Lawful or not? In conclusion, we wish to give the force of law to all that we have set forth concerning …
APOSTOLIC CONSTITUTION
ISSUED BY HIS HOLINESS POPE PAUL VI
MISSALE ROMANUM
ON NEW ROMAN MISSAL In conclusion, we wish to give the force of law to all that we have set forth concerning the new Roman Missal. Missale Romanum (April 3, 1969) | Paul VI
Were does the force of law translate from?
As the same in Latin reads different!!!!
“Ad extremum, ex iis quae hactenus de novo Missali Romano exposuimus quiddam nunc cogere et efficere placet.” Missale Romanum, die III mensis Aprilis anno MCMLXIX | Paulus PP. VI
“cogere et efficere“Translates —- compel and bring about
However “ Here is the sentence, the fourth before the end of the original version, the fifth in the Acta: 'Ad extremum, ex iis quae hactenus de novo Missali Romano exposuimus quiddam nunc cogere et efficere placet...' I have underlined the mistranslated words. Cogere et efficere is a well-known Ciceronian phrase to be found in most dictionaries. Even if the translators could not be bothered to look it up, it is perfectly …More
No law can impose Cranmer's liturgy on faithful Catholics. For refusing to accept this liturgy, the martyrs shed their blood. Paul VI, as Jean Guitton testified, wanted to go even further - to make the Holy Mass as Calvinistic as possible. The wickedness of the Bugnini freemason, however, was only sufficient for the Anglican model. What laws can be discussed under such circumstances.
In the light of TRADITIONIS CUSTODES. To promulgate does one need an Apostolic Constitution? Considering it is claimed to be “the unique expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite.” Art. 1. The liturgical books promulgated by Saint Paul VI and Saint John Paul II, in conformity with the decrees of Vatican Council II, are the unique expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite.
EXCLUSIVE: Pope Francis defends restrictions on Latin Mass – ‘Read the motu proprio’ - LifeSite