It would be until 12 years later, in 1943, that she would become the oldest of the first 11 children ever diagnosed with autism.
The world had no idea what was about to come.
Where were all of the children with autism throughout this time?
Years kept passing by as if they were in fast forward.
But it was almost as if the condition of autism was in a deep sleep and couldn't be awakened.
History would give us many opportunities to learn from our mistakes.
If only our eyes had been open.
But time wasn't waiting for us to learn any lessons.
Even though a child psychologist by the name of Leo Connor had discovered autism almost five decades earlier,
it would remain so rare through this entire period that it was simply never talked about.
But that was about to change very quickly, when thousands of families' lives were soon to be turned upside down.
To end our week of autism coverage, we're going to tell you about one group of very
young children being classified on the autism spectrum at what some say is an alarming rate.
By the end of this newscast, one more person will be diagnosed with autism.
The numbers are going up so quickly, something has to be done.
The numbers are staggering and there's so much fear about autism, there's so much misinformation
about autism.
The autism epidemic is on the brink of entering a brand new chapter.
These numbers represent staggering, 57% increase.
That is more new pediatric cases than AIDS.
diabetes and cancer combined for pediatric cases. We need this entire
globe to come in and find the cure because this is a global epidemic. New
numbers from the CDC showing one child in 68 has autism. That means about 1
million children in the United States are now diagnosed with autism.
A link between childhood vaccines and autism studies a thousand kids
did not show a link like symptoms after receiving five vaccinations in one day reason that doctors
in this country are frustrated because listen all you're doing is you're antagonizing them
For over a decade now, many doctors and scientists and even parents have been in a raging debate
about whether or not childhood vaccines are causing autism.
It all began in 1998 when Dr. Andrew Wakefield published a paper merely hinting at a link
between the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine and autism.
He would end up learning the hard way, never to question the vaccine program.
Breaking news tonight, just hours ago, the British Medical Journal, BMJ, did something
extremely rare for a scientific journal. It accused a researcher, Andrew Wakefield, of
outright fraud. Others have come along claiming it's specific ingredients in the vaccines
that are causing autism. And even others are now claiming it's just too many vaccines given
too soon.
Vaccines, I would argue, are the safest,
best-tested things that we put into our body.
Obviously, nothing is absolutely safe.
It's gotta be the vaccines.
It's the only thing that went up in all 50 states
at the same time.
I don't think it's any longer possible to say there is no evidence of any association
between vaccines and autism.
Many studies have now been done that have showed there is absolutely no relationship
between any vaccinations and autism.
It's unquestionably environmental.
We've proven it's not the vaccines.
It's really time to look elsewhere for the causes of autism.
controversial subject not controversial subject controversial
for parents who still believe.
It is not controversial, Matt.
It's time for kids to get their vaccines.
If it weren't controversial, you would.
wouldn't be ambushed no it's not controversial i mean i really mean that
the science is the science
Vaccines are used in the fight against infectious diseases.
and many are concerned that without them we would risk the return of diseases such as polio and
smallpox. But there is one theory in the vaccine-autism debate that is not questioning the
vaccines themselves. It questions the mercury-based preservative thimerosal.
antiseptic preservative and hasn't that been linked in some cases to autism?
Thimerosal was invented by the pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly in the 1920s.
Thimerosal doesn't make the vaccine more effective, it's just simply a preservative.
It is only added to vaccines, so pharmaceutical companies can be lazy and unsterile during their manufacturing
and have a very cheap option to give vaccine shelf life.
And having an adequate supply of vaccine is very important.
Okay, well, let me follow up on that then single-shot vials does that need to mercile though they
There are a lot of manufacturing issues associated with switching over.
You need much more filling capacity for the lines.
You know, all the benefit of Maxine without using Mercury.
Mercury has always been an option.
And even though other options are available,
the incredible risk of using thimerosal is taken solely because it's the cheapest.
So this theory has nothing to do with the greater good.
It has everything to do with the greater greed.
In three separate cases a special federal court ruled that thimerosal a vaccine preservative containing mercury does not cause autism
Thimerosal was found to be in vaccines at levels far above all mercury exposure guidelines.
And three of the test cases in what was called the omnibus autism proceeding would represent
thousands of parents from the stance that Thimerosal had caused their children's autism.
For families to be compensated, all they had to prove was that it is possible Thimerosal
was to blame.
And still, that argument fell short.
The judgment read loud and clear, Thimerosal does not cause autism.
Except for when it does.
The government conceded liability in the case of Hannah Pulling, who is now kind of the
poster child for the movement.
The question is, did childhood vaccines cause a nine year old girl from Georgia her autism
symptoms?
Did they cause it?
Over two years before the omnibus judgment was made, this same court system had already
quietly awarded and replaced Hannah Pulling as a potential thimerosal test case.
One of the most disturbing things about this case
is that the government did in fact settle,
but now the case has been sealed.
I think the reason they conceded hand-pulling was so that the records would be sealed and
no one would be the wiser.
Back in 1999, eight years before the hand-pulling case, the Centers for Disease Control had
run their initial analysis of thimerosal and found a major association with autism.
Transcripts from a secret meeting in 2000 to address these findings were very clear
regarding one of their concerns.
Then, just over a year later, as we all witnessed a national tragedy,
Others saw this as an opportunity.
There are a lot of tough decisions that will be made as we develop.
and discuss and debate how to move forward.
In November of 2002, Congress passed the Homeland Security Bill,
which created the Homeland Security Department.
And the whole country woke up the next morning,
and it was reported that late at night,
right before the bill was passed,
somebody had slipped in a secret rider
that would have dismissed all lawsuits
against Eli Lilly and other vaccine companies
for having put this mercury-based
preservative in vaccines.
The exact day the Homeland Security Act was signed,
the White House had the Justice Department file a motion
to seal all documents related to hundreds of claims
that thimerosal and vaccines had caused autism.
It was the most ridiculous motion ever filed
in federal court, and under pressure,
the Bush administration quickly withdrew that.
These deceptive acts were raising red flags everywhere.
But there is so much more to the thimerosal story.
They made a lot of mistakes and there's a lot of documents they don't want you to see.
A story that spans over eight decades.
The first thing to note about dimerosol was that it was patented by Eli Lilly scientists
in 1927.
So Eli Lilly did an experiment on humans.
There was an epidemic of meningitis in Indianapolis and Eli Lilly is in Indianapolis, Indiana.
A hundred and forty-four people came down with bacterial meningitis infections of the
brain and what Eli Lilly did is took a subgroup of those people.
and they exposed them to thimerosal, extremely high doses, it was a 1% solution,
so they were giving doses to humans of thimerosal that were killing animals in the laboratory.
They gave it to them intravenously, and of the 22 people, all of them died.
Based on experience of giving these doses of thimerosal to these 22 persons,
they said that thimerosal or mirthiolate, they're the same thing, had a very low
order of toxicity for man.
That is the only safety study ever done on thimerosal is that he told them that it was
safe when he gave it to 22 people, all of whom died, most of whom died within a day.
We were wondering if there's somebody we could talk to regarding the history behind
like thimerosal and the whole controversy behind it.
Is there somebody we could talk to about that?
Pittman Moore bought Thymarosol from Eli Lilly as a preservative for dogs, and what they
found out, this is 1935, we have a letter that they wrote back to Eli Lilly where they
stated that it caused so many reactions in the dogs that they said it was unsuitable
for use in dogs.
There are hundreds, maybe thousands, of studies from the early 1930s through the present that
have called into question the use of thimerus on every single kind of product.
And a particularly interesting one was, in 1948, there were so many complaints that the AMA, the Augusta American Medical Association, put together a blue ribbon panel to study what they should do and recommend about all these complaints that were published in the literature.
And Frank B. Inglie was also...
that committee who's still alive today and you maybe get to talk to him. We may have seen him.
aerosol it would be toxic down to
not grams, not milligrams, not micrograms, but nanograms, parts per billion, which
was almost unbelievable. And this was published in the...
American Journal Medical Society in the New York Academy Sciences and in the journal from the
Chemical Specialty Manufacturers Association and it didn't make a wave that wasn't a ripple.
No one seemed to care.
Mercury is one of the most toxic elements on the planet, much more toxic than lead.
Two parts per billion is the Environmental Protection Agency's limit in drinking water.
200 parts per billion is the level in liquid the EPA classifies as hazardous waste.
50,000 parts per billion is the concentration of mercury in most thimerosal-containing vaccines.
Society has put in place several institutions to take care of kids.
First is the FDA.
They're supposed to license vaccines and affirmatively prove they're safe.
They have failed.
The second institution, CDC, is supposed to mandate vaccines, again, based on safety and need.
They have failed. The third group to protect kids is the doctors,
the American Academy of Pediatrics. They have failed.
partly because they can't be sued,
partly because they are bought off by industry and government contracts.
The fourth group, industry, they're normally responsible for ensuring safety
because it can be sued if they make an unsafe product.
They're off the hook too.
Frank Engle studies in the 40s and 50s confirms that thimerosal is not effective as a preservative
and extremely neurotoxic.
Eli Lilly does nothing.
A 1967 study in applied microbiology finds that thimerosal killed mice when added to vaccines.
Eli Lilly does nothing.
A 1977 study reports 10 of 13 infants treated with thimerosal for umbilical cord infections
die of mercury toxicity.
Eli Lilly does nothing.
A 1983 study concludes that not only is thimerosal extremely toxic to cells, but it is also
capable of changing cell properties.
Eli Lilly does nothing.
A study in 1986 finds that thimerosal has the strongest irreversible lethal effect.
Our own CDC
FDA and AAP remain completely asleep at the wheel, allowing Eli Lilly to continue doing nothing.
When I was a little boy, we only got three vaccines.
But my children, five of my six children, got 22 vaccines.
Beginning in 1989, that's the thimerosal generation.
That's the vaccine generation.
And it's the sickest generation in the history of this country.
During the exact five decades that autism remained asleep at 1 in 10,000,
children would receive four DTP shots, totaling 100 micrograms of mercury.
But between 1989 and 1992, the levels of mercury would be increased.
and the autism rates would start rising.
We added a new vaccine to our schedule,
Hib, homophilus influenza B,
which is a terrible disease,
and I think it's really important
to vaccinate against that.
But that too contained 25 micrograms of mercury,
and that was a series of four shots.
So now we're up to 200 micrograms exposure,
and then they added the hepatitis B vaccine,
three shots, 12 and a half micrograms each.
You expect that the drug companies would make sure that those vaccines are safe and
you have trust, unfortunately most people have trust that the vaccine companies are
looking out for the safety of your children but apparently that's not always the case.
Why aren't they asking CDC, why don't you study the Amish?
You know, why don't you study these homeschool kids?
30,000 homeschool kids studied by the UPI and no autism in that group.
So we know what the truth is, and these mothers know what made their child sick.
So we're doing a our documentary specifically on autism. Do you guys do you know anybody with autism in the Amish community?
Well, most how much people don't want to vaccinate.
Now the reason they don't want to vaccinate is because they feel like they don't want
to do anything to stand in the way of the will of God.
Well, one of the first questions I had when I started on this was simply,
what is the autism rate in never vaccinated kids versus vaccinated kids?
Have you ever known an honest child with autism?
I've never known any of our people or our children with autism know.
Are there any children, any other children in this practice that have autism or similar features to them?
Not that I know.
Dan Olmsted called me in, it was about September of 2006, and he told me that he heard about
us.
We have no autism in our practice.
There may be a couple of cases that we don't know about, but with 30,000 or 40,000 children
we've taken care of, it will be inconceivable that we didn't know of
50, 75, or 100 cases, and since the majority of these children are not vaccinated, there's
very strong evidence that there's a connection between autism and something about the vaccine
program.
I think that the public health officials have been too quick to dismiss the hypothesis as irrational.
Dr. Bernadine Healy was the former head
of the National Institutes of Health.
She stood up against her own colleagues
and said they are deliberately avoiding this research
because they are afraid of what they might.
Dr. Mark Guyer and his son David
both believe mercury is the cause of autism.
But the many studies they have published
linking mercury to autism
have been picked apart by the medical community.
They have also been highly scrutinized
for attempting to recover these children
with treatments that many consider dangerous.
Regardless if the guys are right or not they have both played a pivotal role in this issue for years now
These children are receiving large doses of mercury at intervals that far exceed all
the federal agency guidelines, and not by fivefold, but by over a hundredfold.
In 1971, Dr. Mark Iyer was featured in Time magazine, The New York Times, and Newsweek
for a medical breakthrough that was almost deemed revolutionary.
But the times have changed, once known as brilliant.
Many are now calling him a quack because of a stance on mercury and autism.
Yeah, no. I mean, maybe we can talk about this on camera. I think, you know, it's the
good thing about science is it's really independent of scientists. I mean, good science stands
and bad science does. The guy's science hasn't stood.
Dr. Paul Offitt is the national expert from the side that claims mercury does not cause
autism, yet he has no expertise in either autism or mercury toxicity. His only expertise
in this subject lies in his conflicts of interest.
Because, as I sit on the advisory committee of immunization practices and make recommendations
for children in this country, the only thing I consider is exactly how I would treat my
own children.
Dr. Offit holds a $1.5 million research chair at Children's Hospital funded by Merck.
He holds the patent on an anti-diarrhea vaccine he developed with Merck.
Dr. Offit's share of vaccine profits unknown.
I asked you after what studies he's done.
Isn't done a study.
At least if you talk to one of the guys that did a study, maybe you don't agree with
the study.
But he doesn't have any studies.
You've had a definitive test as far as I'm concerned regarding thimerosal safety.
I mean, that study that Bill Thompson performed at the CDC in 2007 that was published in the
New England Journal of Medicine was a wonderful study.
The lead author of this study is a senior CDC scientist who for over a decade now has played a major role within the CDC to disprove a link between vaccines and autism.
I think that stands as a definitive study.
The Thompson study was not done on any children
with autism or autism spectrum disorder.
They eliminated those that were most likely
to be vulnerable to thomerosol damage
before the study even started.
they're not doing what they should be doing, is they're afraid to look for...
Things that might be associated.
I was just sitting at my desk preparing for lecture and my cell phone rang and it was
Bill Thompson.
I see that on the New England Journal of Medicine paper, you were pressured to downplay
the relationship between the Marisol and Tix.
But I, uh, uh, let me just say this, I did a follow up study because I wanted my opinion
on the record.
There was a definitive, statistically significant association
between the Marisol and Tix.
Pics are like five times as common among kids with autism.
He said, you've got to understand when the CDC sees a vaccine adverse association that
they don't want to report, they put a bunch of scientists in a room together and they
work for hours and hours until they can get that association to go away.
And that's almost a verbatim quote of what he told me.
I showed her that the CDC has put the research 10 years behind, all right?
Because the CDC has not been transparent, we've missed 10 years of research
because the CDC is so paralyzed right now by anything related to autism.
Something is just horribly wrong within the CDC.
There's probably not a real increase in autism as much as there is a real increase in diagnosis and a real increase in awareness that that's what's going on.
Show me where all the 30, 40-year-old
autistic's running around right now
if we're not in the middle of an epidemic.
When I first started in 71, you didn't hear autism.
The last 20 years, we've seen a higher rise,
not just the learning symptoms,
but the fact that they can't control their anxiety,
their anger, they can't control themselves.
Howl howl howl howl Howl howl
The teachers want to know why is this happening so much now? What is going on?
Everyone knows genetics can't cause an epidemic.
Genetics susceptibility can't.
But you have to have the toxin.
There's a lot of discussion about the video from the University of Calgary.
They were going to look at snail neurons in culture because they're big.
You can see them with a microscope and you can film them.
And they decided to add compounds, metals to these neurons to see if it had any effect that you could observe.
And what they observed was exactly what we saw in the live animal.
That mercury and only mercury caused the toolin to disintegrate.
The EPA guideline for mercury, this is actually technically for methyl mercury orally ingested
is 0.1 micrograms of mercury per kilogram body weight per day.
Between 1989 and 1992, the amount of mercury children were
getting in their vaccines had over doubled. The quantity of mercury that's
ethyl mercury that's contained in vaccines is actually not that much.
For this new schedule, a baby with an average weight of six pounds on the day
of birth would be exposed to 46 times over the mercury guideline.
At 2 months, the same baby would weigh around 10 pounds and receive 138 times the guideline.
This baby would have to weigh almost 1400 pounds to be within the federal guideline.
The same baby at 4 months is exposed to 79 times over the guideline, at 6 months 86 times
over the guideline, at 12 months 55 times over the guideline, and to top it all off, this
guideline is fatally flawed.
That guideline deals with methylmercary, number one.
And it deals with methylmercury given by mouth.
The guideline is based off eating fish, which is methylmercury.
Dimerisol and vaccines is an injection of ethylmercury.
A 2012 Italian study concluded that dimerisol and vaccines
was 50 times more toxic to cells than methylmercury and fish.
And this study didn't even take into account other factors.
When you eat a methylmercury containing fish,
your body doesn't absorb all of it.
When you inject an ethylmercury containing vaccine, it's 100% absorption.
Dr. Tom Berbacher performed an experiment on monkeys to compare injecting thimerosal to eating methyl mercury.
Whatever process that's going on in terms of moving the mercury from the body to the brain is actually happening a little bit faster with the thimerosal.
Both ethyl and methyl can wash in and out of the brain, but over time they convert into
an inorganic form, which locks into the brain and accumulates.
An ethyl would do this much faster than methyl.
The first time that we looked at the thimerosol animals,
majority of it was already inorganic.
In the end, the thimerosol exposed monkeys had twice the amount of inorganic mercury locked in their brain.
Berbacher in previous studies found neuroinflammation in the brain directly associated with this inorganic form of mercury.
The 0.1 microgram per kilogram.
It wouldn't be until 1998 that the FDA would be forced to do the math and calculate how
much mercury children were getting in their vaccines.
The CDC was asked in 1998 by Congress in the law called the FDA Modernization Act,
Congress asked them to add up the mercury in medicine to see how high it was.
And in the case of vaccines, it fell to Leslie Ball, a medical doctor at the FDA,
in which she found was at the amount of mercury in the childhood vaccine schedule,
exceeded all the federal safety guidelines.
This particular material came to the attention of Dr. Neil Halsey,
Neil Halsey, who worked for the American Academy of Pediatrics at the time, was in charge of
making vaccine decisions. And he is quoted as saying, and he actually was seeing a crying,
saying that if he had known how to calculate how many micrograms there was in a shot,
he would have stopped it long ago.
Yeah, we've been kind of playing the phone today.
Neil Halsey developed the position, it was the hard line position that we've got to get
rid of mercury right now.
I don't know what to do at this point because we're scheduled to leave today, but...
And you were supposed to call me back like two days ago.
The CDC response was no, we do not want to remove mercury from the vaccines.
And the thought behind this is that they were afraid to label some vaccines good and others
bad.
American Academy of Pediatrics, Neil Halsey, and then it was John Abramson,
said that this is unacceptable, and that we can't tolerate this, we're not going to leave.
And if you persist in this, they said that they were going to issue a press release by themselves,
recommending not giving vaccines to children, that we have to delay these shots.
The Director of Vaccine Research within the FDA wrote an email to the FDA's senior advisor for communication.
The calculations done by FDA are not complex.
I'm not sure if there will be an easy way out of the potential perception that the FDA,
CDC, and immunization policy bodies may have been asleep at the switch regarding dimerosol
until now.
This was the big one.
They have blown what you could not blow in vaccines.
They've allowed children to be exposed to toxic levels of mercury.
What resulted was a joint statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the United
States Public Health Service, stating that thimerisol-containing vaccines should be removed
as soon as possible.
But not only would they not be recalled, they would continue to manufacture these vaccines
until 2001, and the CDC would push for the abundance of backstock to be administered
to children well up until around 2003.
Just before they would do the unthinkable.
Now, most people have no idea that there's an aluminum in the vaccine.
Many investigators, particularly Dr. Boyd Haley, have shown that aluminum and mercury
are synergistic in their action and extremely toxic, much more than one plus one, which is
something that many people have never considered.
We did the study with neuronesome culture, added aluminum and found aluminum was only
slightly neurotoxic by itself, and that the aerosol was significantly toxic by itself,
but when you put the two together, at one point in the
dying of the neurons when you had 10% death with the the Marisol alone, you had over 60% death
with the Tamarisol plus aluminum. So the aluminum definitely enhances the toxicity of the Marisol.
The material and safety data sheet for thimeracol clearly states that thimeracol should never be combined with aluminum.
It reads violent reactions possible with aluminum.
So when the FDA finally did the math that alarmed so many,
they neglected to include three major variables into their equation.
Ethel Mercury injected with aluminum.
Imagine what the math would have shown then.
I would insist, we would insist that Mercury be removed and replaced.
If in doubt, take the Mercury out.
After the AAP's joint statement in 1999, the CDC decided to study the vaccine safety data link, known as the VSD, which is a large database of medical records used to monitor vaccine side effects.
Robert Chen, who was the guru of the Vaccine Safety Daddling, he was the one who set it
out, volunteered.
The Vaccine Safety Daddling is a way to basically affirm the fact that thimerosol was safe in
the vaccines and they would do studies in the VSD to prove it.
Around November, October, November of 1999,
there was a young researcher who was visiting
for a while to work for about a year or so at the CDC,
named Thomas Verstratton.
He was an epidemiologist from Belgium.
They said, run the numbers, Tom, see what you can find.
We saw five different permutations of this study appear over a period of four years.
So the very first generation was when Thomas Verstratton took all the kids and he took
kids who received 25 micrograms or more by one month of age.
and kids who received 25 micrograms or under 25 micrograms in many cases no
mercury at all by one month of age and then he just compared their outcomes
and that's when he found these extremely elevated risks.
A relative risk is the risk of developing a disease, relative to an exposure.
For example, a relative risk of two would mean that a child has two times the chance
of developing autism when exposed to thimerosal, compared to a child who is not exposed to
thimerosal.
For Stratton's first generation of findings consisted of two different analyses, one in
November and another in December of 1999.
In his November analysis, he found a relative risk of 7.62 for autism.
Dr. Sander Greenland is a world-renowned epidemiologist at UCLA in Los Angeles, California.
So from relative risk standpoint, 7.62 would be considered a little bit elevated, high,
Sorry about that.
Very open.
Yes.
If that was real, that would be getting up towards the range where it's smoking your
lung cancer, smoking lung cancer, smoking a pack a day for 20 years is about 10.
The December analysis found a relative risk of 11.35 for autism.
our own Centers for Disease Control and just figured out the cause.
So, Verstratton took this information to his colleagues, rather concerns, and looked
what I found, and they worked with him to rerun the numbers, and basically what they
started to do was stratify the data.
So, they started breaking the data, so they started breaking the data, so they started breaking the data.
breaking the kids down into, say, birth cohorts.
The more you stratify data and break it down into subgroups,
the smaller the subgroups become,
and you start to lose statistical power.
They also started eliminating
They basically eliminated about half the children from the study using exclusion criteria.
There are emails from Verstratton to his colleagues saying it just won't go away.
As you'll see, some of the relative risks increase over the categories, and I haven't
yet found an alternative explanation.
Please let me know if you can think of one.
So, they re-ran the numbers using all these new criteria, and they ended up in the second
generation with a relative risk of 2.48.
They ran the numbers a third time.
It just kept going down and down and down, and the signal kept going away, but it would
not disappear.
We're protesting the amount of mercury that remains in vaccines to the denial of the CDC.
You have blood on your hands.
CDC is concerned about autism and we are working hard to find the causes of autism and other
developmental disabilities.
Tried that, re-ran, re-thought, still the effect is there.
And then another one will say it all came back, the effects of thimerosol.
So, by the third generation, when we had this, I think it was 1.69 relative risk for autism,
that was the data that was presented at Simpson Wood.
The CDC invited other federal agencies and pharmaceutical companies to a private two-day
meeting at the Simpson Wood Conference Center about 45 minutes outside of Atlanta.
They wanted to convene an outside panel of experts in this area to try and review the findings so far that had been gleaned to review the discussions that had taken place within CDC at that point.
By this time, the autism risk had been watered down to 1.69, but Verstratton had been finding
a link between Thimerosol and a whole array of developmental disorders.
I'm not even sure if they knew it was being recorded, but it was, and a transcript was
made.
They took the extraordinary step of convening this external panel, which doesn't happen.
The transcript
We're quite adamant that this was a linear relationship, that they had a problem here.
There were neurodevelopmental specialists, there were pediatricians, there were biostatisticians, there was an epidemiologist me.
Thomas de Stratton is quoted as saying,
Personally, I have three hypotheses.
My first hypothesis is that it is parental bias.
The children that are more likely to be vaccinated
are more likely to be picked up and diagnosed.
Second hypothesis, I don't know.
There is a bias that I have not yet recognized,
and nobody has yet told me about it.
Third hypothesis, it's true.
It's thymarasol.
Dr. Weil from American Academy of Pediatrics said you can play with it all you want,
results are real, they're statistically significant.
They're not unexpected.
Not unexpected.
Other people like Dr. Clemens from World Health Organization said,
you know, we could have predicted this outcome before we did the study and now we're left hanging.
We should have never done this study.
Should have never done this study.
Now, other scientists were worried not so much from a medical point of view, but from
a legal point of view.
They were worried about lawsuits.
They were worried about people suing the drug companies.
There was enough evidence there.
Toward the end of discussions, the participants were asked to vote on a scale of one to six.
How serious they felt these findings were.
Most of the people who did vote voted one or two.
In other words, not very serious.
Of course they were members of the public health establishment
with a big vested interest in
the vaccine program. One of those who voted a one was a chair of the panel himself.
I remember the chair of the panel's grandson being born or the announcement happening
literally as we were in the middle of discussions. He stood up and said that earlier that morning
he had been called out into the hall because his first male grandson had just been born
and there was no way that they were going to vaccinate that baby with thymarosol.
Sir, would y'all raise your right hand, please?
He's all in it, swear to tell the whole truth to nothing about the truth to have begun.
I do.
See you then.
I was chairman of the government reform and oversight committee and we did about four
years of investigation into vaccines.
I had scientists come from all over the world and doctors from all over the world to discuss
it before my committee and that's how we came to the conclusions we did.
There's any question whatsoever about mercury and vaccine.
If there's even a question, why in the world are you continuing to immunize kids
with something that's questionable? You can't give me an answer. I don't understand it.
To date, you know, there is no, we have no evidence, convincing evidence of harm from
the thymera saw.
I don't know.
That's because in exact scene.
I'm going to, Dr. I understand you said that, and I understand that.
Here was Congressman Burton from the government reform committee as the chairperson,
investigating the issue of Thimera, Saul, and medicine.
And they didn't tell the committee anything. Can you imagine what that was like?
One day they were behind closed doors. We found all these effects. Oh my god, what are
gonna do about it? Next day testified before Congress. No links, no data. We need to do
studies in the future.
Everything's fine.
If he had told the truth and pulled out from Simpson Wood, a draft of that study, just think of how many thousands, probably tens of thousands of children would have been spared.
We had somebody from the FDA testifying, and I said that my grandson got seven shots with
mercury in them and became autistic very shortly, and he said, well, there's no evidence that
that caused it.
I said, would you like for me to give you the content that was in there of mercury, seven
shots full?
Would you let me shoot that into your arm?
And he looked at me like he was shot and said, well, no.
And I said, well, why?
If it's alright for my grandson to get seven shots of mercury in it, why is it not alright
for you to take one shot with the same amount of mercury that he got?
No more mercury!
I'm here today to because of my five-year-old twins Robert David you know what
happened at Simpson would we're here because we need more people to come out
and talk about Simpson would just like it just make them all
Kayling is a friend of mine. She had Dalton very premature, I think he was 26 weeks, when
he was born. He was born one pound, 14 ounces. And within that first week of his life, he
was given a hepatitis B loaded with lime aerosol.
I questioned it just because I was like, oh, don't hurt my poor little one-pound baby.
Then we got all the vaccines about 18 months, and he stopped sleeping.
He started screaming all day long. He'd bite me till I'd bleed.
I just, like, out of nowhere, he would just start banging his head on the walls.
He'd have these tantrums where I would have to sit on top of them just to calm him down
because he'd be out of control.
You can do it, you can do it, you can do it.
Many children with autism have aggressive behavior, insomnia, severe seizures,
skin rashes, ear infection after ear infection, major immune system dysfunction.
They have gastrointestinal issues, severe constipation, food allergies,
systemic yeast infections, sensitivity to light sound and touch.
I don't know if he's sick or how he's feeling because he can't tell me.
And the UCLA doctors told me he just needs to be on anti-psychotic medicine because he has autism.
One month after the Simpson Wood Conference, Thomas for Stratton sent an email to voice his frustrations over the pressure he was under to reduce the relative risks.
I do not wish to be the advocate of the anti-vaccine lobby and sound like being convinced that thiamarisol is or was harmful.
But at least I feel we should use sound scientific argumentation and not let our standards be dictated by our desire to disprove an unpleasant theory.
That was basically the end of Verstratton's tenured CDC.
Once he said that, he was doomed.
And a year later, the fourth generation was presented.
At the Institute of Medicine committee meeting that was held in 2001, there were two IOM meetings on vaccines.
The Institute of Medicine, known as the IOM, was paid by the CDC to perform two separate reviews of the evidence in relation to vaccines and autism.
The first was the 2001 IOM, and by this time, Verstratton's fourth generation showed a relative risk for autism that had once again been lowered, this time to 1.52.
When Verstratton...
presented his data that morning at the IOM, he said, as of 8 o'clock this morning, I no longer
work for the CDC. I am now an employee of GlaxoSmithKline, and I'll be going back to Belgium to work
for their Brussels office. Well, Glaxo, of course, is a vaccine maker, uses thymarosol and is a
defendant in a lot of lawsuits.
The 2001 IOM concluded the link between autism and thimerisol is biologically plausible.
They emphasized the need to perform biological and clinical science.
After the IOMO1 report that found biological plausibility, the trial lawyers came out of the little work and were filing class actions in the silver court.
And we're kind of gearing up the whole litigation machinery to go after industry.
And Eli Lilly came along with a writer told my security act that would have given the vaccine company's permanent immunity from suit.
Ten years ago.
Now, it's one in 250, a 40-fold increase in 10 years, and we had the audacity to take
the only tool that these parents had out of their hands to sue the pharmaceutical companies
that manufactured that.
Dan Burton was of course furious and he tried to stop it on the house side but it was too late
at that point it did pass. When it came time to vote in the Senate side they could either
vote down the Homeland Security Bill or vote it in with this writer from the house and that's what
they did they voted in.
Had I been notified, I would have been down here on the floor debating it very
stringently because we've been studying this issue for three years.
Initially, a lot of people thought that
Bill Frist had inserted this writer, he was the Senate Majority Leader Republican at the time.
Bill Frist had major ties to Eli Lilly and had previously attempted to protect them from these lawsuits.
Frist said no, it didn't come from me, you might want to check with the White House.
Before becoming vice president on a Ronald Reagan, George Bush Sr. was a director on the board of Eli Lilly.
His vice president's family owned controlling interest in Eli Lilly, who was a major contributor to the Bush Quail campaign for the presidency.
It was this administration that would over double the amount of thimerisol children were being exposed to in their vaccines.
His son George W. Bush's current budget director was Mitch Daniels, who was vice president of Eli Lilly.
Sydney Terrell, Eli Lilly's current CEO at the time of the Lilly Rider.
Just so happened to be a member of George W. Bush's Homeland Security Advisory Council.
And the White House said no it wasn't us, we think it may have come from Senator Frist.
The parent community just erupted in a unified sense of outrage.
those of us who understood what that meant organized a letter writing campaign, a faxing
campaign, emails, phone calls into Congress. And as one person described it, brought the Senate to
its needs.
In January, in a technical amendments bill, it was taken out.
So it was still remembered on the Hill as one of the few times when a public outcry
has forced an abrupt reversal on such a sleazy rider.
Congressman Dick Army finally admitted that he did it.
He was quoted as saying,
I did it and I'm proud of it.
Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we.
They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.
The CDC would perform one final generation of the Verstratin study, this time without Verstratin.
And then they got the brilliant idea.
Don't have a reference group that has no mercury.
Make a reference group that has some mercury.
And don't take the ones who got the maximum mercury as your exposed group to compare against.
take ones who have a little less. In other words, take the extremes and drive them towards the middle
and the closer you get to the middle, the smaller the relative risks.
That's what they publish.
That's what they ultimately publish.
You weren't involved in first strat in 2003 at all, were you?
How would it be possible for this to go through, you know, from 7.62 to the next analysis,
2.48 to the next analysis, 1.69.
The next analysis is 1.52 and then down to 1.
I don't know how this happened. It's startling.
It does suggest to me that I probably wouldn't want to take too seriously any of the numbers.
The CDC coincidentally lost all of our Stratton's original raw data.
So this study can never be replicated by an outside source.
protocol and you get data, and then you don't like the data you got, so then you go back
and change the rules, that's just not correct, that's fraud in anybody's book.
2003 would flash us back in time to when tobacco companies were paying big
money to prove their cigarettes were not causing lung cancer. The babies
born from women who smoke are smaller but they're just as healthy as the
babies born from women who do not smoke.
And some women would prefer having smaller babies.
This time however, the CDC would spend millions of our tax dollars desperately trying to prove
their thimerosal was not causing autism.
None of the things that you've been found in tobacco smoke are at concentrations which
can be considered harmful.
Small quantities of toxins really need to be there in larger quantities for them to be
dangerous.
Look at the components themselves.
can be considered harmful, can they not?
Anything can be considered harmful.
Apple sauce is harmful if you get too much of it.
Water, for example.
I mean, if I drank two gallons of water
without replacing the sodium,
or the specifically other minerals that are there,
I can lower my serum sodium enough so that I would have a seizure.
Does that mean that water is a neurotoxin? No.
I don't think many people...
People are dying from applesauce.
They're not eating that much.
You're telling us that there is no link? Is that correct?
I am saying that the science to date and over a period of not demonstrate a causal relationship between that.
There is no causal link.
I am not a scientist, Mr. Waxman, and that is why doctors asked or scientists asked to participate here this morning.
They perhaps answered in greater depth the questions that you raised.
I'm glad we're having this hearing today on autism.
We still have many questions about autism.
What causes it?
What are the safest and most effective treatments?
Is there a way to prevent it?
How many people in the country suffer from autism?
If mercury in the vaccines cause autism, why don't all the children have autism?
Just like if cigarette smoking causes lung cancer, why doesn't everybody get lung cancer smokes?
The answer is susceptibility.
Desperate to exonerate dimerosol, the CDC would orchestrate four more studies in collaboration with researchers from other countries.
Their primary focus was on Denmark, where they would conclude in widely
report that autism rates continued to rise even after thimerosal was removed
from their vaccines by 1992. But the CDC knew exactly where the rates had
risen. Confounding factors made it completely impossible to look at the
Marisol removal and autism incidents in Denmark. Shortly after thimerosal was
removed, Denmark changed their autism diagnosing criteria, increasing the rates.
Then they began adding to the rates all children who had been diagnosed outside of a hospital, which account for the majority of cases nationwide.
Easily explaining why the autism rates went up after thiamaresol was removed.
But once these changes stabilized, the rates started going down.
And the CDC knew this.
Yet somehow, you know, through a wave of magic wand,
the Marisol was absolved at the very, very end of the article.
Their conclusions put many countries at ease.
By reassuring them, the Marisol was not to blame.
The principal investigator and co-author on one of the studies is now living in Denmark
as a wanted fugitive for stealing over a million dollars from the CDC.
So all of a sudden you had five published epidemiological studies showing no link
between mercury and autism.
What does the CDC do in December of 03?
It calls on the IOM to suddenly, quickly without warning,
hold a special meeting of the IOM Vaccine Safety Committee
meeting on February 9, 2004.
The CDC had completely ignored the 2001 IOM panels,
recommendation for biological and clinical science.
I always say the cells and molecules don't lie, but you know, numbers can lie.
Epidemiological studies can be designed to come out with an answer that you want.
On January 15th of this year, I wrote Dr. Julie Gerberding, the director of CDC, and
I asked her to postpone the February 9th Institute of Medicine meeting.
There was work being done on the other side, on the biomedical side, on the biological
side, but none of that had yet been published.
I said pressing forward with this meeting at this time I believe will further undermine
the credibility of the Center for Disease Control on matters of vaccine safety and do
damage to the reputation of the Institute of Medicine.
So it's not even possible to do an epidemiology study.
that could rule letters all out?
Absolutely. For all time, you can't do a study that
could have been a logic study. That would rule out
almost anything.
Yet the prestigious Institute of Medicine came to the conclusion that these studies definitively
rule out thimerosol is the cause of autism. Studies that all have fatal flaws and are in no
way even designed to rule thimerosol out. What is perhaps the greatest outrage it goes further to call
for the halt of further research. We never say like the IOM no further study should ever be done.
If you ever read that in science by the way you know there's a problem.
The only reason you'd want to close research is that you might fear what you would find.
And that's how we ended up with the famous May 2004 IOM report,
which has affected this debate ever since.
I rushed order to book about Mercury poisoning
that was written by Dr. Andrew Cutler,
who had a PhD in chemistry from Princeton.
This book was my first hint of hope
that I could recover from what I was going through.
You got to find a key later for mercury that goes into the brain and then figure out how
much to take and how often.
Alpha-lipoic acid was an available material that would do this and it would need to be
given every three or four hours.
And then we had this peculiar decision to increase the recommended coverage for the flu shot.
Just 10 days after the IOM report, the CDC responded by publishing their recommendation
that all babies start getting thimerisol-loaded flu shots, also recommending all pregnant women
get this shot.
Common sense and also all good science suggests that exposure is in utero to these tiny growing
fetuses is catastrophic.
Did we did?
Dymarasol was not removed from flu shots because it was not a routine childhood vaccine when
the joint statement was made in 1999.
Now, after five years of trying to cover their tracks, and just as the backstock of other
Dymarasol-loaded vaccines had finally run out, the CDC had taken in upon themselves
to add Dymarasol-loaded flu shots to the childhood vaccine schedule.
Should I really be getting a shot?
I mean, is it safe?
Yes.
Last year I had a pregnant patient
that did not get vaccinated.
She ended up getting very sick
from the flu and had to be hospitalized.
Oh, that's terrible.
How can they recommend thimerosal containing vaccines to pregnant women now?
I don't know why they still give it to pregnant women,
like that's the last person I would give.
Mercury, yeah.
Certainly, if you look at who's more likely to be at risk, you can argue
reasonably that the developing fetus, because you know the brain is still
developing and all the organs are still developing, is more likely to be
susceptible to the effects of mercury than is somebody who's already born and
getting older. The FDA had issued an advisory to pregnant women three years
earlier in 2001, warning them not to eat certain types of fish because of the
dangers of mercury on the developing fetus.
giving it to a pregnant mother,
when they're telling them not to eat fish,
it has mercury in them.
It's crazy, it's just crazy.
We're seeing a whole new round of autism right now, and I think I'm connecting that
with a flu shot, particularly in gestational time.
Dr. Heiko Langner at the University of Montana tested the amount of mercury and flu shots
given to pregnant women.
The results confirmed the flu shot contained 25 micrograms per dose when the bottle was
shaken.
But when left to sit for 20 minutes and not shaken, the dose contained 27 micrograms.
If the doctor doesn't shake the bottle up or the nurse doesn't shake it, the person getting
in at the end could be getting 40 or 50 micrograms if they're with the eighth, ninth, or tenth
vaccine in that bottle.
Flu shots have never been tested on pregnant women.
The manufacturer's own product insert
that comes with a flu shot clearly states,
animal reproduction studies have not been conducted
with flu zone.
It is also not known whether flu zone can cause
fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman
or can affect reproduction capacity.
Flu zone should be given to a pregnant woman,
only if clearly needed.
Yet the CDC somehow recommends all pregnant women
get these shots.
If you read the flu vaccine drug insert, you'll see all the makers say this, that we don't
know whether flu shot is harmful to the pregnancy.
We don't know if it's harmful to the fetus.
We don't know if it can cause birth defects.
And that's an outright lie.
There's been three animal studies where they looked at the effect of thimerosol on developing
fetuses for animals.
All three studies showed increased to dose of thimerosol and increased the abortion rate.
It kills fetuses.
Thymersal is also known to be more toxic to males than females.
A study exposing mice to increasing levels of thymersal found that all of the male mice
died before even the first female mouse died.
I was six and a half months pregnant with twins and a boy and a girl, I went in for a routine exam and at the end of the exam, as I was about to leave, my doctor said, you know, I really would like you to stop by the nurse's station and get a flu shot.
I told him that I was not comfortable getting the shot.
I didn't want to get it.
And he was very adamant,
and even went as far as to say that he thought I was being selfish.
Against my better judgment,
I went ahead and let them give me the shot.
I would say five to six hours after the shot I started getting severe cramps and bleeding
and I knew something was very terribly wrong and I immediately went back to the hospital
where my doctor was and he said, you are having a miscarriage.
I lost my son.
and my daughter ended up at 18 months diagnosed with severe autism.
She regressed in my womb.
My doctor was so horrified by what happened.
He said I'm not giving any more flu shots to pregnant women.
I had her baby teeth analyzed and baby teeth form in the womb.
You know, they come out later, but they form in the womb.
Her baby teeth had tons of mercury in them.
Listen to our government agencies.
These guys are telling the truth.
You know, there's no conspiracy here folks.
Just get your damn vaccine.
Ignoring the 2004 IOM report that said no further funding should be spent on thym aerosol.
The CDC would spend millions of our tax dollars on yet more epidemiology studies.
This time to use this ammunition against the families in the omnibus autism proceeding.
This proceeding consisted of government lawyers representing a government agency,
presenting government-funded science to government judges.
The biggest kangaroo court of all time.
Hazmat crews were quickly to clean up a small amount of mercury Friday.
Everyone was freaking out.
Firefighters say a teacher and a student knows the small trace of mercury in a water fountain
and called 911.
Schools are shut down and hazmat is called in if even a thermometer breaks or any time
mercury is spilled.
Yet these same schools are turned into flu shot clinics that are injecting the same substance
directly into every child's body.
This is not an issue anymore, this is getting to be something out of science fiction.
CDC has dug in so far they can't back out because them to say now oops we're sorry I
think the public would be very unforgiving.
Many accused the CDC of acting like a lawless maverick with their vaccine program.
Somehow thinking they could make up their own rules as they went.
Completely disregarding any federal exposure guidelines.
Disregarding all required safety testing.
Disregarding warnings and product safety data sheets.
Disregarding study after study showing how toxic thym aerosol is.
And worst of all, this regarding a very similar mercury tragedy of the past.
There was this very interesting disease called pink disease aquedinia in the 30s, 40s and
50s and eventually scientific consensus came about that it was caused by
inorganic mercury in teething powder, and interestingly only one in 500 children
exposed to the mercury developed pink disease, which again strongly suggests a
genetic susceptibility.
Acrodinia, otherwise known as pink disease, became more prevalent as the
teething powder became more commercial.
There's descriptions of kids with with pink disease rocking back and forth and
banging their heads and not playing with the other kids and losing eye contact and
having insomnia and not wanting to eat and many, many, many of the things that we see in autism.
And if you look at the literature, you know, mercury can do these things.
A study published in 2001 compared all known symptoms of mercury poisoning to all of the known symptoms of autism.
You can line them up, line for line, word for word,
and mercury poisoning looks exactly like autism.
A study out of Australia showed that 1 in 25 grandchildren of acrodania victims had autism
compared to the general population at 1 in 160, strongly suggesting a genetic susceptibility
to mercury.
So, pink disease was inorganic mercury, rubbed into the skin or the gums, and kids who were
roughly, I don't know, six months to a year of age.
Whereas the theory with autism is it's ethyl mercury injected directly into newborn babies or pregnant women.
The CDC's focus remains solely where their liability rests, but Mercury is a cumulative
poison, meaning you must account for all sources of exposure or you will be grossly underestimating
the risks.
You've got over a thousand tons of Mercury out there in people's mouths in the United
States.
It's the largest repository of Mercury anywhere, is what people are walking around with in
their mouths.
The concrete block that hasn't been used in a long time, and we're just going to place them out of them in here safe for 10 seconds 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.
Then we're going to dry it off so people can't say this is water vapor.
And we're going to place this now.
Now just what happens when you take a drink of hot coffee and you run it across your
mouth so you release a little bit more mercury.
the mercury levels in the fetus that are born to a woman with amalgams will have
higher tissue levels of mercury than the mother from the mother's fillings. New
research suggests the placenta removes mercury from the mother's bloodstream and
concentrates the mercury in
used to joke. It's kind o
if a woman is mercury toc
effective ways for her to
have a baby because the b
Just like the individual person who accumulates mercury as they age,
the industrial world is accumulating mercury as it ages.
There are over 600 coal-fired power plants in the United States that release over 50 tons of elemental mercury into the atmosphere each year.
They burn coal to generate electricity, and when they're burning the coal, the natural mercury within the coal gets released into the environment.
Dr. Raymond Palmer found that for each 1,000 pounds of mercury released into the environment,
there was a 61% increase in the rate of autism.
So there's this global pool of mercury, of elemental mercury that's circling the globe, literally.
Rain eventually brings the mercury down to the surface of the earth, where it builds up not only on the ground,
but also on the streams and lakes and oceans.
A 2008 study concluded that something in the rain is playing a strong role in the autism rates.
Once they enter a water body, they can get converted by bacteria from these elemental
forms of mercury into an organic form of mercury called methylmercury.
LG will absorb the methylmercury.
Zuo Plankton then eats the algae, which is then eaten by a small fish, which is then
eaten by a bigger fish, and then a bigger fish comes along.
And then Joe Fisher, who is at the top of the food chain, feeds his pregnant wife and
children all of this accumulated mercury.
Another hundred tons of mercury is released in the United States each year from municipal
waste incinerators, chlorine plants, mining, cement plants, steel mills, automobiles, furnaces,
crematoriums, and others.
The projection is that by 2050, the world's mercury levels will almost double and we're
ready at a very high level.
We are literally saturating the entire atmosphere and the planet we walk on with this incredible neurotoxin.
So once we're visiting the living room.
An EPA study found that by 1999, one in six women of childbearing age had blood levels
of mercury above what is known to cause neurological harm to a developing fetus.
You're not starting in the case of thimerosol from ground zero, you're starting with already
a body burden, so maybe even a small dose could put you over the edge.
So that's not zero.
You got Mercury coming up your sweatshally.
It's mercury in the first of my tubes. It's mercury in the thymeracal. It's mercury in the
silver filling. It's mercury in the fish. It's mercury is the key word.
Mercury-containing vaccines may help not harm kids according to two new studies in the Journal of Pediatric
In 2010, the CDC would put their final nail in the coffin.
With an epidemiology study that claimed not only does thimerosal not cause autism,
it actually protects children from autism.
This time, burying an 8.73 relative risk of autism in children exposed to thimerosal prenatally.
I have great shame now when I meet families with kids with autism because I have been part of the problem.
But when you look close enough, you see there's not even one real nail.
And therefore nothing stopping you from lifting that lid, and exposing everything those fake nails were meant to hide.
There are four to five boys to every girl with autism and studies have been published linking it to testosterone
But boy Haley would go beyond this and actually demonstrate why when adding dimer cell to a petri dish of brain neurons
You found about five percent in neuron death by three hours when testosterone was added to a different petri dish
All of the neurons were still alive at three hours, but when he added testosterone with dimer cell
100% of the neurons were dead
testosterone makes mercury much more toxic. He did the same experiment with estrogen and found that
it actually protected the neurons from mercury. Glutathion is the key component a child needs to
excrete mercury. And researchers have identified specific genetic mutations in children
with autism that slow down the normal activity.
activity of the exact pathways that just so happened to make glutathione. Dr. Jill James
Research confirmed that autistic children have much lower levels of glutathione than
typical children. Dr. Amy Holmes would provide the next piece of the puzzle finding children
with autism had much less mercury in their first baby haircuts, meaning they were not
excreting it like typical children. She also found the lower the hair levels, the more
severe the child's autism. Dr. Jeffrey Bradstreet would take it one step further by administering
a key-lating drug that binds to mercury and transports it out through the urine.
Now all of a sudden, autistic children were dumping out mercury compared to typical children.
A study by Dr. James Adams showed children with autism had over two times more mercury in their
baby teeth.
A study out of Harvard looking at brain samples found autistic brains had almost twice the
amount of mercury, so a child's testosterone levels combined with their ability to excrete
mercury clearly define the genetic susceptibility.
But as the exposure levels go up, the environmental trigger becomes the master neurotoxin.
Mercury forms a very strong bond with selenium, and when exposed it can render useless
specific seleno proteins that play a key role in maintaining a child's glutathione in its active state.
This reduces a child's glutathione levels.
Mercury also inhibits the enzyme HST, which is required to convert DHEA to sulfates.
This forces more DHEA in the wrong direction, and increases a child's testosterone levels
making the mercury much more toxic. Elevated testosterone then inhibits the CBS enzyme,
reducing glutathione levels even further, so as the mercury levels increase in the vaccines.
More and more children who were less and less susceptible became more susceptible and ended up poisoned.
Dr. Jill James has since published the ultimate study, showing white blood cells of autistic children
really are more susceptible to the toxic effects of thimerousal than those of typical children,
but even more unbelievable. She was able to increase the susceptibility of the typical children's cells
to match that of the autistic children's. Just by adding more thimerousal, rain, silver fillings,
the mother's age, cold plants, testosterone genes.
So many different studies all showing the link to autism.
All happen to have a single common denominator.
A study in 2004 exposing mice to thimericol and do significant behavioral and neuropathologic
effects very similar to what is seen in autism.
Peruvian scientists in 2007 exposed infant hamsters to thimericol at levels mimicking childhood
vaccines and found severe brain injury in the exact areas of the brain implicated in autism.
A study in 2010 exposing voles to mercury induced two of the hallmark characteristics of autism.
Other studies performed on mice, and rats, and monkeys, all found toxic effects on the brain and behavioral changes similar to autism.
Sick voles, sick mice, sick hamsters, sick monkeys, sick children, but no need to worry.
I'm sure the CDC is working on another epidemiology study.
Walking backwards even further, you see that someone left their fingerprint at the scene of the crime.
The exact year that I myself was introduced into childhood vaccines.
is the exact year the oldest of the first 11 children ever diagnosed with autism was born.
What else on this planet was introduced in 1931?
increased in exposure around 1990.
Accurred in all 50 states at the same time.
Explains why some are born with it
and others regress after vaccines.
Was given to children far beyond safety guidelines
yet remains undetected and blood, hair, and urine.
Effects boys more than girls
explains why some are more susceptible than others
induces animals into autism,
causes a condition similar to autism in the past,
explains the exact symptoms they have,
explains the CDC's behavior,
and explains what many think is impossible.
The recovery of these kids.
That time of year again, time to start thinking about this food shop.
Ooh, also there's a possible treatment for autism that some say is curing children.
Baxter Burley looks and acts like a normal six-year-old because he is.
That's why it's hard to imagine that at age three he had full-blown autism.
The same regional center that gave him the same group of people reversed his diagnosis.
something else that reversed the amount of mercury in his system.
It went from a high level of 13 to what's considered almost negligible.
0.5.
No longer considered autistic.
That was a big day.
We actually call it the day he lost his diagnosis.
We call his second birthday.
We see children that come through that are severely autistic and you know within a year they're
mainstreamed in school and out of the spectrum. Some children turn around in a number of months
other children take years.
We started with the special diet.
We started with lots of supplementation,
geared at healing his body,
helping his body detox from the heavy metal exposure he had.
We did chelation.
Miss'll be 12 injections.
We rented a hyperbaric oxygen chamber for our house.
Self-stimulatory behaviors that we saw so much of are all gone.
He's not covering up his ears.
We went from the baby who had no language and no social interaction and was lost in his own world
to a child who is very verbal. I'm very social.
He's very much engaged in relationships with everybody in the family.
Quinn has a best friend. He wants to see his friend every day and his friend wants to see him
He'll say, you know, when I had autism and then talk about something that we weren't aware
of how he was feeling.
Imagine what could have been done to recover these children starting clear back in 1999,
when the CDC first realized what was causing autism.
Over 12 years later, they continued to tell the same old story.
CDC is not certain how well there's no simple explanation for the in-duty changes
from the definition of autism or it improved recognizes an increased recognition.
and even though some doctors are recovering these kids,
the CDC continues to waste even more critical time
by turning a blind eye to it.
How much longer will we allow those
who have caused this epidemic
to be in charge of solving it?
with a puzzle and we're putting all the pieces of the puzzle together that way.
Was ending, Thaya Marisol, containing vaccines all over the world.
They're taking it out of children's vaccines here in America, but they're still putting in
vaccines.
They're sending to third world countries.
So my colleagues, if you're concerned about Africa and India.
13 years after the AAP's Joint Statement to remove thimericol as soon as possible for U.S. children.
The AAP and the World Health Organization convinced the United Nations not to remove thimericol
and vaccines for developing countries.
Reissuring the delegates of these countries, there is nothing to worry about.
They were like giving us guarantee to the rest of the show, there's been no
case of adverse or favorite portrait in any part of the world.
They dislike us enough without them finding out that they're now getting more autistic children.
But I'm afraid that's a real possibility.
You can lose the whole generation from Mercury.
So why should I accept to have it introduce the vaccine?
What's your response to people who are just going to blow you off as being anti-vaccine?
This has never had anything to do with being anti-vaccine.
You know, I'm not anti-light bulb.
I'm not anti-putting fillings in your mouth.
I'm not anti-fish.
I mean, this has nothing to do with being anti-anything
other than not exposing people to mercury.
The only reason we're using mercury in any product
is strictly for money reasons, and that's it.
Julie Gerberding, who was the director of the CDC, went on to become President of Merck's
$5 billion-year vaccine division.
Eli Lilly went on to make billions of dollars by inventing Prozac for Depression and
Stretara for ADD.
Depression and ADD are two of the most fundamental symptoms of Merckry exposure.
Genius, baseline exposures to mercury continue to increase exponentially.
While the CDC continues to push flu shots on pregnant women like never before,
with yet another epidemiology study.
Women who had the flu while they were pregnant were more likely to have a child later diagnosed
with autism.
So the question is, if your pregnant can you should you get a flu shot?
Yes, yes, yes. And I would say now goes beyond that.
If you are a woman of childbearing age, if you think you're going to get pregnant
or want to get pregnant, could get pregnant, yes, do it.
Get your flu shots to protect your baby from autism.
Get your flu shots.
shot now.
All right.
Doctors orders.
In 2009 and 2010, pregnant women were given a second mercury-loaded shot for the swine flu.
This has never been done before.
Yet the CDC likes to claim mercury was removed and the autism rates keep going up.
They removed mercury from all vaccines and they're still seeing autism rates on the rise.
Can you explain this for us?
They forgot to mention the latest autism rate
is based on children born clear back in 2002.
Those who received the backstock of thimericol vaccines
and then got flu shots starting in 2004.
But there is no mercury in the routine schedule of childhood vaccines anymore, except
maybe just trace amounts.
There is biologic plausibility right now.
I really do believe there is to say that
thy merciful causes ought to them like features.
By September of 2006, I had been sick for so long that I no longer knew what it was like to feel normal.
I remember the exact moment that I finally realized I wasn't going to get any better.
This was the day I decided to buy this video camera
to tell a story that I'm hoping inspires the public
to be part of the solution.
If you choose to get a vaccine, you can request one without the emerical.
You can choose an LED instead of a fluorescent light bulb.
You can choose a filling for your cavity that does not contain mercury.
You can push your local power plants to use mercury filtration systems.
I will not back down from protecting our kids from Mercury poisoning.
And most importantly, you can write the president and ask him to make good on his promise
by issuing an executive order for the immediate and responsible removal of dimerosolum
vaccines.
No matter what has happened in the past, we must all understand.
That it's not too late to fix.
and after days, and months, and even years of going after the science and trying to get myself better.
The exact thing I had set up to do that September day was finally finished.
And by this time,