"They can’t even get right a basic fact like how old the content of the 1962 Missal actually is. They say “400 years,” when it is easily 800, 1200, or 1600, depending on which layer you are speaking of. And again, this is readily available information."
Unconvincing propaganda against the Latin Mass: The public embarrassment of Cavadini, Healy, and …
Earlier today, Dr. Joseph Shaw posted his brief response…
The CHW article was without the slightest bit of merit. Kwasniewski and Shaw demolish it very well, without even trying. I understand that some theologians aren’t too concerned about liturgical matters, but any that are against tradition are in no way allies of ours.
"They can’t even get right a basic fact like how old the content of the 1962 Missal actually is. They say “400 years,” when it is easily 800, 1200, or 1600, depending on which layer you are speaking of. And again, this is readily available information."
