...is that Peter and members of the flag, Australia and myself, are hearing on a regular basis about the pressure that our farmers and food producers are under.
But let me just make the point that these policies come from a far away place.
And you're going to have to bear with me now for a few minutes while I read my speech.
And I will read it because otherwise I'll be up here for hours.
I get a bit carried away with this so I've contained it to as small a speech as I can do.
But we are in trouble.
We all need to pull together on this, and first of all I'd just like to thank people who have been supporting Flag Australia.
in their push to get this word out there at Leon Beiner
on his Don't Sell Australia Short Facebook campaign
who has now over 7,500 members
all concerned about the same thing. Sean Perry from 5AA Talkback
who has allowed Peter and myself
many many times to go on there for
hours at a time.
to get these issues aired and discussed.
And we'll actually be having Lord Monckton on there tomorrow night from 7 o'clock till midnight
so that people can ring in, ask questions and have a discussion about this.
5AA have been behind us, which is great, and also the Southern Argus newspaper.
They have been so supportive of getting the message out there of the stress that our primary
producers are under, and we really can't thank all of those people enough.
So now I'll start to read.
Again, thank you all for coming here today.
I also thank the many people behind the scenes who have helped to educate me on the global issues
and how they are being implemented at a state level so that I can be an effective elected member of your parliament.
And while I'm speaking to you today, I'm going to quote a number of people from various influential positions.
on the international stage and I'll leave it with you to make up your mind
if you want to continue to head in the direction that we're going.
I first stumbled across Agenda 21 in about 2008 and quite frankly my first reaction was
to dismiss what I was reading because I didn't believe that any government in Australia would
take us down this road.
Then I began to see a legislative pattern emerging in Parliament which concerned me
greatly and I also started to see the tenor of legislation that we were passing.
I did hear those concerns in Parliament and it was dismissed and ignored.
The words, Agenda 21, ladies and gentlemen, were never meant to be spoken.
And if they were, then of course it would be dismissed as a conspiracy theory.
Because if people knew Agenda 21 and what it stood for,
there's plenty of information out there where they could actually learn what the endgame was.
And governments didn't want that to be known.
My dad always said to me that people only lie for two reasons.
One reason is because you're ashamed of what you're doing.
And the second reason is that you don't want people to be warned just before you screw them.
And I honestly believe that these secrets have been kept for both of those reasons.
Ladies and gentlemen the origins of the environmental movement as we see it
began back in 1968 when the Club of Rome was formed. The Club of Rome has been
described as a crisis think tank which specializes in crisis creation.
The main purpose of this
the main purpose of this think tank was to formulate a crisis that would unite the world and
condition us to the idea of global solutions to local problems.
In a document called the first global revolution,
authored by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider on pages 104 and 105 it stated
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the
threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.
All these dangers, of course, will be caused by human intervention that will require a
global response.
That's the origin of global warming, ladies and gentlemen.
In 1975, Australia agreed to bring in a new economic order via the Lima Declaration on
the second conference of the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation.
The outcome of this was, as I said, the Lima Declaration, which was the blueprint for the
redeployment of tools, jobs and manufacturing to the developing nations.
leaving countries like Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base and jobs.
Blind Freddy can now see what the outcome of that has been for our country,
with their unworkable trade and tariffs agreements hand in hand with this,
that have followed as a matter of course.
This is now a reality with around 90% of our agriculture and manufacturing just gone.
Australia signed the Lima Declaration and hundreds of others, with the support of all
major political players – Whitlam, Fraser, Hawke, Keating, Hewson, Howard, Rudd, the Democrats,
the Greens and even the Nationals.
It has been put to me that all of these treaties were the foundation for the roll-out of Agenda
21, and it seems that Australia has been moved around the global chessboard, and our so-called
leaders were either complicit or naive to the long-term consequences.
And now, we're almost to check, mate.
In 1992, former President of the United States George Bush, Sr. said effective execution of agenda 21
will require a profound
reorientation of human society unlike anything the world has ever experienced.
A major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment
of human and financial resources.
This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human
action will be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level.
Cutting through the code, I want everyone to consider what the words profound reorientation
of all human society and unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources actually
means.
For everyone here tonight not familiar with Agenda 21, I would suggest that this is the
beginning of your learning curve, not the end.
In 1992, Morris Strong, Secretary General of the UN Earth Summit and member of the Club
of Rome, said
It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class involving
high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil
fuels, ownership of motor vehicles, small electrical appliances, home and workplace
air conditioning and suburban housing are not sustainable.
Put those statements together with the previous one and it must become clear that Agenda 21
is about controlling every aspect of our lives.
How we eat, what we eat, how much we eat, how we move around, food production, the amount
of food and where we even live.
Dixie Ray, former Washington State Governor and Assistant Secretary for Oceans and International
Environmental and Scientific Affairs stated, Agenda 21 seeks to establish a mechanism for
transferring the wealth from citizens to the third world.
Fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a world government and UN central
direction.
From a report in the 1976 UN's Habitat 1 conference, land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset,
controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market.
Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration
of wealth, therefore contributes to social injustice.
In other words, ladies and gentlemen, if you work hard and you exercise good financial
management and invest in property, you are contributing to social injustice.
in a report from the President's Council on Sustainable Development.
We need a new collaborative decision process that leads to better decisions, more rapid
change and more sensible use of human, natural and financial resources in achieving our goals.
And at the same time, Harvey Reuven, Vice Chair of the Wildlands Project, says individual
rights will have to take a back seat to the collective.
J. Gary Lawrence, advisor to President Clinton's Council on Sustainable Development.
Participating in a UN advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy
fixated groups and individuals in our society, and here we are.
This segment of our society, who fear One World Government and UN invasion through which
our individual freedoms will be stripped away, would actively work to defeat any elected
official who joined the conspiracy by undertaking Agenda 21.
So, we will call our process something else.
We will call it comprehensive planning or growth management or smart growth.
We ended up with sustainable development.
The redeployment of human and financial resources has now become visible to us all via the cut
to services and programs to assist the sick, the young, the elderly and of course the creation
of another level of poverty now identified by the term the working poor.
I was speaking to a person last week and he said to me if Hitler was still around he'd
be sitting back thinking I didn't need bullets for it.
a global takeover and he'd be right.
We see data cash-grabbing via new taxes called levies, supposedly because we are cash-strapped
in this state, and at the same time see big project spending that does not fit with the
message that we are in financial crisis, but we the people have to tighten our belt, while
the government seems absolutely unaware and unconcerned of the amount of debt that it
is accumulating.
This in turn means that taxes, levies, fines and other penalties increase, as well as the
cost of living rising exponentially, and the ordinary citizen's ability to exist well
is compromised with almost every law that we pass.
We're constantly paying for so-called services that we don't receive.
This is wealth redistribution at the grassroots level,
redeployment of financial resources,
ensuring only hardship for the citizens
who just really want to get on with their lives.
The Parliament has also ventured into the rights of people to own and retain their property
and manage it without government interference.
In particular, the laws around, as Peter said, water allocation, natural resource management,
the Native Vegetation Act, Development and Planning Act, which are all equally toxic
to our food producers,
As they are to our long-term security, we city dwellers.
Everyone needs to remember, we all pay a natural resource management levy on our tax rates.
So this is not just going.
going to affect the food producers, the intrusions into our property that Peter was talking about
that land producers are going through will roll out into the suburbs and into the city
because they have the authority to do that.
We all have already fiddled in Parliament with land titles of people in rural areas.
And I'm talking about the Barossa and McLaren Vale legislation that passed.
And the buzzwords used to justify that was heritage status.
At the same time that our right to own and manage our land, have access to water, produce
adequate food to ensure that our only option is not to consume, often toxic and substandard
food from places like China, this government has been working overtime to take away our
rights to common law through many pieces of legislation.
Common law is what guarantees us an ability to correct injustices.
This coming year, I promise you, you will also hear debate over a number of pieces of
legislation that will further erode our common law rights.
And you have to get behind me on this, ladies and gentlemen, to stop this from going through.
As Agenda 21 became more and more apparent to me, I began using the line in Parliament
that government was now declaring war on its own citizens.
And that goes back as far as 2008.
This, of course, led me to being labelled a conspiracy theorist.
But here we are now, openly talking about Agenda 21 and the ramifications we will see
in a short period of time if this is not stopped in its tracks.
Let me just say that I often hear we cannot stop what is happening, two-party preferred
system, vote Labor, vote Liberal, what does it matter?
And in fact,
That's probably true for the House of Assembly, because that's where governments formed.
But ladies and gentlemen, here in South Australia we have the Legislative Council, the House of Review.
And, my friends, that is where the true power does lie.
And the last thing that governments want you to understand is that no matter who is in
power, the Legislative Council is there for checks and balances.
And when the Legislative Council is overly influenced by the major parties, legislation
can be blocked.
Remember, on most of these policies that I've spoken about here today, there has been bipartisan
support for everything that has gone through.
When the major parties join together, then the crossbenchers and minor parties, basically
our vote is null and void.
The way to avoid that is to make sure that when the major parties do join together, they
don't have the numbers.
For way too long now we the people have been asleep at the wheel and it is time to wake
up and participate in the democratic process and to do that you need to understand the
parliamentary and political system that you are trying to rein in.
In 1972, the Club of Rome published the alarmist limits to growth document, warning of worldwide
overpopulation, the need for sustainable development.
This was the beginning of the slow process of social engineering and programming people
to accept that the planet is struggling to sustain life.
On 8 October 1973, the New York Times reported a quote from Ted Turner, also Club of Rome.
The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important
and successful in human history.
In 1987, Mikhail Gorbachev, also member of Club of Rome, said,
We are moving toward a new world order, the world of communism,
and we shall never turn off that road.
He also quoted in 1996, Monetary and Economic Review on page 5,
The environmental crisis will be the international disaster
that will unlock the new world order,
World Government. In 1992 came the Earth Summit, which produced the document called
the Earth Charter. This document was co-written by Morris Strong, long-time globalist, elitist,
member of Club of Rome and Mikhail Gorbachev.
Both Strong and Gorbachev stated that it was hoped that this document would be adopted
as the new Ten Commandments, with environmentalism as the new one-world religion.
Out of this summit came Agenda 21.
Ted Turner, who was also a member of the Club of Rome, was quoted as saying, in 1996,
the total population of 250 to 300 million people is ideal.
That means a reduction of 95% from present levels would be even more ideal.
Anyone who abours the China one-child policy is simply a dumb-dumb.
In 1998, the Baltimore Sun reported on July 7th, most of Ted Turner's first donation
to the UN of 22 million went to programs that seek to stall population.
Another goal of the depopulation process is that the upcoming generation will submit
to sterilization to save Mother Earth.
Ladies and gentlemen, everything I've said here tonight can be verified by document searches,
and it is now time for us all to take off our blinkers and encourage our neighbours to
take off their blinkers.
It is also time for you to demand that every person you elect fully understands this policy
that is being rolled out via local, state and federal government at a concerning rate.
We are not talking about decades, we are talking about only years before this is fully
implemented.
And every day another law is passed.
is introduced to produce the end game of Agenda 21 being fully implemented.
So, the question that Lord Moncton asks, carbon tax, climate change and agenda 21, can democracy
survive all three?
It needs to be answered and entered now.
You need to find out from your elected members what they know of Agenda 21 and if they don't
know it, educate them and if they don't know it, then push them to understand what they
are voting on in Parliament because this is Crossroads.
I thank you all very much for your time and for your attention and I would now like to
take the opportunity to introduce Lord Christopher Moncton.
Thank you.