Long list of Francis' wrong picks.
blogspot.com
Tesa
4449

Pope Francis Backs The Wrong Horse....Again

If you care about the Church, you're probably struggling a bit at the moment for lots of reasons. With Jorge Bergoglio at the reigns as Pope Francis,…
Ultraviolet
"JP2 and B16...imperfect as they were/ar never taught heresy." Wrong.
. Ratzinger authored, JPII approved.. Then there are the "list compilers" "Heresies of Anti-Pope Benedict XVI(aka Joseph Ratzinger)
"101 Heresies of Anti-Pope John Paul II"

and technically none of it is "heresy" for any of these Popes until the Church declares it so. How's that ban working out for you, Jimmy? Seriously, …More
"JP2 and B16...imperfect as they were/ar never taught heresy." Wrong.
. Ratzinger authored, JPII approved.. Then there are the "list compilers" "Heresies of Anti-Pope Benedict XVI(aka Joseph Ratzinger)
"101 Heresies of Anti-Pope John Paul II"

and technically none of it is "heresy" for any of these Popes until the Church declares it so. How's that ban working out for you, Jimmy? Seriously, why does GTV even bother banning people when they just allow the same idiot to re-join literally the next day? Don Reto? Seriously, I'm asking... why? Mr. Ohio has been banned twice already and he's already back to back pushing his same agenda.

Even this claim is one I've already refuted and with this same set of sources, no less.

"He has a 7 year record of sinister, anti Christian beliefs"

Stack up that 7 year record against JP II and BXVI, Nutty. I can get you plenty of other "lists" and they scream "Antipope" at BXVI just like you do at Francis.

" You don't become a pope or an anti pope or at the top of the hill without knowing Christian dogma"

Is that so? Then apply your reasoning evenly.

Apply it to all those many troubling teachings from JP II and Benedict XVI. Ah... that's right. Your lengthy absence of a few hours almost made me forget. It isn't reasoning on your part at all, just hypocritical rhetoric that gets applied only to one pope and never to his predecessors. You're such fraud. :P

"There's is something lacking in any Catholic who keeps excusing clear heretical behavior as an error."

You're right there, Jimbo. the "something lacking" is called "stupidity". Another thing lacking is "ignorance of Church law". It's a basic legal principle even in secular law that people are innocent of charges until tried and proven guilty in a court having jurisdiction.

The court of public opinion is not where those charges are decided and Judge Jimmy isn't presiding over the trial. That's a basic problem with your entire world-view. Thing don't become magically true just because you said so.

"which defenders call "mistakes" or errors."

Hoo boy... That didn't take long, did it? :D Good old Jimmy. Same old lies from the same old liar.Calling an error for what it is, isn't a defense of the man making the error.

Likewise, calling a lie for what it is, and calling the man who tells it a liar, isn't a defense of the man telling that lie.

You're a man who lies about his own name, his intelligence, his bogus medical conditions. You lie about the Pope, right here in this very comment of yours you lied (favorably) about JP II and Benedict XVI., later I'll address a few other lies you tell. You'ra liar, that's what you are, but I'm certainly not defending you by pointing that out.

See, Jimmy? That's how "logic" works. On GTV, at least, there aren't any "defenders" of Pope Francis. You see anyone justifying his doctrinal errors? No? How about praising him and his papacy? No? Then shaddap. :P

Since you brought this up, I call Francis' errors by the term "errors", because that's what they are. I call you a lot of things for the same reason. . ;-)

Benedict XVI and JP II almost certainly taught and even committed errors. They didn't stop being Pope because of them. The same is true for Francis.

Pointing that out doesn't make me or anyone else a "defender" and your obviously pointed references ain't foolin' nobody. If that's your notion of literary subtlety, I can see why your career as a professional academic went no further than your sofa.

Hokay, one 'mo time since @Gobbels-Bot 3.0 is back to pushing his same old propganda routine.

"I do not support Pope Francis. I don't like Pope Francis. I don't approve of Pope Francis. But Pope Francis is the Pope. I don't like that either. I have repeatedly explained this to KristianKeller. I've repeatedly explained this to many people here." -Ultraviolet April 16, 2019

Sharp-eyed GTV users will realize this was before Jimbo in ALL his many user-names and banned accounts even joined at all.

...and here I am again, linking the same quote for the same guy who keeps ignoring it in favor of pushing his same lies.

Same lies from you, same factual copy-pasta from me, disproving it.

I've already linked this explanation at least as often as you've changed your names and easily five times as often as you've gotten banned.

Nice to have you back Goebbels Bot 3.0. What would Gloria.tv be without you? Aside from truthful and Catholic?
DEFENSA DE LA FE
This information should be published and after publishing it, bergoglio will resign. It is the end of bergoglio disastrous management.
Ultraviolet
@BrotherBeowulf ...except Francis isn't "false" any more than Saint JP II or BXVI were false or apostates. JP II praised Pachamama and was blessed by her witches, yet somehow God created miracles through JP II's intercession.

BXVI had a notable prayer session with his fellow Muslims, too.
BrotherBeowulf
False Francis the Apostate is the definition of wrong pick.