POPE LEO’S ECCLESIOLOGY WITH THE NEW MISSAL AT THE NOVUS ORDO MASS IS CUSHINGITE AND SCHISMATIC
POPE LEO’S ECCLESIOLOGY WITH THE NEW MISSAL AT THE NOVUS ORDO MASS IS CUSHINGITE AND SCHISMATIC
If the pope used the Roman Missal at the Novus Ordo Mass his ecclesiology would be Feeneyite and non schismatic.
The New Missal cannot support the exclusivist ecclesiology of the past since it is based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally, with exceptions for the Creeds, EENS etc.
It must be replaced by the Roman Missal which is Feeneyite, orthodox and aligned with Vatican Council II and the Catechism of Pope John Paul II, interpreted rationally i.e. LG 16 is an invisible case in 2025 and so does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which is in harmony with the dogma EENS and all the Catechisms interpreted rationally.
So every rite and liturgy must be Feeneyite and not Cushingite. They must be traditional in their theology and not heretical and schismatic, as at present.
Liberalism, created with the false premise ( invisible people are visible in 2025) and false inference ( invisible cases of LG 16 are visible examples of salvation outside the Church and so explicit exceptions for the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed etc), produces a non traditional conclusion which is schismatic ( Vatican Council II is a rupture with the dogma EENS. The Council has explicit exceptions for the Athanasius Creed.).This is schism with the Church Fathers and the popes of the Middle Ages on EENS, the Creeds, etc. It is first class heresy, with reference to the Creeds.
For instance, the Minim Fathers of St. Francis of Paula, at the basilica of Sant Andrea delle Fratte, Rome, affirm the Bible, Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. They can interpret them only rationally and so the conclusion is ecclesiocentric and traditional. They are aligned with the ecclesiology of Alphonse Ratisbonne and Catherine Laboure. So even though the priest offers Holy Mass in Italian , for him, the Novus Ordo Mass with the new missal will be Feeneyite, this is even though the New Missal is Cushingite.
So the Curia General and Superiors of the Minims have to be orthodox and not liberal since Vatican Council II is Feeneyite and orthodox. They only have the rational option which is the honest option, in the interpretation of Vatican Council II etc. This is magisterial and apostolic even if the pope is a Cushingite on this issue. The Council and Catechism are magisterial and apostolic.
In the same way when the SSPX priests offer the Latin Mass at Albano, Italy, they can only be Feeneyite on Vatican Council II. The Council can only be interpreted rationally i.e. LG 16 is an invisible case in 2025-2026. So their theology is the same as that of the Minim Fathers at Holy Mass in Italian at the Marian shrine, Sant Andrea delle Fratte, in central Rome. We have unity in doctrine at the Novus Ordo and Latin Mass since Vatican Council II is no more liberal. Every liturgy and rite has to be Feeneyite to avoid being schismatic.
So LG 16 is invisible for me in 2025 but visible for Pope Leo. LG 16 is an explicit exception for the dogma EENS for Pope Leo but it is not an explicit exception for EENS, for me. LG 16 is always implicit for me. So Pope Leo interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism, while the Council is Feeneyite for me.
The Council is in harmony with the Church Fathers on EENS, the Athanasius Creed etc, for me, but not for Pope Leo. He is in schism. Cushingism creates schism, irrespective of who uses it at the Latin or Novus Ordo Mass. - Lionel Andrades
December 6, 2025
Popes Benedict, Francis and Leo have interpreted Vatican Council II with an irrational premise and inference and a nontraditional conclusion : so also Fischella and Spadaro
Popes Benedict, Francis and Leo have interpreted …