Lisi Sterndorfer
13463
"They can’t even get right a basic fact like how old the content of the 1962 Missal actually is. They say “400 years,” when it is easily 800, 1200, or 1600, depending on which layer you are speaking of. And again, this is readily available information."

Unconvincing propaganda against the Latin Mass: The public embarrassment of Cavadini, Healy, and …

Earlier today, Dr. Joseph Shaw posted his brief response…
Dante Alighieri
I believe this is Father Z's comment on the (unspecified by him) series:
A zwischenzug
rhemes1582
Unfortunately: Reason holds no sway with these ideologs that war against the Catholic Faith.
John A Cassani
The CHW article was without the slightest bit of merit. Kwasniewski and Shaw demolish it very well, without even trying. I understand that some theologians aren’t too concerned about liturgical matters, but any that are against tradition are in no way allies of ours.
Wulfram Elendur Magladhur shares this
19
"They can’t even get right a basic fact like how old the content of the 1962 Missal actually is. They say “400 years,” when it is easily 800, 1200, or 1600, depending on which layer you are speaking of. And again, this is readily available information."