Muslims and Protestants are on the way to Hell unless they enter the Catholic Church as members.Outside the Church there is no known salvation.
FALSE CHURCH THEOLOGICALLY BASED ON VATICAN COUNCIL II (CUSHINGITE)
I thought to myself that this was the point Fr.Alessandro Minutella needed to make, though I could not convey it in Italian and we spoke briefly.Fr.Minutella was correct in rebelling against ' a false church' but he needed to be specific. He needed to point out the difference between Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) which was one of the pillars of 'the false Church', and Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) which contradicted the false ecumenism and inter-religious dialogue which he otherwise correctly opposes.
BISHOPS IN SICILY NEED TO AFFIRM VATICAN COUNCIL II
He needed to affirm traditional ecumenism and inter-religious dialogue without discarding Vatican Council, which really is Feeneyite.
Instead he should ask the bishops in Sicily to affirm Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) which is a not a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Feeneyite) and the old ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) is a rebellion like Lutheranism. It is a false Church which has come into the Church since the Fr.Leonard Feeney injustice in 1949.
Fr.Minutella supports Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI( as I would do so in general) but it is important to note that both these popes only knew Vatican Council II ( Cushingite).Even the traditionalists, including the Lefbvrists only know Vatican Council II(Cushingite).So he cannot expect doctrinal help from that camp.
I REJECT VATICAN COUNCIL II (CUSHINGITE) LIKE THE SSPX
I was telling this religious sister that I hold the traditional teachings of the Church but I do not reject Vatican Council II like the Society of St.Pius X and other traditionalists do.
We can affirm Vatican Council II with rationality or we can affirm Vatican Council II with irrationality. Vatican Council II can be affirmed with invisible cases remaining invisible or it can be seen with invisible cases being visible.It is looking at the same Vatican Council II but with different premises.- Lionel Andrades
Video : Don Alessandro Maria Minutella Omelia 31 marzo 2017
April 2, 2017
Fr. Alessandro M.Minutella critical of Vatican Council II (Cushingite) suspended : Fellay condones Cushingism in exchange for status the popular Palermo priest lost
April 2, 2017
PALERMO. IL VESCOVO IN BICICLETTA TOGLIE LA PARROCCHIA E IMPONE IL SILENZIO AL PRETE CRITICO