Jorge Bergoglio is a destroyer of the papacy and the Church and uses “excommunication” as a weapon of revenge at his whim, and not as the Church has instituted it; as a medicinal weapon to correct …More
Jorge Bergoglio is a destroyer of the papacy and the Church and uses “excommunication” as a weapon of revenge at his whim, and not as the Church has instituted it; as a medicinal weapon to correct Christians who have strayed from the faith and betray the Church with their heresies, but Bergoglio uses it to take personal revenge on those who refuse to join his rebellion against God and the Church. And on the contrary, Bergoglio himself promotes heretics, internal and external enemies of the Church.
From Argentina he has rewarded the predatory homosexual priests who have destroyed the lives of many Catholic seminarians, young people and children.
This wicked man should be in jail.
Archbishop Viganò: I accuse Bergoglio of heresy and schism
With conviction I reject the heterodox doctrines contained in the documents of Vatican II and which have been condemned by the popes up to Pius XII, or which contradict the Catholic Magisterium in any way. I find it disconcerting to say the least that those who are trying me for schism are those who embrace the heterodox doctrine according to which there exists a bond of union “with those who, being baptized, are honored with the name of Christian, though they do not profess the faith in its entirety or do not preserve unity of communion with the successor of Peter” (LG 15).
I wonder how readily one can challenge a bishop for the lack of communion which is also claimed to exist with heretics and schismatics.
From Argentina he has rewarded the predatory homosexual priests who have destroyed the lives of many Catholic seminarians, young people and children.
This wicked man should be in jail.
Archbishop Viganò: I accuse Bergoglio of heresy and schism
With conviction I reject the heterodox doctrines contained in the documents of Vatican II and which have been condemned by the popes up to Pius XII, or which contradict the Catholic Magisterium in any way. I find it disconcerting to say the least that those who are trying me for schism are those who embrace the heterodox doctrine according to which there exists a bond of union “with those who, being baptized, are honored with the name of Christian, though they do not profess the faith in its entirety or do not preserve unity of communion with the successor of Peter” (LG 15).
I wonder how readily one can challenge a bishop for the lack of communion which is also claimed to exist with heretics and schismatics.
