Ultraviolet
@Donna Prima Donna

"My post deals exclusively with the subject matter of this thread."

Please quote where the word "gaslighting" appears anywhere in it. No. That's a topic YOU introduced. Also, please learn the difference between a comment and a post. The -post- was made by Gloria TV.News. YOU did not make this post. Your input is a comment, not a post.

Further, Elizabeth Dias isn't "gaslig…More
@Donna Prima Donna

"My post deals exclusively with the subject matter of this thread."

Please quote where the word "gaslighting" appears anywhere in it. No. That's a topic YOU introduced. Also, please learn the difference between a comment and a post. The -post- was made by Gloria TV.News. YOU did not make this post. Your input is a comment, not a post.

Further, Elizabeth Dias isn't "gaslighting"She's doing what the left has always done: establish a narrative through supportive and approving media articles by sympathetic journalists.

You described "gaslighting" as: "And when we question the false reality that we are being presented, or we claim that what we see is that actual reality, we are vilified as racist or bigots or just plain crazy."

Elizabeth Dias has not vilified anyone nor claimed they are crazy. That, dear heart, is a false accusation on YOUR part.

"You are a continually combative, obsessive, snarky, unpleasant and overall repulsive woman who posts too much and says too little."

I'll certainly admit to being snarky as for being combative, it does your own character no credit to see that as a fault instead of a virtue. Edmund Burke said it best, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”― And I see no reason why I should allow a Catholic site to become a cesspool for post-hijacking anti-Semites. Still, your user-name suits you.

A "Prima Donna" is "a very temperamental person with an inflated view of their own talent or importance."

....and like so many tempermental people, you're quick to display the very faults you perceive in others.. I'm not sure why you claim I'm a woman since I've never mentioned my gender. But I'm not suprised you made that assumption.

This has become THE defining assumption of fundamentally stupid,bigoted, and factually incorrect person on GTV. It's a litmus test with near perfect accuracy.

"you feel compelled to make up for your lack of satisfaction in the world by manically posting and posting and posting (up to 25 or more posts in one sitting)"

Perfect example of my previous point., you're wrong.. I have made only five posts on GTV. Check my profile.

"always attempting to appear wiser and more witty than any other poster expecting that that behavior will provide relief."

Hardly Dr. Bobus is real wit on GTV and he's better educated as well. This isn't the first time I've acknowledged that, either.

No, you're simply doing what other stupid, bigoted and factually incorrect people do. You're inventing motives based on your own personal bias. That isn't "gaslighting" either. I'm simply pointing out it's easy to assume the worst when you dislike someone.

However, thus far, your assumptions and claims have ZERO support except your say-so.

As for your peeing dog analogy, that's simply you continuing to display both your your ignorance and your bias in equal measure. You are ignorant of how GTV's news board works. That ignorance has led you to assigning a false motive behind my comments.

Commenting on posts often works similarly to an "upvote" on Reddit. Posts that have been buried down in the "more news" area get bumped back up after comments appear. Posts that are further "down" on the main page periodically get "bumped" in a similar manner.

Once again, you assumed the worst about me because you don't know what you're talking about.

Do you owe me an apology? You bet. I won't hold my breath, though. ;-)

"It’s a part of his nature just like being a pretentious PITA is a part of yours."

Cry harder, sweetheart. Your tears of butthurt are all the more delicious because you've already made a fool of yourself. :D

"Your behavior is not that uncommon for those with a less than comely appearance coupled with obesity.... These kinds of body image issues lead to rejection..."

Oh LOL. U fat 'n uhhhgly.

Protip. Skip the talk-show amateur psychology. It's as baseless as your assumptions on why I comment.

"I have no doubt this is true in your case."

It's a pity we both can't wager our salvation on the supposed accuracy of your beliefs. You'd be in for a very ugly surprise.whiich would, I freely admit, provide me endless amusement. :D

By contrast, I have no doubt you're utterly oblvious to the fact you've written an essy while complaining about the fact I write them and, best of all, the entire second half of your comment is one giant logical fallacy. pic related
Ultraviolet
"an ill tempered, mentally ill shrew..."

Moar ad hominem.. But still NOT ONE WORD about the rabid anti-Semite who hijacked this post. The best defense is a good offense, except name calling isn't a good offense at all. Yeah, I figured you out with my first reply,

"You are too out of touch with reality to realize it,"

Still playing arm-chair psychologist, I see... Prima Donna

" I did …More
"an ill tempered, mentally ill shrew..."

Moar ad hominem.. But still NOT ONE WORD about the rabid anti-Semite who hijacked this post. The best defense is a good offense, except name calling isn't a good offense at all. Yeah, I figured you out with my first reply,

"You are too out of touch with reality to realize it,"

Still playing arm-chair psychologist, I see... Prima Donna

" I did not read your typical vitriolic ____ posted above."

Nice language on a Catholic board. Also, LOLOL... I"m sure you did.

First it was "yer fat n' ugly" now it's "I dint read yer reply". You're two for two on classic lame message board replies . :D

Those two have been kicking around since literally the days of the first BBS systems.

" Your manic idiotic behavior amuses me."

Make that three for three on lame replies.. "I'm so amused at you even when when you beat down every point I raised.,"

Anything other lame ,over-used, under-powered comebacks you want to re-use out of desperation?

Don't stop now. It's all you've got at this point, You're just following the tire ruts of literally thousands of failures over the last quarter of a century.
Ultraviolet
Speaking of being "so far'out of touch" as you call it.. Your "gas-lighting" argument has been factually disproven. This post isn't about Jews and it isn't about me. You share that penchant for obsessive irrelevancy with your pal Pope Innocent III. They're a post-hijacker and so are you.

Repeating your fantasies about my childhood, weight, appearance, social and romantic life isn't going to …More
Speaking of being "so far'out of touch" as you call it.. Your "gas-lighting" argument has been factually disproven. This post isn't about Jews and it isn't about me. You share that penchant for obsessive irrelevancy with your pal Pope Innocent III. They're a post-hijacker and so are you.

Repeating your fantasies about my childhood, weight, appearance, social and romantic life isn't going to change that.

Your Fallacies -are-... Argumentum Ad Nauseam on a pre-existing fallacy of Argumentum Ad Hominem. And still not one word about Pope Innocent III's post-hijacking which is what you originally set out to defend with your claims of "gas-lighting". Yes, I -did- notice you're STILL avoiding that point.

"Perhaps no man will have you?"

Perhaps you should show proof I'm a woman. ;-)

"This is perfectly understandable given the reasons listed."

Given the -assumptions- listed. Reasons have supporting evidence. Your claims do not. You haven't supplied any evidence for any of them except through repeition. :P

"The point is that you have become a proverbial _____..."

I see your profanity continues to do a Catholic site no credit. I doubt you'd use that word speaking to your Pastor in Church after Mass. I warned you about the profanity yesterday, too.

...and adding to your baseless assumptions, now you include sexual preference. You're also contradicting yourself, Donna.

If I were a woman and a lesbian, then I wouldn't want a man in the first place. That contradicts your "perhaps no man will have you?" speculation. Pick one false narrative and stick with it.

"with serious mental health issues that impact your behavior at this site and, without doubt, in the real world as well."

Strange how my supposed "mental health issues" didn't stop me disproving your silly "gas-lighting claim".

What qualifications do you have to judge sound mental health? Your replies hardly inspire confidence..Your replies are, without exception now, one long seriies of unsupported personal insults... literally day after day after day.

"However, there is hope. Even for a miserable mentally unstable shrewish creature as yourself, with professional help there is a small chance of reformation."

Oh indeed there IS hope. Even for you and yes, it will involve "professional help" as you call it. Just not the kind you're describing. ;-)
Donna Prima Donna
Ultraviolet
My post deals exclusively with the subject matter of this thread and has absolutely nothing to do with any other matter or poster WHICH YOU HAVE FALSELY CLAIMED. If you took the time to READ my post, you will see that I actually quoted from the GTV news article that was posted and followed up with the definition of GASLIGHTING which is what Elizabeth Dias along with other reporters …More
Ultraviolet
My post deals exclusively with the subject matter of this thread and has absolutely nothing to do with any other matter or poster WHICH YOU HAVE FALSELY CLAIMED. If you took the time to READ my post, you will see that I actually quoted from the GTV news article that was posted and followed up with the definition of GASLIGHTING which is what Elizabeth Dias along with other reporters routinely do.

Having read some of your other posts they tell me that although there is little point in posting to you, I will do it anyway. However, I have no desire to dialogue with you and my reasons follow.

You are a continually combative, obsessive, snarky, unpleasant and overall repulsive woman who posts too much and says too little. I seldom read those posts (especially the essays) but I am amused by the quantity.

Obviously your life in the real world is so devoid of meaningful content that you feel compelled to make up for your lack of satisfaction in the world by manically posting and posting and posting (up to 25 or more posts in one sitting) always attempting to appear wiser and more witty than any other poster expecting that that behavior will provide relief. (“It’s a mosquito not a fly.”) This annoying conduct is similar to a dog who has not been taken out for a while suddenly going for a long walk who then feels compelled to pee on each and every bush, tree or fire hydrant that the dog encounters. Fido can’t help it. It’s a part of his nature just like being a pretentious PITA is a part of yours.

Your behavior is not that uncommon for those with a less than comely appearance coupled with obesity. These kinds of body image issues lead to rejection and the absence of significant, interpersonal, real-world relationships that would follow. The afflicted person will try to make up for that rejection in any way that presents itself...on a safe Catholic internet message board for instance. I have no doubt this is true in your case.
Ultraviolet
No, @Donna Prima Donna. The "actual reality" as you put it is, This post has nothing to do with Jews. That is reality. Also.Pope "Innocent" III is trying to steal an audience for his Jew-bashing propaganda.

Terms exist for a reason. People who express bigotry are called bigots. People who express racism are called racists. People who hate Jews are called anti-Semites. And people who make …More
No, @Donna Prima Donna. The "actual reality" as you put it is, This post has nothing to do with Jews. That is reality. Also.Pope "Innocent" III is trying to steal an audience for his Jew-bashing propaganda.

Terms exist for a reason. People who express bigotry are called bigots. People who express racism are called racists. People who hate Jews are called anti-Semites. And people who make excuses for such people are called "sympathizers" and "enablers".

So if you're making excuses for Pope "Innocent" III's post-hijacking and irrelevant Jew-bashing propaganda, both of those latter terms apply to you.

That isn't "gaslighting", it's simply applying the definitions humanity uses to define reality where they apply.
Donna Prima Donna
WHAT IS GASLIGHTING?
Dias hails Biden’s “Christian moral vision” as “pluralistic,” “different” and “part of a diverse America” which defines itself through love rather than through hate and fear or exclusion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Today, we are living in a perpetual state of gaslighting. The reality that what we are being told by …More
WHAT IS GASLIGHTING?
Dias hails Biden’s “Christian moral vision” as “pluralistic,” “different” and “part of a diverse America” which defines itself through love rather than through hate and fear or exclusion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Today, we are living in a perpetual state of gaslighting. The reality that what we are being told by the media is at complete odds with what we are seeing with our own two eyes. And when we question the false reality that we are being presented, or we claim that what we see is that actual reality, we are vilified as racist or bigots or just plain crazy. You’re not racist. You’re not crazy. You’re being gaslighted.
facebook.com/login/web/
Ultraviolet
This post has nothing to do with Jews @Pope "Innocent" lll Go start your own post to bash Jews. . Not one person mentioned in this post is a Jew. Most Marxists aren't Jews. Most Marxists in the media aren't Jews. Joe Biden isn't a Jew. Elizabeth Dias isn't a Jew. Jesuit Father Kevin F. O’Brien isn't a Jew. Senator Raphael Warnock isn't a Jew.

But that's the only thing you ever rant about. "…More
This post has nothing to do with Jews @Pope "Innocent" lll Go start your own post to bash Jews. . Not one person mentioned in this post is a Jew. Most Marxists aren't Jews. Most Marxists in the media aren't Jews. Joe Biden isn't a Jew. Elizabeth Dias isn't a Jew. Jesuit Father Kevin F. O’Brien isn't a Jew. Senator Raphael Warnock isn't a Jew.

But that's the only thing you ever rant about. "da jooz"... Borrowing your rhetoric, "you walk as a anti-Semitic bigot, you talk as a anti-Semitic, bigot because you ARE an anti-Semitic bigot". And like so many of your depsicable kind you're a post-hijacking anti-Semitic bigot trying to steal an audience you can't earn on your own. That's a common character trait, as in a LACK of character, that's common to every one of you Jew-bashing "false evangelists" who show up on GTV trying to make "converts". You show your true colors how you comment-bomb totally unrelated posts with your manure.

You want the audience, you can't get an audience on your own so you have no problem trying to steal one. On a Sunday no less. Hell of a way to show your respect for the Sabbath. Lies and theft all in one comment.

There's been a lot of gossip on GTV whether or not I'm a moderator. Users like you are living proof that I am not.

If I was a GTV mod, you would have been evaporated the second time you pulled this stunt. Oh, not because you're another stupid, hypocritical Jew-hater. That's your right. But becuase you're a no-good post-hijacking thief. Boards with regular levels of moderation do NOT tolerate this kind of topic-shifting and agenda-pushing. pic related.
Pope Innocent lll
Joe Biden is one with the subversive Marxist Jews.
When he was V.P., Biden and the Marxist Jews' vast media outlets, relentlessly inflicted humanity with propaganda for the perversion of marriage.
The Washington Post:
"Jewish leaders in the media are in large part responsible for American acceptance of gay marriage, Vice President Biden said Tuesday night."
Biden described the impact on society,…More
Joe Biden is one with the subversive Marxist Jews.
When he was V.P., Biden and the Marxist Jews' vast media outlets, relentlessly inflicted humanity with propaganda for the perversion of marriage.
The Washington Post:
"Jewish leaders in the media are in large part responsible for American acceptance of gay marriage, Vice President Biden said Tuesday night."
Biden described the impact on society, inflicted by the Marxist-Talmud Jews through their Media, "The influence is immense, the influence is immense..."
(WP 5/2013)
Many Catholics have stated that Biden is not a Catholic. He walks as a Marxist Jew and he talks as a Marxist Jew, then he's a ...
"...And if he will not hear the church, let him be to thee as the heathen and publican."
-Sacred Scriptures, St. Matthew