ALL abortion-tainted vaccines are evil, immoral and not of God Who is the Creator and the Author of Life...
Servant Of Divine Mercy

Let’s get a few things cleared up: Testing, cell lines, and fetal tissue

LifeSiteNews has been permanently banned on YouTube. Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library. May 14, 2021 (Childr…
Ultraviolet
Yes, @Louis IX we are. However consideration does not presuppose automatic adherence and Pope Francis was not speaking infallibly. Lastly, this is not a subject of Catholic doctrine. I give much serious consideration to Pope Francis' comments (usually resulting in disappointment and dismay).
Louis IX
Agree, yet does not the Pope have the authority to bind and loose? If he and the CDF say it is licit, it cannot then be a mortal sin to get the shot, correct?
Servant Of Divine Mercy
It is a mortal sin once you know the vaccines are abortion-tained. You are an accessory to abortion and Woe to those who receive this. The Catechism of the Catholic Church says ( I paraphrase) a mortal sin needs to have all 3 together: full knowledge; full consent of the will; and it has to be serious. If knowing what babies have gone through torture then death to be in a vaccine then I don't …More
It is a mortal sin once you know the vaccines are abortion-tained. You are an accessory to abortion and Woe to those who receive this. The Catechism of the Catholic Church says ( I paraphrase) a mortal sin needs to have all 3 together: full knowledge; full consent of the will; and it has to be serious. If knowing what babies have gone through torture then death to be in a vaccine then I don't know what the word serious means. When the buying stops so does the selling. When not taking vaccines then they won't do this to babies created in the image of God. I wouldn't want to be in anyone's shoes on Judgment day if they know all this this then go ahead with the jab shots. Watch the videos I posted on what bishop Schneider says that we can not take any abortion-tained vaccines.
Ultraviolet
Yes, he does. @Louis IX As do all priests... the authority to bind and loose sins. First, a sin must be committed. ;-)

"If he and the CDF say it is licit, it cannot then be a mortal sin to get the shot, correct?"

First, unless you have a direct quote and a hotlinked citation to the contrary, a few corrections are in order. The Pope and the CDF did not say all abortion-tainted vaccines orMore
Yes, he does. @Louis IX As do all priests... the authority to bind and loose sins. First, a sin must be committed. ;-)

"If he and the CDF say it is licit, it cannot then be a mortal sin to get the shot, correct?"

First, unless you have a direct quote and a hotlinked citation to the contrary, a few corrections are in order. The Pope and the CDF did not say all abortion-tainted vaccines or their administration were licit, ipso facto.The Pope and CDF gave their consent to only a very specific range of vaccines which we will now discuss..

Specifically The CDF stated (which was approved by The Pope) , "all vaccinations recognized as clinically safe and effective can be used in good conscience with the certain knowledge that the use of such vaccines does not constitute formal cooperation with the abortion from which the cells used in production of the vaccines derive."

I call your attention to the clause, "all vaccinations recognzied as clinically safe and effective..." Recognized? Recognized by whom? Does recognition by a vaccine's own manufacturer count? :D In fact, these vaccines are NOT "recognized as clinically safe and effective...". Many reputable scientists are claiming just the opposite, nor are they alone. Several countries in Europe have suspended vaccination in part or entirely in light of the staggering number of deaths and disabilities that keep occurring directly after administration.

So this isn't simply a few "anti-vaccine" naysayers refusing to accept the consensus of the scientific community. The community itself is divided so these vaccines clearly are not recognized as clinically safe and effective.

Therefore the Pope and the CDD have, intentionally or otherwise, included a safety standard to be met in order to qualify as, "morally acceptable".

Since these vaccines clearly do not meet that standard of safety stipulated by the CDF and the Pope, (as evidenced by the EU nations cancelling the "vaccine rollout,") then consequently their usage is not "morally acceptable".

The Pope and the CDF underscored this distinction when they stated, "the morally licit use of these types of vaccines, in the particular conditions that make it so, does not in itself constitute a legitimation, even indirect, of the practice of abortion."

Again, I call your attention to the phrase, "of these types of vaccines", namely the ones they've defined, i.e. "all vaccinations recognized as clinically safe and effective" which undoubtedly does not include the vile concoction you might be considering getting. I'm certain the rot you would get has already killed or crippled more than its share of people. So while it may also be derived from abortion-tainted tissue, it is not one "of these types of vaccines" the Pope and the CDF did allow.

That may or may not have been either the Pope or CDF's intent, but glossing Pontius Pilate, they have written what they have written. As loyal Catholic and legalist, I defer to their judgement and hold them to their officially published decision.. ;-)

Third, while it's true, Pope Francis has indeed repeated his view that everyone should be vaccinated, his views are not automatically those of The Church. He does not speak infallibly every time he opens his mouth, something for which we should all be grateful. :D

A Pope, this one especially, can err most sersiously, even on basic facts when forming (much less voicing) his opinion.

For example, he says, "I believe that morally everyone must take the vaccine,"

"The" vaccine? There are more than one, something he just tacitly admitted to not knowing. Or this gem...

"I do not understand why some say that this could be a dangerous vaccine," said Francis. "If the doctors are presenting this to you as a thing that will go well and doesn't have any special dangers, why not take it?"

By his own admission, the Pope does not understand why some say getting vaccinated is dangerous, even when numerous European countries already do understand. Why not take it? Because not all "the doctors" are presenting this "as a thing that will go well." Many of them are bitterly saying just the opposite. and several countries are realizing, after thousands of dead and maimed, those doctors are correct. There are risks the Pope simply doesn't understand and, in his humility, he admits his ignorance. The Pope's own opinion, in this case, is based on repeated and demonstrable ignorance.

In sum, what all of this means is

a.) The Pope and the CDF have set a safety standard for the "morally acceptable" use of vaccines derived from abortion-tainted tissue.

b.) The current abortion-tainted vaccines do not meet that safety standard set forth in a.).

c.) Thus, receiving an abortion tainted vaccine that does not meet the aforementioned safety standards indeed very likely is a mortal sin for the reasons @Servant Of Divine Mercy paraphrased from The Catechism in paragraph 1857
Servant Of Divine Mercy
This link below from LifeSiteNews.com may enlighten more but if God says ( I think it was in Proverbs something like there is 6 or 7 things that are an abomination to God and one is the shedding of innocent blood then I can not see how it would not be a mortal sin even in an indirect way as its still an accessory. Also, God will always provide a way out of an evil situation and he does with …More
This link below from LifeSiteNews.com may enlighten more but if God says ( I think it was in Proverbs something like there is 6 or 7 things that are an abomination to God and one is the shedding of innocent blood then I can not see how it would not be a mortal sin even in an indirect way as its still an accessory. Also, God will always provide a way out of an evil situation and he does with other treatments for COVID (all those many posts I've posted such as ivermectin, etc); also the Papacy to my understanding is not the pope alone so when making decisions the bishops such as Bishops Schneider, Strickland and Vigano and im sure there's more, are opposed to abortion-tainted vaccines to the point where bishop Schneider says we need to be Martyrs. We must be in full communion with Pope Francis however he has been careless in his words and judgment inviting some of the New World Order for the Vatican health conference and it took him i think a few months to say he didn't approve of homesexual blessings which gay people thought that guy blessins were approved. The holy scriptures say (I paraphrase) the blind lead the blind and both fall into the pit. Also, how can Pope Francis say there vaccines when numerous doctors and scientists say they are a gene therapy, and experimental, with serious adverse effects andvwith deadly consequences. Remember you are the temple of the Holy Spirit and we can not abuse our bodies with drugs, drunkenness, impurity, nor w.ith venomous vaccines that are abortion-tained. God bless your decisions.
Servant Of Divine Mercy
Louis IX
Thank you both for your thorough replies. I must say many people are being coerced or manipulated into taking these shots, so in these cases I can see how the question of full consent of the will comes into play.
Ultraviolet
Scripture, notably the book of Revelations, shows that consider coercion isn't an extenuating circumstance for compliance with evil. Don't take it, @Louis IX It would be bad enough if some fiend created a vaccine/ cure for cancer using murdered infants abortion that was perfectly safe. But this stuff? Not only is it made in an evil manner, it doesn't even do what it supposedly should, and to …More
Scripture, notably the book of Revelations, shows that consider coercion isn't an extenuating circumstance for compliance with evil. Don't take it, @Louis IX It would be bad enough if some fiend created a vaccine/ cure for cancer using murdered infants abortion that was perfectly safe. But this stuff? Not only is it made in an evil manner, it doesn't even do what it supposedly should, and to top everything else off, it has a nasty habit of killing, blinding, and crippling people as well. Truly evil from evil.
Louis IX
How does this square with the Pope encouraging people to get the shots? If it’s a moral question aren’t we obliged to consider very seriously the statement of the reigning pontiff? Honest question.