3
4
1
2
Clicks693
F M Shyanguya
10
Freemasonry the British Monarchy and Queen Elizabeth II
J G Tasan
1 John 5: 21
F M Shyanguya
@J G Tasan, precisely. There are only two sides: Those who worship the one true God, and those who glory in their idols - behind them are demons - to their enslavement.
Alex A
Nor worth commenting on.
F M Shyanguya
“*Not worth ...”

Is a comment.
F M Shyanguya
F M Shyanguya
“They are all masons”
Caroline03
Re the British Monarchy

Examine the evidence.

The Stuarts were sent into exile, first of all protected by King Louis XIV, and then housed in Rome where they held Court courtesy of Pope Pius VI .... When Bonnie Prince Charlie (Charles Edward Stuart )died modern day revisionism claims that there was no heir to inherit the Crown and the Stuart line transferred across to Sardinia since BPC's …More
Re the British Monarchy

Examine the evidence.

The Stuarts were sent into exile, first of all protected by King Louis XIV, and then housed in Rome where they held Court courtesy of Pope Pius VI .... When Bonnie Prince Charlie (Charles Edward Stuart )died modern day revisionism claims that there was no heir to inherit the Crown and the Stuart line transferred across to Sardinia since BPC's brother, King Henry IX was a Cardinal who never married.

However, what is taught in schools today regarding the matter of what happened to the Stuart Line upon the death of Cardinal Henry is erroneous. Clearly refuted in this 19th century American History Book.
It confirms that a Count Stuarton became the legitimate heir of the Stuart Crown and that Louis XVI hoped to support Ct Stuarton's Claim once the troubles in France regarding the Revolution were over. There is mention of a Papal Bull acknowledging Ct Stuarton as the legitimate heir of Charles Edward Stuart.

archive.org/…ils/discwesternworld02bartrich

......Here again, is more evidence that there was a legitimate heir to both BPC and Henry Cardinal York Stuart. In this C19th "Memoir" of the life of Charles Edward Stuart it states that both the Wills of BPC and Henry, Cardinal York profess that the title passes to their "relative Count Stuarton."

archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.5710
Caroline03
PS Regarding the end of the French Monarchy - there might be a descendant after all. A little publicized DNA analysis was reported in a main French Newspaper in France not long ago..

The analysis involved the DNA of someone who claims to be descended from the presumed "Imposter" who claimed in the C18th that he was the Dauphin. Many people accepted him as such, including the former Dauphin's …More
PS Regarding the end of the French Monarchy - there might be a descendant after all. A little publicized DNA analysis was reported in a main French Newspaper in France not long ago..

The analysis involved the DNA of someone who claims to be descended from the presumed "Imposter" who claimed in the C18th that he was the Dauphin. Many people accepted him as such, including the former Dauphin's Nurse. The government in Holland clearly believed "Naundorf" claim since they permitted his body to be buried in a Dutch tomb on which is written clearly "Here lies Louis XVII"

The contemporary descendant of this "imposter Dauphin" is called Hugues Charles Guy de Bourbon,.

The article regarding his DNA analysis says that there is a possibility that he might be descended from the Bourbons.

www.lefigaro.fr/…/01016-20140328A…

A picture of Hugues Charles Guy de Bourbon .... spot the resemblance to Louis XVI...

So an accurate surmise would be that the history we are taught in schools,
is not REAL!
F M Shyanguya
Prince Harry
Caroline03
@F M Shyanguya Just going back through some old posts, as I looked at this picture I noticed the picture of P Harry didn't look right - his head looked strange. Here is the reason - it's photo-shopped. Here's the original.

pbs.twimg.com/media/Ej3bKbyX0AASVtT.jpg

God Bless