Leo XIV Asks FSSPX to Reconsider Episcopal Ordinations - Schismatic Act
Today, Cardinal Tucho Fernández, soft porn author and Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, issued a statement on the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X. The text reads:
“Regarding the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X, we reiterate what has already been communicated.
The episcopal ordinations announced by the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X do not have the corresponding papal mandate. This act constitutes ‘a schismatic act’ (John Paul II, Ecclesia Dei, n. 3) and ‘formal adherence to schism constitutes a grave offense against God and entails the excommunication established by the law of the Church’ (ibid., 5c; cf. Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts, Explanatory Note, August 24, 1996).
The Holy Father continues to pray that the Holy Spirit will enlighten those responsible for the Priestly Fraternity of Sts Pius X so that they may reconsider the their grave decision.”
#newsTtiovyfbhg
One thing puzzle me about SSPX is about calling some one Pope who teach errors of the faith . We have Vatican I teaching on Papal infallibility and after Pachamama
you still call them Popes how much more evidence do you need.
The FSSPX Fraternity has, in fact, supported Bergoglio: an apostate and public heretic, and the author of heretical and apostate documents that attack the Faith (Abu Dhabi, *Laudato Si*) and Moral (*Amoris Laetitia* and *Fiducia Supplicans*). By recognizing Bergoglio and Prevost as Pope, they are doing exactly what Bergoglio did—who referred to homosexual men dressed as women as "girls"—or what Prevost did, who addressed a schismatic heretic posing as a bishop by calling her "Your Grace." FSSPX perpetuates the deception by remaining in communion with these apostates. Moreover, they intend to forge a pact with them—a goal for which they met with Tucho—a public sodomite who attacks Catholic Faith and Morals.
Trying to have their cake and eat it to I thought the gates of hell wouldn't prevail I guess Fatima sun miracle harbinger of things to come all seems lost then God steps in a lets say second coming.
What is demonstrated is that the anti-church of Bergoglio and Prevost is a sect, not the Catholic Church. Now do you remember God's promise to King David? The promise was not fulfilled by David's sons but by Jesus himself. Likewise, Jesus asked rhetorically, when the Son of Man comes, will there be faith on earth? Because the apostasy must come before the Second Coming. And in the Book of Revelation we are commanded to leave the false church and flee to the wilderness where God will feed his Faithful Church. Remember Jesus told us whoever perseveres to the end will be saved, this is a test we all have to go through.
What about the the time of the Arian heresy , 40 antipopes , three popes western schism. Fr Gregory Hess has pretty good talk youtube.com/watch?v=pGjNLFtWn3k
Fallability Of The Popes Fr Hesse
The diversity of religions that "God wills"—according to the apostate Bergoglio and Prevost—does not include Catholics. Didn't Bergoglio say that all religions were 'paths' to reach God? But since they do not care if the Most Holy Trinity is rejected—only if *they* themselves are rejected—that is when they apply the term "schism."
Playing along with Tucho and Prevost is tantamount to the apostasy through which Bergoglio—maliciously promoting deception—referred to homosexual transvestite men as "girls." To recognize a homosexual who usurps the office of Defender of the Faith—while attacking Catholic faith and morals by promoting sacrilegious pseudo-blessings for sodomite concubines and by fostering sacrilegious Communions for adulterers and sodomites—is to perpetuate that deception. To make a pact with the synodal sect—which renounces God and wages war against Him, and against morals and all Catholic doctrine—is apostasy. It is equivalent to Prevost’s deception when he endorsed the Anglican woman dressed as a bishop.
Cardinal Fernandez has written at least 5 pornographic books - WHILE AN ORDAINED PRIEST - one of which includes an erotic scene between a young girl and Jesus Christ, but he gets to declare "schism" upon the SSPX, not for separating from the Church, but for preserving it.
SSPX is the Dragon slayer St Michael Defeated the Dragon with Blood of the lamb you find that blood at a SSPX mass near you propitiatory sacrifice of the mass . TLM
What Prevost seeks is loyalty to himself—not to Christ. As if Prevost actually cared about a schism against Christ and the Church! This is the very same man who recognizes a heretical, schismatic woman—disguised as a bishop—as a priest, and who tells Muslims that the mosque—where they deny the Most Holy Trinity to worship the false god Allah—is a sacred place. Spin us another yarn; we won't believe you.
This very enemy of God and of the Church, who defies God’s natural law to promote the sacrilegious and apostate pseudo-blessing for sodomite concubines—with the complicity of all the priests, bishops, and laity who recognize this apostate, schismatic, and heretical worshiper of Pachamama as Pope.
However, I prefer not to comment until I see whether the Fraternity consecrates bishops; for Saint Vincent Ferrer, speaking of the reign of the Antichrist, prophesied that many priests would join the Antichrist out of personal self-interest and a love for money.
Saint Vincent explained that schismatics are those who align themselves with a false pope and render him papal veneration, thereby committing the sin of idolatry.
And this on the May 13th. Remember TC was issued on the feast of Our Lady of Mount Camel.
Devil realy cannot help himself and must show his hate of Blessed Virgin.
If God wills a diversity of religions, why are they persecuting Catholicism, and allowing persecution of Catholics around the world and the burning of churches?
Neither did the episcopal consecrations of 1988 have episcopal approval, and yet Benedict lifted the excommunication of the four bishops without their repenting. So, were the four bishops, and Archbisops Lefebvre and Mayer, really in the wrong? If so, why lift the excommunication, Benedict? If not, why worry about a coming excommunication? What makes sense in the Church these days? Yogi Berra said, "In baseball, you don't know nothing." It's pretty much like that in the modern Church.
If God wills a diversity of religions, as Francis taught and Leo has confirmed, why not also the Lefebvrist religion?
Citing John Paull II’s Ecclesia Dei, Tucho threatens SSPX with excommunication if episcopal consecrations proceed: “The episcopal ordinations announced by the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X do not have the corresponding papal mandate…”
Cardinal Tucho is characterized by a double standard: neither the cardinals appointed by the Chinese state (and approved by the Vatican) nor the German bishops (for their synodal and LGBT-supporting activities) are considered to have committed a "schismatic act," and do not result in excommunication...