Gloria.tv And Coronavirus: Huge Amount Of Traffic, Standstill in Donations
catholicfamilynews.com

Francis' Nightmares for the Church: Analysis of New Apostolic Exhortation

Francis had some dreams, but they are really nightmares for the Church. These are not the dreams of the Patriarch Joseph, nor those of St. Joseph or …
I would give it a LIKE in thanks, but the document is disgraceful.
Thanks for posting this
Short version: Pope Francis has been watching "The Emerald Forest (1985)" way too often. :P
There is now no such entity as “pope” francis.
That individual was excommunicated some years ago.
Some actually believed he was a pope at one time but those numbers are , thank God, dwindling.
The problem arose because the real Pope Benedict xvi never resigned the papacy PROPERLY.
Many, including himself, thought he did, but that confusion is being cleared up now.
"Many, including himself, thought he did, but that confusion is being cleared up now."

Thank you, Crackers. What a lovely concession you offered in that sentence. :D By saying this you acknowledge Benedict XVI

a.) wanted to resign
b.) made an effort to resign
c.) and assumed he had done so.

According to Canon 332.2 So long as he did a.) and b.) and properly maniftested them (and there's …More
"Many, including himself, thought he did, but that confusion is being cleared up now."

Thank you, Crackers. What a lovely concession you offered in that sentence. :D By saying this you acknowledge Benedict XVI

a.) wanted to resign
b.) made an effort to resign
c.) and assumed he had done so.

According to Canon 332.2 So long as he did a.) and b.) and properly maniftested them (and there's no Canon Law defining how that must be done, either) then he resigned.

The problem arose because the real Pope Benedict xvi never resigned the papacy PROPERLY."

The problem "arose" because you don't like his successor and for no other reason. You're inventing extra-Canonical requirements that simply don't exist.

I've covered this a dozen times by now. The only "proper" resignation you'll ever accept is the one he didn't give. You will always invent another "interpretation" another "requirement" another "stipulation".

Worse, none of them exist in Canon Law except where YOU choose to fallaciously interpret them in obvious bad-faith to reach the same desired conclusion.

How often you claim to care so much for "Pope Benedict", you claim to worry so much that he's "mistreated" and "under house arrest" and every other fairy-story you invent.

But when it suits you, here you are, exploiting the fact a 92 year old man in poor health doesn't want to spend his few remaining years endlessly re-addressing his resignation.

...and even if he somehow impossibly managed to cover every single point you could possibly invent, your last unproven fall-back will always be

"some evil Mafia thug MADE him write all this, so it doesn't really count."

Seriously, Thor. You sicken me.

If you ever wonder why I'm so implacable in debunking your sewage on GTV, take a good long look at yourself.

There's plenty that's pathetic about you and none of it's amusing.
CFN still calls Francis Pope because they aren't staffed by delusional parrots yammering the same meaningless accusations every day. You see, Thors Catholic Hammer? It isn't so amazing at all. ;-)
It’s quite revealing that each time I refer to the anti papacy of the excommunicated formal heretic known as “francis “ and the enduring papacy of Pope Benedict XVI it provokes a very predictable knee jerk Pavlovian type response from you.
It might be even amusing were it not so pathetic.
Ah well.
Now that you mention it, just about every post on GTV provokes the same Pavlovian type response from you. Go look up the psychiatric term "projection" sometime, you silly parrot. In your case, the reaction is an irrelevant seque to "anniepope Francis", typcially as an preface to your other regularly repeated lies. So, BenedictXVI's papacy is enduring is it?

Then he must still be wearing …More
Now that you mention it, just about every post on GTV provokes the same Pavlovian type response from you. Go look up the psychiatric term "projection" sometime, you silly parrot. In your case, the reaction is an irrelevant seque to "anniepope Francis", typcially as an preface to your other regularly repeated lies. So, BenedictXVI's papacy is enduring is it?

Then he must still be wearing his official Fishermans's ring, yes? The one with his title engraved on it. Reads like BENEDICTVS XVI.

Should be a simple matter for you to prove your claim once and for all with a nice high-res image from 2019 showing Benedict wearing his Papal Ring.

How about it, Crackers?

No big walls of bold text, no rampant underlining. Just an URL to a 2019 photo of Benedict wearing "the Fisherman's Ring". Simple enough.

Put up or shut up.
Quite amazing that CFN still refer to “francis “ as some class of “pope”
He is nothing of the kind having now revealed himself as an enemy of God and by extension the entire human race.