en.news

Tucho’s Marian Document Leans on Selective Citations and Neglects the Magisterial Tradition

On November 5, Mark Miravalle, professor emeritus of theology and mariology at Franciscan University of Steubenville and president of the International Marian Association, responded on MotherOfAllPeoples.com to Tucho’s November 4 document Mater Populi Fidelis which attacks Marian titles common in the Catholic Church.

The use of the title "Co-Redemptrix"

Tucho stated that the title "Co-Redemptrix" is "not appropriate," despite its historical use by numerous popes. Miravalle questions whether this implies that past popes and many saints used an improper title.

Tucho's document concludes that the title is allegedly "inappropriate" due to the need to often "re-explain" it.

Miravalle comments: "Other Marian titles, such as 'Immaculate Conception' and 'Mother of God,' have likewise required ongoing explanation and re-explanation. Yet these titles remain, as do other Catholic dogmas, such as 'Papal Infallibility,' 'Original Sin,' and 'Transubstantiation.'"

Our Lady as Mediatrix of All Graces

Miravalle explains that the Papal Magisterium has consistently taught the doctrine of Mary’s role as “Mediatrix of All Graces” for the last four centuries, both in title and in explanation.

Pope Leo XIV used the title on August 15, 2025.

Miravalle finds it "disconcerting and confusing" that Tucho's document contains several references that seem to suggest Our Lady does not play a secondary role alongside Christ in the universal dispensation of redemptive grace.

He is also surprised that the Papal Magisterium's treatment of the Mediatrix of All Graces from the 18th to 21st centuries is absent from Tucho’s document.

Inconsistency in Cited Sources

Miravalle explains that Tucho’s use of magisterial references “appears inconsistent and, at times, lacks objectivity and parity.”

For example, Francis's extemporaneous comments during homilies or audiences (not found in the written texts) are quoted in full, while John Paul II’s references to the Co-redemptrix during papal homilies and addresses, accompanied by an extended explanation (e.g., the 1985 homily in Guayaquil on January 31), are not included in the text nor quoted in the footnotes. Pius XI, in his November 30, 1933 address, provides an excellent explanation of the Co-redemptrix title; however, it was not included in the document either.”

Miravalle uncovers another disparity in the references to Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger. As a cardinal, he expressed reservations about the title in 1996, some 30 years ago: "As pope, he never explicitly spoke against it. Referencing private interviews of Cardinal Ratzinger against the Co-redemptrix title while not referencing papal statements using the title lacks objectivity, which is crucial in this discussion.

Role of the Faithful and Synodal Process

Finally, Miravalle emphasizes the importance of consulting the faithful. He points to widespread global support for the rejected Marian titles.

"May the full synodal process championed by Pope Leo and the Holy See be genuinely and comprehensively implemented in guiding the Church's discernment on this quintessential Marian subject."

#newsHptxcelbrk
141K

His wife?

Ecclesiasticus 11:29
"Many are the traps of the crafty."

eva333

Fr Briese: McElroy had 40 year sodomitic relationship with Archbishop Quinn
Briese: McElroy had 40 year sodomitic …

Let it be clear that I do not recognize this homosexual Tucho Fernandez as Prefect of the Doctrine of the Faith, but Catholics who recognize Prevost as their pope must assert their rights.
14 – Come si può contattare il Dicastero per la Dottrina della Fede?
Mediante la posta ordinaria, da indirizzare al Prefetto del Dicastero per la Dottrina della Fede, 00120, Città del Vaticano – cdf@cfaith.va

“Mediatrix of All Graces” is not dogma and never will be.

Catena Aurea
GREEK EXPOSITOR. (Geometer) But this is the sum of the whole message. The Word of God, as the Bridegroom, effecting an incomprehensible union, Himself, as it were, the same both planting, and being planted, hath moulded the whole nature of man into Himself. But comes last the most perfect and comprehensive salutation; Blessed art thou among women. i. e. Alone, far before all other women; that women also should be blessed in thee, as men are in thy Son; but rather both in both. For as by one man and one woman came at once both sin and sorrow, so now also by one woman and one man hath both blessing and joy been restored, and poured forth upon all.

The Vatican downgrading & disregarding the Blessed Virgin for some time.. eg. Pachamama; 3rd secret delayed/ obscured; delayed & questionable consecration of Russia etc. This document is part of their scheme

Christ alone mediates grace: He is the bridge between God and humanity.
Mary intercedes, but does not mediate or dispense grace.

philosopher

Heal me with your mouth- Cld. Fernandez is not a brilliant theologian.

listening to this youtube.com/watch?v=QU9pH7nCDL4
Fr. Murr makes excellent points

eva333

Let’s be blunt: Tucho Fernández cares nothing about the Co-Redemption, much less about the potential misunderstandings of the faithful. And it would be pathetic to think that he is supposedly reaffirming the sole mediation of Our Lord while both his employers—Bergoglio and Prevost—maintain that all religions lead to God.
Tucho Fernández does not have the slightest concern about the spread of doctrinal errors that the Dicastery he unworthily presides over should promptly condemn, errors which he deliberately fuels. No one was concerned about possible “doctrinal misunderstandings” when an attempt was made to pass off the filthy idol of Pachamama as an image of the Virgin Mary carrying the Lord in her womb, after the faithful were outraged and scandalized by the worship of a hideous pagan image by Bergoglio and his associates. (VIGANÒ)

Supermarket Mariology: grave aberration.

"May the full synodal process championed by Pope Leo and the Holy See be genuinely and comprehensively implemented in guiding the Church's discernment on this quintessential Marian subject."
A "synodal proces" is by definition unable to discern the appropriateness of a dogma. A dogma is a definitive, absolute and infallible proclamation of the Church, while "synodality" excludes precisely that.
The only correct response of the faithful to Mater Populi Fidelis is to reject this errant teaching authority.

This is not an infallible document.