가입을 원합니다
Angelo Santelli's comment : Is this why he "abdicated"? Did Bergoglio and his tribe use this to force him out?
// 'The Third Secret of Fatima is that Satan would enter into the Church' is why ?

Fr. Pual Kramer said that The secret of Fatima warns against the New Mass and foretells the Second Vatican Council as an "evil council". Cardinal Ratzinger told this to Fr. Ingo Döllinger, and to …More
Angelo Santelli's comment : Is this why he "abdicated"? Did Bergoglio and his tribe use this to force him out?
// 'The Third Secret of Fatima is that Satan would enter into the Church' is why ?

Fr. Pual Kramer said that The secret of Fatima warns against the New Mass and foretells the Second Vatican Council as an "evil council". Cardinal Ratzinger told this to Fr. Ingo Döllinger, and to another priest whose name I am not at liberty to reveal. The Introduction to the first volume of my latest work proves that it is revealed in the secret of Fatima that Bergoglio's reforms will cause the great apostasy foretold by St. Paul in 2 Thessalonians.

" Earlier or later checkmating his opponent and anti- church would backfire on his maneuver. One who studied by engaging reason and willingness may always be enlightened with God's grace and be invited to pray for true Successor of Peter , that is living pope Bendict XVI. Then over time all the pieces of the puzzle fit showing clear and logical picture of a simple situation which sinful and modern man has tendency to complicate, in contrary to God's simplicity."
Ultraviolet
"You keep saying canon law says you can judge the pope, but I don’t see it anywhere in there." @Mathathias Maccabeus Wait your turn, please. :)

I've been waiting since Jan. 14 for @Les Crispi to quote where "Jesus Christ told us how to define heresy." If He did, and since Jimmy takes such pride in his Novus Ordo Catholicism, then it should be an easy thing to quote Jesus Christ erbatim. A …More
"You keep saying canon law says you can judge the pope, but I don’t see it anywhere in there." @Mathathias Maccabeus Wait your turn, please. :)

I've been waiting since Jan. 14 for @Les Crispi to quote where "Jesus Christ told us how to define heresy." If He did, and since Jimmy takes such pride in his Novus Ordo Catholicism, then it should be an easy thing to quote Jesus Christ erbatim. A proper citation would be lovely, too... Book, Chapter, Verse.

"I've already posted Bergoglio's heresies."

...and I've already pointed out you don't have the authority to declare them "heresies" by the standards of heresy used by The Catholic Church.

"Jesus Christ and his words and Canon Law, are my authority...

You aren't quoting Jesus Christ. Witness Jan. 14 up above. You aren't quoting Canon Law. Witness your comments here.

...and Galatians 1:8-9 doesn't support you either. Jesus condemns anyone who would write a false "gospel" account of Jesus' life and His teachings. There is no "Gospel of Francis" so this cite is ireelevant.

"You believe..."
Jimmy the Mind Reader. One of your standard tactics: claiming what other people "believe" what the "think" and so on.

However, you argue Benedict XVI supposedly still is Pope even in spite of a long list of supposed "heresies", even against the dogma you supposedly champion. The Real Presence of Jesus in the Eucharist is Catholic dogma. According to his critics, Benedict XVI denied that.

Supposed "heresies" don't bother you. Francis bothers you, and that's how hypocrisy works.

"Canon Law 751 defines heresy. And there's no doubt Bergoglio is obstinate."

Wrong. That isn't how "obstinate" works in Canon Law 751.

Canon Law 751 states "Heresy is the obstinate denial or obstinate doubt."

"Obstinate" shows a deliberate course of action in the face of correction, i.e. "stubbornly adhering to an opinion, purpose, or course in spite of reason, arguments, or persuasion."

Citation (Merriam-Webster dictionary entry: "Obstinate")

An obstinate denial or an obstinate doubt shows that:

a.) the accused heretic has expressed a view
b.) The Church has disgreed with that view as contrary to its teachings.
c.) The Church has attempted to correct the accused heretic
d.) the accused heretic has opposed that correction by the Church.

Regarding Pope Francis,
a.) He has certainly expressed his views.
b.)-d.) have not.

Who has the temporal authority to represent The Church in correcting the supposed errors of the Church's highest temporal authority?

"Bergoglio's own quotes indict him for heresy. Pretty simple."

Not according to Canon Law 751. Also, if you truly followed your standard honestly, you would argue the same for Benedict XVI based on the examples provided above. You don't because it's just a talking point for you.
Ultraviolet
"If I am wrong, and am a blasphemer, then that's my problem."
No, Jimmy... It's a problem for all faithful when you try to convince Catholics to adopt your Lutheran approach to Catholicism.

"You've not proven anything, except your affiliation with heresy, your cowardice, and your childishness."

The irony of this coming from you, Jimmy. Good Heavens. :D

"You have an aversion to the truth."…More
"If I am wrong, and am a blasphemer, then that's my problem."
No, Jimmy... It's a problem for all faithful when you try to convince Catholics to adopt your Lutheran approach to Catholicism.

"You've not proven anything, except your affiliation with heresy, your cowardice, and your childishness."

The irony of this coming from you, Jimmy. Good Heavens. :D

"You have an aversion to the truth."

See my last point. You can't defend your position factually. Rhetoric is not evidence.
Ultraviolet
Classic Marxist "victimhood" ploy. Leftists alway cry out in pain when striking others. Common trick they pull outside of abortion clinics, too.
Les Crispi
If he's really on the verge of dying, he needs to be getting his house in order. He should admit his heresy to Jesus Christ, then to the Church, ask for His forgiveness, and resign and live out the rest of his days in penance.
Ultraviolet
"He should admit his heresy to Jesus Christ..." He isn't a heretic until The Church condemns him as one. Until The Church does so, you should admit your calumny of the man to Jesus Christ as well
Mathathias Maccabeus
“and I say this in the name of Jesus Christ,”

Pure and utter blasphemy. Go back to whoever your schismatic lover is and shut your useless mouth, please :)
You are again breaking the second commandment :)

Also, what proof do you have that Christ gave you the mission to judge Peter?

“ It's even defined caonincally. ”

Come on brah, what’s your source? You keep saying canon law says you can judg…More
“and I say this in the name of Jesus Christ,”

Pure and utter blasphemy. Go back to whoever your schismatic lover is and shut your useless mouth, please :)
You are again breaking the second commandment :)

Also, what proof do you have that Christ gave you the mission to judge Peter?

“ It's even defined caonincally. ”

Come on brah, what’s your source? You keep saying canon law says you can judge the pope, but I don’t see it anywhere in there. If you have a more perfectly preserved bible or code of canon law, please give me the citation!

“The Church has been wrong before, has made mistakes, and has taken centuries to admit things.”

Heresy. The Church has never been wrong, and if you think the Church has been wrong you call God a liar, and call God wrong.

This is proof you are not a Catholic by faith, because Catholics cannot hold that the Church is ever wrong.

“ The Church is saying the TLM is invalid.”

And this shows your stupidity. The church not once said the TLM was invalid. Not even pope Francis said it was invalid. So not only are you a stupid, arrogant prick, but you are a liar.

Further, you are a sore loser, which is why you keep turning off comments to all of your posts. You know if you don’t turn off your comments, you’ll end up looking retarded.

Your blasphemous use of God’s name to justify your sins is sickening, and I can only laugh at how stupid you sound doing it 😂😂😂

-Ciao 😘
Mathathias Maccabeus
Now quickly, turn off comments again before I prove how stupid you are a second time my sweeticans 🥰
2 more comments from Mathathias Maccabeus
Mathathias Maccabeus
“ He doesn't believe in anything Peter believes in- by his own words. Hence, he cannot be Peter.”

Oh my sweet, loving Crispi, now you are the infallible judge of hearts and interior dispositions, of which we were taught only God was! Are you the second coming?!

“ I'm accusing Bergoglio of being a heretic. And an antipope.”
And I’m asking by what proof do you have that authority?

“ The Church …More
“ He doesn't believe in anything Peter believes in- by his own words. Hence, he cannot be Peter.”

Oh my sweet, loving Crispi, now you are the infallible judge of hearts and interior dispositions, of which we were taught only God was! Are you the second coming?!

“ I'm accusing Bergoglio of being a heretic. And an antipope.”
And I’m asking by what proof do you have that authority?

“ The Church is our guide in these matters, and I use CANON LAW to arrive at my judgment.”

I’m still waiting on an actual citation.

“ You sound like a Lutheran, who didn't believe in reason as a gift from God. ”

Funny, because you are literally doing what Luther did.
Mathathias Maccabeus
My sweetness, please hurry and give me sources!
Les Crispi
I've already posted Bergoglio's heresies. Truth is infallible. Truth is always infallible. So when Bergoglio denies the immaculate conception, the incarnation, the existence of hell, etc., he speaks against Christian Truth. That is heresy.

Jesus Christ and his words and Canon Law, are my authority. Galatians 1:8-9 .

You believe a man who denies Jesus Christ is the Pope. You believe a man who …More
I've already posted Bergoglio's heresies. Truth is infallible. Truth is always infallible. So when Bergoglio denies the immaculate conception, the incarnation, the existence of hell, etc., he speaks against Christian Truth. That is heresy.

Jesus Christ and his words and Canon Law, are my authority. Galatians 1:8-9 .

You believe a man who denies Jesus Christ is the Pope. You believe a man who denies God's plan of salvation is the Pope. You believe a man who doesn't even believe in the Eucharist is the Pope.

Maybe I'm a blasphemer in your church. But I am Catholic, I believe in Jesus and I believe in his Truth. Peter did too. Bergoglio is not Peter.
Mathathias Maccabeus
“ So when Bergoglio denies the immaculate conception, the incarnation, the existence of hell, etc., he speaks against Christian Truth. ”

I want quotes, direct quotes, not what other people *claim* he said.

“ Jesus Christ and his words and Canon Law, are my authority. Galatians 1:8-9 .”

Cite the canon law please :)

As for Galatians, it would still have to be proven he is preaching heresy, and …More
“ So when Bergoglio denies the immaculate conception, the incarnation, the existence of hell, etc., he speaks against Christian Truth. ”

I want quotes, direct quotes, not what other people *claim* he said.

“ Jesus Christ and his words and Canon Law, are my authority. Galatians 1:8-9 .”

Cite the canon law please :)

As for Galatians, it would still have to be proven he is preaching heresy, and not just error, and that cannot be done because no one but God can judge the pope (or a later pope down the line).

Hence I ask, what authority do *you* have. Not what authority does the *church* have.

You see, my love, St. Paul was writing to the Church of Galatia, and specifically they had their own bishop who did have that authority.

So please, again, who me your mark of authority. When were you ordained? When were you given the mission by the Church to pass judgment on the members of the Church?
Mathathias Maccabeus
“ You believe a man who denies Jesus Christ is the Pope.”

Jesus Christ is not the pope though?

“ You believe a man who denies God's plan of salvation is the Pope.”

God’s plan of salvation is also not the pope.

“ You believe a man who doesn't even believe in the Eucharist is the Pope.”

You know you didn’t provide any quotes to support any of these accusations?
One more comment from Mathathias Maccabeus
Mathathias Maccabeus
My sweet, sweet lesbian crispers, you can do better!
Les Crispi
I've already posted Bergoglio's homily in Colombia. I'm not google. Do it yourself.

You can easily find his quotes. You don't want to.

Canon Law 751 defines heresy. And there's no doubt Bergoglio is obstinate.

Bergoglio's own quotes indict him for heresy. Pretty simple. ANd, since he has refused to answer the dubia or , more recently, a formal delict of heresy, he is, ahem, a heretic.

I'm …More
I've already posted Bergoglio's homily in Colombia. I'm not google. Do it yourself.

You can easily find his quotes. You don't want to.

Canon Law 751 defines heresy. And there's no doubt Bergoglio is obstinate.

Bergoglio's own quotes indict him for heresy. Pretty simple. ANd, since he has refused to answer the dubia or , more recently, a formal delict of heresy, he is, ahem, a heretic.

I'm amused you are so defensive about this. If I am wrong, and am a blasphemer, then that's my problem. But what if you're wrong? Seems like you're losing your mind over that:

You're not bothered at all that you call a man who enthroned a demon into the Vatican "Peter".

How Catholic.
Mathathias Maccabeus
The problem is everything you posted I have already proven wrong, but you kept disabling the comments so no one count point out your errors.

No one in this thread likes Francis, but we aren’t little babies that have to keep crying about how we got stuck with one of the worst popes in history.

We, my dear, suck it up and act like real men, focusing instead on our own spiritual growth and the …More
The problem is everything you posted I have already proven wrong, but you kept disabling the comments so no one count point out your errors.

No one in this thread likes Francis, but we aren’t little babies that have to keep crying about how we got stuck with one of the worst popes in history.

We, my dear, suck it up and act like real men, focusing instead on our own spiritual growth and the obedience that God commanded us to do.

You, however, reject that cross and thereby reject the Church, all the while claiming it is by God that you do.

So my beloved, the reason we respond is because you act like a petulant child throwing a tantrum, and we want to help you so you don’t end up remaining in sin.

It’s because we don’t want you to die, but we instead love you.

At least me. I can’t speak for @Ultraviolet.
Les Crispi
You've not proven anything, except your affiliation with heresy, your cowardice, and your childishness.

I'm explaining how we got "stuck" with Bergoglio, but for whatever pride and fear you have, you won't accept it.

If the Truth makes your fill your pants, don't read what I write. Ok? Good.
Mathathias Maccabeus
Sweet love, it’s not my pants that truth fills, it is my heart and my mind. And that’s why you sound like garbage :)
I have a natural aversion to the lies you spew ❤️
Les Crispi
If you had an aversion to my "lies" you would be proving them lies. But instead you resort to toddler-level mockery. You have an aversion to the truth. Anyway, I hope you give really good, sincere confessions.
Mathathias Maccabeus
@Les Crispi

Interesting that you once again closed your post right after posting what you thought was proof.

Take a look at page 19, here.

Notice it says that the pope isn’t automatically removed? That’s the opposite of what you say, so once again you are wrong.

Also, if you did read St. Robert Bellarmine’s book on the papacy, you’d know that YOU have not authority (in fact commit sin) to …More
@Les Crispi

Interesting that you once again closed your post right after posting what you thought was proof.

Take a look at page 19, here.

Notice it says that the pope isn’t automatically removed? That’s the opposite of what you say, so once again you are wrong.

Also, if you did read St. Robert Bellarmine’s book on the papacy, you’d know that YOU have not authority (in fact commit sin) to pass judgment on the pope regardless of his state.
Angelo Santelli
I read this twaddle. My reply is, No the Church needs to get rid of Jorge Bergoglio.

Read Jon Allen's THE POPE WHO QUIT. Learn how many past Popes and hierarchy were beaten (figuratively or literally) by the RC faithful. Back in the Middle Ages of Bonaventure, Aquinas, and Scotus the faithful tolerated nothing from the hierarchy and frquently applied physical means to brng them back in line …More
I read this twaddle. My reply is, No the Church needs to get rid of Jorge Bergoglio.

Read Jon Allen's THE POPE WHO QUIT. Learn how many past Popes and hierarchy were beaten (figuratively or literally) by the RC faithful. Back in the Middle Ages of Bonaventure, Aquinas, and Scotus the faithful tolerated nothing from the hierarchy and frquently applied physical means to brng them back in line with the teachings of the Apsotles. Some of those means were indeed life threatening.
Ultraviolet
"No the Church needs to get rid of Jorge Bergoglio." Please be a darling and name which temporal authority has the temporal authority to "get rid of" the highest temporal authority in The Catholic Church. I'll wait.
Jan Joseph
Paus Franciscus is een geboren oplichter.
Prayhard
Honestly I cannot see how that was worse than the Grassi or immediately after the Inzoli case.
Angelo Santelli
Former pope Benedict accused of misconduct over four sex abuse cases

Ratzinger failed to take action against priests in four cases of alleged sexual abuse in his diocese while Archbishop of Munich, bombshell report says

Is this why he "abdicated"? Did Bergoglio and his tribe use this to force him out?
Kenjiro M. Yoshimori
No, Bergoglio and his thugs (Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini, SJ, Cardinals Danneels, Murphy-Occonor, Sodano, Silvestrini, McCarrick, and others forced Benedict XVI out much because of "Summorum Pontificum" and the explosion of new TLM sites around the world, new religious Orders, monasteries, cloisters, and also that Benedict XVI dressed, acted, and spoke like real Pope, like the ones pre-Vatican …More
No, Bergoglio and his thugs (Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini, SJ, Cardinals Danneels, Murphy-Occonor, Sodano, Silvestrini, McCarrick, and others forced Benedict XVI out much because of "Summorum Pontificum" and the explosion of new TLM sites around the world, new religious Orders, monasteries, cloisters, and also that Benedict XVI dressed, acted, and spoke like real Pope, like the ones pre-Vatican II...even though he still supported Vatican II. Liturgically and otherwise, Benedict XVI was restoring the Church...which this gang hated. That's why they forced him out.