72 years . Baptised as an infant. Catholic ancestors go back to Goa. Urban hermit. Discoverer of The Rational Premise and VC2 rational and irrational. Break for trads.Discovered late in life that with LG 16 visible we get the New Theology and with LG 16 invisible we return to the Scholastic theology on EENS etc.
March 17. St. Patrick. Baptised at St. Patrick's Cathedral. Studied at St. Patrick's School,Graduated from St. Patrick's College, Karachi. Irish missionaries!
Eldest son of Luke and Maggie Andrades.Completed semesters in theology , with exams and credit points, at the National Catholic Institute of Theology, Karachi.
Studied Philosophy at the University Pontificia Regina Apostoloum, Rome. Final semester left. Also attended corses in Theology and Latin.
Seminarian at the Pontificial Maria Mater Ecclesia seminary ( 2002) of the Legion of Christ and the English Beda Pontifical College ( seminary) Rome ( 2023).
Holder of the All Pakistan Newspaper Society (APNS) Best Reporter of the Year Award presented at an event for journalists, in Karachi, by Benazir Bhutto.
SEDEVACANTISM BASED UPON VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL IS NOW OBSOLETE. THE COUNCIL CAN BE INTERPRETED RATIONALLY AND THE CONCUSION IS ECCLESIOCENTRIC AND TRADITIONAL.
Catholic lay man in Rome. Discoverer of Feeneyism versus Cushingism, the Rational Interpretation of Vatican Council II, a breakthrough for the present Catholic Church.The sedevacantists reject the pope because of Vatican Council II irrational. When the Council is rational it supports Tradition. There is no reason for them to reject the Council or the pope. Even the SSPX can now accept Vatican Council II , rational, and meet the demand that they accept the Council. The Council is in harmony with Tradition. So they can ask for canonical recognition. They can also demand that Pope Leo XIV interpret Vatican Council II rationally, since this is ethical and that he also accept Tradition, as did Pope Leo XIII. The main line Catholic Church must now be traditional since the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms can only be interpreted rationally and the conclusion is traditional.
Changing the understanding of the Creeds is first class heresy .The penalty is excommunication. The cardinals and bishops are interpret the Nicene Creed heretically and schismatically. The SSPX is does the same.
08.05.2026
In the Nicene Creed we pray, I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins. It refers to one, visible and repeatable baptism for me and not two or more baptisms which are visible in the present times.
But for Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez it refers to three or more visible baptisms (desire, blood etc) which exclude the baptism of water. If it included the baptism of water they would be Feeneyite. If they say there is only one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins, then they are Feeneyite on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with no exceptions. This would not be politically correct.
So they interpret the baptism of desire as being a visible exception for the dogma EENS. This changes the traditional and rational interpretation of the Nicene Creed. So the Profession of Faith, based upon the Nicene Creed has two meanings. The new version is irrational and modernism.
Changing the understanding of the Creeds is first class heresy according to the hierarchy of …More
SSPX MUST NOT ACCEPT ‘THE REFORMS’ OF VATICAN COUNCIL II BASED UPON LG 16 VISIBLE : WITH LG 16 CUSHINGITE FERNANDEZ COULD BE EXCOMMUNICATED FOR SCHISM
08.05.2026
SSPX MUST NOT ACCEPT ‘THE REFORMS’ OF VATICAN COUNCIL II BASED UPON LG 16 VISIBLE : WITH LG 16 CUSHINGITE FERNANDEZ COULD BE EXCOMMUNICATED FOR SCHISM
The Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) must accept ‘the reforms of Vatican Council II based upon the visible and so liberal interpretation of the Council. We have a rational and traditional alternative choice, now.
Vatican Council II irrational (Cushingite) has brought division into the Catholic Church and even cardinal Burke, Sarah an Muller accept it
The SPX must announce that they accept Vatican Council II with LG 16 invisible. The Council has a continuity with the dogma EENS of the Council of Florence 1442.
The SSPX must clarify its doctrinal position on this issue. This is the minimum they could do. The LG 16 visible or invisible issue was not covered in Fr. Davide Pagliarani's Declaration of Faith. – Lionel Andrades
06.05.2026
I AFFIRM THE CREEDS WITH NO KNOWN EXCEPTIONS AND POPE LEO AND MARIA MONTSE ALVARADO CHOOSE EXCEPTIONS …More
I AFFIRM THE CREEDS WITH NO KNOWN EXCEPTIONS AND POPE LEO AND MARIA MONTSE ALVARADO CHOOSE EXCEPTIONS : I USE LG 16 invisible and they LG 16 visible : CHANGING THE CREEDS IS FIRST CLASS HERESY ( Ad Tuendem Fidem)
06.05.2026
I AFFIRM THE CREEDS WITH NO KNOWN EXCEPTIONS AND POPE LEO AND MARIA MONTSE ALVARADO CHOOSE EXCEPTIONS : I USE LG 16 INVISIBLE AND THEY LG 16 visible : CHANGING THE CREEDS IS FIRST CLASS HERESY ( Ad Tuendem Fidem)
I affirm the Athanasius Creed with no known exceptions of invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance being physically visible cases in 2026. For Pope Leo , the Dicasteries and cardinals and bishops, there are exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed, the Nicene Creed etc.
Lumen Gentium 16 refers to a visible case for them and an invisible case for me.
I affirm the Nicene Creed,’ I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins ’. It is the baptism of water. I do not affirm three or more visible baptisms (desire, blood) which exclude the baptism of water. There are no objective cases of being saved with the baptism of water outside the Church. We cannot meet or see someone saved outside …More
FOR THE SAN CAMILLIO, ST.FRANCIS OF PAULA AND NEWMAN CENTER- PRIESTS IN ROME, LUMEN GENTIUM 16 IS INVISIBLE IN 2026 : BREAKTHROUGH ON VATICAN COUNCIL II FOR THE TRADITIONALISTS
06.05.2026
FOR THE SAN CAMILLIO, ST.FRANCIS OF PAULA AND NEWMAN CENTER- PRIESTS IN ROME, LUMEN GENTIUM 16 IS INVISIBLE IN 2026 : BREAKTHROUGH ON VATICAN COUNCIL II FOR THE TRADITIONALISTS
The Provincial and the religious community of Sant Camillio de Lellis, would agree: LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible cases in 2026?, I asked a priest of the community yesterday. He refers to LG 16 etc as being a hypothetical and invisible case only in 2026.We agree. They would have to be asked directly he said.But even if they were, they could not say that LG 16 etc refers to a physically visible case of a non Catholic saved outside the Catholic Church in the present times.
What’s this about ‘invisible’ and ‘visible’ it may be asked ?
Whenever someone says that Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition, he means there are visible exceptions, for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( EENS) of the Council of Florence 1442, which did not mention any exceptions. He means there are …More
MARIA MONTSE ALVARADO ES IRRACIONAL Y NO TRADICIONAL EN CUANTO A CREDOS, CONCINCIOS Y CATECISMOS, AL IGUAL QUE MICHAEL WARSAW EN EWTN
04.05.2026
MARIA MONTSE ALVARADO ES IRRACIONAL Y NO TRADICIONAL EN CUANTO A CREDOS, CONCINCIOS Y CATECISMOS, AL IGUAL QUE MICHAEL WARSAW EN EWTN
El problema radica en que el Papa León XIII, los cardenales y las conferencias episcopales no afirman:
1. El Credo Niceno, considerando que Lumen Gentium 16 es invisible, es decir, que existen casos invisibles de no católicos salvados en la ignorancia invencible fuera de la Iglesia, por ejemplo, en 2026.
2. No afirman el Credo Atanasio, considerando que LG 16 es invisible.
3. No afirman un ecumenismo de retorno a la Iglesia Católica del Syllabus de Pío IX, sin excepciones conocidas en la actualidad. LG 16 es invisible.
4. No afirman que el Concilio Vaticano II, considerando LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA2, Gs 22, etc., sean casos implícitos y no explícitos. Son hipotéticos e invisibles.
5. No afirman que el Catecismo de la Iglesia Católica, considerando CCC 847-848, no sea una excepción explícita a CCC 845-846.
En cambio, proyectan erróneamente …More
@adeste fideles She likes to talk!
They are a chip off the same block, the "Errors of Russia."
MARIA MONTSE ALVARADO VERHALTET SICH IN BEZÜGLICH DER GLAUBENSBEKENNTNISSE, KONZILBEKUNDUNGEN UND KATECHISMEN UNGEWÖHNLICH, GENAUSO WIE MICHAEL WARSAW BEI EWTN.
04.05.2026
MARIA MONTSE ALVARADO VERHALTET SICH IN BEZÜGLICH DER GLAUBENSBEKENNTNISSE, KONZILBEKUNDUNGEN UND KATECHISMEN UNGEWÖHNLICH, GENAUSO WIE MICHAEL WARSAW BEI EWTN.
Das Problem ist, dass Papst Leo, die Kardinäle und die Bischofskonferenzen Folgendes nicht bestätigen:
1. Das Nicänische Glaubensbekenntnis, wobei Lumen Gentium 16 als unsichtbar gilt. Das bedeutet, dass Fälle von Nichtkatholiken, die in unüberwindlicher Unwissenheit außerhalb der Kirche gerettet wurden, beispielsweise im Jahr 2026, unsichtbar bleiben.
2. Sie bestätigen nicht das Athanasius-Glaubensbekenntnis, wobei Lumen Gentium 16 als unsichtbar gilt.
3. Sie bestätigen nicht den Ökumenismus der Rückkehr zur katholischen Kirche gemäß dem Syllabus Pius’ IX., der in der heutigen Zeit keine bekannten Ausnahmen kennt. Lumen Gentium 16 ist unsichtbar.
4. Sie bestätigen nicht, dass das Zweite Vatikanische Konzil die impliziten und nicht expliziten Fälle der LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 usw. anerkennt. Sie betrachten …More
Well I guess they are irrational!
MARIA MONTSE ALVARADO TENUE UNE POSITION IRRATIONNELLE ET NON TRADITIONNELLE CONCERNANT LES CRÉDOS, LES CONSEILS ET LES CATÉCHISME, À L'INstar de MICHEAL WARSAW sur EWTN.
04.05.2026
MARIA MONTSE ALVARADO TENUE UNE POSITION IRRATIONNELLE ET NON TRADITIONNELLE CONCERNANT LES CRÉDOS, LES CONSEILS ET LES CATÉCHISME, À L'INstar de MICHEAL WARSAW sur EWTN.
Le problème est que le pape Léon XIII, les cardinaux et les conférences épiscopales ne reconnaissent pas :
1. Le Credo de Nicée, avec Lumen Gentium 16, comme invisible. Autrement dit, il n'existerait pas de cas invisibles de non-catholiques sauvés dans une ignorance invincible hors de l'Église, par exemple en 2026.
2. Ils ne reconnaissent pas le Credo d'Athanase, avec LG 16 invisible.
3. Ils ne reconnaissent pas un œcuménisme de retour à l'Église catholique selon le Syllabus de Pie IX, sans exceptions connues à l'heure actuelle. LG 16 est invisible. 4. Ils ne reconnaissent pas le Concile Vatican II, considérant les LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA2, Gs 22, etc. comme des cas implicites et non explicites. Ils les jugent hypothétiques et invisibles.
5. Ils ne reconnaissent pas le Catéchisme de l'Église catholique …More
En plus d'être illégitime et contraire à la Constitution divine de l'Eglise, cette nomination est un désastre. Léon XIV n'est finalement qu'un autre Bergoglio, en version moins hargneuse envers la Tradition et un peu plus civilisée.
MARIA MONTSE ALVARADO È IRRAZIONALE E NON TRADIZIONALE SUI CREDI, I CONCILI E I CATECHISMI, COME MICHEAL WARSAW DI EWTN
04.05.2026
MARIA MONTSE ALVARADO È IRRAZIONALE E NON TRADIZIONALE SUI CREDI, I CONCILI E I CATECHISMI, COME MICHEAL WARSAW DI EWTN
Il problema è che Papa Leone, i cardinali e le conferenze episcopali non affermano:
1. Il Credo niceno con Lumen Gentium 16 invisibile, ovvero i casi invisibili di non cattolici salvati in invincibile ignoranza al di fuori della Chiesa, ad esempio nel 2026.
2. Non affermano il Credo di Atanasio con LG 16 invisibile.
3. Non affermano un ecumenismo di ritorno alla Chiesa cattolica del Sillabo di Pio IX, senza eccezioni note ai giorni nostri. LG 16 è invisibile.
4. Non affermano un Concilio Vaticano II in cui LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA2, Gs 22 ecc. siano casi impliciti e non espliciti. Sono ipotetici e invisibili.
5. Non affermano il Catechismo della Chiesa Cattolica in cui CCC 847-848 non costituisce un'eccezione esplicita per CCC 845-846.
Al contrario, proiettano erroneamente quanto segue:
1. I casi invisibili di LG 8, 14, 16 ecc. sono visti come esempi visibili …More
MARIA MONTSE ALVARADO IS IRRATIONAL AND NON TRADITIONAL ON THE CREEDS, COUNCILS AND CATECHISMS LIKE MICHARL WARSAW AT EWTN. .
04.05.2026
MARIA MONTSE ALVARADO IS IRRATIONAL AND NON TRADITIONAL ON THE CREEDS, COUNCILS AND CATECHISMS LIKE MICHARL WARSAW AT EWTN. .
The issue is that Pope Leo, the cardinals and the bishop conferences, do not affirm:-
1. The Nicene Creed with Lumen Gentium 16 being invisible.i.e invisible cases of non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance outside the Church in for example 2026.
2. They do not affirm the Athanasius Creed with LG 16 invisible.
3. They do not affirm an ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church of the Syllabus of Pius IX, with no known exceptions in the present times.LG 16 is invisible.
4. They do not affirm a Vatican Council II with LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA2 ,Gs 22 etc being implicit and not explicit cases. They are hypothetical and invisible.
5. They do not affirm the Catechism of the Catholic Church with CCC 847-848 not being an explicit exception for CCC 845-846.
Instead they wrongly project the following:-
1. Invisible cases of LG 8, 14, 16 etc are seen as …More
Correction:
MARIA MONTSE ALVARADO IS IRRATIONAL AND NON TRADITIONAL ON THE CREEDS, COUNCILS AND CATECHISMS LIKE MICHAEL WARSAW AT EWTN.
The interpretation of Vatican Council II by Alberto Melloni,Cardinal Gerhardt Muller, Bishop Robert Barron, Bishop Bernard Fellay, Fr. Davide Pagliarani, Fr, Jean Marie Gleize, Fr. Michael Mary Sim and Maria Montse Alvarado is Cushingite and not Feeneyite
03.05.2026
The interpretation of Vatican Council II by Alberto Melloni,Cardinal Gerhardt Muller, Bishop Robert Barron, Bishop Bernard Fellay, Fr. Davide Pagliarani, Fr, Jean Marie Gleize, Fr. Michael Mary Sim and Maria Montse Alvarado is Cushingite and not Feeneyite
‘Rome comes back to the Faith’ with Vatican Council II Feneeyite and not Vatican Council II Cushingite.
The interpretation of Vatican Council II by Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School (FSCIRE), Ursula Von Layen of the European union, Cardinal Gerhardt Muller, Bishop Robert Barron, Bishop Bernard Fellay, Fr. Davide Pagliarani, Fr, Jean Marie Gleize, Fr. Michael Mary Sim of the Transalpine Redemptorist is Cushingite and not Feeneyite. It is the same with Maria Montserrat Alvarado, the new Prefect of the Vatican's Dicastery for Communication and the EWTN Rome staff.
Creeds interpretd with Cushingism (LG 16 visible in 2026) are heretical and schismatic and a mortal I sin of faith.
With LG 16 visible we have schism with LG …More
POPE FRANCIS WAS OBJECTIVELY IN SCHISM AND HERESY ON VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH THE LG 16 VISIBLE ERROR MADE ALSO BY POPE LEO AND THE CARDINALS AND BISHOPS TODAY
02.05.2026
POPE FRANCIS WAS OBJECTIVELY IN SCHISM AND HERESY ON VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH THE LG 16 VISIBLE ERROR MADE ALSO BY POPE LEO AND THE CARDINALS AND BISHOPS TODAY
They can correct the error today and return to normal.They will then be Magisterial and Apostolic.
All this is mentioned so that they will interpret Vatican Council II etc rationally and so traditionally. There will be a continuity with the pre-1940 Magisterium of the Catholic Church.
They must correct the error in the Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano schism-traial which was based upon irrational Cushingism.
Even a cardinal or bishop can be in manifest public mortal sin and would need absolution in the Sacrament of Confession to avoid Hell. During this period they do not cease being cardinals and bishops.
A pope who is publically oriented to Hell is not in communion with Jesus until he is sorry for his sins, asks for mercy and changes his life style. He cannot keep committing a public mortal sin for political reasons.
Mortal …More
A.I ON X IS ALIGNED WITH THE TRADITIONALISTS AND NOT POPE LEO, THE CARDINALS AND BISHOPS
Tuesday 2, June, 2026
A.I ON X IS ALIGNED WITH THE TRADITIONALISTS AND NOT POPE LEO, THE CARDINALS AND BISHOPS
Catholic doctrine interpreted rationally is coherent and traditional.
Honesty demands that all interpret Vatican Council II rationally and not confuse what is implicit as being explicit and then make liberal conclusions, in faith and morals.
Everyone agrees that LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible and hypothetical cases only. Even AI confirms the obvious.
You can post the following three reports of mine onto AI on X and then ask for comments. You can seek clarifications.Then re-post your views and that of AI on line.
01.06.2026
ALBERTO MELLONI AND THE FSCIRE, BOLOGNA ARE IRRATIONAL AND SCHISMATIC ON VATICAN COUNCIL II: AI CONFIRMS THE SAME FOR POPE LEO
Alberto Melloni and the FSCIRE and the Archdiocese of Bologna, are officially and publically irrational. They continue to confuse what is invisible as being visible and then conclude that …More
Wow AI got it right!
ALBERTO MELLONI AND THE FSCIRE, BOLOGNA ARE IRRATIONAL AND SCHISMATIC ON VATICAN COUNCIL II: AI CONFIRMS THE SAME FOR POPE LEO
01.06.2026
ALBERTO MELLONI AND THE FSCIRE, BOLOGNA ARE IRRATIONAL AND SCHISMATIC ON VATICAN COUNCIL II: AI CONFIRMS THE SAME FOR POPE LEO
Alberto Melloni and the FSCIRE and the Archdiocese of Bologna, are officially and publically irrational. They continue to confuse what is invisible as being visible and then conclude that the Council is a break with Tradition. This is not ethical. This cannot be Magisterial. Since the Holy Spirit will not ask us to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and so deceptively. It is only with the deception in theology and philosophy that the FSCIRE can support their liberalism.
Melloni and Ursula Von der Leyen and the rest of the European Union, choose the fake premise (invisible people are visible). If they choose the rational premise then they would return to the ecclesiology of the Middle Ages.
Melloni does not deny that he chooses to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as physically invisible examples of salvation outside the …More
AI ON X AGREES WITH ME: POPE LEO IS IN SCHISM WITH THE LG 16 VISIBLE ERROR.
01.06.2026
AI ON X AGREES WITH ME: POPE LEO IS IN SCHISM WITH THE LG 16 VISIBLE ERROR.
The conversations on this subject are now there on X. It can be read.
This information can be accessed on Grok. The data can be re-fed into Grok by anyone and there will be an output from Grok. Questions can be asked and clarifications can be sought from AI.
The so called ‘development of doctrine ‘in the Catholic Church comes from the fake premise; the LG 16 visible and not invisible confusion. It can be avoided and the Council emerges embarrassingly traditional and ecclesiocentric for the liberals.
The conversations on this subject are now there on X. It can be read. There have been many conversations on this subjective in great detail between Grok (AI) and me.
So we now know that Pope Leo and the cardinals and bishops are in public schism. This is not just my view.
This information can be accessed on Grok. The data can be re-fed into Grok by anyone and there will be an output from Grok. Questions …More
A.I ON ‘X’ INDICATES POPE LEO IS IN PUBLIC SCHISM WHICH WAS AN IMPEDIMENT IN HIS ELECTION BY THE COLLEGE OF CARDINALS ALSO IN SCHISM.
30.05.2025
With LG 16 visible we have schism with LG 16 invisible Vatican Council II is ecclesiocentric and traditional. This is a major doctrinal discovery in the Catholic Church. The liberal Vatican Council II becomes orthodox.
There is no denial from Fr. Joseph Fession sj, Jimmy Akin, Raymond Arroyo, Cardinal Muller. No denial from Larry Chapp, Scott Hahn, Matt Fradd. There is no denial or correction from Raoberto dei Mattei, Chris Ferrara and Corrado Gnerre.
There is no denial from the Society of St. Pius X, the Transalpine Redemptorists and the Franciscans of the Immaculate.
With LG 16 visible, Pope Leo and Cardinal Fernandez become traditionalists on Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
I affirm Vatican Council II. I affirm the Catechism of the Catholic Church. I affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Athanasius Creed with no known exceptions. I affirm invisible and hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible …More
RAYMOND ARROYO INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY SO HE CANNOT INTERVIEW FR. DAVIDE PAGLIARANI WHO REJECTS THE LIBERAL CONCLUSION
29.05.2026
RAYMOND ARROYO INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY SO HE CANNOT INTERVIEW FR. DAVIDE PAGLIARANI WHO REJECTS THE LIBERAL CONCLUSION : EWTN IS POLITICAL
Raymond Arroyo interprets Vatican Council II irrationally so he cannot interview Fr. Davide Pagliarani who rejects the liberal conclusion of Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. Catholic Answers like the National Catholic Register also interprets Vatican Council II heretically and schismatically. So there is no discussion or dialogue with the traditionalist and sedevacantists. Scott Hahn, Matt Fradd, Cardinal Raymond Burke, Bishop Athanasius Schneider would be approved politically by EWTN.
LG 16 visible is schismatic.
LG 16 invisible is traditional.
We can choose either the schismatic or traditional option.
The Vatican and the political Left permit Vatican Council II to be interpreted with only the LG 16 visible premise.
No pope has announced that Vatican Council II should be interpreted rationally and …More
I never liked Arroyo!
SSPX, TRANSALPINE REDEMPTORISTS MUST ADAPT TO NEW INFORMATION FAST AND NOT FOLLOW THE PATTERN OF ARCHBISHOP VIGANO AND THE CARMELITE SISTERS IN ARLINGTON TEXAS
28.05.2026
SSPX, TRANSALPINE REDEMPTORISTS MUST ADAPT TO NEW INFORMATION FAST.
The axe could see fall on the Society of St. Pius X and the Transalpine Redemptorists since they cannot accept fast enough new information and show Cardinal Fernandez that with the Creeds, Councils and catechisms interpreted irrationally and unetyhically7, he is public and official schism. Canonically, he cannot be a prefect, a cardinal or offer Holy Mass.
There is enough material on line which show that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance interpreted as physically invisible or visible cases can change the conclusion of the Council. One conclusion would be traditional and the other schismatic.
CARD.GERHARDT MULLER
The whole Church is choosing the LG 14, G 16 visible interpretation of Vatican Council I. This includes Cardinal Gerhardt Muller, who has asked how can the whole Church we wrong.
In an interview, he has not stated that he and all the bishops and cardinal, are politically …More
THE TRANSALPINE REDEMPTORISTS AND THE SSPX MUST URGENTLY INFORM THE VATICAN THAT THEY AFFIRM VATICAN COUNCIL II INTERPRETED RATIONALLY IN HARMONY WITH TRADITION : THEY REJECT THE VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL OF POPE LEO
27.05.2026
THE TRANSALPINE REDEMPTORISTS AND THE SSPX MUST URGENTLY INFORM THE VATICAN THAT THEY AFFIRM VATICAN COUNCIL II INTERPRETED RATIONALLY IN HARMONY WITH TRADITION : THEY REJECT THE VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL OF POPE LEO
The Transalpine Redemptorists in Scotland founded with the blessing of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) of Archbishop Lefebvre, must inform the Vatican and local bishops, before canonical action is taken against them, that they affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted rationally and in harmony with Tradition and the Magisterium over the centuries. The Council interpreted rationally is no more an issue for the Latin Mass traditionalists.
This is urgent. It must be made clear that:-
1. You affirm Vatican Council II rational and continue to reject Vatican Council II irrational. You affirm the Council in harmony with Tradition. The Council has the hermeneutic of continuity with the Athanasius …More
Open Letter to Bishop Hugh Gilbert and Fr. Michael Mary Sim
24.05.2026 Pentecost Sunday
Open Letter / To Whom it may concern
To:
Bishop Hugh Gilbert, the bishop of Aberdeen, Scotland and to Fr.Michael Mary Sim, The Religious Superior of the Sons of the Most Holy Redeemer (Transalpine Redemptorists), Scotland.
According to a May 21, 2026 press release of the Diocese of Aberdeen Scotalnd, 2026 there is a canonical process underway regarding the status and Catholic religious community Sons of the Most Holy Redeemer.
Sons Of The Most Holy Redeemer
papastronsay.com/resources/documents/2025 Open …
papastronsay.com/resources/documents/the-dogma-to…
Sons of the Most Holy Redeemer - Wikipedia
Of concern to me is that in spite of so many reports on the Internet over the last 20 years, in Scotland they interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally.
1. For them LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to explicit, objective, specifically known in particular cases of non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church, …More
SSPX MUST CLARIFY ITS DOCTRINAL POSITION ON FEENEYISM, ECCLESIA DEI AND THE 1949 LETTER OF THE HOLY OFFICE
Feeneyism
From Wikipedia,
the free encyclopedia
Feeneyism, also known as the Boston heresy, is a Christian theological concept associated with the Jesuit priest Leonard Feeney. Feeneyism advocates an interpretation of the dogma extra Ecclesiam nulla salus ("outside the Church there is no salvation") claiming that only Catholics who are baptised with water can go to heaven. Feeneyism's denial of the doctrines of baptism of desire and baptism of blood, is considered a heresy by the Catholic Church.
Lionel: For me Feeneyism is opposed to Cushingism. Feeneyism sees invisible cases as being just invisible. This is rational. Cushingism sees invisible cases as being visible. This is irrational.
So Lumen Gentium 16 being saved in invincible ignorance , refers to a visible exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, for Cushingites.
Since it is physically invisible it is not an objective exception for the dogma EENS, for Feeneyites.It is not an exception for me.
Wikipedia’s …More
The 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston is irrational, non traditional, schismatic and Cushingite.
Catholic research Baptism of Desire
Those who accept the Letter of the Holy Office …
Lay Catholics must reject the 1949 Letter of the …
2023 and 2024: No One Dared to Ask Francis to …
From what I know, the SSPX does not support Feeneyism. One of their priests wrote a letter concerning the errors it contains.