Clicks106
Lionel L. Andrades
3

It was the Archbishop of Boston Cardinal Richard Cushing who was in heresy and not Fr.Leonard Feeney.

It was the Archbishop of Boston Cardinal Richard Cushing who was in heresy and not Fr.Leonard Feeney.
It was the Magisterium of Pope Pius XII and the Jesuits in Boston who were in heresy and not Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center.Once this is discovered and understood it will be seen that the interpretation of Vatican Council II dramtically changed.
For the traditionalists, sedevacantists and the present magisterium today there are visible cases of the baptism of desire and so the baptism of desire is an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).So they criticize Fr. Leonard Feeney and support Pope Pius XII.
Now they realize that invisible for us baptism of desire(BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) cannot be an explicit exception to the dogma EENS. This has been confirmed in public my many responsible Catholics.
So when hypothetical cases are not explicit in 2017 there is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict 'the strict interpretation' of the dogma EENS.
It means there is no change in the old ecclesiology of the Church. There is no theological basis for the new ecumenism.There is no theolological basis for the Anonymous Christian theory of Rahner and Ratzinger.The Catechism of the Catholic Church (846) should not have said all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church as if BOD and I.I were relevant to the dogma EENS and were exceptions.
For Fr.Nicholas Gruner, John Vennari, Chris Ferrara, the late Mons. Ignacio Barreiro, the SSPX bishops and the FSSP priests it was Fr. Leonard Feeney who was in heresy and not Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Jesuits.
The sedevacantists Bishop Sanborn and Pirvanus have also accepted the New Theology based on visible for us baptism of desire being an exception to the dogma EENS as it was known in the 16th century. So their interpretation of Vatican Council II has its foundation on LG 16 etc excluding the baptism of water and being a visible exception to EENS. This is irrational and non traditional. It leads to heresy.
Even the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, the communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the diocese of Worcester and Manchester, USA were following the Lefebvrists and the present magisterium in assuming invisible cases (LG 16) were visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. Though on EENS they were always correct and it was the SSPX which was wrong.
With Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) and EENS ( Feeneyite) there should be no problem any more for the SSPX regarding Vatican Council II.
It is the liberal cardinals and bishops in England, Germany, Australia,USA etc who will want to reject Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) and EENS ( Feeneyite) since it will not be in harmony with the Mason's New World Order Agenda.
-Lionel Andrades
Lionel L. Andrades
JANUARY 17, 2016

Pope Francis and Cardinal Muller interpret the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II with Cushingism : 'the Church' is in manifest heresy

eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/pope-francis-an…

Pope Francis and Cardinal Muller interpret the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II with Cushingism : this is manifest heresy
eucharistandmission.blogs…More
JANUARY 17, 2016

Pope Francis and Cardinal Muller interpret the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II with Cushingism : 'the Church' is in manifest heresy

eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/pope-francis-an…

Pope Francis and Cardinal Muller interpret the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II with Cushingism : this is manifest heresy
eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/pope-francis-an…

JANUARY 15, 2016

For me the clerics in 1949 Rome and Boston were in heresy since there was no baptism of desire case without the baptism of water. There were none known to them and none in past history

eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/for-me-clerics-…

JANUARY 13, 2016

Roberto Mattei accepts this invisible-visible distinction made by the contemporary magisterium. It is not irrational for him.It is not heretical. Since he uses this same reasoning to interpret Vatican Council II

eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/roberto-mattei-…

DECEMBER 11, 2015

No denial from traditionalists : modernism in their liturgy

eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/no-denial-from-…

DECEMBER 9, 2015

Latin Mass Societies' Mass is heretical

eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/latin-mass-soci…

NOVEMBER 16, 2015

eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/sedevacantists-…

FEBRUARY 17, 2015

The mistake from 1949 was placed in Vatican Council II (AG 7,LG 14) and also in the Catechism of the Catholic Church 1257

eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/the-mistake-fro…

JULY 15, 2014

USCCB Secretariate for Divine Worship statement is heresy

eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/usccb-secretari…

JUNE 30, 2014

I accept implicit baptism of desire according to Vatican Council II, Mystici Corporis etc.

eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/i-accept-implic…

JUNE 11, 2014

If ' a ray of the Truth' (NA 2) is considered visible or invisible decides heresy

eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/if-ray-of-truth…
Lionel L. Andrades
SEPTEMBER 26, 2016

Heresy results also when we assume hypothetical cases are personally known in the present times,example the baptism of desire:Bishop Fellay like the Vatican Curia violates the Principle of Non Contradiction
eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/heresy-results-…

SEPTEMBER 25, 2016


Bishop Fellay's understanding and interpretation of Vatican Council II is heretical
eucharistand…More
SEPTEMBER 26, 2016

Heresy results also when we assume hypothetical cases are personally known in the present times,example the baptism of desire:Bishop Fellay like the Vatican Curia violates the Principle of Non Contradiction
eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/heresy-results-…

SEPTEMBER 25, 2016


Bishop Fellay's understanding and interpretation of Vatican Council II is heretical
eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/the-letter-of-h…

SEPTEMBER 24, 2016


CDF/ Ecclesia Dei would have to clarify that Cushingism from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 is heresy and that Feeneyism is Catholic orthodoxy

eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/cdf-ecclesia-de…

JUNE 13, 2016


The doctrinal position of Bishop Bernard Fellay is heretical. He also contradicts the SSPX doctrinal General Chapter Statement 2012 which affirmed EENS with NO exceptions
eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/the-doctrinal-p…

JULY 12, 2016


Anonymous Catholics object to Amoris Laeitia : Pope not in heresy
eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/anonymous-catho…

MARCH 31, 2016


eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/pope-francis-in…eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/pope-francis-in…

JANUARY 18, 2016


Pope Francis and Cardinal Muller interpret the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II with irrationality : manifest heresy
eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/pope-francis-an…
One more comment from Lionel L. Andrades
Lionel L. Andrades
SEPTEMBER 28, 2016

Heresy is caused by directly not accepting a teaching of the Church which it is necessary to accept. However heresy is also caused if you mix up what is defacto as being dejure ( in principle), is you confuse what is hypothetical as being objective.

eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/heresy-is-cause…

JUNE 5, 2017

eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/two-popes-in-he…eucharista…More
SEPTEMBER 28, 2016

Heresy is caused by directly not accepting a teaching of the Church which it is necessary to accept. However heresy is also caused if you mix up what is defacto as being dejure ( in principle), is you confuse what is hypothetical as being objective.

eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/heresy-is-cause…

JUNE 5, 2017

eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/two-popes-in-he…eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/two-popes-in-he…

When Chris Ferrara wrote The Great Facade he did not know Vatican Council II could be interpreted without the irrational premise and the conclusion would be different eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/when-chris-ferr…