LATIN MASS GROUPS MUST UPDATE THEIR PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY
11.11.2025LATIN MASS GROUPS MUST UPDATE THEIR PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY
The Archdiocese of Chicago is in open schism, AI on ‘X’ indicates. While the Franciscans of the Immaculate ( Latin group) must stop playing victim and affirm Vatican Council II, rational, in harmony with the Roman Missal. Then they can ask the President and Secretary of the FI Governing Body to do the same.Fr. Paulo Siano fi and Fr. Affonso Bruno f.i are both Cushingite. It is the false philosophy and theology which produces division in the Church and not the Italian or Latin Mass.
1. The empirical error, the false philosophy is invisible cases in 2025 are physically visible.
2. The new theology, the false theology is outside the Catholic Church there is known salvation in particular cases in 2025. So the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) is made obsolete and so is the rest of Tradition.
Without this philosophical and theological error Vatican Council II is ecclesiocentric just like traditional mission over the centuries. Membership in the Catholic Church with faith and baptism (Ad Gentes 7, CCC 846) is necessary for salvation from Hell.
With Vatican Council II no more being liberal the Church returns to the pre-1949 ecclesiocentric mission and outreach.
ALTAR RAILING REMOVED
The Latin Mass group in Charlotte, USA reports on altar railings being removed and the Latin Mass closed or transferred. It does not report on the bishop being in schism with Vatican Council II, irrational.
The issue is that the bishop is interpreting the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally and this is being ignored.
If he affirms Vatican Council II and the Catechism of Pope John Paul II, rationally, he supports the ecclesiocentrism of the dogma EENS, the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Roman Missal and the rest of Tradition. He can no more be a liberal since the Council is no more liberal when interpreted honestly.
You have to avoid the Rahner-Ratzinger-Lefebvre new theology and then it is a simple return to Tradition, carrying along Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, also interpreted without the new theology ( LG 16 is visible).
Without the Rahner-Ratzinger-Lefebvre new theology, the bishop in Charlotte will be offering the Novus Ordo Mass with the ecclesiology of the Roman Missal. It will be a return to the 16th century Mass, at the Mass in English today.
One small step and 60 years of liberalism is finished.
So the bishop has removed altar rails…why? You mean he is not a traditionalist when the Council and Catechism are ecclesiocentric?
NEW MISSAL IS NOT FEENEYITE
The New Missal of Pope Paul VI is accepted by the Latin Mass group when Vatican Council II is ecclesiocentric, traditional and non-schismatic with the 16th century?
Why does the Latin Mass group in Charlotte allow Dr.Joseph Shaw and Una Voce to interpret Magisterial Documents irrationally and so indirectly support the bishop in Charlotte?
The bishop still uses a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II. They also do the same in the archdiocese of Detroit, Rome and the Vatican. This is an issue in the secular realm. The people do not know about it.
They are also interpreting Church Documents with the heresy and schism of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston. This is a canonical issue.
So we have a secular and canonical issue in Charlotte, Detroit, Fort Worth, Rome, and Chicago…
The archbishop, curia and all the Catholic organizations in Chicago, interpret Magisterial Documents irrationally and so dishonestly. This is even though they have a rational choice. So they contradict Vatican Council II and the Roman Missal. This is public schism.
The Latin Mass groups have to break away from this schismatic cycle. They must interpret the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms rationally and without the mistake in the 1949 LOHO. They must make this public. Then they can appeal to the bishop to do the same.
When what is invisible is confused as being visible I call it Cushingism. When what is invisible is seen as just being invisible I call it Feeneyism.
Why must the Jesuits, Franciscans, and Dominicans be allowed to use the New Missal when it is not aligned with the ecclesiology of the founders of their religious orders and neither with Vatican Council II? This is the norm for the Latin Mass group?
The Roman Missal is Feeneyite but the New Missal is Cushingite.It is not ecclesiocentric like Vatican Council II, rational. Something important is missing. So it cannot be the lex orandi, in its present state, until it is updated.
So the Latin Mass groups cannot accept the New Missal as the norm in the Church. It is Cushingite. The Novus Ordo and Latin Mass must have a Missal which is Feeneyite. It is the same at every liturgy and rite since Vatican Council II is Feeneyite and not Cushingite. It is rational and not irrational. It is traditional and not non traditional.
Peter Kwasniewski is a Cushingite on Vatican Council II and so in a rupture with the Latin Mass as offered by St. Ignatius of Loyola the founder of the Jesuits, who was a Feeneyite. This is acceptable for the Latin Mass groups?
STAY ALERT: ‘NUANCED INTERPRETATION’
EWTN, Cardinal Ladaria, Bishop Augustine di Noia op, apologists at Catholic Answers, correspondents of the National Catholic Register, Crisis Magazine, blog 1Peter 5, Matt Fradd etc are Cushingite on Vatican Council II so there will be schism with the ecclesiology of Catholic at Holy Mass in Greek and Latin over the centuries. They call their Cushingite interpretation; the confusing of what is implicit as being explicit, a ‘nuanced interpretation’. This tern was used by Pope Benedict and Cardinal Ladaria in papers of the International Theological Commission.
The ‘nuance’ emerges after they confuse what is invisible as being visible. So visible cases of LG 16 etc are examples of salvation outside the Church for them and so LG 16 contradicts the ‘strict interpretation’ of the dogma EENS.
So there is the nuanced, baptism of desire (irrational), dogma EENS (irrational), Athanasius Creed (irrational with alleged practical exceptions). This is the nuanced interpretation. It is approved by the political left and is dishonest.
For me baptism of desire is rational, the dogma EENS is rational, the Athanasius Creed is rational and Vatican Council II and all the catechisms are rational- Lionel Andrades
E-mail: lionelandrades11@gmail.com
Gloria TV link: Lionel Leslie Andrades
VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL DOES NOT HAVE THE …