ALL THE BOOKS IN TEXAS ON VATICAN COUNCIL II ARE WRITTEN WITH AN IRRATIONAL PREMISE TO PRODUCE A LIBERAL CONCLUSION.
ALL THE BOOKS IN TEXAS ON VATICAN COUNCIL II ARE WRITTEN WITH AN IRRATIONAL PREMISE TO PRODUCE A LIBERAL CONCLUSION.
All the books on Vatican Council II in Texas (in general) are written and published with an irrational premise to produce a non traditional conclusion.This is schism. It is a break with the past. We now have a rational choice which is non schismatic.
Archbishop Joseph Strickland’s Pastoral Letter on Vatican Council II does not cover this point. In Tyler, Texas the books on Vatican Council II are political. They are not honest.
Bishop Strickland does not interpret LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, as referring to only hypothetical cases. If they exist they can only be known to God.Invisible and hypothetical cases cannot be objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. They do not exist in our reality in 2025.
If there is a box of oranges with an apple in the center then the apple is an exception because it is there in that box. If it was not there it would not be an exception.
There are no cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance in our human reality in 2025. Yet the books on Vatican Council II project LG 14 and 16 as exceptions for the dogma EENS and Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation). This is irrational.
So new books have to be written in Texas, with the Council interpreted only rationally.
In Arlington, Texas, Bishop Michael Olsen at Fort Worth, and the Discalced Carmelite Sisters, were interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally, like Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez. So the Carmelite Sisters traditional Carmelite theology and faith was in conflict with Vatican Council II interpreted only irrationally by them and the bishop. They were laicized. The Council interpreted irrationally has exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors etc.
Tradition is made obsolete. This was not known to the Sisters.
Bishop Strickland the bishop in Tyler, Texas did not intervene since he too was interpreting the Council and Catechism irrationally and not rationally.-Lionel Andrades