Homosexuality Is "Wild Lust To Be Overcome”

The Sephardi chief rabbi of Jerusalem, Shlomo Amar, has confirmed that homosexuals cannot be religious Jews. According to Israeli media, Amar said in a sermon that homosexuality is a "wild lust" …
@Ultraviolet @pmfji Tell me, was Saint John an antisemite, was Saint Matthew, was Saint Paul? They say the jews are: children of satan, accursed, enemies of humanity, synagogue of satan. Was Jesus Christ an antisemite? Are the jews antichristian?; the talmud they are: it says Jesus is a son of a prostitute an a roman soldier called Panthera; an egiptian magician, justly killed by them for His …More
@Ultraviolet @pmfji Tell me, was Saint John an antisemite, was Saint Matthew, was Saint Paul? They say the jews are: children of satan, accursed, enemies of humanity, synagogue of satan. Was Jesus Christ an antisemite? Are the jews antichristian?; the talmud they are: it says Jesus is a son of a prostitute an a roman soldier called Panthera; an egiptian magician, justly killed by them for His sins; in hell for ever in boiling excrement. Now, tell me: what do Marx, Freud, Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem, Allen Ginsberg, Trotski, Lenin, Kaganovich, Bela Kuhn, Lukacs, Rosa Luxenburgo, Kurt Eisner, Horkheimer, Adorno, Eric Fromm, Marcuse, Shabbetai Tzevi, Samuel Ha-Levi, Derridá, Phillip Roth, Woody Allen, Harvey Weinstein, Lawrence Ladder, Bar Kokhba, those who betrayed Spain in the 8th century, the Young Turks (who killed 2 MM armenians) and a big etcetera have in common? Yeah, right, they are all jews and revolutionaries. Do you know what 'tikkun olam' means? A hint: it's a jewish principle and it's revolutionary. Now, do something for me: define antisemitism: is it a fit definition this: to state unconfortable historical truths about the jews? Just so you know: I cann't be an antisemite, for two reasons, at least: 1) I don't believe in race as an explicative principle of human affairs; 2) I am a Chistian, I don't know what hate is, I have not hated any single person in my entire life. Don"t judge others on the basis of your poor conceptions... Saying that jews are revolutionaries is no antisemitism, it's a historical truth even jews are proud of...
Let's go on a little bit with the list:

Lasalle, Heinrich Heine, Moses-Moritz Hess, Zinoviev, Radek, Leo Strauss, Irving Kristoll, Midge Deckter, The Rosenthals, the Spingarn brothers, Leo Pfeffer, Stanley Levin, Oppenheimer (the communist chief of the Manhattan Project), Ayn Rand-Alissa Rosenbaum, Steven Spuelberg, James Cameron, Jakob Frank, Louis Wirth, Morgentau, Hollywood -as a whole-, …More
Let's go on a little bit with the list:

Lasalle, Heinrich Heine, Moses-Moritz Hess, Zinoviev, Radek, Leo Strauss, Irving Kristoll, Midge Deckter, The Rosenthals, the Spingarn brothers, Leo Pfeffer, Stanley Levin, Oppenheimer (the communist chief of the Manhattan Project), Ayn Rand-Alissa Rosenbaum, Steven Spuelberg, James Cameron, Jakob Frank, Louis Wirth, Morgentau, Hollywood -as a whole-, Baruch Spinoza, Arcadio Axelrod, Mark Natanson... You could keep going for a month. But let's make another consideration: Alexander Solzhenitsyn, he wrote 200 years together, about the relation of the jews to Russia, the ressult of their revolutionary activity and the fact that THE REVOLUTION wasn't russian but jewish: are these FACTS AND Solzhenitsyn antisemites? Enlighten me, please!!!!
@Ultraviolet @pmfji let's hear the jews themselves, proud of the revolutionary ideoligy:

QUOTES FROM THE JEWS

“Some call it Marxism - I call it Judaism.”

Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, in the American Bulletin of May 15, 1935

“The revolution in Russia is a Jewish revolution”

The Maccabean (New York), Nov. 1905, p, 250

“Jewry is the mother of Marxism.”

Le Droit de Vivre, May 12, 1936

“Judaism…More
@Ultraviolet @pmfji let's hear the jews themselves, proud of the revolutionary ideoligy:

QUOTES FROM THE JEWS

“Some call it Marxism - I call it Judaism.”

Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, in the American Bulletin of May 15, 1935

“The revolution in Russia is a Jewish revolution”

The Maccabean (New York), Nov. 1905, p, 250

“Jewry is the mother of Marxism.”

Le Droit de Vivre, May 12, 1936

“Judaism is Marxism, communism”

Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 64

“The communist soul is the soul of Judaism.”

Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 143

“We Jews cannot be called upon to denounce Communism.”

The American Hebrew (New York), February 3, 1939, p. 11

“The picture which the Soviet Union presents today is one that should bring rejoicing to world Jewry.”

The Youngstown Jewish Times, Sept. 18, 1936, page 51

“It would be absurd to deny the intensity of the Jewish participation in the Russian revolutionary movement.”

Leon Dennen, in The Menorah Journal (New York) July-September 1932, p. 106

“That achievement - the Russian-Jewish revolution - destined to figure in history as the overshadowing result of World War, was largely the outcome of Jewish thinking, of Jewish discontent, of Jewish effort to reconstruct.”

The American Hebrew, September 10, 1920

“The Bolshevik Government of Russia is the key-stone of the arch of the proof of the Jewish conspiracy for radicalism and world-domination.”

William Hard, The Great Jewish Conspiracy (New York: American Jewish Book Company, 1920), p. 31

“The Jewish elements provide the driving forces for communism”

Dr. Oscar Levy, in George Pitt-Rivers, The World Significance of the Russian Revolution (Oxford, 1920), p. ix

“The Jews [have been] furnishing for the Bolsheviks the majority of their leaders”

The Jewish World (London), April 16, 1919, p. 11

“Russian Jews have taken a prominent part in the Bolshevist movement”

The American Hebrew (New York), November 18, 1927, p. 20

“Jewry has come to wield a considerable power in the Communist Party.”

Dr. Avrahm Yarmolinsky, in The Menorah Journal (New York), July 1928, p. 37

“The East-Side Jew [Trotsky] that Conquered Europe”

The liberator (New York), March 1920, pp. 26-27

“The real East Sider [New York Jew Trotsky] is at the head of things in Russia.”

M. L. Larkin, in The Public (New York), November 23, 1918, p. 1433

“It is not an accident that Judaism gave birth to Marxism, and it is not an accident that the Jews readily took up Marxism; all this is in perfect accord with the progress of Judaism and the Jews.”

Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 148

“Karl Marx, who came from an old family of rabbis and brilliant Talmudic scholars, was to point the path of victory for the proletariat.”

L. Rennap, Anti-Semitism and the Jewish Question (London, 1942), p. 31

“Among his [Karl Marx’s] ancestors were Rabbis and Talmudists, men of learning and keen intellect.”

Henry Wickham Steed, in The American Hebrew (New York), December 9, 1927, p. 206

“The peculiarly Jewish logic of his [Karl Marx’s] mind”

Henry Wickham Steed, in The American Hebrew (New York), December 9, 1927, p. 206

“Mr. Wickham Steed lays the rise of Bolshevism at the doors of Jewry.”

The Jewish Guardian (London), November 28, 1924, p. 4

“The Bolshevik Revolution has emancipated the Jews as individuals”

Dr. Avrahm Yarmolinsky, in The Menorah Journal (New York), July 1928, p. 33

“There are many Bolshevik leaders of Jewish extraction”

D. L. Sandelsan, in The Jewish Chronicle (London), February 20, 1920, p. 22

“There is no Jew who does not hope with all his heart that the Soviet Union will survive and be victorious”

Zionist Review (London: Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland), September 26, 1941, p. 7

“Communism and internationalism are in truth and in fact great virtues. Judaism may be justly proud of these virtues”

Harry Watan, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 80

“If the tide of history does not turn toward Communist internationalism … then the Jewish race is doomed.”

George Marlen, Stalin, Trotsky, or Lenin (New York, 1937), p. 414

“The [Jewish] Commissaries were formerly political exiles. They had been dreaming of revolution for years in their exile in Paris, in London, in New York, in Berlin, everywhere and anywhere. They saw in the Bolshevist Movement an opportunity of realizing the extreme ideas of Communism and internationalism to which their fate had compelled them.”

Dr. D. S. Pazmanik, in The Jewish Chronicle (London), September 5, 1919, p. 14

“The Jewish people will never forget that the Soviet Union was the first country - and as yet the only country in the world - in which anti-Semitism is a crime.”

Jewish Voice (New York: National Council of Jewish Communists), January 1942, p. 16

“Anti-Semitism was classed [by the Soviet Government] as counter-revolution and the severe punishments meted out for acts of anti-Semitism were the means by which the existing order protected its own safety”

The Congress Bulletin, (New York: American Jewish Congress), January 5, 1940, p. 2

“There is no official anti-Semitism in Russia; anti-Semitism in Russia is a crime against the State.”

Dr. Chalm Weizmann, The Jewish People and Palestine (London: Zionist Organization, 1939), p. 7

“Anti-Communism is anti-Semitism.”

Jewish Voice (New York: National Council of Jewish Communists), July-August 1941, p. 23

“The part which Jews play in the [Communist] Government of the country [Russia] does not appear to be declining”

Harry Sacher, in The Jewish Review (London), June-August 1932, p. 43

“The Jews have a right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters over the whole earth. This is the historic destiny of the Jews”

Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), pp. 99-100

“We Jews, we the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do, will meet our needs and demands. We will destroy because we need a world of our own.”

Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, page 155

“The Russian intelligentsia . . . saw in the philosophy of Judaism the germs of Bolshevism - the struggle of ... Judaism versus Christianity.”

Leon Dennen, in The Menorah Journal (New York, July-September 1932, p. 105

“Soviet Russia has declared war on Christianity, and on those who profess this faith. In the Russian villages today Bolsheviks and Herbert H. Lehman . . . were called the ‘secret government of the United States’ and were linked with ‘world communism.’”

Dr. Louis Harap, in Jewish Life (New York), June 1951, p. 20

OTHER IMPORTANT QUOTES

WINSTON CHURCHILL

“The Secretary of War [Winston Churchill] charges Jews with originating the gospel of Antichrist and engineering a ‘world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization’“

The Jewish Chronicle (London), February 13, 1920, p. 8

GEORGE WASHINGTON

“The Jews work more effectively against us than the enemy’s armies. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our Liberties and the great cause we are engaged in. It is much to be lamented that each State, long ago has not hunted them down as pests to society and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America.”

BENJAMIN FRANKLIN

“In whatever country Jews have settled in any great numbers, they have lowered its moral tone, depreciated its commercial integrity, have segregated themselves and have not been assiminated, have sneered at and tried to undermine the Christian religion, have built a state within a state, and have, when opposed, tried to strangle that country to death financially.”

ANDREW JACKSON

“You Jewish Bankers are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God, I will rout you out.”
3 more comments from eticacasanova
Now, again, am I an antusemite or are jews themselves antisemites? You CANNOT have yourcake and then eat it too....!!!!!!
Now that we have warmed up, let's keep it rolling, shall we? All right, tell me: are Dostoyevski, Tertullian, Saint Augustine, Saint John Chrisostom, Pope Saint Pius X, Saint Peter Canisius to be exiled because all of them were "antisemites"? Were they antisemites or were they good persons who were very conscious?

Great answers, I love when people awakens to the truth, after they have been druge…More
Now that we have warmed up, let's keep it rolling, shall we? All right, tell me: are Dostoyevski, Tertullian, Saint Augustine, Saint John Chrisostom, Pope Saint Pius X, Saint Peter Canisius to be exiled because all of them were "antisemites"? Were they antisemites or were they good persons who were very conscious?

Great answers, I love when people awakens to the truth, after they have been druged by revolutionary bull crap. So, tell me: the wars in the middle east the US is fighting, the huge genocide being perpetrated, is it a jewish operation or what? Hilary, herself, go figure, said so in a leaked email. The Colin Powell swindle at the UN is very indicative. But the PNAC, the Clean break document and the Oded Yinon plan, all of them, should tell you how it is. I'm going to leave you so you can look these things up.

Next time, go smear your .... cat, not me, all right? Not cool, not cool!!!!!!
For you, the antisemite, Saint Pius V:

"The Jewish people fell from the heights because of their faithlessness and condemned their Redeemer to a shameful death. Their godlessness has assumed such forms that, for the salvation of our own people, it becomes necessary to prevent their disease. Besides usury, through which Jews everywhere have sucked dry the property of impoverished Christians, …More
For you, the antisemite, Saint Pius V:

"The Jewish people fell from the heights because of their faithlessness and condemned their Redeemer to a shameful death. Their godlessness has assumed such forms that, for the salvation of our own people, it becomes necessary to prevent their disease. Besides usury, through which Jews everywhere have sucked dry the property of impoverished Christians, they are accomplices of thieves and robbers; and the most damaging aspect of the matter is that they allure the unsuspecting through magical incantations, superstition, and witchcraft to the Synagogue of Satan and boast of being able to predict the future. We have carefully investigated how this revolting sect abuses the name of Christ and how harmful they are to those whose life is threatened by their deceit. On account of these and other serious matters, and because of the gravity of their crimes which increase day to day more and more, We order that, within 90 days, all Jews in our entire earthly realm of justice -- in all towns, districts, and places -- must depart these regions." ~ Pope St. Pius V (From his Bull, "The Jewish Race," Feb.26, 1569; PAC, p.648).
Since you asked, eticacasanova , if the people on your list harbored intense hatred of all Jews as a group, by every definition of the term, that's anti-semitism. And so, what of it? Saint Paul also hated and persecuted Christians before his famous stroll on the road to Damascus. It seems you're confusing sainthood with infallibility. You're also making a very common logical mistake known as a …More
Since you asked, eticacasanova , if the people on your list harbored intense hatred of all Jews as a group, by every definition of the term, that's anti-semitism. And so, what of it? Saint Paul also hated and persecuted Christians before his famous stroll on the road to Damascus. It seems you're confusing sainthood with infallibility. You're also making a very common logical mistake known as a Fallacious Appeal To Authority. It goes something like this... ---Because "X" is an expert, everything X says is always correct---.The fallacy occurs because even experts can make mistakes.

Christ was a Jew and celebrated His Jewish faith.. Think about that for a moment. People like you choose to ignore the Jewishness of Jesus entirely too often. His Heavenly Father could have chosen any human race on the planet, and yet tje Redeemer of Mankind was born and raised as a Jew. They were God's "chosen people" --to bear His Son! That alone should give you some hesitation about despising them..

Christ also teaches us that we should forgive our enemies, particularly those who persecute us and Him. I'm sure you know this but like so many "good Christians" today, you simply don't care what He taught, at least not when it contradicts YOUR carefully nurtured hates.

You're also making a common error in believing two wrongs make a right. Just because certain Jewish religious teachings clearly contradict our Catholic faith, that does not justify or legitimize despising those who dwell in spiritual darkness. Christ was really, really specific about those who deny Him, just as He was on the need for charity and mercy and forgiveness -virtues you clearly lack.

It would be ironic and oddly appropriate if your hatred of Jews condemns you to share their damnation.

"am I an antusemite or are jews themselves antisemites? You CANNOT have yourcake and then eat it too....!"

First, I don't know who you are beyond what you claim. Now we come to the fun part. :D Finally, because squashing your brand of bigotry isn't even a challenge anymore. Your cake reference is technically wrong. Yes, it is. Think about it for a moment.

Everyone must first be in possession, i.e. "have" their cake before they can eat it. It is logically impossible to eat something without first being in physical possession of it BEFORE eating it. But I understand what you're trying to say. You're attempting in a clumsy way to present what you believe is a logical contradiction.

The problem is you didn't think any of this through. Or, perhaps, it's just another shameful example of how little you know about the real world. Ignorance is a prerequisite for bigotry.

A Jew can be anti-semitic, because some people (for whatever reason) hate themselves, hate their upbringing, etc. Being "X" does not prevent a person from hating "X". In fact, that kind of self-hatred is a depressingly common mentality among leftists. Many thousands of Caucasian Americans are militantly anti-White and anti-American.

"So, tell me: the wars in the middle east the US is fighting, the huge genocide being perpetrated, is it a jewish operation or what?..."I'm going to leave you so you can look these things up."

...implying I'm not already familiar with them. Yes, that's another example of third-rate reasoning on your part. Just for fun, because your bigotry has been a tedious bore otherwise, let me dissect just -one- of your mistakes. Just one. Hillary said in a leaked e-mail....

Show that Hillary wrote the e-mail. Can you? No. You can't.

All you might be able to show is that such an e-mail was sent from her IP address. Unless you have video footage of her actually -writing- the -e-mail, you can't show that -she- wrote it. Further, suppose you somehow managed to show that she wrote it. Hooray for you! And so? Remember what I said about a Fallacious Appeal To Authority? It still applies. In Hillary's case, we also have to add the fact she's notoriously prone to untruth. Meaning just because "Hillary said..." doesn't mean it's true or even that Hillary herself even believes it is true. Then there's one other thing.

Your "evidence" is inadmissable because it was illegally obtained..

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fruit_of_the_po…

You really need to spend less time wallowing in your hate of Jews and more time, not only re-reading the Gospels but even just a good high school-level textbook on law.

One last thing, friendly suggestion... Stay the heck off of Stormfront. Their brand of sloppy thinking truly -is- contagious. :D
I see, you are not a Christian, a CHRISTIAN knows the Gospels are inerrantes, because they are the word of God. This is inadmisible: "You're also making a very common logical mistake known as a Fallacious Appeal To Authority. It goes something like this... ---Because "X" is an expert, everything X says is always correct---.The fallacy occurs because even experts can make mistakes". Got you
It's not just that you're not a Christian, you are a Jew: "Christ was a Jew and celebrated His Jewish faith". Chridt was NOT a jew, because 'jew' after him, means one who belongs that people blood ties that rejects Christ. That people is not the heir of the ancient hebrews, orechristian, because, there is a NEW ISRAEL, PEOPLE OF THE COVENANT, THE NEW COVENANT (Jeremiah, 31). Your ignorance, like …More
It's not just that you're not a Christian, you are a Jew: "Christ was a Jew and celebrated His Jewish faith". Chridt was NOT a jew, because 'jew' after him, means one who belongs that people blood ties that rejects Christ. That people is not the heir of the ancient hebrews, orechristian, because, there is a NEW ISRAEL, PEOPLE OF THE COVENANT, THE NEW COVENANT (Jeremiah, 31). Your ignorance, like all ignorance seems bliss, but is a chain
4 more comments from eticacasanova
They are no-God-chosen-People, the ancient hebrews were the bearers of the PROMISE. A promise that was fullfilled: news break, they rejected the fullfillment of the promuse. Not all the ancient hebrews, those that persusted in their stiffneckedness
One thing is to forgive and another is to let the evil triumph. And one thing is MY enemies and amother is the ENEMIES OF HUMANITY, THE CHURCH, THE FAITH, CHRISTIAN SOCIETY, SALVATION OF THE SOULS. You got that very wrong.
No one despises those in spiritual darkness. Despise others us one thing, calling a pervert pervert (only an exanple) is another very different. Despise is not fighting evil; and, to fight evil you ought to call it by it's name and prevent others from falling for it
So, I yell you I don't hate any one, "I don't hate NO ONE, SON" , and you still accuse me of that. That's dishonest and no discussion is possible in that situation. Any ways, I destroyed you already. Maybe, that's the reason why you still have the audacity of calling me names: you have no legitimate arguments. So I leave it here: you, false Christian, who say that an argument based on Scripture …More
So, I yell you I don't hate any one, "I don't hate NO ONE, SON" , and you still accuse me of that. That's dishonest and no discussion is possible in that situation. Any ways, I destroyed you already. Maybe, that's the reason why you still have the audacity of calling me names: you have no legitimate arguments. So I leave it here: you, false Christian, who say that an argument based on Scripture authority is invalid, falacious.

It is like saying that San Jorge Matamoros, Saint George Moorkiller, was a hatefull man, not a saint: fighting evil doesn't equate to hate evil men, it's not the same.

But good bye, get some oinyment for the burning heat. I hope God enlightens you. God bless. In Christus.
--"I see, you are not a Christian, a CHRISTIAN knows the Gospels are inerrantes, because they are the word of God...."-
No True Scotsman Fallacy.

*yawn* You're off to a bad start. Now show us where in the Gospels our Lord Jesus taught His disciples to hate the Jewish people the way you do. I want chapter and verse. Put up or shut up.

--"It's not just that you're not a Christian, you are a …More
--"I see, you are not a Christian, a CHRISTIAN knows the Gospels are inerrantes, because they are the word of God...."-
No True Scotsman Fallacy.

*yawn* You're off to a bad start. Now show us where in the Gospels our Lord Jesus taught His disciples to hate the Jewish people the way you do. I want chapter and verse. Put up or shut up.

--"It's not just that you're not a Christian, you are a Jew:"
Ad Hominem and Tu quoque Fallacy.

Also wrong on both parts. Actually, on all three parts if we include this monumental insanity:

--"Chridt was NOT a jew, because..."

Do people like you even READ the Gospels? You're not the first person to, for obviously bigoted reasons, propose something so ipso facto ridiculous. Fortunately for me others have wasted a great deal of their time refuting such silliness.

www.biblicalarchaeology.org/…/was-jesus-a-jew
www.pbs.org/…/bornliveddied.h…

--"They are no-God-chosen-People,"

No? Into which religious/ cultural group was Jesus born? This was, of course, a deliberate choice by God and therefore God chose them. :D

--" they rejected the fullfillment of the promuse."

Yes they did. ...and how many Christians have done the same? How many other Christians are like YOU? You reject Christ's teachings of universal charity and mercy and forgiveness through an irrational hatred of "joooz"...

--"And one thing is MY enemies and amother is the ENEMIES OF HUMANITY, THE CHURCH, THE FAITH, CHRISTIAN SOCIETY, SALVATION OF THE SOULS."

...which, even if true, still makes them YOUR enemies since you (in theory) are human, Catholic, follow the Catholic Faith, believe in Christian society and, laughably I believe, believe a lifetime of hating people has no effect on your soul's salvation.

Now show me where Christ made a distinction between forgiving your personal enemies and forgiving your enemies in general. Again, I want chapter and verse where He said that. Direct quote. Not something with your "explanation" putting your own filth in our Lord's mouth.

--"No one despises those in spiritual darkness."
You do. That's self evident.

--"So, I yell you I don't hate any one".

Instead you fixate on hating an entire group of people. You don't hate any one. You hate EVERY ONE who is a Jew. False distinction, techinally a lie on your part.

--"you have no legitimate arguments."

...said the person who just had their own destroyed by me.

My argument is Christ's teachings did not and do not support your bigotry against Jews.
My argument is you can't present any of your stupidities without making a fool of yourself and lapsing into on logical fallacy after another.

Worth pointing out you haven't been able to refute either of those points. And no, simply replying with MORE errors doesn't "prove" your previous mistakes are correct, either. It just makes you to dumb to know when to stop.

--"who say that an argument based on Scripture authority is invalid, falacious."

You really need to study basic logic, @eticacasanova Your lack of education is showing.
Observe:
Martin Luther made many arguments based on Scripture authority. Does that make his arguments against The Church correct? Is everyone who says Luther is wrong a "false Christian"? By YOUR reasoning it does.

An argument may be -based- on Scripture and still turn out wrong, for a huge number of reasons.

When someone like you makes a wrong argument and points to the Bible, that does not automatically make your argument correct. Luther did the same thing. He was wrong and so are you. You made different arguments, to be sure, but they are both wrong.

The Church, Our Church, has a term for such Scripture-based wrong-arguments, they are called heresies.

Think about that for a bit. Then you can reconcile screaming "false Christian" at me while complaining about "name calling". If ignorance is the seed of bigotry, hypocrisy is always the fruit.
You are not an honest interlocuyor. I say, I don't hate the jews, but they are revolutionaries and children if satan, as the Gospel says. And you come back with a "fallacy, the Gospel didn't teach us to hate tge hews". I di'nt waste my time with a mendacious, bad faith oerson as yoy. And don't try to respond: 'ad hominem, blabla": I'm not discussing, I'm telling you why I dob't discuss with …More
You are not an honest interlocuyor. I say, I don't hate the jews, but they are revolutionaries and children if satan, as the Gospel says. And you come back with a "fallacy, the Gospel didn't teach us to hate tge hews". I di'nt waste my time with a mendacious, bad faith oerson as yoy. And don't try to respond: 'ad hominem, blabla": I'm not discussing, I'm telling you why I dob't discuss with dishonest persons. Something I learned fron Aristotle: it has no point. Besides, I proved my point beyond the reasonable dount; the problem is you arenot reasonable, are full of prejudices. So hasta la vista, baby
Before, I copied like 50 quotes of jewish authorized publications saying they are revolutionaries and that marxism is equivalent to judaism, which is what I claim, for which you say I'm an antisemite. I don't argue with you anymore, since you are not honest, and cannot acknowledge even the profusión of quotes I produced. But, even so, just so you stop your folly, I will put forward another quote,…More
Before, I copied like 50 quotes of jewish authorized publications saying they are revolutionaries and that marxism is equivalent to judaism, which is what I claim, for which you say I'm an antisemite. I don't argue with you anymore, since you are not honest, and cannot acknowledge even the profusión of quotes I produced. But, even so, just so you stop your folly, I will put forward another quote, irrefutable:

"Sexual revolutionaries

Extending the subversive thesis, Jewish involvement in the X-rated industry can be seen as a proverbial two fingers to the entire WASP establishment in America. Some porn stars viewed themselves as frontline fighters in the spiritual battle between Christian America and secular humanism. According to Ford, Jewish X-rated actors often brag about their ‘joy in being anarchic, sexual gadflies to the puritanical beast’. Jewish involvement in porn, by this argument, is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion. Astyr remembers having ‘to run or fight for it in grammar school because I was a Jew. It could very well be that part of my porn career is an “up yours” to these people’. Al Goldstein, the publisher of Screw, said (on lukeford.net), ‘The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don’t believe in authoritarianism.’ Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream (and is no doubt consumed by those very same WASPs), its subversive character becomes more charged. Porn is no longer of the ‘what the Butler saw’ voyeuristic type; instead, it is driven to new extremes of portrayal that stretch the boundaries of the porn aesthetic. As new sexual positions are portrayed, the desire to shock (as well as entertain) seems clear.

It is a case of the traditional revolutionary/radical drive of immigrant Jews in America being channelled into sexual rather than leftist politics. Just as Jews have been disproportionately represented in radical movements over the years, so they are also disproportionately represented in the porn industry. Jews in America have been sexual revolutionaries. A large amount of the material on sexual liberation was written by Jews. Those at the forefront of the movement which forced America to adopt a more liberal view of sex were Jewish. Jews were also at the vanguard of the sexual revolution of the 1960s. Wilhelm Reich, Herbert Marcuse and Paul Goodman replaced Marx, Trotsky and Lenin as required revolutionary reading. Reich’s central preoccupations were work, love and sex, while Marcuse prophesied that a socialist utopia would free individuals to achieve sexual satisfaction. Goodman wrote of the ‘beautiful cultural consequences’ that would follow from legalizing pornography: it would ‘ennoble all our art’ and ‘humanize sexuality’. Pacheco was one Jewish porn star who read Reich’s intellectual marriage of Freud and Marx (lukeford.net):

“Before I got my first part in an adult film, I went down to an audition for an X-rated film with my hair down to my ass, a copy of Wilhelm Reich’s Sexual Revolution under my arm and yelling about work, ‘love and sex’.”

As Rabbi Samuel H. Dresner put it (E. Michael Jones, ‘Rabbi Dresner’s Dilemma: Torah v. Ethnos’ Culture Wars, May 2003), ‘Jewish rebellion has broken out on several levels’, one being ‘the prominent role of Jews as advocates to sexual experimentation’. Overall, then, porn performers are a group of people who praise rebellion, self-fulfilment and promiscuity". Source:

Triple-exthnics

Nathan Abrams on Jews in the American porn industry

Nathan Abrams | Winter 2004 – Number 196

www.jewishquarterly.org/issuearchive/articled325.html
--'"You are not an honest interlocuyor.

Ad Hominem, no proof given.

--"I say, I don't hate the jews, but they are revolutionaries and children if satan, as the Gospel says.

So you don't hate people and then you verbally attack them here and over and over again. If that isn't hatred, your definition is as deluded as your world-view. Also, show where the Gospel says all Jews are children of …More
--'"You are not an honest interlocuyor.

Ad Hominem, no proof given.

--"I say, I don't hate the jews, but they are revolutionaries and children if satan, as the Gospel says.

So you don't hate people and then you verbally attack them here and over and over again. If that isn't hatred, your definition is as deluded as your world-view. Also, show where the Gospel says all Jews are children of Satan. I want chapter and verse.

...and, no, it isn't John 8:44, either. Jesus was speaking to a specific group of critics. He was NOT speaking about ALL Jews, or the Jewish faith. Most of his Apostles and disciples were Jews and He Himself practiced the Jewish faith.

The passage you're basing your bigotry on has been clarified ages ago.

www.cbsnews.com/…/jews-are-the-ch…
www.thedailybeast.com/how-bigots-easi…

--"I di'nt waste my time with a mendacious, bad faith oerson as yoy."

Wasting your time? You have ALL this TIME to post your garbage... reply after reply after reply but oh goodness! "I won't waste my time" when it comes to a formalized debate where reasoning matters. Where premises and fallacies actually count for something. Oh no, not you. Then your time is something not to be wasted. After all, you have at least ten more replies you need to write, filled with stupidity. Your time is precious. But the awful truth is you simply don't know how to fight with the tools I use.

--"I'm telling you why I dob't discuss with dishonest persons."

Your definition of "dishonest persons" actually means persons you recognize are more intelligent, better read, and know how to reason and debate in a way that you do not.

--"Besides, I proved my point beyond the reasonable dount"

Please don't use legal terms you don't understand. The only thing you "proved" is how badly you foam at the mouth against Jews.

If you wish to quote Aristotle, I'll counter with Confucius. "When a dog barks for an hour, all it made was noise. The dog might think it's poetry, but thinking men know better."

The same can be said of your "proof".

Yes, you are an anti-semite. You pick and choose anything that bolsters your hate, and have no conception of reasoning, just the very sort of name-calling you like to complain about. Your latest gimmick is "dishonest". Every time I prove you wrong, I'm "dishonest".

--"Before, I copied like 50 quotes of jewish authorized publications saying they are revolutionaries and that marxism is equivalent to judaism,"

..and I pointed out that some Jews hate themselves. I DID and DO "acknowledge" you posted a lot of quotes. Is that "dishonest"??? What you fail to recognize or refuse to, is one jew does not speak for ALL jews. Does the Novus Ordo cardinals speak for you? Does Pope Francis speak for ALL Catholics? Truly?

What that means is, your long tedious "proof" from Nathan Abrams is irrelevant. Ultimately, Nathan Abrams speaks only for himself and for the people in the porn industry he quotes. Most Jews don't work in porn. Orthodox Jews despise it.

You, however, CHOOSE to quote Abrams as "irrefutable proof" (your words) that Jews are... evil/ revolutionaries/ pornographers/ whatever.

...and, yes, that makes you a filthy, bottom-feeding bigot. It's what you are, what you CHOOSE, what you ignore, that twisted way of seeing only the evil, only the bad, never the good. It's the lack of charity, the absences of mercy, of refusing to do what Christ preached because you prefer to misquote Him.

People like you are a disgusting embarrassment to the Catholic Church. You like to sneer and criticize Papa Bergoglio, but you are worse. His Marxism is a new problem, one that is failing around the world. He will go, a better pope will follow.

But so-called Catholics like you have been around for centuries, fixated and obsessed with hating the very race, the very culture from which The Holy Family sprang.

Spiritually speaking, every time you spew your Jew-hating filth on a Catholic forum, every time you laughably dare to call yourself a Catholic, you drive another thorn driven into our Lord's brow, and jam another dagger into our Blessed Mother's heart.
Incredible, I tell you I don't argue with you because you are not honest, and you call that an ad hominem, of course: I'm talking about my interlocutor, not about the subject at hand, you have to be either too short of mind or too quarrelsome to respond in such a manner. Answer, if you want, to the 50 AUTHORIZED jewish sources which say they are revolutionaries, which is what I said, in the …More
Incredible, I tell you I don't argue with you because you are not honest, and you call that an ad hominem, of course: I'm talking about my interlocutor, not about the subject at hand, you have to be either too short of mind or too quarrelsome to respond in such a manner. Answer, if you want, to the 50 AUTHORIZED jewish sources which say they are revolutionaries, which is what I said, in the first place, for which you called me an antisemite and, then, we could talk
Now, @Ultraviolet, since you say that it's not jews that arerevolutionaries, what about judaism, its doctrine, what thet learn from their 'sacred [rotten] sripture", te talmud? I already quoted it. It says Jesus is a son of a prostitute an a roman soldier called Panthera; an egiptian magician, justly killed by them for His sins; in hell for ever in boiling excrement. Is it antisemitic, id est, …More
Now, @Ultraviolet, since you say that it's not jews that arerevolutionaries, what about judaism, its doctrine, what thet learn from their 'sacred [rotten] sripture", te talmud? I already quoted it. It says Jesus is a son of a prostitute an a roman soldier called Panthera; an egiptian magician, justly killed by them for His sins; in hell for ever in boiling excrement. Is it antisemitic, id est, racist, to quote the talmud? Is it some type of fallacy? Will you, now, instead of arguing, start making a strawman out of my irrefutable proofs? Did you know the talmud is a many timescondenmed book by tge Catholic Church? Will you say that's the arhument on authority? If you choose to do so, would you still be a Christian?
--"Incredible, I tell you I don't argue with you because you are not honest, and you call that an ad hominem, of course:"

You said: "You are not an honest interlocuyor."

That is an ad hominem criticism. One that you have never proven, either. The comment does nothing whatsoever to refute anything I've said which is why such personal remarks are classified as fallacies. In point of fact, even …More
--"Incredible, I tell you I don't argue with you because you are not honest, and you call that an ad hominem, of course:"

You said: "You are not an honest interlocuyor."

That is an ad hominem criticism. One that you have never proven, either. The comment does nothing whatsoever to refute anything I've said which is why such personal remarks are classified as fallacies. In point of fact, even if I were dishonest, even if you somehow managed to prove that I was arguing in, say, bad faith. Or I was arguing because I'm paid to, that still doesn't prove what I have said is false.

If you could prove I was not an honest interlocutor, what I would then point out is you've made a Genetic Fallacy by attacking the source instead of the material presented.

If it seems like nearly everything you say falls under a fallacy somehow, that's because it does!

--"I'm talking about my interlocutor, not about the subject at hand,..."

Yes, that's why it's a fallacy. Good of you to notice. You're SUPPOSED to be talking about the subject at hand, not supporting your position by casting doubt on my honesty.

--"you have to be either too short of mind or too quarrelsome to respond in such a manner.

That's a False Dilemma Fallacy, btw. In addition to being Ad Hominem. There are other possibilities, including that I"m correct. :D

--"Answer, if you want, to the 50 AUTHORIZED jewish sources which say...

Authorized? by WHOM? Ah yes... the single evil Jewish cabal that helpfully AUTHORIZES such material. The one that supposedly "runs everything" in the mind of silly people like you.

Judaism is not structured like the Catholic Church. There is no single "imprimateur" that AUTHORIZES an official position for ALL Jews.

Even among Christians, there are many different denominations and opinions. Lutherans famously can't agree with each other, or with us. So an AUTHORIZED Lutheran printing does not speak for all Lutherans, or all Christians, particularly us.

Even within the Catholic Church, there are such divisions. Just look at the Amazonian Synod. Its documents are also AUTHORIZED, but they hardly speak for traditionalists.

Jews are not the single scheming bogeyman that exists in your mind. There are conservative Jews and liberal Jews. Capitalist Jews who like Donald Trump and Marxist Jews who like Bernie Sanders.

This is something you simply can NOT abide. In your world-view, they are one thing... "jews". Yes, this is how you indict yourself as a bigot. It's also why I said that ignorance is the seed of bigotry.

So much for your 50 "authorized" sources, eh? That was too easy.

--"Now, @Ultraviolet, since you say that it's not jews that arerevolutionaries,"

Quote where I said that directly, word for word. Because I'm fairly certain you can't.

That's a Strawman Fallacy on your part.

It also shows you don't know how "all, some, none" work in logical deduction. So long as two Jews exist who are Marxist revolutionaries a person can correctly say, "SOME Jews are Marxist revolutionaries." What people like you do is expand "some" to "all/ most" because you don't like Jews. --which is why people like me point out people like you are bigtoted.

--"what about judaism, its doctrine, what thet learn from their 'sacred [rotten] sripture", te talmud?

What of it? It's no different than what the Lutherans learn about Jesus or the Mormons or the Muslims. It is contrary to the teaching of the Catholic Church.

--"Is it antisemitic, id est, racist, to quote the talmud?"

In the context that you're doing, yes. For example, many Jews are atheists. They don't care about the Talmud. But again, there's a kind of Jew that has no interest for you. It doesn't fuel your religious mania, your bigotry, and so it escapes your notice.

--"Is it some type of fallacy?"

'course it is. It falls under several, in fact. Just since you asked. :D

--"Will you, now, instead of arguing, start making a strawman out of my irrefutable proofs?"

:D :D :D Please don't use debating terms when you don't understand what they mean. :D :D :D

Even if I WERE to "make a strawman out of your (LOLOL) irrefutable proofs", I would STILL be arguing, not "instead of". I would be arguing fallaciously if I made a strawman, but I'd still be arguing. You would know this if you understood how debating actually works, which you do not.

I've refuted your proofs any number of times now which hardly makes them "irrefutable", either.

--"Will you say that's the arhument on authority?"

No, in this context, I'll say it's a Red Herring. Since you asked. :D The Church has condemned literally thousands of books for being contrary to our faith. So? That doesn't make a Jewish book particularly worthy of note -except to people who have an irrational hatred of Jews.

--"If you choose to do so, would you still be a Christian?"

Being a Christian is not dependent on debating skill. For that, you should be eternally grateful. :D
@pmfji Gloria.TV has a small, yet rabidly anti-Semitic contingent. They tend to grow like mushrooms on any online venue that doesn't explicitly and regularly expunge them -that's regardless of the venue's stated topic. It isn't about Catholicism, or even Christianity. If a board doesn't weed out the first one, more follow. Always. You'll find Our Lord Jesus made a very similar observation in …More
@pmfji Gloria.TV has a small, yet rabidly anti-Semitic contingent. They tend to grow like mushrooms on any online venue that doesn't explicitly and regularly expunge them -that's regardless of the venue's stated topic. It isn't about Catholicism, or even Christianity. If a board doesn't weed out the first one, more follow. Always. You'll find Our Lord Jesus made a very similar observation in Matthew 12:43-45
www.biblegateway.com/passage/
pmfji
Just what the hell are you babbling on about again? Go join Hamas. Or Fatah. Or Jeremy Corbyn. I wish you were 14 or, at least 3 centuries old.
Tell these guys who say the same I say, they are antisemites:

"Sexual revolutionaries

Extending the subversive thesis, Jewish involvement in the X-rated industry can be seen as a proverbial two fingers to the entire WASP establishment in America. Some porn stars viewed themselves as frontline fighters in the spiritual battle between Christian America and secular humanism. According to Ford, …More
Tell these guys who say the same I say, they are antisemites:

"Sexual revolutionaries

Extending the subversive thesis, Jewish involvement in the X-rated industry can be seen as a proverbial two fingers to the entire WASP establishment in America. Some porn stars viewed themselves as frontline fighters in the spiritual battle between Christian America and secular humanism. According to Ford, Jewish X-rated actors often brag about their ‘joy in being anarchic, sexual gadflies to the puritanical beast’. Jewish involvement in porn, by this argument, is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion. Astyr remembers having ‘to run or fight for it in grammar school because I was a Jew. It could very well be that part of my porn career is an “up yours” to these people’. Al Goldstein, the publisher of Screw, said (on lukeford.net), ‘The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don’t believe in authoritarianism.’ Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream (and is no doubt consumed by those very same WASPs), its subversive character becomes more charged. Porn is no longer of the ‘what the Butler saw’ voyeuristic type; instead, it is driven to new extremes of portrayal that stretch the boundaries of the porn aesthetic. As new sexual positions are portrayed, the desire to shock (as well as entertain) seems clear.

It is a case of the traditional revolutionary/radical drive of immigrant Jews in America being channelled into sexual rather than leftist politics. Just as Jews have been disproportionately represented in radical movements over the years, so they are also disproportionately represented in the porn industry. Jews in America have been sexual revolutionaries. A large amount of the material on sexual liberation was written by Jews. Those at the forefront of the movement which forced America to adopt a more liberal view of sex were Jewish. Jews were also at the vanguard of the sexual revolution of the 1960s. Wilhelm Reich, Herbert Marcuse and Paul Goodman replaced Marx, Trotsky and Lenin as required revolutionary reading. Reich’s central preoccupations were work, love and sex, while Marcuse prophesied that a socialist utopia would free individuals to achieve sexual satisfaction. Goodman wrote of the ‘beautiful cultural consequences’ that would follow from legalizing pornography: it would ‘ennoble all our art’ and ‘humanize sexuality’. Pacheco was one Jewish porn star who read Reich’s intellectual marriage of Freud and Marx (lukeford.net):

“Before I got my first part in an adult film, I went down to an audition for an X-rated film with my hair down to my ass, a copy of Wilhelm Reich’s Sexual Revolution under my arm and yelling about work, ‘love and sex’.”

As Rabbi Samuel H. Dresner put it (E. Michael Jones, ‘Rabbi Dresner’s Dilemma: Torah v. Ethnos’ Culture Wars, May 2003), ‘Jewish rebellion has broken out on several levels’, one being ‘the prominent role of Jews as advocates to sexual experimentation’. Overall, then, porn performers are a group of people who praise rebellion, self-fulfilment and promiscuity". Source:

Triple-exthnics

Nathan Abrams on Jews in the American porn industry

Nathan Abrams | Winter 2004 – Number 196

www.jewishquarterly.org/issuearchive/articled325.html
Now, my friend I copy for you what I just wrote for your partner Ultraviolet. Read and, then, double down:

Now, Ultraviolet, since you say that it's not jews that arerevolutionaries, what about judaism, its doctrine, what thet learn from their 'sacred [rotten] sripture", te talmud? I already quoted it. It says Jesus is a son of a prostitute an a roman soldier called Panthera; an egiptian …More
Now, my friend I copy for you what I just wrote for your partner Ultraviolet. Read and, then, double down:

Now, Ultraviolet, since you say that it's not jews that arerevolutionaries, what about judaism, its doctrine, what thet learn from their 'sacred [rotten] sripture", te talmud? I already quoted it. It says Jesus is a son of a prostitute an a roman soldier called Panthera; an egiptian magician, justly killed by them for His sins; in hell for ever in boiling excrement. Is it antisemitic, id est, racist, to quote the talmud? Is it some type of fallacy? Will you, now, instead of arguing, start making a strawman out of my irrefutable proofs? Did you know the talmud is a many timescondenmed book by tge Catholic Church? Will you say that's the arhument on authority? If you choose to do so, would you still be a Christian?
--"Now, @Ultraviolet, since you say that it's not jews that arerevolutionaries,"

Quote where I said that directly, word for word @eticacasanova . Because I'm fairly certain you can't.

That's a Strawman Fallacy on your part.

It also shows you don't know how "all, some, none" work in logical deduction. So long as two Jews exist who are Marxist revolutionaries a person can correctly say, "…More
--"Now, @Ultraviolet, since you say that it's not jews that arerevolutionaries,"

Quote where I said that directly, word for word @eticacasanova . Because I'm fairly certain you can't.

That's a Strawman Fallacy on your part.

It also shows you don't know how "all, some, none" work in logical deduction. So long as two Jews exist who are Marxist revolutionaries a person can correctly say, "SOME Jews are Marxist revolutionaries." What people like you do is expand "some" to "all/ most" because you don't like Jews. --which is why people like me point out people like you are bigtoted.

--"what about judaism, its doctrine, what thet learn from their 'sacred [rotten] sripture", te talmud?

What of it? It's no different than what the Lutherans learn about Jesus or the Mormons or the Muslims. It is contrary to the teaching of the Catholic Church.

--"Is it antisemitic, id est, racist, to quote the talmud?"

In the context that you're doing, yes. For example, many Jews are atheists. They don't care about the Talmud. But again, there's a kind of Jew that has no interest for you. It doesn't fuel your religious mania, your bigotry, and so it escapes your notice.

--"Is it some type of fallacy?"

'course it is. It falls under several, in fact. Just since you asked. :D

--"Will you, now, instead of arguing, start making a strawman out of my irrefutable proofs?"

:D :D :D Please don't use debating terms when you don't understand what they mean. :D :D :D

Even if I WERE to "make a strawman out of your (LOLOL) irrefutable proofs", I would STILL be arguing, not "instead of". I would be arguing fallaciously if I made a strawman, but I'd still be arguing. You would know this if you understood how debating actually works, which you do not.

I've refuted your proofs any number of times now which hardly makes them "irrefutable", either.

--"Will you say that's the arhument on authority?"

No, in this context, I'll say it's a Red Herring. Since you asked. :D The Church has condemned literally thousands of books for being contrary to our faith. So? That doesn't make a Jewish book particularly worthy of note -except to people who have an irrational hatred of Jews.

--"If you choose to do so, would you still be a Christian?"

Being a Christian is not dependent on debating skill. For that, you should be eternally grateful. :D
Well, @Ultraviolet, thank you very much. I consider this discussion over, but it was good, you taught me something very valuable (in addition to the fun):

I can quote 50 jewish sources in which it is stated, by authorized people (representatives of B'Nai B'rith, the World Jewish Congress, famous rabbies, etc), that they are revolutionaries. I quote important historians, like Solzhenitsyn, …More
Well, @Ultraviolet, thank you very much. I consider this discussion over, but it was good, you taught me something very valuable (in addition to the fun):

I can quote 50 jewish sources in which it is stated, by authorized people (representatives of B'Nai B'rith, the World Jewish Congress, famous rabbies, etc), that they are revolutionaries. I quote important historians, like Solzhenitsyn, fathers of the Church, popes (long, unequivocal, quotes) and the Bible, to sustantiate my claim. And you dismiss all of it on the basis of suposed fallacies; in order to argue that, in reality, saying that jews are revolutionaries is only the product of bigotry and hatred. And your conclusion is spotless, perfectly logical, no need for any more proofs, the claim alone -being made by me- is enough. So, those jews who say they are revolutionaries are not antisemites; but I am, because I say what they say. And you don't see any problem there. And there's no denying it, it admits no prove to the contrary, it's a praesumptio iuris et de iure. And, if I say I don't discuss with some one like this, I'm incurring in an ad hominem fallacy.

Like I told you ut supra, it was a plessure, thank you, man, you are such a moral teacher... and a logician of high flights, too. Jesus!!!!! Qué bárbaro, gracias, mi panela, eres el mejor. Mio caro ragazzo, grazie tante, io non posso esporesare il mio cuore dopo tan gran magistro... Mercie, monsieur... Capo di tutti capi
Sarcasm is a garment you wear poorly, @eticacasanova. :)

You have accused me of being dishonest and in truth, you are the one guilty of it. No, I did NOT "dismiss all of it on the basis of suposed fallacies". I dismiss your position on the basis of very real fallacies.

Interesting point... for "supposed" fallacies, you have never ONCE disproven ANY of them. --Supposed--, indeed!

I have alrea…More
Sarcasm is a garment you wear poorly, @eticacasanova. :)

You have accused me of being dishonest and in truth, you are the one guilty of it. No, I did NOT "dismiss all of it on the basis of suposed fallacies". I dismiss your position on the basis of very real fallacies.

Interesting point... for "supposed" fallacies, you have never ONCE disproven ANY of them. --Supposed--, indeed!

I have already explained to you why your "authorized" people do not speak for all Jews. Your problem is you do not listen because you do not WANT to listen.

You "know" (i.e. believe you know) a set of "facts" about the Jewish people. Any explanation I supply why you are wrong, you ignore.

I am arguing not with a scholar or a philosopher. I am arguing with a zealot. Like every zealot, your opinion is faith-based. No example will ever disprove even a single point about Jews that you believe. You are no different than the stupid Mormons who still claim there are communities living on the moon and others living on the sun because one of their crazy founders SAID so.

No amount of science will change their opinion and no amount of reason will change yours. Still... I try:

Your "authorized sources" speak only for themselves and for those Jews who agree with those "authorized people". All the OTHER Jews, which is nearly all of them, believe differently.

I have explained that the fathers of the Church were not God and therefore capable of error. You have quotes from Popes? So? Would you acknowledge Pope Francis the same way? is he an "authorized person" for all Catholics? Is he "always right" just because he shares his often Marxist opinions? Think on it for a moment.

You apply different standards to your sources, you pick only the ones you want to believe, and ignore everything and everyone who contradicts your own petty irrational hate. That is the cornerstone of all hypocrisy.

THAT is what dishonesty looks like, THAT is how it functions. What you can not accept is that most Jews aren't the embodiment of human evil. They aren't "revolutionaries" or "marxists" or "children of satan".

They are normal people who, sadly, live their lives in what we Catholics recognize as spiritual error.

You live in a different kind of error. You have turned your bigotry over Jews into a kind of malign anti-religion. You have your own selection of "theologians," your own unclean "gospels" and "commentaries".

Somewhere, a long time ago, some foul "evangelist" or "missionary" filled your head with his filth, covered it with lots of manure and your posts are the noxious result.
God bless you, man, illuminates and set you free. Amén
advoluntas@aol.com likes this.
Prayhard
Morality for me, not for thee, sayers the Talmudists.
Jews have a free pass, because they are in power, they are the subverters and the talmud says they are superior and blablabla... But, since it's not a religion, half the jewish population of so called "Israel" is comprised of atheists and that's the most abortion and gay friendly state of the world. They are being the victims of their own subversion: go figure, had I known it would be so, and 14 …More
Jews have a free pass, because they are in power, they are the subverters and the talmud says they are superior and blablabla... But, since it's not a religion, half the jewish population of so called "Israel" is comprised of atheists and that's the most abortion and gay friendly state of the world. They are being the victims of their own subversion: go figure, had I known it would be so, and 14 or, at least, 3 centuries ago I'd have started to redirect their generosity towards them!!!!!!!!!!