Ay!!! to those priests, bishops cardenals lost faith, and act as if they do, only by economic interest, and the sheep astray with false doctrine, so practicing illogical, false and warm prudence. That will be theirs !! They do not want to be excommunicated by a false pope. They are not willing to martyrdom that will take away the cassock, because one day they spoke the truth. Warmth, warmth, warmth. Devil's Trap !! And those who follow them, even knowing the truth ... They are as treacherous as they !!!!

There is a big difference between a "bad pope" and a "heretic pope", and between an "invalid pope " the election of a heretic as a pope is invalid and the sin of formal heresy separates ipso facto the heretic from the Church.
By Cannon Law (can. 194 § 1, 2) the heretic is ipso facto excommunicated and separates away from the Church and also Pope Pius XII warned in his encyclical Mystici Corporis Christi, the Doctrine of the Mystical Body of Christ, that heresy and apostasy are grievous sins that separate by its own nature a man from the Body of the Church.

@Abramo it is the teaching of the Church that we are (all of us), kings, prophets and priests if this is true (and yes it is true), then bergoglio IS a false prophet, false king and false priest like Judas was as he is teaching falseness knowingly...

Second Jesus did appoint Judas as a disciple BUT Jesus is God, He knew Judas was a traitor from the get go, JPII and Benedict despite they represent Jesus, they are not, they're not divine, so, they rely in the opinions of others... didn't pope Benedict elevate Cardinal Burke and cardinal Sarah? Didn't JPII elevate cardinal Arinze?

Yes we have many who priests who are liberal, who are modernists, but JPII and Benedict didn't have a crystal ball... even Bergoglio when he was a Bishop gave traditionalists a church when the motu propio came out, but we all know that was all to keep the appearances as he is disgusted on traditional minded people...

I assure you that most popes of the past did appoint a judas or two...

So please Abramo, JPII is dead and Benedict is suffering for a church in the depths of apostasy, stop blaming someone specifically from the past about the crisis of today, the crisis is being permitted by God for us rejecting the truth as 2 Thes 2 reveals, truth was negated in Vatican II by the whole Church, and when I say the whole church I include the whole laity, the SSPX were the only ones who actually said something about it, anyways, have a blessed day.

@Abramo When pope Benedict lifted the excommunications to the SSPX, he didn't know Bishop Williamson had Jewish 'issues', when the Vatican accepted the reign of communists in China by inviting the 'priests' appointed by the communists in China a holy man stood up against it, Cardinal Kung... but Benedict who is the most brilliant disciple of pope JPII who stood against communism would never go against his friend and pope JPII the great, this is one of many things that happened while he being in office, things were happening without him knowing and with his approval.

"My power doesn't reach beyond the doors of my office" was once reported that Benedict said, since Vatican II popes relied more and more on the men around them to appoint men in places of power, popes of the past did too, but weren't in haste to appoint anyone.

JPII and Benedict appointed many men who are now liberal... but didn't JPII stood against communion to remarried? Didn't JPII proclaimed people living in sin to live as brother and sister? Didn't Benedict spoke against ecumenism when he said Nostra Atate was dangerous? Didn't pope Benedict the brave said in summary that Islam was dangerous? JPII and Benedict laid the foundations for us to fight the Liberal priests of today who stumble on their words, as familiaris consortio and Benedict's summorum pontificum are a headache for all those Judas.

It is easy to blame JPII or Benedict the brave for their respective papacies, for their 'hasty' appointments, and I understand your pain and others because the practices of old took a hit since Vatican II... but it is hard to see between the lines and the truth is that they became popes and got a ring of liberal people around them, JPII was almost killed and Benedict's was too as a plot to kill him was planned and revealed during vatileaks.

2 Thes 2, Fatima and la Salette reveals the same thing that happened to the Jewish top back then: apostasy.

Apostasy closed the kingdom of heaven for the common people, Jesus told those pharisees that they don't go in and didn't let anyone in, the same is happening at an alarming rate and Catholics embrace this as 'heavenly and merciful'... sorry for the long post, but many blame this on JPII and Benedict when the blame is to be pointed to the mirror: us.

But we are alive and we can always repent and amend, we can do now what we didn't do back then... resist while remain faithful, Bergoglio IS a false prophet as he is proclaiming what the world wants and what their leaders have planned since long.

Blessed Pope Pius IX teaches in one of his encyclicals
We should not conclude that religion does not progress in the Church of Christ. There is great progress! But it is truly the progress of faith, which is not change. The intelligence, wisdom, and knowledge of everybody should grow and progress, like that of the whole Church of the ages. In this way we might understand more clearly what we used to believe obscurely; in this way posterity might have joy of understanding what used to be revered without understanding. In this way the precious stones of divine dogma might be worked, adapted exactly and wisely decorated, so that they increase in grace, splendor, and beauty -- but always in the same fashion and doctrine, in the same meaning and judgment, so that we can speak of a new manner rather than new substance.

The «mafia di San Gallo» counterfeit the papacy and a denial the dogma , nothing makes sense anymore because is a human fabrication of a false papacy. Gänswein admits this counterfeit is a human invention also the heretic Leonardo Boff said "Bergoglio does not begin with the reform of the curia but reforming the papacy and is no longer the same".
"Pope Francis is a pope of change". This is new. His predecessors John Paul II and Benedict XVI wanted the church to maintain its continuity. Francis has now started to reform the papacy "This is the Pope of rupture"; "the figure of the papacy is not the classical", it means that Bergoglio is commits schism against the Church.

George Weigel has become a schismatic against Pope Benedict and joins a false papacy committing spiritual adultery joins a concubine and false church. Bergoglio has fallen into formal heresy mean excommunication ipso facto. George Weigel has as a heretic invalid pope, an idol, a false christ. George Weigel is joined the anti-church