Francis treats layman as an Archbishop.

In this picture taken June 16, 2014, are presented Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who declares himself the bishop of Rome, and Justin Welby, who claims to be Archbishop of Canterbury, and primate of the Anglican Communion.
With the Bull "Apostolicae Curae" of September 18, 1896, Pope Leo XIII - confirming the decisions of his predecessors - has solemnly declared that Anglican orders are absolutely invalid.
It follows that Justin Welby is not only - as an Anglican - notorious heretic and schismatic, but it is not - in any way - a validly ordained: it is not a priest and bishop.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio not only explicitly stated that he does not believe in the bull of Pope Leo XIII on the invalidity of Anglican ordinations. But at the same time, with his gestures and his way of acting, outwardly expressed this conviction.

Link
Abramo
"Speaking with action" means is just another way of preferring praxis to theory and to affirm the primacy of action.
Knights4Christ
Dr Bobus Francis Speak with action 🤦
This is no the first time that Francis is preaching religious indifferentism and religious syncretism. Francis still is promoting religious indifferentism & syncretism 🤦
Dr Bobus
Could someone show the text and/or link in which Papa Bergoglio explicitly says that he opposes Apostolicae Curae?
Knights4Christ
😡 This action is a very grave error and heresy that leads to the complete destruction of the moral principles of Catholicism and they will not enter into communion with the church. The hierarchy will fall in Apostasy and will enter into communion with the Apostates. 🤦
Prof. Leonard Wessell
One can easily miss the seriousness here. If one considers that de essentia all humans are seeking God, i.e., naturally religious, then it is easy to conclude that all paths lead to God, some ways, perphaps, better than others, e.g., Catholicism is better than Anglicism and Shamanism, etc.. But, all ways are valid. This is modernism. The strict validity or not of Anglican priests are really secondary …More
One can easily miss the seriousness here. If one considers that de essentia all humans are seeking God, i.e., naturally religious, then it is easy to conclude that all paths lead to God, some ways, perphaps, better than others, e.g., Catholicism is better than Anglicism and Shamanism, etc.. But, all ways are valid. This is modernism. The strict validity or not of Anglican priests are really secondary. Who is the Pope to judge? Indifferentism is built into modernism.
Josefine
The false prophets claiming the fundamental innocence of the people, therefore, most recognize not the cause and effect their wrong life through their own human laws, promote homosexuality, adultery and abortion, removing them from God.
Because people wrong are lectured by the Bishops of the Council about the law of cause and effect, they blame the wars, suffering and disasters God ultimately.
These …More
The false prophets claiming the fundamental innocence of the people, therefore, most recognize not the cause and effect their wrong life through their own human laws, promote homosexuality, adultery and abortion, removing them from God.
Because people wrong are lectured by the Bishops of the Council about the law of cause and effect, they blame the wars, suffering and disasters God ultimately.
These false theologians smear honey around the mouth until today the sinful people and push the responsibility to God, rather than on the transgressors of the commandments of God, the law of love and eternal life.
"You closes the Kingdom of heaven the people... Even not going into but you don't let into the, which want to enter". And: "you moves over land and sea, to win a single people of faith; and when he won, then her makes him a son of hell, which is twice as bad as you yourselves! " Matthew 23.13 15.