Clicks4.8K

Gloria.TV News on the 18th of October 2016

Gloria.TV News
83
Pontifical Boot-Licking: Radical Archbishop Bruno Forte of Chieti-Vasto, Italy, who after the election of Pope Francis turned Ultramontanist, insulted legitimate Catholic critics of Pope Francis by …More
Pontifical Boot-Licking: Radical Archbishop Bruno Forte of Chieti-Vasto, Italy, who after the election of Pope Francis turned Ultramontanist, insulted legitimate Catholic critics of Pope Francis by accusing them of – quote – “cultural closeness, nostalgia, and immobility of ideological and political attitudes.” Forte called the reign of Pope Francis a – quote – “providential gift.”

Profound Religiosity? The news site “Il sismografo” which is controlled by the Vatican, has republished John Paul II’s message written in October, 1983 for the 500th anniversary of Martin Luther’s birth. In this message John Paul II praises a – quote – “profound religiosity of Luther” and warns of considering Luther the only or main culprit for the schisms caused during the Reformation.

Radically Christocentric? Il sismografo also published Benedict XVI’s talk in front of Protestant leaders from September, 2011 in Erfurt, Germany. Benedict presents himself as the, “Bishop of Rome” and claims that the question about God was Luther’s deep passion and the impulse of his whole life. According to Benedict, Luther’s thinking and his entire spirituality were radically Christocentric.

Monumentally Worse: Father Frank Pavone, National Director of Priests for Life, has stated that certain lewd remarks uttered by U.S. presidential hopeful Donald Trump should not affect pro-life voters at all in terms of how they vote in the presidential race, because the alternative to Trump is monumentally worse. Quote: “Voting for someone isn't a score on a personal virtue test.” And: “The Lord is the one who says, 'Your sins I will remember no more.' The one who is known as the 'accuser' is the devil.”
GTVisrockin likes this.
Lionel L. Andrades
I am a Catholic. If being a Catholic is being a fundamentalist then so am I

If they called me a fundamentalist I would say that it is true that I affirm the Syllabus of Errors,the Catechism of Pope Pius X and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS)according to the 16th century missionaries but I also accept Vatican Council II, with all hypothetical cases being invisible and not explicit …More
I am a Catholic. If being a Catholic is being a fundamentalist then so am I

If they called me a fundamentalist I would say that it is true that I affirm the Syllabus of Errors,the Catechism of Pope Pius X and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS)according to the 16th century missionaries but I also accept Vatican Council II, with all hypothetical cases being invisible and not explicit in 2016.So I affirm the Catholic Church's teachings before and after Vatican Council II, including the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1995),with no known exceptions to the old ecclesiology as it was known to St. Robert Bellarmine, St. Francis of Assisi and St. Francis Xavier.
I do not interpret magisterial documents with the Kasper-Lefebvre premise,which infers invisible cases are visible in 2016.I do not apply the Ratzinger-Rahner new theology to Vatican Council II which infers invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance(Lumen Gentium 16) are visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS; to 'the rigorist interpretation' of the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Church.So with the old ecclesiology in place, for me, there is no change in the Church's old teachings on ecumenism(only of return) and no known salvation outside the Church in other religions.Since there is no salvation outside the visible Church, and all need to be incorporated as members I affirm the need for the Social Reign of Christ King and the non separation of Church and State.The inter-office Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston made an objective mistake when it assumed that the baptism of desire was explicit.It was Cardinal Richard Cushing who was in heresy for me and Fr.Leonard Feeney who was teaching orthodoxy.
So I differ from the liberals, traditionalists and sedevacantists who use the Kasper-Lefebvre new theology to interpret Vatican Council II etc.The liberals accept the irrational and heretical conclusion and the traditionalists reject it but both use the same new, irrational theology.
Like them all I do not use the irrational premise and so my conclusion is not non traditional and heretical like that of the present magisterium and the political Left.
I affirm Feeneyite EENS and implicit- for-us and known-only- to- God baptism of desire.So there is no violation of the Principle of Non Contradiction.

Someone allegedly saved with the baptism of desire and without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church in the past, cannot be a living exception to the dogma EENS in 2016.

If a liberal says he is a Catholic and accepts Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases being not hypothetical but objectively visible in 2016 , he differs from me.
If a traditionalist says he rejects Vatican Council II, with hypothetical cases being explicit, I would agree with him.I too reject this irrational Cushingite version of Vatican Council II.
However unlike the traditionalist, I accept Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases just being hypothetical.
I am a Catholic. If being a Catholic is being a fundamentalist then so am I.-Lionel Andrades

October 18, 2016


Vatican Council II is fundamentalist if you stay clear of the Kasper-Lefebvre theology.
eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/…/vatican-council…
aderito
Both candidates are rotten to the core ,the government smells of cover ups .but I would vote for the one that does not promote abortion
HolyTrinity3 shares this.
Accuser is the devil. Say no to hate. Say yes to Good-Gods love to have peace, joy n Lord-Jesus Spirit within us. Come good Holy-Spirit...Amen.10-18-16
Rafał_Ovile
Reesorville 1. Should conform thoughts to reality and reply to adversaries arguments(evidence) otherwise ideas will divert any discussion. 2. Must reason otherwise will fall into fideism. Free will is a gift from God which influences decision and history. 3. Should learn differences in substances (substance theory - St. Thomas Aquinas) otherwise will hold monistic views. Yes, your opinion on …More
Reesorville 1. Should conform thoughts to reality and reply to adversaries arguments(evidence) otherwise ideas will divert any discussion. 2. Must reason otherwise will fall into fideism. Free will is a gift from God which influences decision and history. 3. Should learn differences in substances (substance theory - St. Thomas Aquinas) otherwise will hold monistic views. Yes, your opinion on Trump is from main stream media, in particular CNN. / Fatima is very important in theory and practice. Praying without action is (or wrong action) common to liberal / "cafeteria" Catholics. True Ora et true Labora should go together!
Reesorville
@Rafał_Ovile If you want to avoid WWIII then you must do what Mary said to do at Fatima and other occasions: to pray and to suffer for sinners. As long as there are ten righteous remaining in the wicked city, the whole place will be saved for their sake. Putting Donald Trump into office is not going to save the world from destruction.

When Hitler invaded the Soviet Union, there were Catholics …More
@Rafał_Ovile If you want to avoid WWIII then you must do what Mary said to do at Fatima and other occasions: to pray and to suffer for sinners. As long as there are ten righteous remaining in the wicked city, the whole place will be saved for their sake. Putting Donald Trump into office is not going to save the world from destruction.

When Hitler invaded the Soviet Union, there were Catholics who supported him because they saw him as putting an end to communism. Volunteers from Spain joined the German army in the battle for Leningrad. But actually, in the end, Hitler's actions only served to spread communism even further. The Catholics who supported him were deceived. The house they built was on sand and not on a rock.

In my fallible opinion, Trump's actions could perhaps be something similar. The republicans should have been able to win this election this year, for many reasons, but it seems that they will not. Why will they not? Because of Trump's own actions. There is no one damaging the cause to put a pro-life candidate into the white house more than he is when he does the things that he does. Perhaps I am wrong.
Josefine
The convergence to Vladimir Putin would be appreciated to prevent an imminent war by the NATO member states - but Donald Trump must remove Guantamo. The former US presidents and all European governments are responsible for the recent terror, the war and millions of refugees by deliberate provocation and warmongery.
I wonder about the silence of the courts, because they did not supply them before …More
The convergence to Vladimir Putin would be appreciated to prevent an imminent war by the NATO member states - but Donald Trump must remove Guantamo. The former US presidents and all European governments are responsible for the recent terror, the war and millions of refugees by deliberate provocation and warmongery.
I wonder about the silence of the courts, because they did not supply them before a Tribunal.
sputniknews.com/trend/atlantic_resolve/
Rafał_Ovile
Reesorville Do not be deceived, if Trump loses Hillary and NWO will prevail. It is math, logic and prudence. Election outcome will influence world globally, including my homeland Poland being fervently pushed towards WWIII. P.S. No, Trump shows no active support to murder babies, Clinton celebrates 7 mil. abortions.
/ Rigging the Election - Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at …More
Reesorville Do not be deceived, if Trump loses Hillary and NWO will prevail. It is math, logic and prudence. Election outcome will influence world globally, including my homeland Poland being fervently pushed towards WWIII. P.S. No, Trump shows no active support to murder babies, Clinton celebrates 7 mil. abortions.
/ Rigging the Election - Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies
Fischl
Anybody is better than Hellary Cleanton
Rafał_Ovile and one more user like this.
Rafał_Ovile likes this.
poverello likes this.
Dr Bobus likes this.
Reesorville
are there no pro-life options in the race? (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_McMullin)

Trump has publicly made comments calling for US forces to target civilians and use torture. He is not a pro-life candidate.