Clicks416

Sept. 15, 2020: Without Corrupt Politics And Communist Takeovers, There’d Be No FrancisChurch

Canon 212
4
**Salvadoran Colonel involved in killing of 5 treasonous Jesuits in 1989, not 89 Jesuits** DONATE TO CANON212: canon212.com/newspages/More
**Salvadoran Colonel involved in killing of 5 treasonous Jesuits in 1989, not 89 Jesuits**
DONATE TO CANON212: canon212.com/newspages/
Saveusfromhell
Hi @JamesMichaelYerian every time @Ultraviolet insults you by changing your name to some derogatory name or uses abusive or insulting posts report her, its disgrasful what she is allowed away with to post here on gloriatv, but seems to have the power to have others banned
Ultraviolet
I see two are getting acquainted. How nice. ;-) "I didn't know UV was a she" @JamesMichaelYerian That makes two of us. :P I've never posted a photo of myself or claimed to be a woman. Or a man. Or a mammal. Or even an organic. Maybe I'm an AI living in a server somewhere! Project 2501 with a sense of humour. :D

"maybe the squeaky wheel gets the grease, I don't know.".

You're right, You More
I see two are getting acquainted. How nice. ;-) "I didn't know UV was a she" @JamesMichaelYerian That makes two of us. :P I've never posted a photo of myself or claimed to be a woman. Or a man. Or a mammal. Or even an organic. Maybe I'm an AI living in a server somewhere! Project 2501 with a sense of humour. :D

"maybe the squeaky wheel gets the grease, I don't know.".

You're right, You don't know. Maybe it's the trouble-makers who get banned, the ones who keep pushing an agenda. That's for GTV's admins and mods to decide. I'm not an admin and I'm not a mod. Well, not yet, anyhow. When I'm on GTV, I'm here for my own entertainment.

So why should I complain when batting you around provides so much amusement? ;-)

It doesn't matter who or what I am. Male or female, mammal or mollusk, Organic or mechanical

...speaking of the latter @Saveusfromhell is a nasty little spam-bot with an axe to grind from way, way back.
Ultraviolet
You lie by calling the truth a lie. You've had an upgrade, @Goebbels-bot.

"you keep repeating the lie that Benedict fully resigned. He didn't."

LOL. Same old claim, from you. same same lack of factual support except your big dumb mouth. Canon Law? No, that's my forte!

Canon Law 332.2 requires only two points for a valid Papal resignation.

2. If it happens that the Roman Pontiff resigns …More
You lie by calling the truth a lie. You've had an upgrade, @Goebbels-bot.

"you keep repeating the lie that Benedict fully resigned. He didn't."

LOL. Same old claim, from you. same same lack of factual support except your big dumb mouth. Canon Law? No, that's my forte!

Canon Law 332.2 requires only two points for a valid Papal resignation.

2. If it happens that the Roman Pontiff resigns his office, it is required for validity that the resignation is made freely and properly manifested but not that it is accepted by anyone.

Freely and properly manifested. That's it. Benedict has said he did so freely and he's "properly manifested" it endlessly. Benedict himself contradicts you.

"The only condition for the validity of my resignation is the complete freedom of my decision. Speculations regarding its validity are simply absurd."

"Let's see how far your brainwashing goes."


...said the liar who's been trying to batter his opinion all over GTV ever since he joined.

"If Francis isn't an antipope, would you at least call him a heretic?"

We've covered this already, Literally last night.

Heresy and error are two different things. A Pope may err, everything a Pope states is not automatically infallible. Heresy, as the Church defines it, is "an obstinate denial or obstinate doubt after the reception of baptism of some truth which is to be believed by divine and Catholic faith; "

Obstinacy shows a deliberate course of action, i.e. "stubbornly adhering to an opinion, purpose, or course in spite of reason, arguments, or persuasion."

In this context, the term shows that
a.) the accused heretic has expressed a view
b.) The Church has disgreed with that view as contrary to its teachings.
c.) The Church has attempted to correct the accused heretic
d.) the accused heretic has opposed that correction by the Church.

Regarding Pope Francis,
a.) has happened.
b.)-d.) have not.

You aren't qualified to represent The Church in doing b.-d., not in law or in fact. Neither is some blogger.

Your opinion that the Pope doubts or denies a truth taught by the Church to be divine is not an objective fact. Likewise, your opinion that his supposed doubt or denial is maintained in an obstinate manner is also an opinion. You haven't shown The Church has attempted to correct it and failed. So your claim has no support -as usual.
Ultraviolet
"Bergolio's own words aren't an objective fact that he's a heretic, kid?"

No, because the interpretation of those words isn't an objective fact. Failed logic, Jimbo.

"When you doubt the basics of your religion and never apologize for them, you're not erring, you're a heretic."

That isn't the definition of heresy according to Canon Law 751. Again, YOU don't speak for the Church, Jimmy.

"And …More
"Bergolio's own words aren't an objective fact that he's a heretic, kid?"

No, because the interpretation of those words isn't an objective fact. Failed logic, Jimbo.

"When you doubt the basics of your religion and never apologize for them, you're not erring, you're a heretic."

That isn't the definition of heresy according to Canon Law 751. Again, YOU don't speak for the Church, Jimmy.

"And in Bergie's case, and antipope because of Benedict's partial, erroneous, resignation."

Same old nutty lies, literally from ten minutes ago. There's something seriously wrong with you.

Copy Pasta....

Canon Law 332.2 requires only two points for a valid Papal resignation.

§2. If it happens that the Roman Pontiff resigns his office, it is required for validity that the resignation is made freely and properly manifested but not that it is accepted by anyone.

Freely and properly manifested. That's it. Benedict has said he did so freely and he's "properly manifested" it endlessly. Benedict himself contradicts you.

"The only condition for the validity of my resignation is the complete freedom of my decision. Speculations regarding its validity are simply absurd."

You've shown no evidence of "partial, erroneous, resignation."... Jimmy's Big Mouth Again. Nothing more. Seriously, this was supposed to be a party-game, not posting-style.
Ultraviolet
"You've defended Bergolio at every chance and for no reason."

:D I don't defend Bergoglio. I recognize his claim to the Papacy. As does Benedict. ;-)

You repeat your lies because that's all you've got.

"If you tell a lie long enough, it becomes the truth." -Joseph Goebbels

"You ascribe him another bad pope, but you don't believe that..."

Followed by a regular appearance of Miss Jimmy the …More
"You've defended Bergolio at every chance and for no reason."

:D I don't defend Bergoglio. I recognize his claim to the Papacy. As does Benedict. ;-)

You repeat your lies because that's all you've got.

"If you tell a lie long enough, it becomes the truth." -Joseph Goebbels

"You ascribe him another bad pope, but you don't believe that..."

Followed by a regular appearance of Miss Jimmy the GTV Psychic.

CALL NOW! :p
One more comment from Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet
"I submit you follow the AntiChurch, not the Catholic Church, and profane Jesus Christ every time you defend it and receive His body and blood."

You "submit" nothing, you fatuous pretentious oaf. :p

The only things you "submit" are your own endlessly repeated falsehoods, errors, and mindless rhetoric.

Appeal to emotion is stil a fallacy, Jimbo.

There is only one Catholic Church and you …More
"I submit you follow the AntiChurch, not the Catholic Church, and profane Jesus Christ every time you defend it and receive His body and blood."

You "submit" nothing, you fatuous pretentious oaf. :p

The only things you "submit" are your own endlessly repeated falsehoods, errors, and mindless rhetoric.

Appeal to emotion is stil a fallacy, Jimbo.

There is only one Catholic Church and you schismatics aren't part of it.

You may "submit" your big dumb mouth as much as you please.

Canon Law and The Church is on my side, not yours.

"Your scheme is evidenced by your curious incuriosity."

Look out world. Sherlock Jimmy is going to start uncovering "schemes". I'll have to cook up some new memes for this. :D

"You have more faith that Bergolio is pope than you do in Jesus Christ."

I have faith in the Laws of the Church. I don't make them up the way you do, Jimmy. That's your "De Facto" programming.

"Maybe you're afraid, maybe you're proud, but you're wrong nevertheless."

Saying something doesn't make it true, Goebbels-Bot. And facts aren't your stongpoint, only your stubborness. :D
Ultraviolet
"except we never had during that time an antipope", @Goebbels-Bot Francis isn't an anti-Pope. You repeat that lie daily. Quick copy-pasta correction.

From wiki and quoting the Encyclopedia Britannica.

"An antipope is a person who, in opposition to the lawful pope, makes a significant attempt to occupy the position of Bishop of Rome and leader of the Catholic Church."

There must be a pope …More
"except we never had during that time an antipope", @Goebbels-Bot Francis isn't an anti-Pope. You repeat that lie daily. Quick copy-pasta correction.

From wiki and quoting the Encyclopedia Britannica.

"An antipope is a person who, in opposition to the lawful pope, makes a significant attempt to occupy the position of Bishop of Rome and leader of the Catholic Church."

There must be a pope for an anti-pope to challenge.

A pope who resigns is no longer pope. In this case, Benedict fully acknowledges the validity of his successor.

"I'm grateful to be bound by a great identity of views and a heartfelt friendship with Pope Francis. Today, I see my last and final job to support his pontificate with prayer."

So you're just repeating your dumb lies hoping theyll stick.

It is not the task of propaganda to present intellectual truths." -Joseph Goebbels

"nor any pope that took bribe money from the Chinese government,"

Since you don't have access to the Vatican's account books, the only evidence you have for your unsupported claim is the unsupported claim of Guo Wengei. Pic related.
One more comment from Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet
Very true. Worth remembering those corrupt politics and communist takeovers predated the "Francis Church" by half a century.