Tesa
42K
Ultraviolet
@Gunman123 You've brought up several very interesting topics.

"How on earth that the true traditional roman rite of conferring sacraments be called an extraordinary form instead of ordinary form"

...cuz Benedict XVI sed so. :P No, really. That's why. There's a lot more to it than -just- that and you can read about it at length over here:
rorate-caeli.blogspot.com

"more over there is only…More
@Gunman123 You've brought up several very interesting topics.

"How on earth that the true traditional roman rite of conferring sacraments be called an extraordinary form instead of ordinary form"

...cuz Benedict XVI sed so. :P No, really. That's why. There's a lot more to it than -just- that and you can read about it at length over here:
rorate-caeli.blogspot.com

"more over there is only one licit and valid form which is the traditional form, the novus odo is hipto facto inlicit"

Welllp, now y'all disagreeing with The Pope (as he was at that time). "Hipto facto inlicit." That's pure awesomesauce. :D I am SO going to use that next time the discussion gets technical with Dr. Bogus.

"calling the tradional rite an extraordinary form is an insult to God himself"

...but, wouldn't you agree that "ordinary" means something regular 'n boring while "extraordinary" means something special and fantastic? Like think about restaurants, for example.

Where would you rather eat? A restaurant with ordinary food? Or one where the cooking is extraordinary?
Gunman123
How on earth that the true traditional roman rite of conferring sacraments be called an extraordinary form instead of ordinary form, more over there is only one licit and valid form which is the traditional form, the novus odo is hipto facto inlicit but may be valid and catholics are not allowed to attend inlicit sacrament, calling the tradional rite an extraordinary form is an insult to God …More
How on earth that the true traditional roman rite of conferring sacraments be called an extraordinary form instead of ordinary form, more over there is only one licit and valid form which is the traditional form, the novus odo is hipto facto inlicit but may be valid and catholics are not allowed to attend inlicit sacrament, calling the tradional rite an extraordinary form is an insult to God himself who ordained the seven sacraments.
HerzMariae
Ultraviolet
It's very revealing that the FSSP in Canada needs to import a bishop from the USA.