I have a slight objection to the terminology, particularly in the more headline part of the ANALISIS. There is, for example, no such thing as the "US" that blocks or supports anything. There is within the "real functioning" democratic political nature of the US, the gaining of power by LEFTISTS, be they secular or Catholic (Biden, Pelosi or Cuomo and at times bishops). Inside of America there is both a cultural war (and I mean "war" culturally as there was a Civil War militarily after 1860) and a political struggle of a mean sort (not normal politics). I find it offensive to me as an American to read that the "US" blocks family values at the UN (which I view as leftist dominated with a large amount of Islamism too >> I would like to see the demise of the UN). In reality,the bearer of offense is the American Left (and for that matter the EU Left), occupying the institutional offices determining formally the activity of those working, say, in the State Department (and Hillary Clinton is of the left, supports publically financed abortion and represents leftish Christianity). The same is true for the EU.

My stylistic critique is aimed at the generaliations that all to often Gloria.tv falls into, particularly with the (for my feelings) boarder-line anti-Americanism that I experience. The entry above this one in German (?) represents a venture into politics that is exceptionally distasteful to me and stupidly supportive of Russia (without noting the influence of thinkers such as Alexander Dugin and others of this type on Putin) and is irrelevant for the religious domain of prime interest to Gloria.tv.

I condemn uniquivocably the pansexualism of the "US" or the "EU", i.e., of those on the Left that carry out such policies in the frame work of the ongoing political structure. I do not appreciate the over generalizations in the areas of politics that Gloria.tv and some of its contributors are inclined to make, particularly when I sense a generalized anti-Americanism