Clicks1.3K

Bavarian Farmhouse Theology

Picture: © gloria.tv, CC BY-ND, #newsDssiiurara
Ultraviolet
Go start your own post for an interview with Pope Francis. Quit trying to hijack another post for your own site-shilling content @KristianKeller
KristianKeller
Speaking of interviews, here is one that many probably missed: Antipope Francis' Bombshell Interview
Holy Cannoli
Yet another jerk chimes in.
KristianKeller
You are really a foolish person to judge me based on exposing truth about heresies of Francis.
What an arrogant fool you are.
Holy Cannoli
Most Holy Family Monastery is a sedevacantist organization run by Michael Dimond. Due to its publication of a pamphlet entitled "101 Heresies of Anti-Pope John Paul II" it was declared "a dissident organization that challenges the papal authority" by The Catholic League in January, 1999. The group has also been condemned by the Catholic diocese of Lincoln, Nebraska.

www.youtube.com/watch

More
Most Holy Family Monastery is a sedevacantist organization run by Michael Dimond. Due to its publication of a pamphlet entitled "101 Heresies of Anti-Pope John Paul II" it was declared "a dissident organization that challenges the papal authority" by The Catholic League in January, 1999. The group has also been condemned by the Catholic diocese of Lincoln, Nebraska.

www.youtube.com/watch

forums.catholic.com/…/883

buffalonews.com/…/monastery-accus…

www.la-foi.fr/…/I_Quit_MHFM_201…

www.churchmilitant.com/…/faq-sedevacanti…
Holy Cannoli
I'm waiting for you Christina. Post some more of your sedevacantist (read: heretical) website.
2 more comments from Holy Cannoli
Holy Cannoli
Who are the Dimond Brothers?

Most Holy Family Monastery is a radical sedevacantist Catholic sect currently run by brothers Frederick Dimond (pseudonym "Brother Michael Dimond, O.S.B.") and Robert Dimond (pseudonym “Brother Peter Dimond, O.S.B.") in Filmore, New York.Nov 22, 2019
Holy Cannoli
Punks.
Caroline03
@Holy Cannoli "declared "a dissident organization that challenges the papal authority" by The Catholic League in January, 1999. The group has also been condemned by the Catholic diocese of Lincoln, Nebraska."

.... Yet, by some miraculous intercessory power of God, the Traditional Monks of a Sedevacantist Benedictine Order were pronounced innocent of all charges made against them by the …More
@Holy Cannoli "declared "a dissident organization that challenges the papal authority" by The Catholic League in January, 1999. The group has also been condemned by the Catholic diocese of Lincoln, Nebraska."

.... Yet, by some miraculous intercessory power of God, the Traditional Monks of a Sedevacantist Benedictine Order were pronounced innocent of all charges made against them by the American County Court on the Feast Day of St Benedict March 21st ....

www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/DOC008.pdf

www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/…/amazing-final-j…

By the way here is the case -
casetext.com/case/hoyle-v-dimond-5

Why did you draw hair on this Monk? - I'm completely appalled at the hatred, venom and hostility that some fellow Catholics spout when faced with people who have a clear
contempt for Modernism. Be on your guard.
Accept the date on that document issued by the American Courts as the final word.

Peace be in your heart and soul . Whether you agree with people or not - defacing their photographs, making false accusations and creating scandal sounds mean. Don't do it.
Holy Cannoli
You’re positively right, Caroline. How could anyone sully the image of a phony monk, charlatan and pretend Catholic who is working his scam for the money with the hope and expectation that there are enough stupid catholics (hint-hint) who will finance their game? It’s actually a great money making scheme they’ve got going. Prey on disaffected, weak catholic dupes who don’t like the pope, who don’…More
You’re positively right, Caroline. How could anyone sully the image of a phony monk, charlatan and pretend Catholic who is working his scam for the money with the hope and expectation that there are enough stupid catholics (hint-hint) who will finance their game? It’s actually a great money making scheme they’ve got going. Prey on disaffected, weak catholic dupes who don’t like the pope, who don’t like the N.O., who don’t like ecumenism and, most importantly, hate the Jews.

How much have you sent them, Caroline? I hope it was a lot so that eventually it will hurt. Perhaps then you will come to find that the old saying is true. “A fool and their money are soon parted.” 🤪
Holy Cannoli
Whether you agree with people or not - defacing their photographs, making false accusations and creating scandal sounds mean. Don't do it.

Whatever you say, Sweetie. 😊
mystic
Can't stop laughing.
Eva
Benedict kept "the spiritual dimension" of the papacy
Ultraviolet
Technically, Lifesite news misquoted Benedict. He was careful to separate himself -from- the papacy and not to bifurcate it. ;-)

He sees his "spiritual mandate" as something from God and it remains separate from the office of the Papacy itself. Since Canon Law defines the Papacy in terms of office, the "munus" Benedict's supporters endlessly brought up, this should have been the last word.…More
Technically, Lifesite news misquoted Benedict. He was careful to separate himself -from- the papacy and not to bifurcate it. ;-)

He sees his "spiritual mandate" as something from God and it remains separate from the office of the Papacy itself. Since Canon Law defines the Papacy in terms of office, the "munus" Benedict's supporters endlessly brought up, this should have been the last word.

As Monsignor Bux's prevarications in the article prove (and the author notes), "As becomes clear here, the scholarly discussion concerning Pope Benedict's concept of his resignation is not yet closed."

Nor will it be, ever. I've said as much any number of times. The only resignation Benedict's supporters will ever accept is the one he didn't give. No matter what else the man says, no matter how many times he repeats he resigned the Papacy, they will always pick at his words trying to show how he supposedly didn't "truly" fulfill "all" the requirements. Or, in the Monsignor's case, how Benedict is allegedly still retaining "some" element of Papal power.

There's some comedy in LifeSite News "reaching out" to a Monsignor to argue against a Pope's renunciation of power-while trying to argue that he somehow retains it -even against his own repeatedly statements to the contrary.

So Benedict XVI must be obeyed because he is Pope, right up until he says he resigns. Then he must be contradicted by the laity and various former subordinates year after year -all trying to force him to resume the very authority they already refuse to accept in the first place.

These people see themselves as "kingmakers", where they decide when the Pope speaks authoritatively on his own status and when he doesn't. Respect for the "office", much less for the man who once held it, plays no part in their decisions.

They've turned Benedict into exactly the sort of puppet-figure they routinely accuse Francis of doing, even to the extent of puttting words in the man's mouth with a misleading article title.

This is, what? The third or fourth time Benedict said he resigned? And it's still not good enough for them.
Rafał_Ovile
Ultraviolet I have admonished you publically numerous times for being uneducated on the subject of papal crisis and thereby formulating wrong assertions and contradictions to pope Benedict's XVI decision. In fact you are so overwhelmed by pride that you put your own false ideas into his mouth. This all being for the reason of you not willing to understand the purpose of dialogue/debate, …More
Ultraviolet I have admonished you publically numerous times for being uneducated on the subject of papal crisis and thereby formulating wrong assertions and contradictions to pope Benedict's XVI decision. In fact you are so overwhelmed by pride that you put your own false ideas into his mouth. This all being for the reason of you not willing to understand the purpose of dialogue/debate, disregarding scientific method of the process, unwilling to educate yourself (misunderstanding the nature of Petrine Office) and obvious inability to use Catholic philosophy to analyse and truly reason the extra ordinary situation which God permitted to occur. Finally, you are doing a great disservice to youself and others by devaluating the Vicar of Christ - earthly monarch - pope Benedict XVI and leading others astray...
Rafał_Ovile
Eva yes, and pp BXVI discerned with God the strategy, as a way out in the extra ordinary situation of massive rejection and disobedience manifested against him inside and outside the Church, and clearly confirmed by himself , Abp. Ganswein and many others thereby remaining the Vicar of Christ.
Ultraviolet
All you ever do is "admonish" me "for being uneducated". Rafał_Ordure

But I'm always the one correcting you! :D I correct you and I supply factual support. YOU never do that. EVER.

All you do is make empty claims with ZERO proof supporting them. Like this one:

"In fact you are so overwhelmed by pride that you put your own false ideas into his mouth."

Prove it.

Show where I have done …More
All you ever do is "admonish" me "for being uneducated". Rafał_Ordure

But I'm always the one correcting you! :D I correct you and I supply factual support. YOU never do that. EVER.

All you do is make empty claims with ZERO proof supporting them. Like this one:

"In fact you are so overwhelmed by pride that you put your own false ideas into his mouth."

Prove it.

Show where I have done so. Quote me, quote Benedict. Show where the statements contradict each other. You can't and you won't.

Your entire debating "strategy" is to make empty claims without a shred of support. Like this one:

"you not willing to understand the purpose of dialogue/debate"

In a debate, a person supports their claims. YOU never do. I understand that perfectly.

"disregarding scientific method of the process"

See my last comment.

"misunderstanding the nature of Petrine Office"

Again, you never show any evidence of this. You would have to quote me and then show, using Canon Law, that my understanding of the nature of the Papacy is incorrect

That would require correcting me with facts that you simply do not have and are too stupid to find, even if they hypothetically existed.

"and truly reason the extra ordinary situation"

"Extraordinary" is one word not two, you moron. See Rafal? This is the basics of a debate. I just corrected an error you made, and I supplied factual support for the correction.

You never do that when you "admonish" or tell me to "learn" things because you don't know what you're talking about.

The Vicar of Christ is no longer Benedict XVI. He resigned. I've quoted him enough times by now you're just being deliberately stupid and ignoring the very man you pretend is 'pope'.
Rafał_Ovile
Ultrastooge since you do not use traditional definitions and do not know purpose of dialogue and debate , through false assertions, therefore being intellectually disable to use citations of pope Benedict XVI with righteous purposes. Again please learn and true all your intellectual best to answer question directed to you already few months ago to which you still did not find an answer. That is …More
Ultrastooge since you do not use traditional definitions and do not know purpose of dialogue and debate , through false assertions, therefore being intellectually disable to use citations of pope Benedict XVI with righteous purposes. Again please learn and true all your intellectual best to answer question directed to you already few months ago to which you still did not find an answer. That is surprisingly long for a person with an elementary school diploma, I reckon. And if you didn.t graduate from elementary school then please correct me if I.m wrong. Have more sleep and spiritual life...
Ultraviolet
"you do not use traditional definitions" -Rafał_Ordure

I linked up the Merriam-Wesbster dictionary for a reason, you idiot.

"and do not know purpose of dialogue and debate"

...which explain why I'm always beating you in these debates.. .

Learn some English, palant. You should write,. "do not know the purpose of dialogue and debate". Idiot.

"therefore being intellectually disable..."

You …More
"you do not use traditional definitions" -Rafał_Ordure

I linked up the Merriam-Wesbster dictionary for a reason, you idiot.

"and do not know purpose of dialogue and debate"

...which explain why I'm always beating you in these debates.. .

Learn some English, palant. You should write,. "do not know the purpose of dialogue and debate". Idiot.

"therefore being intellectually disable..."

You meant "therefore being intellectual unable..." Yes, lecture me some more about what I am "intellectually disable" to do, Rafal. You pathetic buffoon. :D :D

"and true all your intellectual best to answer question"

You menat "try your intellectual best"., not "true". Whenever you start talking about "intellectual" you end up making one mistake after another.

Let's see you link up this question I didn't answer. :D Again, I say this. Prove it.

You made the claim, but you never ever prove it. That is your entire strategy: you refer to statements as if they were proven true but you never support them when someone challenges you.

"That is surprisingly long for a person with an elementary school diploma, I reckon."

Do you now? Then you reckon incorrectly.

"And if you didn.t graduate from elementary school then please correct me if I.m wrong."

I'll do better than that. In elementary school we learned that contractions are formed using the apostrophe and not the period. It's "didn't" and "I'm".

Every time you try a condescending attack on my edcuation, you end up making one elementary mistake after another. :D

Before I forget... A "stooge" is the butt of a comedian's jokes. You're not a comedian and you never tell jokes,

...but you're routinely the butt of my own.