Archbishop Bans Communion On The Hand

Kampala Archbishop Cyprian Kizito Lwanga, 67, Uganda, published a 1 February decree forbidding the reception of Holy Communion on the hand (below). Priests are only allowed to distribute Holy Communi…
Wish Western Bishops had their faith and courage.
DEFENSA DE LA FE likes this.
WESTERN BISHOPS ARE MORE INTERESTED IN THEIR WELLBEEN THAN IN SPIRITUALLYTY THEY ARE MORE WORLD ORIENTED THAN GOD. AND THEY ARE MUTE DOGS.
J G Tasan and one more user like this.
J G Tasan likes this.
Alex A likes this.
THIS ARCHBISHOP IS A REAL CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP MAKE SURE YOU NAME HIM A CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP BECAUSE THERE ARE LOTS OF ARCHBISHOPS BISHOPS CARDINALS AND PRIESTS THAT ARE NOT CATHOLIC. BELONG TO THE FALSE church.
THIS CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP ALSO PROHIBITED ADULTERS TO TAKE THE SACRED EUCARIST. THIS IS IN FAVOUR OF OUR CATHOLIC CHURCH BUT AGAINST THE ANTI CHURCH.
Novella Nurney and one more user like this.
Novella Nurney likes this.
Alex A likes this.
Remnant Army is fine and strong. God bless Arc Lwanga. No lay extraordinary ministers
DEFENSA DE LA FE likes this.
YES EXCELLENT. EVERY BISHOP SHOULD FOLLOW HIM.
Small step in the right direction. Now ban and Novus Ordo and then we're talking.
Alex A likes this.
DEFENSA DE LA FE likes this.
St Cuthbert,

Referencing an obsessive poster, somewhere down below you wrote:
prescribed anti psychotics

Personally I believe that the individual in question is self medicating by recklessly imbibing copious amounts of Jameson’s Irish Whiskey. However, judging from this individuals irrational fixation on Pope Francis and his visceral, daily animus for the man, your reference to psychosis is …More
St Cuthbert,

Referencing an obsessive poster, somewhere down below you wrote:
prescribed anti psychotics

Personally I believe that the individual in question is self medicating by recklessly imbibing copious amounts of Jameson’s Irish Whiskey. However, judging from this individuals irrational fixation on Pope Francis and his visceral, daily animus for the man, your reference to psychosis is indeed accurate and can lead to schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.

If he is not already institutionalized and his behavior being carefully monitored, he ought to be.
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is an anxiety disorder in which people have recurring, thoughts, ideas or sensations (obsessions) that make them feel driven to do something repetitively (compulsions). The disorder is manifested by repetitive behavior in which the person affected feels compelled to perform. Doesn't that kind of behavior sound like someone who posts daily at this website?

Habit Reversal Training and medication have been known to be effective in treating OCD. However, I am not this individual’s physician and, other than general prayers for the sick and dying, I have no intention of ever getting near this sicko. And, if such an individual would ever extend his hand to me during the handshake of peace at mass, I would make him regret it for a long-long time.

Good luck. Gloria.tv, a shadow of its former self, has now become a sewer abounding with the musings of idiots. This is the reason I and so many others do not choose to be associated with the lunacy that currently prevails at what once was a strong Catholic website.
@Holy Cannoli

2 hours ago
Unable to even string together a coherent counter argument you hide behind abuse and then whinge about strong catholic standards .
Part of your strong catholic standards according to your diatribe is to threaten violence on those who disagree with you.
That fits in well with the thug antipope Francis whose penchant for hitting Chinese women is well known.
It is no wond…More
@Holy Cannoli

2 hours ago
Unable to even string together a coherent counter argument you hide behind abuse and then whinge about strong catholic standards .
Part of your strong catholic standards according to your diatribe is to threaten violence on those who disagree with you.
That fits in well with the thug antipope Francis whose penchant for hitting Chinese women is well known.
It is no wonder you admire him so much.
thug antipope Francis

Even in your failed try to make a counter argument you can't help your obsession with Pope Francis. You prove every point I made in my previous post.

Pay attention, Dearie. Habit Reversal Training and medication have been known to be effective in treating OCD. However, I am not this individual’s physician and, other than general prayers for the sick and dying, I have no …More
thug antipope Francis

Even in your failed try to make a counter argument you can't help your obsession with Pope Francis. You prove every point I made in my previous post.

Pay attention, Dearie. Habit Reversal Training and medication have been known to be effective in treating OCD. However, I am not this individual’s physician and, other than general prayers for the sick and dying, I have no intention of ever getting near this sicko. And, if such an individual would ever extend his hand to me during the handshake of peace at mass, I would make him regret it for a long-long time.

Indeed you would regret it. I would simply spit in my hand and then allow your loony OCD demented intellect to wrestle on whether or not there were any anti-pope, schismatic, heretical, thug Pope Francis pathogens in my spit.

You can have the last word Hummer. I'm done wasting time with you.
@@Holy Cannoli
It is obvious from your violent threatening and hate filled ravings
you are indeed a disciple of antipope Francis who indulges frequently in that type of angry rhetoric towards those he disagrees with.
The antipope Francis has admitted to receiving psychiatric care in the past but following and emulating such people poses no problem for a “strong catholic”like you.
Yes.
Your viol…More
@@Holy Cannoli
It is obvious from your violent threatening and hate filled ravings
you are indeed a disciple of antipope Francis who indulges frequently in that type of angry rhetoric towards those he disagrees with.
The antipope Francis has admitted to receiving psychiatric care in the past but following and emulating such people poses no problem for a “strong catholic”like you.
Yes.
Your violent ravings and hatreds indeed tell us everything we need to know about you.
EXCELLENT ARCHBISHOP EVERY PRIEST EVERY BISHOP HAVE TO DO THAT NO ONE THAT HAS NO CONSECRATED HANDS CAN TOUCH THE BODY OF CHRIST.
IF YOU WANT TO BE A GOOD EUCARISTIC RECEPTIONIST RECEIVE THE BIDY OF CHRIST IN YOUR TONGUE AND KNEELED AS ALL THE SAINTS HAVE DONE AS IT IS STATED IN THE TRIDENTINE MASS THAT HAS BEEN IN OUR CHURCH FOR TWO THOUSAND YEARS.
IF ANYO…More
EXCELLENT ARCHBISHOP EVERY PRIEST EVERY BISHOP HAVE TO DO THAT NO ONE THAT HAS NO CONSECRATED HANDS CAN TOUCH THE BODY OF CHRIST.
IF YOU WANT TO BE A GOOD EUCARISTIC RECEPTIONIST RECEIVE THE BIDY OF CHRIST IN YOUR TONGUE AND KNEELED AS ALL THE SAINTS HAVE DONE AS IT IS STATED IN THE TRIDENTINE MASS THAT HAS BEEN IN OUR CHURCH FOR TWO THOUSAND YEARS.
IF ANYONE DONOT WANT TO DO IT TELL YOUR PRIEST TO USE A SILVER SPOON SILVER KILLS ALL GERMS.
LIVE CHRIST THE KING!!!
Thors Catholic Hammer likes this.
Hooray!!!
Hooray for what?
Communion on the tongue was an innovation in the early church as prior to that everybody received in the hand following Christ’s own method used at the Last Supper.
How nastily you talk for an alleged follower of Christ
Communion on the tongue is a continual tradition. Receiving it on the hands is an irreverent Dutch custom, not something derived from paleo-Christian times.
Why is it irreverent?
Sticking out your tongue at somebody was regarded was and is considered an example of Supreme irreverence .

Communion in the hand is far more reverent and proven to Ben more hygienic.
Never have I heard that! I learned that the Disciples were permitted by Our Lord to touch the Bread (and no doubt the wine too) at the Last Supper because they had been made Priests by Our Lord - thereby set aside for the task and permitted to do so!. It is true also, we know that they were His first Bishops from whom the Apostolic Succession comes down to the Priesthood today.

Even these days, …More
Never have I heard that! I learned that the Disciples were permitted by Our Lord to touch the Bread (and no doubt the wine too) at the Last Supper because they had been made Priests by Our Lord - thereby set aside for the task and permitted to do so!. It is true also, we know that they were His first Bishops from whom the Apostolic Succession comes down to the Priesthood today.

Even these days, it is known that a Priest's hands are Consecrated during Ordination, (set apart from ours as Laity) so they are deemed fit by Our King to touch His Holy Body and Blood. As Our Lady was "set apart" and immaculately conceived free of all sin, so the Son of God could tabernacle within her, so, it makes sense, that no person should consider themselves worthy to handle Our Lord unless ritually consecrated to the Priesthood and made worthy by a ritual ordination in the proper manner! Priests do not just TOUCH the Consecrated Host, they ritually wash themselves prior to Holy Communion to remove any impurities from them. As Our Lady had to - like every OTHER Mother, submit to the Law (Feb 2) and go and bathe and be classed as purified (even though she had no need of purification) she submitted to it as it was Temple Law for every woman to be so cleansed after having given birth to her child. It seems inappropriate that a Lay person would be allowed to just touch the Host, whilst the Priest has to perform the ritual of purification of his Sacred Hands, prior to HIMSELF being considered fit to touch Our Lord. AND HE IS THE PRIEST - the person classed Consecrated to do so!!!

The fact that the Disciples were classed as His Priests BEFORE the Resurrection, (according to the training I have received) is shown in

Matthew 12:1-8.

The Lord and His Disciples wander through the fields eating the grains of wheat, only to come under the Judgement of the Pharisees that they are blaspheming the Sabbath by touching the Wheat and eating the grains as nobody but a Priest is permitted to handle grain on the sabbath.. since it was part of his Ministry to bake the Bread of the Presence which a Priest serving in the Temple prepared Daily, and placed on a plate before the Lord. The Bread of the Presence, you probably know, is an Old Covenant precursor of the Holy Eucharist, (Luther somewhat has obscured this connection, probably deliberately, since he translated the Hebrew incorrectly which when Anglicised from the German it became "Showbread") but it's proper title according to the Hebrew was "The Bread of the Presence." It was baked by the Priests in the Temple upon the Sabbath and no-one but a Priest was able to pick grain on the Sabbath.

Christ responds to the Pharisees accusation against His Priests, the disciples. Wherein He specifies that King David had entered the Holy of Holies, even though he was not permitted to do so, not being a Priest, and had not only handled but eaten the Sacred Bread of the Presence, due to his hunger. In the Passage of Scripture in the Book of Matthew, Our Lord confirms with the Pharisees that nobody but a Priest is permitted to pluck and eat Grain on the Sabbath.

Our Lord tells the Pharisees that He is "Far greater than the Temple" (He is of course plucking the grain because He IS the Eternal High Priest and can legitimately do so! But, what excuse does He give for His Disciples being able to do so? It is obvious, they are His Priesthood. This is what The early Church taught that Christ had permitted them to handle and eat the grains of wheat on the Sabbath, because unlike David they were already His Sacred Priests.

Dr Brant Pitre covers all of this little known information on this talk. It's a great presentation. He provides evidence for the historical foundations of the Holy Eucharist in the Old Testament...

Dr Brant Pitre - Jesus and the Jewish Roots of the Eucharist www.youtube.com/watch
@Caroline03
The disciples were never formally consecrated as priests as far as I know.

But even if they were Christ gave his church the power to administer the sacaments including the manner of reception.

Therefore the churches catholic magisterium has permitted reception of communion in the hand therefore Christ permits it.

Catholics who reject and condemn the practice are in serious erro…More
@Caroline03
The disciples were never formally consecrated as priests as far as I know.

But even if they were Christ gave his church the power to administer the sacaments including the manner of reception.

Therefore the churches catholic magisterium has permitted reception of communion in the hand therefore Christ permits it.

Catholics who reject and condemn the practice are in serious error and disloyal to the church they profess membership of.

1 hour ago
DEFENSA DE LA FE likes this.
Caroline03 likes this.
I have received communion on the tongue along with saliva from a nearby communicants mouth that made its way onto the Eucharistic ministers fingers.
This deeply unhygienic method of distributing Holy Communion should either be abolished or the method drastically upgraded.
This so called archishbishop is guilty of inhuman conduct that places lives in danger.
What else would you expect from a …More
I have received communion on the tongue along with saliva from a nearby communicants mouth that made its way onto the Eucharistic ministers fingers.
This deeply unhygienic method of distributing Holy Communion should either be abolished or the method drastically upgraded.
This so called archishbishop is guilty of inhuman conduct that places lives in danger.
What else would you expect from a supporter of that enemy of the human race antipope Bergoglio?
Christ at the Last Supper distributed the bread into the Hand of each disciple.
Communion on the tongue was an innovation in the early church as prior to that everybody received in the hand.
I am not a modernist merely a practical catholic interested in essentials , not outward practices like you.

You also I note continue to acknowledge a formally heretical schismatic priest like Bergoglio as …More
Christ at the Last Supper distributed the bread into the Hand of each disciple.
Communion on the tongue was an innovation in the early church as prior to that everybody received in the hand.
I am not a modernist merely a practical catholic interested in essentials , not outward practices like you.

You also I note continue to acknowledge a formally heretical schismatic priest like Bergoglio as a “pope”.

So just exactly who is the modernist ( whatever that idiotic term means) here.?
@@St Cuthbert Mayne
See my comment above please.
3 more comments from Thors Catholic Hammer
@St Cuthbert Mayne

You continue to accept a formally heretical man like Francis as a valid pope.
That makes you a modernist.
Not only a modernist but a Catholic snob who thinks bishops are privileged Catholics superior to lay Catholics.
Intinction was not employed at the Last Supper as far as I know and yes I have it on good authority that Jesus distributed the bread into the hand of each …More
@St Cuthbert Mayne

You continue to accept a formally heretical man like Francis as a valid pope.
That makes you a modernist.
Not only a modernist but a Catholic snob who thinks bishops are privileged Catholics superior to lay Catholics.
Intinction was not employed at the Last Supper as far as I know and yes I have it on good authority that Jesus distributed the bread into the hand of each disciple.

Your hatred of people who receive communion in the hand is quite astounding.
Having received communion at many TLM masses on the tongue, along with the saliva on occasions transferred via the priest s fingers , I can confidently state that such a method is deeply deeply unhygienic a potential health hazard

But your bizarre superstitious attitude along with your hatreds really tell us all we want to know about you.
@St Cuthbert Mayne

56 minutes ago
In permitting practising adulterers to receive the Eucharist without purpose of amendment expressed in confession Francis permits sacrilige.

This is all laid out in Francises exhortation Amoris Laetitia which you clearly have never heard of before so go read chapter 8 now.

This specific offence by a priest is condemned in the articles of the Council of …More
@St Cuthbert Mayne

56 minutes ago
In permitting practising adulterers to receive the Eucharist without purpose of amendment expressed in confession Francis permits sacrilige.

This is all laid out in Francises exhortation Amoris Laetitia which you clearly have never heard of before so go read chapter 8 now.

This specific offence by a priest is condemned in the articles of the Council of Trent along with the penalty of EXCOMMUNICATION.

Thats the evidence so run along now like a good little lad and do the homework that you have seriously neglected to do.
@St Cuthbert Mayne

42 minutes ago
A public formal declaration is not required in a case like Francises where the penalty of excommunication for heresy is automatically incurred.

But keep on believing that a man like bergoglio who wants to destroy the catholic sacramental system and publicly worships pagan idols is somehow the Vicar of Christ.

Believe in a cruel Christ like that if you …More
@St Cuthbert Mayne

42 minutes ago
A public formal declaration is not required in a case like Francises where the penalty of excommunication for heresy is automatically incurred.

But keep on believing that a man like bergoglio who wants to destroy the catholic sacramental system and publicly worships pagan idols is somehow the Vicar of Christ.

Believe in a cruel Christ like that if you wish.

Oh I forgot, you are not a catholic so Christ is irrelevant to you anyway who now say above that nobody cares.
Alex A
So very sad this backward and forward dismissiveness of one's fellow catholic.
@@Alex A
Yes.
The extreme hatreds expressed by St Cuthbert Mayne, Ultraviolet and Holy Canoli all follow the pattern of pathological hatred expressed by antipope Francis toward persons who disagree with him.
This is one sure sign that none of these people are actually Catholic.
@St Cuthbert Mayne
@St Cuthbert Mayne

The extreme hatreds expressed by you , Ultraviolet and Holy Canoli all follow the pattern of pathological hatred expressed by antipope Francis toward persons who disagree with him.

This is one sure sign that none of you people are actually Catholic
One more comment from Thors Catholic Hammer
@St Cuthbert Mayne
The extreme hatreds expressed by you toward persons you disagree with all follow the pattern of pathological hatred expressed by antipope Francis toward persons who disagree with him.

This is one sure sign that you are not a genuine Catholic.