Clicks500
Francesco I
3

The church of Sodom: Francis & his Argentine transsexual 'girls'

This is not the first time that Francis has praised the work of Argentine Carmelite nun Monica Astorga Cremona, who supports and assists homosexual men who have had surgeries to appear like women, above. TIA covered this issue in 2017, here.
The primary goal of these male prostitutes in undergoing such surgeries is to steal the "clientele" of female prostitutes. So, in addition to being a double crime against nature – to be homosexuals and to mutilate themselves to look like women – this infamous commerce is also fraudulent, since it fools the "clients" who are looking for actual women. So, we have infamy multiplied by infamy.
Sister Monica claims that she is rescuing these degenerate men – the so-called trans-women – from prostitution and they benefit from her good work. But this is not true. The whole work of Monica is to support Vidas Escondidas (Hidden Lives) – an NGO that calls itself Catholic and guides transgender persons. Now, in a press statement, trans-woman Lujan Acuna, president of that NGO, stresses that its members can return to the practice of prostitution at will.

Indeed, he affirmed: “For us most of the time there is no other way out than prostitution. From here [in the NGO Vidas Escondidas] we have other possibilities. If the comrades want to prostitute themselves, they should do it, but let it be an option, not the only way out." (here)

This is the background, then, for the "charitable" work of Sr. Monica in Neuquen, which has the full support of the Diocese.
Recently this Carmelite nun made the headlines when, on August 14, 2020, she inaugurated the "Tutorial Social Condominium for Trans Women" in Patagonia, Argentina, below, three first rows. This is "the only place in the world where the trans women have a home," Sr. Monica told the press, praising her own initiative. The project was funded by tax-payer money given by the government...
After the inauguration of the "Trans Home," Monica received a letter from Francis, who confirmed his moral benevolence for homosexuality (here and here), transsexuality (here and here) and male prostitutes. He wrote: “Dear Monica, God who did not go to the seminary or study theology will repay you abundantly. I pray for you and your girls.”

But there is more. Sr. Monica Astorga is also an advocate of transgenderism for children, seventh row below. In this case of such blatant child abuse, we wonder whether Francis is also supporting her point-of-view or has some restrictions regarding it. It would be good if he would clarify his position.

From the fourth row down we limited ourselves to posting as records notices of Monica's work. English translations are under the Spanish texts – we do not make any commentary.
In the two last rows, we see Francis in St. Peter's Square favorably receiving a book about the work of Sr. Monica in the city of Neuquen.

Romina was born in Rawson and, when he was an adolescent, he decided to leave his live in San Juan to find a better road, a path of acceptance of his sexual condition by society

Monica Astorga: "I fight for them because they are very valuable persons" - Restless and lonesome. Fourteen years ago she started to help one transvestite leave prostitution. She promotes contention and a working life for the trans-women of Neuquen

The Path of Special Projects - Twenty years ago they formed an association; 10 years ago a cloistered nun learned about their work and decided to support them in the day-to-day work. The NGO works in an office by the Diocese. They plan their micro-enterprise with the support of the State.

Childhood trans without violence or discrimination - Join us!

"Yes, I know Monica," said Francis when he received the book

______________________________________________
traditioninaction.org
Ultraviolet
@philosopher When you're done reading, ask Jimmy why he's too chicken to let you comment on his post. Then read my refutation here. I'll give even money he "undisables" the comments after I shame him into it and still blocks me. It's what cowards do, in spite of all his talk about "manly hands" grandiose weight-lifiting claims, or supposed willingess to "backhand" people.
philosopher
@Ultraviolet Awesome refutation! I hereby decare thee recipient of the Canon lawyer of the year Award.

Nowhere have you ever came off as anything other than an orthodox Catholic. Pardon the seemingly juvenile analogy but according to your interloculor's illogic, if one's father was a Judas -traitor to the family's honor, a liar and a promulgator of bad ideology that means they are no longer …More
@Ultraviolet Awesome refutation! I hereby decare thee recipient of the Canon lawyer of the year Award.

Nowhere have you ever came off as anything other than an orthodox Catholic. Pardon the seemingly juvenile analogy but according to your interloculor's illogic, if one's father was a Judas -traitor to the family's honor, a liar and a promulgator of bad ideology that means they are no longer their father but subjectively they now declare their real biological father to be their step-dad (no offence to all the great step dads out there). But the fact remains a bad dad is still one's dad.

However, I'm done. Debating Jimmy is like arguing with geo-centrists, flat-earthers, scientologists and Mormons, lol.
Ultraviolet
In truth, my conscience compels me to admit there -are- genuine accredited Cnaon Lawyers and I'm not in their league @philosopher. Given the material I was refuting, in the kingdom of the blind, even a one-eyed man is king. '-)
Ultraviolet
New user-name, same old "Jimmies", @Yecch...2:19 (B.S.) artificial as ever. Canon Law 332.2 requires only two points for a valid Papal resignation.

§2. If it happens that the Roman Pontiff resigns his office, it is required for validity that the resignation is made freely and properly manifested but not that it is accepted by anyone.

Freely and properly manifested. That's it. Benedict has …More
New user-name, same old "Jimmies", @Yecch...2:19 (B.S.) artificial as ever. Canon Law 332.2 requires only two points for a valid Papal resignation.

§2. If it happens that the Roman Pontiff resigns his office, it is required for validity that the resignation is made freely and properly manifested but not that it is accepted by anyone.

Freely and properly manifested. That's it. Benedict has said he did so freely and he's "properly manifested" it endlessly. Benedict himself contradicts you.

"or might disturb some who believe what a pope says doesn't matter"

So you agree that what Benedict says matters, yes? Good.

"I no longer bear the power of office for the governance of the Church" -last General Audience of Benedict XVI before his resignation took effect.

"Francis has a strong presence. Much stronger that I could ever have with my physical and mental weaknesses," he observed. "To remain in my office would not have been honest."

Benedict a.) explicitly used the term "office" in reference to the Papacy and his renunciation OF that office. Twice. Before the fact and afterwards. It shows a line of conistency in Benedict's statements. He knows the Papacy is an "office", he referred to it as such, and he renounced it.

Mister Mouth, Mister Mouth,... :P
One more comment from Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet
Jimmy's changed his name again. But the lies Mr. Mouth tells remain constant.The "jimmies" don't change. RE "antipope" From wiki and quoting the Encyclopedia Britannica.

"An antipope is a person who, in opposition to the lawful pope, makes a significant attempt to occupy the position of Bishop of Rome and leader of the Catholic Church."

There must be a pope for an anti-pope to challenge.

A …More
Jimmy's changed his name again. But the lies Mr. Mouth tells remain constant.The "jimmies" don't change. RE "antipope" From wiki and quoting the Encyclopedia Britannica.

"An antipope is a person who, in opposition to the lawful pope, makes a significant attempt to occupy the position of Bishop of Rome and leader of the Catholic Church."

There must be a pope for an anti-pope to challenge.

A pope who resigns is no longer pope. Further, there has to be opposition from that "lawful pope".

In this case, Benedict is not the lawful pope and he fully acknowledges the validity of his successor.

"I'm grateful to be bound by a great identity of views and a heartfelt friendship with Pope Francis. Today, I see my last and final job to support his pontificate with prayer."

catholicnewsagency.com/…ms-validity-of-his-resignation

That's a direct quote from Benedict.

Benedict calls him "Pope Francis" by name and promised "to support his pontificate with prayer."

Also "When Francis came up to him to greet and embrace him at the start and end of the ceremony (a Consisatory on 22 February 2014), Benedict removed his zucchetto as a sign of respect and also to show that there is only one reigning Pope."
catholicworldreport.com/…he-validity-of-my-resignation/

Off you go, Mr. Mouth!
Fischl
wer zuletzt lacht...