Müller: Benedict Is Not "Pope Emeritus" But "Bishop Emeritus"

“We don’t have two Popes, there is only one Pope, Francis,” Cardinal Gerhard Müller told Corriere.it (January 14). According to Müller, Benedict’s chosen title “Pope emeritus” is a form of courtesy, …
Gunman123
Cardinal muller is very very confused bishop emeritus dont where white cassok and red shoes and the fiser man's ring. More over they campaign for the election of pachamama Francis.
Yeah, and he supports liberation theology... Very bad.
Gesù è con noi likes this.
aderito
In which way are you all on pope francis side ,even when pachamamas are brought into the church ? when he says that Jesus was not Devine until is death and ressurection ? or Mary is not the Co~redemptrix ?,and etc ,etc ,etc ??
Gunman123 and one more user like this.
Gunman123 likes this.
Thors Catholic Hammer likes this.
MyronM
Müller: Benedict is not "Pope Emeritus" but "Bishop Emeritus". The cardinal is right: B16 is the "Bishop in white" of Fatima's 3rd secret. Before his death he will receive a wonderful chance of repentance, conversion and martyrdom for Catholic faith.
elbow
OK. There are three options: 1) Bergoglio is Pope, 2) Ratzinger is Pope, 3) SV. I'm tired of all the speculations. I leave the final judgement to the Church and history.
Ah, now the papacy is a 'courtesy title'. As if Jesus Christ had told Peter you will be a pope until you feel like it and when you want you can retire. The Marxist Gerhard Müller distorts the dogma of the papacy and continues to demonstrate that he is a modernist heretic and the modernists do not know how to explain that Pope Benedict XVI continues to dress as Pope, using the papal ring, …More
Ah, now the papacy is a 'courtesy title'. As if Jesus Christ had told Peter you will be a pope until you feel like it and when you want you can retire. The Marxist Gerhard Müller distorts the dogma of the papacy and continues to demonstrate that he is a modernist heretic and the modernists do not know how to explain that Pope Benedict XVI continues to dress as Pope, using the papal ring, preserving the name of Benedict XVI and imparting the apostolic blessing Nor do they know how to explain why Bergoglio from the beginning did not call himself Pope but Bishop of Rome.
Gunman123 and one more user like this.
Gunman123 likes this.
Thors Catholic Hammer likes this.
iwirawan
No Your Eminence, Benedict IS Pope of the Catholic Church, The Berg is just some spiritual leader of the Pachamama religion. The religion that worship nature, (and Soros I think?). The religion of the confused, but currently they occupy Rome.
I am sure one day God will send us another Pope after we get our chastisement that we deserve and after our repentance who will undo all the damages by …More
No Your Eminence, Benedict IS Pope of the Catholic Church, The Berg is just some spiritual leader of the Pachamama religion. The religion that worship nature, (and Soros I think?). The religion of the confused, but currently they occupy Rome.
I am sure one day God will send us another Pope after we get our chastisement that we deserve and after our repentance who will undo all the damages by this occupier.
Thors Catholic Hammer and one more user like this.
Thors Catholic Hammer likes this.
la verdad prevalece likes this.
That's nice, Cardinal. Pope Emeritus Benedict chose his current title while he was still reigning Pope.
Benedict failed to resign in accordance with canon law.
The resignation did not comply with wording of canon 332 no 2 in terms of resigning the office nor has it complied with the requirement to be properly manifested.
You obviously haven’t seen Pope Benedict going about in white clothes and imparting his apostolic blessing just the other day to cardinal Sarah.
Would I be correct in assuming you're sufficiently well-educated to understand the term "Argumentum Ad Nauseam" without having to google it? ;-)

We've covered this point of Canon Law several times already. Your interpretation of what constitutes a "valid" resignation or "proper manifestation" is essentially a self-serving one shared by many: "I need to find a reason to invalidate Benedict's …More
Would I be correct in assuming you're sufficiently well-educated to understand the term "Argumentum Ad Nauseam" without having to google it? ;-)

We've covered this point of Canon Law several times already. Your interpretation of what constitutes a "valid" resignation or "proper manifestation" is essentially a self-serving one shared by many: "I need to find a reason to invalidate Benedict's resignation because I don't like his successor."

You infer Benedict is still Pope because of his dress and blessings. What do you infer from his (and Cardinal Sarah's) publicly stated "filial obedience" to Pope Francis?
It’s a matter of basic church law.
For any pope to resign he can not say, he resigns the ministry he must in words state he reigns the office.
Benedict has not actually done that.
The dress , titles etc are the manifestation of his partial and failed resignation.
But you are happy to accept a manifest formal heretic like Bergoglio as Christ’s true Vicar on Earth.
Well good luck with that because …More
It’s a matter of basic church law.
For any pope to resign he can not say, he resigns the ministry he must in words state he reigns the office.
Benedict has not actually done that.
The dress , titles etc are the manifestation of his partial and failed resignation.
But you are happy to accept a manifest formal heretic like Bergoglio as Christ’s true Vicar on Earth.
Well good luck with that because I can’t and never will.
"For any pope to resign he can not say, he resigns the ministry he must in words state he reigns the office."

The Canon Law you've been citing, 332 Section 2 does not say that. Nowhere does it say "he must in words say he resigns the office" That's you manfacturing law where it literally does not exist.

"But you are happy to accept a manifest formal heretic like Bergoglio as Christ’s true Vicar…More
"For any pope to resign he can not say, he resigns the ministry he must in words state he reigns the office."

The Canon Law you've been citing, 332 Section 2 does not say that. Nowhere does it say "he must in words say he resigns the office" That's you manfacturing law where it literally does not exist.

"But you are happy to accept a manifest formal heretic like Bergoglio as Christ’s true Vicar on Earth."

Ironically enough, the same can be said of those who argue in favor of Benedict XVI. According to many critics Benedict XVI is supposedly an anti-pope, apostate and heretic as well.

www.calefactory.org/misc-v2-heresiesofb16.htm
www.opusdeialert.com/footnotes.htm
www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/…/anti-pope-bened…
holywar.org/Ratzinger.htm
Poor old cardinal Muller. Desperate to paper over the cracks caused by Benedict’s faulty resignation and Bergoglios formal heresies.
It’s not working because the gaps are widening every day .
If Muller were a man he would tell antipope francis to clear off.
Sepp Benedikt likes this.
But he is waking up,, and that is by the Grace of God, for his soul and ours....Deus lo Vult!
la verdad prevalece likes this.
If Müller really said that all cardinals, bishops and Catholics are on the side of Francis,” and were it true, then they all are working as Antipope Bergoglio to destroy Holy Mother Church. It seems that many even most cardinals and bishops are.

May it not be so. Certainly there is a Catholic remnant opposing Antipope Bergoglio. And I warrant Christ and the Virgin Mary will not permit Bergoglio …More
If Müller really said that all cardinals, bishops and Catholics are on the side of Francis,” and were it true, then they all are working as Antipope Bergoglio to destroy Holy Mother Church. It seems that many even most cardinals and bishops are.

May it not be so. Certainly there is a Catholic remnant opposing Antipope Bergoglio. And I warrant Christ and the Virgin Mary will not permit Bergoglio to destroy the Church.

“Rejoice, Virgin Mary, for alone thous hast destroyed all heresies throughout the world.”
Sepp Benedikt and one more user like this.
Sepp Benedikt likes this.
Thors Catholic Hammer likes this.
Cardinal Müller is a clown. He was known as the Clown at the CDF. He doesn’t care about truth only about career advancement. Look where his loyalty to Antipope Francis landed him—out the door on his Fat German Asinorum.
Thors Catholic Hammer likes this.
Muller is not a clown . I believe he is well intentioned but unable or unwilling to join the necessary dots to expose the false pontificate of Bergoglio.
Fair enough. But he is playing politics to position himself and his ‘brand’. Mamba pamby deference and fealty to Bergoglio is not courageous.
Thors Catholic Hammer likes this.
The Holy Ghost is working on him. Mueller has in the past denied the Real Presence (in writing--making him a formal heretic--Fr. Joe Ratzinger did the same in writing...auf Deutsch naturlich). I think he is learning Faith once again...let us hope so for the sake of his eternal soul...
Papa Ratz is a part of the Hegelian Dialectic serving as the false opposition. Anti-thesis to the neo-modernist thesis. He changed his coat-of-arms eschewing the papal crown for a bishop's mitre. A revolutionary and deeply damaging act. He resigned from the papacy-- another revolutionary act. He and all the post VII Popes are responsible for the damnation of billions. Remember, according to the …More
Papa Ratz is a part of the Hegelian Dialectic serving as the false opposition. Anti-thesis to the neo-modernist thesis. He changed his coat-of-arms eschewing the papal crown for a bishop's mitre. A revolutionary and deeply damaging act. He resigned from the papacy-- another revolutionary act. He and all the post VII Popes are responsible for the damnation of billions. Remember, according to the saints, the streets of Hell are paved with the skulls of Bishops....and Popes...cf Dante...time to wake up and smell the coffee...
MyronM
Note the motto of BXVI' coat of arms: 'Cooperatores veritatis' ('Cooperators of the truth') - it seems that Bishop Joseph Raztinger has long thought about splitting the mandate of church authority.
Francis 1st is a formal manifest heretic. As such he can not be the Vicar of Christ.
Negative... if you dig deep enough..Paul VI, JPII, Ben XVI as well....in fact, Francis is actually less dangerous than these others, as he doesn't hide his goals. He is helping to wake up many...the Holy Ghost moves...
As popes none of the above mentioned manifested formal heresy.
Bergoglio as a pretend “pope” has manifested formal heresy in his writings and actions
hitherto
It's the Reformation all over again. The faithful need to reclaim their church. From the top down these bishops are thugs (definition of thug according to Oxford HISTORICAL
a member of a religious organization of robbers and assassins in India. Devotees of the goddess Kali, the Thugs waylaid and strangled their victims, usually travelers, in a ritually prescribed manner. They were suppressed by …More
It's the Reformation all over again. The faithful need to reclaim their church. From the top down these bishops are thugs (definition of thug according to Oxford HISTORICAL
a member of a religious organization of robbers and assassins in India. Devotees of the goddess Kali, the Thugs waylaid and strangled their victims, usually travelers, in a ritually prescribed manner. They were suppressed by the British in the 1830s.)
BrotherBeowulf likes this.
Protestant Revolution based on a lust for lust and gold....
Lalanz
Once you become a heretic, you no longer are the Pope...period... God seems to Not have given these cardinals clearity
Thors Catholic Hammer likes this.
Lalanz—Antipope Bergoglio was never Pope to begin with due to Pope Benedict’s faux and forced partial resignation. . . . But as you say Bergoglio amply demonstrates his heretical anti catholic views in Buenes Aires and for that and other reasons—like forcing out Benedict and conspiring to elect himself—disqualified himself even had the conclave been valid.

Viva il Papa! Viva, Benedetto!
Thors Catholic Hammer likes this.
Lalanz--- that's a big negative, shipmate. Only a Pope and/or a council after a trial can determine that. It may be true, but it is way above our paygrade to judge...We have to hold all the post VII Popes as Popes. A future Pope and/or Council will decide according to canon law.
The Unrepentant Revolutionary www.linkedin.com/pulse/unrepentant-rev… Today, when many conservatives believe that Benedict XVI has became a strong advocate of Church tradition, the question is more opportune than ever. Did he abjure his previous Progressivism? I think the record will show, that in deed, word, and devotion Joseph Ratzinger was and is and will likely die an heresiarch and …More
The Unrepentant Revolutionary www.linkedin.com/pulse/unrepentant-rev… Today, when many conservatives believe that Benedict XVI has became a strong advocate of Church tradition, the question is more opportune than ever. Did he abjure his previous Progressivism? I think the record will show, that in deed, word, and devotion Joseph Ratzinger was and is and will likely die an heresiarch and inveterate revolutionary.
"It is 'absolutely clear' to him that all cardinals, bishops and Catholics are on Francis' side." Well, then, he's sadly mistaken because, as far as I'm concerned, I'm not with whoever teaches or has been taught to teach error... !!!
BrotherBeowulf and one more user like this.
BrotherBeowulf likes this.
Lalanz likes this.
The Unrepentant Revolutionary www.linkedin.com/pulse/unrepentant-rev… Today, when many conservatives believe that Benedict XVI has became a strong advocate of Church tradition, the question is more opportune than ever. Did he abjure his previous Progressivism? I think the record will show, that in deed, word, and devotion Joseph Ratzinger was and is and will likely die an heresiarch and …More
The Unrepentant Revolutionary www.linkedin.com/pulse/unrepentant-rev… Today, when many conservatives believe that Benedict XVI has became a strong advocate of Church tradition, the question is more opportune than ever. Did he abjure his previous Progressivism? I think the record will show, that in deed, word, and devotion Joseph Ratzinger was and is and will likely die an heresiarch and inveterate revolutionary.
I do not believe that Pope Benedict is a heretic. A very confused theologian yes. What matters about him is that he is the only default authentic pope in the light of his defective resignation and the formal heresies proclaimed by antipope Francis.
S. B.—while Pope Benedict may not have abjured his past errors as professor he did not once promulgate or formally teach error as pope. He needs our prayers now more than ever. He freed the Old Mass.

Pope Benedict struck a momentous blow as if with Thor’s mighty hammer just yesterday in defense of Holy Mother Church and the Priesthood—giving Antipope Bergoglio fits of rage!
Arthur McGowan and one more user like this.
Arthur McGowan likes this.
Thors Catholic Hammer likes this.
Bishop (Cardinal) Ratzinger is at least a material heretic, and most likely (a future council and Pope will judge) a formal heretic. He has never repudiated is past heretical beliefs. He is the unrepentant revolutionary...neo-modernist to the core. Is the Holy Ghost working on him? Yes, I think so. I hope so fo rthe sake of his eternal soul...
BrotherBeowulf-- Gǣð ā Wyrd swā hīo scel!
BrotherBeowulf likes this.
One more comment from Sepp Benedikt