@V.R.S. Thank you I used google translate and now I will leave the English version here.

Father Benedykt Jacek Huculak, The Miracle in Sokółka is a response to the insult

The great miracle of the transformation of the consecrated host (consecrata) into a perceptible human body, and more precisely - into a heart muscle that is still alive, suffers a lot and is in an agonal, pre-infarct state [1], this event is not only equal to a miracle in Anxanum (Lanciano), but in some respects even surpasses him. Well, both of them are the Lord Jesus' answers to a certain human condition or step. ……. There, in central Italy on the Adriatic Sea, more than 1,200 years ago, a similar transformation was the Lord's response to the doubts of a hieromónachos, a Greek religious priest, regarding the real presence of the Body of Christ in the bread transformed during the divine Liturgy. A separate miracle was that the Greek lump of leavened bread, after being transformed and transformed into a perceptible body, adopted the outline of the Latin host. In our case, in Saint Podlasie, the miracle was a response to the desecration of the holy host by a local priest. ……. While giving Communion, the Host "without his knowledge" [2], that is due to carelessness, fell to the step of the altar. The woman kneeling next to her noticed this and pointed at her to the priest. What he did? Something completely different from what it should have been. Well, indeed, he lifted the host, but only to immerse it in the water of the small vessels, which, however, next to the tabernacle, are only so that the priest, having given Communion, moistened the tips of his fingers and then wiped them, on the obvious assumption that they had settled on them. pollen from hosts he touched. ....... Let no one dare to repeat the lie that "a host that has fallen to the ground can no longer be given to the faithful for hygienic reasons" [3], if until recently a piece of bread that fell to the ground had to be picked up, kissed, and then eat it. And even if - contrary to reality - it was not to be given to some of the faithful, would it not - even after carefully rubbing it with a mass cloth (purificatorium) - eat it by a priest, who is essentially a servant of the Body and Blood of the Lord: the one to whom He at ordination he entrusted himself completely? Which pope or council said something like that? None, mainly because he couldn't do it; on the contrary - also after the Second Vatican Council, the age-old principle was repeated: ……. "If the transformed host (consecrata) or any part of it fell to the ground, it should be reverently picked up (reverenter accipiatur), and to the place where it fell, pour some water and wipe it with a purificator" [4], that is, the aforementioned mass cloth. …… .The host should be lifted reverently so that it can be eaten, not immersed in water, and also in a vessel to moisten the fingers. This exclusion is as ruthless as the Church's great concern that even the place where the host has fallen be venerably washed and wiped with linen cloth from the chalice. This exclusion, and at the same time the priest's crime, additionally shines in the light of two other Church decrees: ……. "If something poisonous (aliquid venenosum) or causing vomiting falls into the cup [after transubstantiation] or causes vomiting, then the transformed wine (consecratum) should be poured into another cup filled with water so that the forms of wine dissolve, and such water should be poured into the vessel consecrated (in sacrarium). Another wine and water should be poured into the chalice in order to transform it again. …… .If something poisonous touches the transformed host, then let [the priest] transform another and eat it as is said, and let the [poisoned] one put into a cup full of water, as above (no. 36) is said about Blood "[5 ]. ....... It is not without significance that in both cases it is a chalice and not a finger-dipping dish, but the most important thing is that this dissolving in water only concerns the host that has been poisoned with something, not the one that has fallen. on the ground. It was found, strictly speaking, not on the ground or on the earthy floor as in the old huts - where the pious people reverently picked up and kissed even a slice of bread and then ate it - but on the step of the altar. In this respect, the remark of another priest from the same Podlasie parish was absolutely correct, who emphasized that the host fell "not into any mud, but on the altar step" [6]. …… .Even if it fell into the mud, it would not be allowed to dip it in water to dissolve it, but carefully clean it with a purificator - maybe slightly moistened - and then eat it reverently. According to the aforementioned Church ordinance, the host is dissolved in water only when something poisonous has touched it, and this is not even mud. Once a novice religious saw a holy host that had fallen to the floor while giving Communion outside the sanctuary, and there were many believers in the church. In an instant he picked it up and, without the slightest hesitation, put it into the golden communion box held by the priest. After Mass, not yet cooling down from horror at what might have happened, he had no words of gratitude for the "eagle" in the law. ……. There was a saint in Sokółka