F M Shyanguya
F M Shyanguya
Caroline03
Francis is "Pope" of another group entirely; It's about time Catholics stopped affiliating a man dressed in white living in a Church owned Property with "Peter" the holder of the keys, the Prime Minister OF CHRIST, through whom the Holy Spirit speaks. Historically it has been taught that a simple test as to whether a lawful Pope is seated upon the Throne of St Peter is whether he expounds on …More
Francis is "Pope" of another group entirely; It's about time Catholics stopped affiliating a man dressed in white living in a Church owned Property with "Peter" the holder of the keys, the Prime Minister OF CHRIST, through whom the Holy Spirit speaks. Historically it has been taught that a simple test as to whether a lawful Pope is seated upon the Throne of St Peter is whether he expounds on True Catholic Doctrine. In another era, Francis would have aroused suspicion during the Conclave that he was not a Christian.

Throughout the UK today, Church buildings that are STILL lawfully owned by the Roman Catholic Church are inhabited by Anglicans. They were stolen from us then, just as, the Vatican, and countless OTHER Church properties have been stolen today.

The Roman Catholic Church is where TRUE Doctrine remains. People should not think that just because Francis is within the Vatican that he represents Christ's Church since Blessed Anne Emmerich spoke of a FALSE church (that would NOT BE the Catholic Church) that many would BELIEVE was the Catholic Church.

Our Lady of La Salette said these words in 1846

"Rome will become the Seat of THE ANTICHRIST." We ALL know it is usually the Seat of the Bishop of Rome. Why with so much evidence against Francis, and these words of Our Lady to guide us, are we still calling him the POPE ?

sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1846sallette.asp
F M Shyanguya
@Caroline03 Yes I am, even though it is now clear he is an imposter who usurped the papacy, and has also unmasked as the False Prophet - we know how he ends so the situation is neither irredeemable nor hopeless. It is the LORD’s Church and he is in charge. In him I trust. I wait for him. Clearly he is not far of now since we are at the End of the Age.

Cf Gospel Reading for this past Wednesday. …More
@Caroline03 Yes I am, even though it is now clear he is an imposter who usurped the papacy, and has also unmasked as the False Prophet - we know how he ends so the situation is neither irredeemable nor hopeless. It is the LORD’s Church and he is in charge. In him I trust. I wait for him. Clearly he is not far of now since we are at the End of the Age.

Cf Gospel Reading for this past Wednesday. It was taken from Lk 12:39-48.

PS As I have commented here on GTV, the Church has even had Popes like John XII, who it is reported toasted to the Devil. I am on record asserting that Pope Francis is an idolater and a pagan.

PPS Cf The Serenity Prayer.
F M Shyanguya
This is strange @Caroline03, wanting people to be schismatics AND believe in private revelations that have received no approbation from the Church, the latter which ought to be enough for her children because by the LORD’s promise, she can never be prevailed upon.
Caroline03
What a strange reaction to my comment @F M Shyanguya Not only have subsequent events PROVED the 1846 prophecy to have been accurate, but an Imprimatur was given to it.

APPARITION of the BLESSED VIRGIN
on the Mountain of LA SALETTE
the 19th of September, 1846

Published by the Shepherdess of La Salette with
Imprimatur by Mgr. Bishop of Lecce

Secondly, although you call me a Schismatic, it'…More
What a strange reaction to my comment @F M Shyanguya Not only have subsequent events PROVED the 1846 prophecy to have been accurate, but an Imprimatur was given to it.

APPARITION of the BLESSED VIRGIN
on the Mountain of LA SALETTE
the 19th of September, 1846

Published by the Shepherdess of La Salette with
Imprimatur by Mgr. Bishop of Lecce

Secondly, although you call me a Schismatic, it's not Me who is free-wheeling here. It's yourself. Yikes! You sound like Francis himself, a veritable modernist. Reserving the right to pick and choose which of the Statement's alleged to come from the Queen of Heaven are to receive your stamp of approval. Francis and the other Popes since Vatican II played this game with the third Secret of Fatima. They chose to scoff at it. They chose not to release it, and God will be avenged. Presuming that He will accept their condescending judgement regarding the suitability of whether or not to reveal his warnings is a fools game. Like them, it seems my friend, you ALSO stand there with your nose in the air, picking and choosing what is to be viewed as TRUE as though you were Martin Luther himself! All Protestants, Heretics & Schismatics ie false friends of Our Lord do the same.

Melanie Calvert Sr Marie of the Cross WAS a Bride of Christ. Her Life was hard, and she offered up lots of Sacrifices for the forthcoming sins of Christ's Church - need I say it - we owe her some respect. Will YOU be eating an egg instead of a huge banquet on Christmas Day as an offering to God? I probably won't EITHER, but Melanie Calvert did! Her Diocesan Bishop beheld her offering up her beautiful Christmas Meal so that souls may be made righteous by her Sacrifices.

The statement that Melanie made to Abbe Combe (her Priest Confessor) that the Naundorf family (who were a point of contention within French society at the time) was the King of France, was NOT a prophecy. It was a comment she made to her Confessor Abbe Combe during a friendly meeting at her house. It was Abbe Combe who wrote down each conversation for the Diocesan Records. He presumably deemed her far more worthy of belief than YOU do, my free-thinking friend.

My other point - relating to Maximin Giraud. That was not a prophecy EITHER. It is a statement of fact. Yes, he really DID visit the Comte de Chambord to request that he did not ascend the Throne because he was not a Lily! It is a historic event. The Secretary of the Comte spoke of the visit within his memoires..

It's a bit silly crying out "It's a sham I don't need to believe it" but you yourself come on this website every day saying that Rome is ruled by an evil person and the Seat of Peter has an imposter seated on it.
So why call Our Lady of La Salette's message something you don't have to believe in?

If it's the private conversations regarding the King of France that you don't want to accept - I humbly remind you that Naundorf's descendant Hugues Charles Guy de Bourbon, PROVES without a shadow of a doubt that he is genetically descended from Louis and Marie Antoinette. As that newspaper article confirms

Don't waste time disagreeing with accredited prophecies that agree with YOUR OWN view. Neither should you say you doubt the veracity of a "private revelation " which Science has actually confirmed to be true! The DNA of the direct descendant of Naundorf (whom Melanie Calvert said was the Dauphin) is a perfect match genetically for the King and Queen of France. He is a direct descendant apparently! What is there not to believe? Don't waste your time complaining or making oaths to modernist views of private revelations! DNA proves Hugues Charles really IS a descendant of King Louis and Marie Antoinette!.

Good luck explaining to Our Lord why you rely on your OWN authority to judge a prophecy to be believable or not. If you don't trust the Imprimatur of Bishop Lecce - and won't accept Scientific proof then who ARE you likely to TRUST? It is YOU who are relying on private Judgement. Don't be such a fraud. 😃

My friend - I urge you not to waste time calling any of us on this website "Schismatics" Shame on you.
F M Shyanguya
@Caroline03 This is asking others to be schismatics - never labeled you or others as such - and that’s what I said @Caroline03, wanting people to be schismatics“: If you want to separate yourself from the Pope, go ahead, but don’t ask others to follow you.
F M Shyanguya
As for the Papacy being taken over by the enemy, my blogs, my GTV articles and comments have me saying exactly that. So I am not seeing what you appealing to with Church approved apparitions if what I say agrees. Repeating, I am going nowhere even if a Pope were the Devil himself cf. the parable of the vine and the branches. The Church is the LORD’s.
Caroline03
@FM Shyanguya Now what we have here is a Catholic challenging a fellow Catholic preaching from Scripture
and providing evidence that a reviled Mystic is a true Mysitc befriended by a few Bishops during her time.
You claim Francis to be the Pope of the RC Church founded by Christ on the Rock of St Peter? I put it to you that instead of that, he is the leader of the Church of Darkness that would …More
@FM Shyanguya Now what we have here is a Catholic challenging a fellow Catholic preaching from Scripture
and providing evidence that a reviled Mystic is a true Mysitc befriended by a few Bishops during her time.
You claim Francis to be the Pope of the RC Church founded by Christ on the Rock of St Peter? I put it to you that instead of that, he is the leader of the Church of Darkness that would superimpose itself over the TRUE Church of Jesus Christ, as forewarned by Blessed Anne Emmerich. I also declare, that this Pope is acclaimed by the antichrist's of the world, the godless EU, the lawless UN.
Take your pick - what sinister godless organisation reviled by Christ and His Saints, does YOUR Pope not support? Why every day he upholds the perverts without proclaiming that they are sinning. What Pope ever did that?

He leads, as one Prophet said The Mystical Body of Satan.
The TRUE RC Church is not governed by just the Pope. Like it's God, She is Triune. She rests on a Three legged stool apparently, The Sacred Magesterium, The writings of Saints, and Laws dogmatically declared by former Popes, the Sacred Scriptures, all that God pronounced therein,

.....and finally the never ending line of validly elected Popes.

At least 10 accredited Saints have warned us about these times, forewarning that there would be a church of darkness in Rome, superimposed over the TRUE Church. Why is this not acceptable to men? Women find no fault with it. As a female Catholic, without being a feminist, which I am not! I object strongly to your approbation and lack of respect for Brides of Christ who Christ prophecised (correctly) through. Evidently, in the male mind-set, It's not wrong for YOU to call Francis wicked and sinful and state he is serving Satan, but woe betide Our Lady, Our Lord, or a few great Saints to chip in with a few accurate prophecies warning you first.

Also, woe betide the fellow CATHOLIC, who agrees with you, or who provides evidence that God forewarned everybody of this! As soon as THEY criticise the Pope along with you, you counter-attack - calling them Schismatics, Heretics, Apostate, saying Francis is Christ's Pope, in charge of Our Lord's Church. Christ said that His Children HEAR His voice, that they flee from the wolves of this world.

Hear you go again. Preaching against the Pope in the first instance, and then mocking the great Saints and Our Lord in the second instance, then denying the Church it's PURITY, and sincerity of teaching and unblemished Doctrine in the third. Denying in the fourth instancinge that the Sacred Magesterium and abidance by Sacred scripture are ALSO needing to be upheld by one governing the REAL Church of Our Lord Jesus Christ.. Here we find just a figure dressed in white calling himself Our Pope. Speaking AGAINST Sacred Scripture, against the Moral Law found within them, Creating HIS OWN Magesterium, which a RC Pope is not allowed to do, speaking with his OWN authority against the teachings of God.

God Bless us all. A Pope who is NOT a Pope, who proclaims Christ is misunderstood, that he wants same-sex unions, gays to adopt children, The Lord's Prayer (God's own words) changed to suit himself.
Denounces every Catholic Virtue as ritualistic rigidism everywhere he goes. Every Christian - even the Born Again lot, would denounce him as Satan!

Yet we must accept him since he's wearing white and has seated himself vainly upon the Throne of Peter. egging the sheep of Christ to follow their Leader? When Christ warned us against it?

I say to you again....

"Rome will become the Seat of the Antichrist - the Church will be in eclipse" Our Lady of La Salette 1846 - IMPRIMITUR - the Bishop of Lecce.

PS - When is a the Church of Christ no longer the authenticated Church that Christ founded?
Answer... When that Church has Her Sacraments changed, Her offices altered, Her Priests falsely indoctrinated, Her true Clergy removed from Office. Pope Pius V stated that His Missal from now on must be the only Missal used FOREVER within the RC Church (Quo Primum 1570) The Dogmatically pronounced Law that the number of Cardinals must never exceed 70 upheld for centuries, changed.
writelatin.org/papal/postquamveras.html

Since when were we told that it was alright to no longer abide by the Sacred Magesterium ? To stop abiding by Quo Primum and Postquam Verus, those two documents ALONE, is to create a false church.. To say that Satan governs Christ Church is blasphemy. Christ said He can do no good, so either you accept that this Pope is NOT Canonically elected to govern Christ's Church, or you call God a liar.

New Priests, New Sacraments, Overturned Dogmatic Councils.... unbreakable Statutes broken? Why do you give a Pope the right to change the Laws? Along with this, why do you tell him he's Christ's Pope when he's governing the body of Antichrist from a former Sacred Building? Why do mere MEN, claim they have the self-given authority to not believe the writings of a Saint? Unravelling Sacred Traditions, one by one, a new policy .

It's NOT the true Church of Christ, but there are many innocent people falsely adhering to this Pope - claiming that a Pope can not preach error whereas A False Pope CAN! History confirms that Christ is present within His True Church. He uphold Her and protects Her.. If Francis were Pope of Christ's Church, Christ would have rebuked/removed him by now. Oftentimes in the past, robbers have broken into Our Lord's Church and proclaimed themselves to be the Pope of the Lord. One called a Council and died the following morning before he could alter any doctrines. Another bribed his friends to elect him, and once made Pope underwent a full conversion overnight and had his former friends dragged off in chains and put in prison.

Be warned that a Man dressed in White - who creates his own Magesterium, speaks against Our Lord's Moral Laws as laid down in Scripture - is to be suspected as being AN IMPOSTER! Whilst some NOT adhering to the Pope who upkeep aspect one, and aspect two, are likely to fair better in staying INSIDE the Church themselves and hearkening to the warnings given by the Mystics.

By the way. The 3rd Secret of Fatima not being revealed, and each Pope instructing us that they have the right to disobey God - is not a good sign......

The writings of Many Catholic Saints crying out that in the Last Days there would come a false Church which vain men would superimpose over the True Church is being treated as though it were a conspiracy theory..... the modern mind set needs to seek out and be instructed by those who lived in chastity, and ate an egg instead of a great Feast on Christmas Day In submission to a request made by Christ! He asked her to deny herself to save souls. (Melanie Calvert)