02:44

Francis Proclaims a Crossbreed Theology

Francis Proclaims a Crossbreed Theology During his December 12 homily on the feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe, Francis again dived into crossbreed-phantasies, saying that during her apparitions in …More
Francis Proclaims a Crossbreed Theology
During his December 12 homily on the feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe, Francis again dived into crossbreed-phantasies, saying that during her apparitions in Guadalupe, Our Lady “wanted to become a crossbreed” with the seer, Saint Juan Diego, and also with “the people.” He also claimed that “Mother Mary crossbreeds God.”
Francis Is Repeating an Old Heretic
The Roman historian Roberto de Mattei pointed out on CorrispondenzaRomana.it that Francis was, perhaps unknowingly, repeating the heresy of Eutyches, an archimandrite at Constantinople who died in 456. He claimed that, in the Incarnation, Christ’s humanity and divinity merged, and formed a substance that was neither God nor man. Pope Leo the Great called for the famous Council of Calzedon which condemned Eutyches.
Francis Said It More than Once
De Mattei observes that Francis crossbread-theology is also expressed in what he told the Italian journalist, atheist and enemy of the Church, Eugenio …More
Bergoglio is not now or never has been a valid pope.
He has no authority over anybody and should be ignored by all Catholics.
Bergoglio repeats the heresy of the 'Crossbreed of the Incarnation' of Eutchyes who was condemned as a heretic and excommunicated.
Bergoglio repite la herejía del ' mestizaje de la Encarnación' de Eutchyes que fue condenado como hereje y excomulgado.
Bergoglio's “mestizo” vision regarding the Mystery of the Incarnation is in the heresy of Eutyches, who was condemned as a heretic and excommunicated. rorate-caeli.blogspot.com
Col. Buckshot likes this.
foward
Bergoglio is influenced by Kabbalah.
Fischl
Obviously, the Bergo is a crossbreed himself; guess from whom.
Don Reto Nay likes this.
Any Bishop which talks like this man, is probably fornicating and thinks its meritorious.
Arthur McGowan likes this.
Arthur McGowan
It is common knowledge in Argentina.
AJPM
FRANÇOIS PROCLAME une THÉOLOGIE du MÉTISSAGE
catholique.forumactif.com/t623-news-au-20-decembre-2019
Lors de son homélie du 12 décembre, en la fête de Notre-Dame de Guadalupe, François plongea à nouveau dans les croisements de phantasmes, disant que lors de ses apparitions à Guadalupe, Notre-Dame « voulait se croiser » avec le voyant, Saint Juan Diego, et aussi avec « le peuple ». Il a …More
FRANÇOIS PROCLAME une THÉOLOGIE du MÉTISSAGE
catholique.forumactif.com/t623-news-au-20-decembre-2019
Lors de son homélie du 12 décembre, en la fête de Notre-Dame de Guadalupe, François plongea à nouveau dans les croisements de phantasmes, disant que lors de ses apparitions à Guadalupe, Notre-Dame « voulait se croiser » avec le voyant, Saint Juan Diego, et aussi avec « le peuple ». Il a aussi affirmé que « Mère Marie croise Dieu ».

François répète un vieil hérétique

L'historien romain Roberto de Mattei a signalé sur CorrispondenzaRomana.it que François répétait, peut-être sans le savoir, l'hérésie d'Eutychès, un archimandrite de Constantinople qui mourut en 456. Il affirmait que, dans l'Incarnation, l'humanité et la divinité du Christ fusionnaient et formaient une substance qui n'était ni Dieu ni homme. Le pape Léon le Grand a convoqué le fameux Concile de Calcédoine qui a condamné Eutychès.

François l'a dit plus d'une fois

De Mattei observe que la théologie des croisements de François s'exprime aussi dans ce qu'il a dit au journaliste italien, athée et ennemi de l'Église, Eugenio Scalfari, à savoir que le Christ, après son incarnation, a cessé d'être Dieu jusqu'à sa crucifixion. Quand Scalfari, qui est l'ami de François, a rendu cela public, cela a provoqué une dispute internationale. Le Vatican n'a jamais nié les paroles de Scalfari.

Notre Dame est l'opposé d'un croisement

Le professeur De Mattei explique que la théologie de François est un métissage « parce qu'elle mélange la vérité et l'erreur », formant ainsi un amalgame confus dans lequel rien n'est clair, déterminé, distinct. Je cite : « Tout échappe à toute définition et la contradiction semble être l'âme de la pensée et du langage. » Il observe que François ne veut pas seulement croiser Notre-Dame mais aussi l’Église pour qu'à la fin elle soit absorbée par le monde. Au contraire, De Mattei explique que Notre-Dame n'est pas un croisement, parce que rien en elle n'est hybride, sombre ou confus. Elle est lumière sans ombres, et beauté sans imperfections.

[Viganò vient de répondre magistralement à l'Antéchrist ; voir ici : VIGANO : « L’AVÈNEMENT de l’ANTÉCHRIST est INÉVITABLE »]
Arthur McGowan
This is why the term "God-Man" should not be used. I'm talking to you, Patrick Coffin.
Francis is a formal heretic who denies the divinity of Christ from the moment of the Incarnation.
A divinity that has endured and will endure forever.
Francis is not a true pope.
That title remains with the theologically confused modernist pope Benedict.
The term homo Deus, or in English God-man is an ancient Catholic term for the Son of God Incarnat and we should not abandon it because the heresies of an antipope. That is just the kind of reaction the Devil wants .And stupid people get played by the Devil every time.
Col. Buckshot likes this.
Arthur McGowan
I read criticisms of the term forty years ago. I.e., nothing to do with Bergoglio.
KristianKeller
Hello, please see more about this in this video:
www.youtube.com/watch

Please also see vaticancatholic.com
KristianKeller
(Better to read on your laptop/PC)
...the entity which presently purports to be the Church of Rome is not the true Church of Rome. It is, rather, a false sect which adheres to Vatican II...
It does call itself the Catholic Church. It does occupy buildings that belonged to the Catholic Church; but it is not the true Catholic Church. It is a Counter Church...As Catholics, we certainly do not …More
(Better to read on your laptop/PC)
...the entity which presently purports to be the Church of Rome is not the true Church of Rome. It is, rather, a false sect which adheres to Vatican II...
It does call itself the Catholic Church. It does occupy buildings that belonged to the Catholic Church; but it is not the true Catholic Church. It is a Counter Church...As Catholics, we certainly do not reject the true popes or the true Church of Rome. We accept the Papacy and all Catholic dogmas...
As the material proves, Benedict XVI (and now Francis) and his bishops are the schismatics. They teach that schismatic groups don’t need to convert. They teach that schismatic ministries are to be promoted and esteemed. They teach that schismatics are members of the true Church. They teach that schismatics go to Heaven...
...It's critical that you embrace the historic Catholic faith, which is necessary for salvation.
(From their e-exchanges 2011)
Visit vaticancatholic.com and click on Steps to conversion
Novella Nurney likes this.
Er the awfully confused modernist theologian pope Benedict xvi remains the one true pope of the Roman Catholic Church.
Sedevacantism is without serious logical support.
Francis is not now and never has been a pope .
Frà Alexis Bugnolo likes this.
KristianKeller
This comes from "Thors Catholic Hammer" you are paganising Catholic religion with your nick name. What an abomination. You are wrong on Benedict XVI he was antipope. Only illogical is position SSPX and all such groups, and also Benedict XVI hoaxers (people who create false reality with Benedict XVI being pope). Brother Dimonds are backed up by logic, Catholic teaching and traditional faith. Here …More
This comes from "Thors Catholic Hammer" you are paganising Catholic religion with your nick name. What an abomination. You are wrong on Benedict XVI he was antipope. Only illogical is position SSPX and all such groups, and also Benedict XVI hoaxers (people who create false reality with Benedict XVI being pope). Brother Dimonds are backed up by logic, Catholic teaching and traditional faith. Here is file on antipope Benedict XVI:
www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com
G.K.Chesterton
The thing from which we suffer just now more than any other evil is not the assertion of falsehoods, but the endless and irrepressible repetition of half-truths.
Novella Nurney likes this.
Holy Cannoli
Pope Francis: ...Christ, after his incarnation, stopped being God until his crucifixion.

Electrical device pointed out in the photo may be:
* A continuous infusion pump for subcutaneous insulin, part of the treatment for type one diabetes.
* A device for administering an intrathecal morphine analgesia treatment, generally used to relieve chronic pain in the spine.
* An implantable medication …More
Pope Francis: ...Christ, after his incarnation, stopped being God until his crucifixion.

Electrical device pointed out in the photo may be:
* A continuous infusion pump for subcutaneous insulin, part of the treatment for type one diabetes.
* A device for administering an intrathecal morphine analgesia treatment, generally used to relieve chronic pain in the spine.
* An implantable medication pump to help manage pain, with daily doses pre-programmed.

“Outside these hypotheses,” the article said, “it could be a security or communication device, but everything indicates that it is one of the three used by modern medicine.”

Link
There is no such valid entity as pope francis.
The only lawful pope is the ghastly modernist half theologian and entirely confused Pope Benedict xvi .
Any examination of his so called resignation speech will find it filled with errors and misleading sentences.
The conclave of 2013 acted in haste and unlawfully by accepting this dogs dinner of a so called resignation speech.
The result has been …More
There is no such valid entity as pope francis.
The only lawful pope is the ghastly modernist half theologian and entirely confused Pope Benedict xvi .
Any examination of his so called resignation speech will find it filled with errors and misleading sentences.
The conclave of 2013 acted in haste and unlawfully by accepting this dogs dinner of a so called resignation speech.
The result has been the usurpation by fraud of the Chair of the great and holy Saint Peter himself.
Frà Alexis Bugnolo likes this.
Holy Cannoli
There are 2 distinct possibilities concerning the name or title of the individual commonly known and referred to as Pope Francis.

#1. He is truly the pope of the Roman Catholic Church and is due the respect and honor of the office.
#2. He is not pope of the Roman Catholic Church.

If #1 is true then it is fitting and proper to refer to the man as Pope Francis.

If #2 is true then it is incumben…More
There are 2 distinct possibilities concerning the name or title of the individual commonly known and referred to as Pope Francis.

#1. He is truly the pope of the Roman Catholic Church and is due the respect and honor of the office.
#2. He is not pope of the Roman Catholic Church.

If #1 is true then it is fitting and proper to refer to the man as Pope Francis.

If #2 is true then it is incumbent on the individual/s making the claim that he is not pope to prove by a declaration of legitimate hierarchical authority that this man has been declared not to be pope.

If an individual/s claim the man is NOT POPE but they can show NO declaration of legitimate hierarchical authority confirming this belief, then those individuals making such a claim can simply be discounted as disgruntled obsessives and their perpetual ferocious roaring is nothing more than a group of meshuggah nobodies howling into the wind.

There are a number of such nobodies at GTV.
--------------------------
Footnote:
Question: What is legitimate hierarchical authority?
Answer: You will know it when you see it but you can be sure it is not a pack of nutters kvetching on the internet.
Holy Cannoli, your name is very suitable. Try reading Canon 41, which canon Mons. Arrieta, Secretary of the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts, gives EVERY priest in the Church the right to examing the Renunciation AND DECLARE IT NULL and refuse to act on it.
Holy Cannoli
Frà Alexis Bugnolo
I like cannolis (who doesn't). Actually I enjoy all Italian food but I am careful not to overindulge so as not to gain the appearance of a Catholic bishop. The Holy before the Cannoli is simply a rhyming literary device suggested to me years ago by a non-Italian.

------------------------------------
You wrote:
[Canon 41 gives] EVERY priest in the Church…More
Frà Alexis Bugnolo
I like cannolis (who doesn't). Actually I enjoy all Italian food but I am careful not to overindulge so as not to gain the appearance of a Catholic bishop. The Holy before the Cannoli is simply a rhyming literary device suggested to me years ago by a non-Italian.

------------------------------------
You wrote:
[Canon 41 gives] EVERY priest in the Church the right to examing the Renunciation AND DECLARE IT NULL and refuse to act on it.

You seem to imply that EVERY priest in the Church has a right to make their own personal choice to either obey or not obey, agree with or not agree with or DECLARE IT [any directive] NULL issued by the governing body of the Church. I realize that could obviously not be true so would you be so kind as to explain exactly what you mean and how your comment contradicts what I have written in my previous post?
Everyone in the Church with a ministery of mere execution has in virtue of canon 41 been granted to the authority not to act on the basis of any administrative act of a superior when that act is not in conformity with the code of canon law. That is a major right. That distinguishes the Church from a dictatorship of relativism where you have to obey like a good little nazi regardless of what you …More
Everyone in the Church with a ministery of mere execution has in virtue of canon 41 been granted to the authority not to act on the basis of any administrative act of a superior when that act is not in conformity with the code of canon law. That is a major right. That distinguishes the Church from a dictatorship of relativism where you have to obey like a good little nazi regardless of what you are commanded to do.
Holy Cannoli
Frà Alexis Bugnolo wrote:
Everyone in the Church has in virtue of canon 41 been granted to the authority not to act on the basis of any administrative act of a superior when that act is not in conformity with the code of canon law.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Who decides whether an act of a superior is “not in conformity with the code of canon law”? You seem …More
Frà Alexis Bugnolo wrote:
Everyone in the Church has in virtue of canon 41 been granted to the authority not to act on the basis of any administrative act of a superior when that act is not in conformity with the code of canon law.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Who decides whether an act of a superior is “not in conformity with the code of canon law”? You seem to be saying that everyone or anyone is permitted to decide for themselves?

For example, what if my own personal prejudices, biases, hatred, inclinations, anger, resentment or dislike for a certain individual in the church or a given teaching of the church negatively affects me personally. Do I get to decide myself whether or not a person or act is or is not n conformity with canon law?

If I decide, may I then reject that person or that teaching if, looking to my own conscience, I regard those personal feelings of mine to be valid and in conformity with canon law?

For example, if I reject the Church’s prohibition on artificial contraception and the entirety of Humanae Vitae your post seems to say that I am then permitted to ignore that teaching because I personally believe that it is not in conformity with canon law plus I don’t want to be thought of as a good little obedient Nazi?

For whatever reason if I personally have honestly determined that a certain act (teaching) or a person is “not in conformity with the code of canon law”, then, anything goes.

If I totally reject the validity of the man commonly refereed to as Pope Francis, I may then publicly declare him not to be a true pope and attack him verbally with such vehemence that would easily rival an attack on the greatest mass murderers in history. I may then add to the verbal attack using the worst possible terms and even by referring to the man considered to be Pope Francis by hundreds of millions of Catholics, as an anti-pope and a tool of Satan?

Taking this idea a bit further, If there are no witnesses to legally verify my ‘hate crime’ may I then refer to a black man as a “good for nothing mulignan or melanzana ”(eggplant)? Or can I freely call a Mexican a “lazy mojado” (wetback)? Can I now call the Jews “conniving morta christo” (Christ killers)? How would making any of these remarks differ from disparaging and impugning publicly the man commonly refereed to as Pope Francis by over one billion Catholic worldwide?

Is there a remote possibility that using these demeaning terms with respect to a pope or to any man does nothing to affect or harm the man we are calling these names but it actually does quite the opposite by negatively impacting our own psyche and fouling our own souls?