Utter genius!! Read to the end. (fun)
Alex A
Which all goes to show that the SSPX is no better at informing others about a complex subject without first informing the listener, what it is that constitutes a complexity of subject in the first place. Having discerned a subject's complexity, one can then proceed to inform the complexity to others, avoiding the trap of a lengthy discourse which describes the logic of complexity prescribed to …More
Which all goes to show that the SSPX is no better at informing others about a complex subject without first informing the listener, what it is that constitutes a complexity of subject in the first place. Having discerned a subject's complexity, one can then proceed to inform the complexity to others, avoiding the trap of a lengthy discourse which describes the logic of complexity prescribed to the said topic of discourse. So what exactly has been imparted by the SSPX that has stripped bare the complex laden subject, revealing a kernel of understanding to that, which ordinarily would be deemed, complex? Frankly, precious little by way of clarity or simplicity to what is noted to be a very complex issue. We know the degree of complexity simply by ascertaining the number of times the word complex was stressed. We also note the importance of adding a layer of good old-fashioned prudence to the mix. However, enlightenment escapes this writer simply because the first cause of the said topic has not, as yet, been discovered (proven) namely, the existence of COVID-19. Without the scientific certainty of its existence, there is no complexity and the multiplicity of complex usage adds no more weight of authenticity than does the usage of intellectualised prudence. This of course brings us neatly back to my opening remarks. Which all goes to show that the SSPX is...........