Clicks1.2K
en.news
17

Cardinal Müller Would Serve Joseph Biden with Holy Communion

“There should be no public debate at the Communion rail [which the Novus Ordo abolished],” Cardinal Müller told Edward Pentin who asked him if he would give Holy Communion to Joseph Biden (NcRegister.com, September 23).

Müller pontificated that Biden’s parish priest or bishop “must clearly tell” Biden and other "Catholic" pro-abortionists that the killing of a human being in the womb is a grave sin - as if Biden, 78, wouldn't know the Catholic doctrine on abortion.

Picture: Gerhard Ludwig Müller, © Mazur, CC BY-NC-SA, #newsJujzanheki

Arthur McGowan
Once again, NO LINK TO THE SOURCE OF THE STORY.
Arthur McGowan
All functioning brain cells have been expelled from Rome by Bergoglio. Giving Communion to ANYONE in violation of Canon 915, regardless of the SPECIES of the grave sin he is involved in, is a mortal sin. The canon is not about adultery, or abortion, or any other particular sin. If a person who is notorious on account any persistent grave sin approaches for Communion, it is a mortal sin to give …More
All functioning brain cells have been expelled from Rome by Bergoglio. Giving Communion to ANYONE in violation of Canon 915, regardless of the SPECIES of the grave sin he is involved in, is a mortal sin. The canon is not about adultery, or abortion, or any other particular sin. If a person who is notorious on account any persistent grave sin approaches for Communion, it is a mortal sin to give it to him. Decisions about individuals belong primarily to the pastor, but the bishop and the pastor commit sacrilege and give grave scandal if they allow violations of Canon 915.
Tesa
Here is an answer
Ultraviolet
"there are no Catholic cardinals anymore. Or bishops." @jimbo Only "Catholic" stay-at-home do-nothings, the kind milking a "bad back" year after year. Oh, and also bloggers who can't even get a janitor's job because, if my suspicions are correct, most companies don't want to hire a felon who got busted for tax evasion.
Ultraviolet
"Then he projects sewage and venom during the week. Idk, that sounds quite Novus Ordo to me...."

You oughta know, since you're Novus Ordo and that's all you ever "project".

Unfortunately for you, my venom is truthful and mocking you isn't "sewage" either, you chump. Christ mocked His critics. Again, you don't know your Scripture. Dummy. :D

"So in review we have a hypocrite relying on his …More
"Then he projects sewage and venom during the week. Idk, that sounds quite Novus Ordo to me...."

You oughta know, since you're Novus Ordo and that's all you ever "project".

Unfortunately for you, my venom is truthful and mocking you isn't "sewage" either, you chump. Christ mocked His critics. Again, you don't know your Scripture. Dummy. :D

"So in review we have a hypocrite relying on his own narcissism to attack me every day"

Actually, I rely on Canon law and factual information to attack your falsehoods. Typical fabricated "review" from a biased reviewer. :D

Interesting how you see no problem criticizing the Pope every day, yet you whine like a little girl when that same critical focus is applied to you.

Thenyou have the nerve to throw the term "hypocrite" around, you sow-bellied fraud.

"personally, because he can't live with disagreement."

I can take it. You can't. ;-)

"This cockroach has been on my back since day 1"

You've been spouting your lies and nonsense from day 1, too.

Remember your classic "I don't wear a mask"? Pic related, Ohio-boy.
Ultraviolet
"oddly, seems to have more time on his hands than he says I do."

Welcome to the 21st century workplace, lazy-bones. We're not all waddling into a stock room punching a time-clock for an eight hour shift. My superiors don't care when my case-load gets done so long as it done on time and as you've probably noticed by now, I almost never sleep.

I also don't sit around watching ESPN all day. You'd …More
"oddly, seems to have more time on his hands than he says I do."

Welcome to the 21st century workplace, lazy-bones. We're not all waddling into a stock room punching a time-clock for an eight hour shift. My superiors don't care when my case-load gets done so long as it done on time and as you've probably noticed by now, I almost never sleep.

I also don't sit around watching ESPN all day. You'd be astounded how much "free time" you have when you turn off the TV but that would mean no more NFL for your vicarious "exercise".

"A coward hiding behind a VPN and his vape smoke..."

Interesting you checked to see I'm on a VPM. Why would you go looking for my IP number, you naughty little Jimmy? Still trying to find me? Maybe I should start taking a closer look at your banking info.. ;-)

No, I don't vape. Another fabrication. Again, you're making up nonsense out of thin air. Like always, like usual, you're all just mouth.
6 more comments from Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet
"he has no Catholicism in him,

My Catholicism is enough to put you to shame every time you attempt to discuss the Catholic faith. You should realize that by now. ;-)

"which is why he defends an antipope and heretic."

This again. A perfect example of you telling a lie you know is a lie. I was correcting this lie before you even joined GTV and I've pointed this out to YOU directly before. many …More
"he has no Catholicism in him,

My Catholicism is enough to put you to shame every time you attempt to discuss the Catholic faith. You should realize that by now. ;-)

"which is why he defends an antipope and heretic."

This again. A perfect example of you telling a lie you know is a lie. I was correcting this lie before you even joined GTV and I've pointed this out to YOU directly before. many times.

"I do not support Pope Francis. I don't like Pope Francis. I don't approve of Pope Francis. But Pope Francis is the Pope. I don't like that either. I have repeatedly explained this to KristianKeller. I've repeatedly explained this to many people here. Likewise, I'm a staunch supporter for the Traditional Latin Mass."

UV -April 16, 2019

"He projects all his insecurities and beliefs about himself on to me."

Cool story, Dr. Jimmy...
Ultraviolet
"A child who would be on the ground with a broken jaw if he got anywhere near me, and even then I'd still be more Catholic than him."

Thank you for saying that, Jimmy. Screen-capped. :D Heck, I'm saving the whole HTML for the page this time! :D

So. I'll "be on the ground with a broken jaw" even if I "got anywhere near" you.

Good to know. So now I have a lawful reason to fear for my life …More
"A child who would be on the ground with a broken jaw if he got anywhere near me, and even then I'd still be more Catholic than him."

Thank you for saying that, Jimmy. Screen-capped. :D Heck, I'm saving the whole HTML for the page this time! :D

So. I'll "be on the ground with a broken jaw" even if I "got anywhere near" you.

Good to know. So now I have a lawful reason to fear for my life and safety even if I SEE you in close physical proximity.

According to you, I'll "be on the ground with a broken jaw" if I "get anywhere near" you.

Even without so much as offering any physical threat .... Bang, I'm on the ground with a broken jaw for "getting anywhere near" you. Your words.

You have no idea what kind of legal door your big mouth just opened up concerning New Hampshire's laws on using deadly force in self-defense.

Tonight is a very, very good night.

You see, years ago, my state adopted sweeping set of "stand your ground" and "castle doctrine" reforms. Lots of changes, some complicated.

I paid a very good criminal attorney to explain those laws to me point by point. What I can do, what I can't, when I can do it and what I need to show after I've done it. Took the better part of a day and cost me close to (then) a week's wages. Worth every penny.

You keep forgetting... I'm a legalist. The Church and the world we live in run according to law. TL:DR... after what you just claimed... aw... Jimmy. :D

This fist-fight fantasy of yours ain't gonna play out the way you think it will.

I'm trying to spare your folks a lot of heart-break. Protip: If my actions are justified, they can't sue for wrongful death, either. Your stupidity won't even score them an insurance settlement. ;-)
Ultraviolet
"This girl only bothers me for one reason: he infects every post on GTV with his cancerous presence."

On what grounds do you assume I'm a girl? And what kind of man hits a girl simply for saying something he dislikes?

I'm beginning to understand why you fail at relationships just as badly as you do at holding a job. Holy Cannoli speculated you might be divorced.

In truth, I haven't bother…More
"This girl only bothers me for one reason: he infects every post on GTV with his cancerous presence."

On what grounds do you assume I'm a girl? And what kind of man hits a girl simply for saying something he dislikes?

I'm beginning to understand why you fail at relationships just as badly as you do at holding a job. Holy Cannoli speculated you might be divorced.

In truth, I haven't bothered to check. Even if you aren't, that kind of violent ugly temper sends women running. Here's why you're still single at 47 and, no doubt, still indulging in a single man's vices. :P

Big Bad Jimmy is sittin' on the sofa as usual, watchin' TV with his (then) GF.

Let's say they're eatin' Funyuns or Cheeze Doodles or some other ghastly thing.

A woman on da TV starts sayin' sumfin' Big Bad Jimmy don't like.

Big Bad Jimmy starts running his Big Bad Mouth about back-handin' her.

Funny thing... a day or so later GF says bye-bye and Big Bad Jimmy can't for the life of him, figure out why. :D

"And for some reason he can't be banned. Oh I can get banned for getting into it with a sensitive priest, but this scum can't."

...because that "sensitive priest" just happens to be a site admin and is (or was) the site owner.

In terms of authority on a forum or board, the site admins/ owner is like God.

Only an idiot dares "getting into it with" someone who can erase his existence with a click of button. You did a stupid thing because you're a stupid man.

I stay within GTV law and that's why I don't get banned. You break it and you do. Remember what I said? I'm a legalist.

This fact and your obvious frustration with it should, again, should give you a very clear understanding now why I'm so happy you've threatened me with a "broken jaw" just if I "get anywhere near" you.

I understand the law and you don't. You break that one and you'll get banned for good. ;-)

Frankly, your behavior here, threats included, is why most boards don't allow banned members to re-join and they ban the ones who try creeping back on.

No, I'm not going to "report" you or anything of the sort. But this, this right here is why banned ex-members should always be banned on sight, no exceptions. You don't belong here, you've shown -why- you don't belong here and now you're showing it some more.

Solid Bold and Argumentum ad Nauseam are a poor substitute for the facts, Jimbo.

Point 1.) Catholic Church says differently.
Point 2.) Catholic Church hasn't said so, therefore he isn't until it does.
Point 3.) Catholic Church says differently and so does Benedict.
Point 4.) I'm a better-educated, more loyal, and more precisely Catholic Catholic than you are.

I'm also consistent with my beliefs. You are not. You scream about Vatican II being evil except you gladly go to a Vatican II-created form of the Mass and accept communion in a way that was promoted by the very leftists who taught and eventually promoted Jorge Bergoglio.

Pope Francis despises the Latin Mass. He's just like you: Novus Ordo and Communion In The Hand.

Every time you slouch your way into a Novus Ordo Mass, every time take Our Lord Jesus in your grubby, filthy, unwashed mitts, you are a Bergoglian. You, Jimmy.

All the bold-text in the world isn't going to change your double standards. Even your online GF Anne Barndhardt denounces the Novus Ordo and all its works.

Funny how you never repost her blog entries on THAT subject, you two-faced charlatan. :D

"You've not worked on day of hard labor in your life and, as far as I can tell, are something far less than a blogger."

Terrible assumptions on your part. Truth is, very early on, like most high schoolers I had the usual round of summer-jobs. Menial work. Hard labor. I didn't like it. Gave me every reason to bust my chops with a ferocity you're incapable of comprehending.

I didn't want to end up like you and I haven't. I work a "desk job.".

In point of fact, I work longer hours than you ever will. My superiors are delighted with my performance, lavish me with "incentives" and their metrics for "hard work" are the only ones that mattter.

"If you have that much time, while working, to research and write you're petulant screeds, YOU ARE NOT WORKING THAT HARD."

You might apply that line of reasoning to Anne Barnhardt, too. Ah, that's right. She's doesn't work at all, does she?

Again your double standards betray themselves, Jimbo. You lash out at me for "NOT WORKING THAT HARD" while your fave blogger lady sits on her can and does nothing. Presumably just like you do.

...and this from the man calling me a "hypocrite".

I suppose that's it for tonight, yeah? Another truck just pulled into Wal-Mart's loading dock and I -know- you're gonna swipe one of these for yourself. :D

.
Ultraviolet
PS. Since you've edited your post with some new invective, I'll address that as well. @Zechariah 4:06

"No matter what you do, UV, I win."

You're one of life's "winners" aren't you, Jimmy? :D

Winners don't delete comments because they don't need to. Losers do. It's a reflection of their (wait for it) "De Facto" disregard for the truth, their willingness to hide the truth when the truth…More
PS. Since you've edited your post with some new invective, I'll address that as well. @Zechariah 4:06

"No matter what you do, UV, I win."

You're one of life's "winners" aren't you, Jimmy? :D

Winners don't delete comments because they don't need to. Losers do. It's a reflection of their (wait for it) "De Facto" disregard for the truth, their willingness to hide the truth when the truth contradicts their cherished fantasies.

No, you're not a winner, Jimmy. You're a whiner.

"Because I accept the truth of things, and I care for this Church."

You're not part of this Church. You're a schismatic.

You don't accept the truth of things. When "the truth of things" contradicted Anne Barnhardt's claim about Pope Francis' apostolic blessings, you made the truth disappear.

"Go ahead, do what you have to do. Cry like a girl to GTV. Get me banned."

What I -have- to do is correct you. Even here, even now.

I don't cry like a girl to GTV for the same reason I don't block people the way YOU do.

I don't need to. :D I'm perfectly capable of dealing with your simple-minded nonsense entirely on my own and while staying within the legal framework of GTV's posting regulations.

If you get banned, it won't be through my doing. It wasn't the last time, it won't be this time, assuming "this time" occurs the way you seem to expect.

Maybe you're right. Threatening me with a broken jaw might make Don Reto Nay wonder if you really should continue posting here.

He might ask himself if allowing a violent user to remain a member makes GTV legally liable in some fashion for any injuries he causes. A jury might see it that way and that would be a tragedy.

I know on most sites, a user who start making threats of physical violence against other users gets immediately banned. GTV, however, is not most sites. On most sites, banned users get immediately banned again if they rejoin. Again, GTV is not most sites.

Don't bother deleting your comments, I'll just re-post the screen-caps.

You see , I do "accept the truth of things". ;-) ...and having dealt with your self-serving and utterly baseless concept of "truth" before, I'm expecting a repeat.

"Take a drag of your pineapple vape and luxuriate in the delight of the narcissist."

I don't vape. Another fabrication. I have no idea where you got that wacky notion.

"You will get yours sooner or later. And you know it. Deep down."

At your hands, presumably? Well! That's three threats in one night, isn't it? One overt threat in the post, a second overt threat in a "chat" and now a strongly implied threat in your edit.

...all of which means I have reasonable cause to expect physical violence at your hands the moment I see you coming towards me.

Noted. Oh, yes. ;-) Noted indeed.
Ultraviolet
"@Ultraviolet I don't need to find you, I already know where you are."

I call BS. This is moar of Big Jimmy's Big Mouth. Easy way for you to prove it. Post my contact info. Give me a good "doxing"...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxing

You know I can dox you. So let's see what you've got.

"And I don't sit around either."

You're sitting around right now, dummy. :D

"But I know damn well you don'…More
"@Ultraviolet I don't need to find you, I already know where you are."

I call BS. This is moar of Big Jimmy's Big Mouth. Easy way for you to prove it. Post my contact info. Give me a good "doxing"...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxing

You know I can dox you. So let's see what you've got.

"And I don't sit around either."

You're sitting around right now, dummy. :D

"But I know damn well you don't do any manual work."

Not for money, no. Thanks be to God.

"Your job is easy af. It has to be."

Given my "work day" is 12-16 hours on average six days a week, your definition of "easy" appears only in Jimmy's Dictionary For Dummies.

"And you project me as a loser who sleeps alone, etc. "

It isn't projection to derive a conclusion from your statements in your post. A post you deleted. A pity I didn't screen-cap that one as well. In truth, it was so dismal and pathetic, I felt sullied just by reading it. But again, this shows your willingness to hide the truth.

The facts are:

a.) You're not married.
b.) You don't have a girlfriend.
C.) You do post on Catholic-Match which corroborates a.) and b.)

Ergo, as you put it, you sleep alone. I'll let individual readers decide if you fit the definition of "loser". I will say, by many people's standards, an unmarried, under or unemployed 47 year old man with no girlfriend who still lives at home definitely fits the popular perception of the term. ;-)

"No woman would ever want you bc first and foremost you're a terrible human being."

Skip the psychology gimmick, Doctor Jimmy. And puh-leeze don't combine it with some two-bit psychic routine.

If you knew what women want, you wouldn't be sleeping alone or posting on Catholic Match :D

Pic related.
Ultraviolet
"Secone, you are a narcissist. Third, you're a fake Catholic."

"Secone"
... sure sounds like "XBox Live Spelling". Then again, you should know. I'm sure you've spent untold hours on your soft can playing Madden NFL 20 on your XBox.

It's funny that you would lecture me on being a terrible human being.

Look at yourself. You're a man who lies about his own name, his professional credentials, …More
"Secone, you are a narcissist. Third, you're a fake Catholic."

"Secone"
... sure sounds like "XBox Live Spelling". Then again, you should know. I'm sure you've spent untold hours on your soft can playing Madden NFL 20 on your XBox.

It's funny that you would lecture me on being a terrible human being.

Look at yourself. You're a man who lies about his own name, his professional credentials, who deletes his posts constantly whenever they become an embarrassment to the truth.

No more IQ of 160, eh? Fancy that. No more posts about God sending you signs in Clint Eastwood movies, eh? Yes, tell me all about the truth, Jimmy.

If you're what passes for a "real" Catholic then God help the Church. You lie as easily as you breathe, you accept Him in a licit, indulted Post-Vatican II travesty, you insult the Pope and the Curia, you suppress evidence favorable to him, and then you, -you- have the nerve to wag your finger at someone who runs rings around you on Canon Law, the Catechism and Theology, saying "fake Catholic".

Cool story... Moar of Mr. Mouth doing what Mr. Mouth always does.

"No doubt you were doing something indoors and safe from the real world."

The real word isn't simply manual labour anymore, Jimmy. You tried for something better than throwing hay and cutting grass. An English degree should have given you a nice cushy indoor job as an academic. You blew it as you've blown everything else.

"With my bad back and overweight I can still outwork you."

Good for you, bunky. Obviously you can't outwork much less keep up with other manual labourers your own age, otherwise you'd have a land-scaper's job or some such.

"With my brains I outhink you."

:D :D :D ...and delete every comment when that doesn't happen.

"But soon enough I'll find out,"

...let's hope you don't. ;-) As I've told you before, dear heart, I'm not known for my charity or my forgiving nature.

"You've been getting away with attacks on me for so long, the reckoning will be swift and terrible."

So this is what? Four threats, now?

You're etablishing a pattern of intent, that you weren't just speaking out of anger on one occasion. Instead, you're displaying deliberate t motive for a violent, criminal act.

Noted. Screen-capped. Don't want these "disappearing" in a day or so. Nope, nope, nope. ;-)
Arthur McGowan
Notice how, with bishops, the issue is always that abortion is a sin, not whether voting against limitations on abortion is a sin, or whether voting for funding abortions is a sin, or whether taking campaign contibutions from abortionists is a sin.
mccallansteve
I guess the cardinal would give communion to an unrepentant abortionist as long as he was Catholic
Arthur McGowan
One would hope that Mueller knows that an abortionist actually does incur excommunication. Despite what many laity think, a pro-abortion politician does not.
Tesa
“Devout Catholic” Biden is praised for his religious faith. “Devout Catholic” Amy Coney Barrett is condemned for hers. How can it be that people of the same faith receive two very different judgments? Could it be because one is not really a “Devout Catholic”?
Arthur McGowan
I won't be upset if Barrett is put on the Court. She's better than the best Democrat. But she is a MOTTRAMIST. She accepts Bergoglio's death penalty heresy. Apparently, however, she does not believe herself bound to rule against it, or to recuse herself.