Francis & the Evangelicals prepare for a one world religion

My dear prof. Wessel, my friend: It has been prophecied that in order for Jesus to return the man of perdition has to appear, but also the holder of evil in this world needs to disappear, it's there in the bible... many false prophets will come, but in order for the man of perdition to make his entrance he needs the Eucharist gone.

The only way to that is by anulling dogma, but how that could happen if they are still faithfull who are loyal to our Lord?

You take a council and thwist some things here and there, while the foundation of falsehood within some clergy grows overtime, you throw some wolves clothed in sheep, to disrupt the faith here and there... scandals have arisen like NEVER before, the reputation of the church have been compromised and some laity have gone to other religions and have embrace the world... but the Eucharist still there.

The protestants at least the majority don't believe in the real presence of the Lord and they like to replicate what our priests do with cookies and juice, but the only way to do it is through a catholic priest and love to our Lord...

Desolation is within many of the christians churches, no Eucharist there, there is no Eucharist within any other Religion like ours because we have that Catholic God bergoglio refuses to belive in, to this man Jesus was just that a man, a feel good story...

It is only logical that the Eucharist needs to be GONE, there are 3 pillars in the Catholic God: The word of the Lord, The Eucharist and the papacy... Bergoglio has put aside the importance of the papacy, the word of the Lord have been manipulated since 1965, but The Eucharist still remain... NOW...

What the son of perdition needs in order for him to go in the Holy temple and fulfill La Salette? Well he needs the Eucharist gone, how they will do that? They will introduce anti-doctrine in this synods (communion to the divorce and remarried claiming that the Eucharist is for the weak not the perfect), the Catholic Church will break apart like never before, it is prophesied...

A gigantic schism (and our friend Voris said that if they approve communion of the divorce and remarried the most enormous difficult times for the church will happen), will happen...

We have been telling this for a long time, but most traditionalists are expecting the nest pope to overrride whatever Bergoglio did, if they have the schism they want, they will claim that most of ous are close minded and will unify the churches ALL of them, and this churches (even muslims, jews, buddists, etc) will have their tradition respected, they will do thei celebrations in their tradition and it is only Logical that because they need their collagues to feel good (jews, muslims) they will CANCEL the Eucharist.

This time will be like no other, and persecution will start slowly until full scale martyrdom... as the new terrorists will be us... then the war will break out and much confusion shall arise, but peace shall be negotiated by the antichrist and he will be considered the 2nd coming of Christ with the one world goverment and religion at his feet.

Who wants schism? they do... why so they could have the Eucharist gone, and then they shall have their true master jump to the world scene... sounds hard, but that is how all come down... may Jesus give us all His sweet Mercy and clarity. Amen

How serious is this meant? I know well "fundamentalist" evangelicals and they do not like Catholicism and are not overly "social justice" types. Salvation offered by Jesus and accepted by the believer IS the main thing. Pope Francis does not really talk about salvation for the next world, rather emancipation in this world. I can guarantee that Billy Graham would never have accepted unity with a social Gospel. So, just what type of "Evangelical" is meant? The social justice crowd? There I see continuity between Pp Francis and the so-called Evangellicals because there is the same focus of "evangelicalizing" the world in worldly terms.

As to Voris: His excellent critique of the Church of Nice is applied to any and everyone, particularly bishops, except to the Pope from whom he selects quotations seemingly substantiating "traditional" Catholicism. In the link given there is a two part quotation from the Pope, one part of which Voris has quoted as orthodox. Small examples of Voris' self-imposed blinders sre his insistence that only boys or males should assist at the Mass, yet Pope Francis has had female servers. At Rio the Pope had the Host distributed in paper cups and by hand (the Host in the hand has been attacked by Voris). In other words he views the Pope with selective vision.

Now, I repeat the question: What is to be done? If the gist of the posting is correct, the Pope is seeking a "world church" (not just cooperation with other Christian faiths). That has a fiundamental re-interpretation of the Church as an extension of the Body of Christ. The Pope is heading towards a non-metaphysical view of grace to a voluntary (Protestant) view, i.e., whoever accepts Christ by an act of the will is on a par with those baptized into the Body of Christ. For Catholics the Mass is not primarily a meal celebrating the good Word (= Protestant view), rather the real sacrifice of Christ in the Host. (Pardon my not particularly word-correct formulations. I am too tired at the moment.) I am slowly being forced to hold as prima facie evident that Pope Francis is, as Louie Verrecchio has maintained, a material heretic (which is a tenous position as it easily changes into a formal heresy -- which would disprove the infallible magisterium. Horrible!) But I ask, just how many words and deeds must accumulate before I find it necessary to conclude that the Pope and I inhabit quite literally different Churches? If so, what shouldI make of this "fact"? Can someone clarify the matter for me? Am I just a loner here? Or should I just sticik my head (intellect) in the sand and continue on?