FISCHELLA AND SPADERO CHOOSE THE FALSE PREMISE AND INFERENCE TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II : NO DENIAL FROM PAULO RUFFINI
06.12.2025All the books of Archbishop Rino Fisichella and Fr. Antonio Spadero sj, are written with a false premise and inference, with Cushingism. They agree with me. There is no denial from journalist Paolo Ruffini.
It would mean that they interpret the Nicene. Apostles and Athanasius Creed also with the false premise and inference; with irrational and schismatic Cushingism.
Changing the interpretation of the Creeds is first class heresy according to Ad Tuendam Fidem, the Moto Proprio, Apostolic Letter of Pope John Paul II (1998).
For me, the Athanasius Creed has no exceptions but for Fisichella and Spadero there are exceptions. There were exceptions for the liberal theologians Rahner, Ratzinger, Balthazar and also for the traditionalists Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Michael Davies, Dietrich von Hildebrand, Plinio Correa de Oliveira, Romano Amerio, Attila Guimares, Fr. Nicholas Gruner, Christopher Ferrara and John Vennari and Roberto dei Mattei.
May be even Fr. Leonard Feeney, Catherine Goddard Clarke and Brother Francis Maluf micm. were interpreting Vatican Council II with the irrational premise and inference and so the conclusion was nontraditional.
He is not allowed to change the understanding of the Creeds. For me, the baptism of desire is invisible and so is not an explicit example of salvation outside the Catholic Church. It is not an objective exception for the Athanasius Creed, which I affirm in the original.
This was how Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston affirmed the Athanasius Creed, which is ecclesiocentric, when his excommunication was lifted.
Archbishop Fisichella and Fr. Spadero sj must recant. They could do so simply by announcing that LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical and invisible cases in 2025-2026.It will be understood that there are no exceptions for the Athanasius Creed and the dogma EENS of the Council of Florence 1442.
This is not my understanding of the Nicene Creed and it is not the original understanding of the Baptism of desire and the Nicene Creed.
For them, in the Apostles Creed, ‘the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church’, teaches that outside the Catholic Church there is salvation; known salvation in the present times. So the Church contradicts the Magisterium of the 16th century today. For me there is no conflict with the Magisterium of the 16th century.
Their understanding of the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms is heretical and schismatic with LG 14 and LG 16 being ‘visible’.This is a public denial of the Catholic Faith.
My channel on ‘X’, I observe, is being followed by journalists Hannah Brockhaus and Courtney Mares. It is also being followed by the Masons and the enemies of the Church.
They know that there is no denial from Archbishop Rino Fisichella, Fr. Antonio Spadero and lay journalist Paulo Ruffini.-Lionel Andrades
04.12.2025
POPE PIUS X WAS FEENEYITE ON THE CREEDS BUT POPE LEO IS CUSHINGITE.
POPE PIUS X WAS FEENEYITE ON THE CREEDS BUT POPE …
03.12.2025 Feast of St. Francis Xavier
ARCHBISHOP RINO FISICHELLA AGREES THAT VATICAN COUNCIL II IS ECCLESIOCENTRIC AND TRADTIONAL AND NOT LIBERAL : NO DENIAL
ARCHBISHOP RINO FISICHELLA AGREES THAT VATICAN …
3 Dec,2025
FISICHELLA AND SPADERO ARE ALIGNED WITH ST. FRANCIS XAVIER WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL
FISICHELLA AND SPADERO ARE ALIGNED WITH ST. …
1 Dec,2025
There is no denial from Archbishop Fisichella. He agrees with me.The Council is ecclesiocentric and traditional and not liberal
There is no denial from Archbishop Fisichella. …
1.12.2025
CUSHINGITE-FEENEYITE DIFFERENCE HAS NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED : FELLAY AND SPADERO MAKE THE SAME ERROR
CUSHINGITE - FEENEYITE DIFFERENCE HAS NOT BEEN …
29.11.2025
ALL THE BOOKS OF ARCHBISHOP SALVATORE RINO FISICHELLA ARE WRITTEN WITH THE FALSE PREMISE
ALL THE BOOKS OF ARCHBISHOP SALVATORE RINO …