L’OSSERVATORE ROMANO, CIVILITA CATTOLICA AGREE WITH AI ON ‘X’ : POPE LEO IS IN SCHISM WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL.
L’OSSERVATORE ROMANO, CIVILITA CATTOLICA AGREE WITH AI ON ‘X’ : POPE LEO IS IN SCHISM WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL.
Andrea Monda, Director, L’Osservatore Romano , Fr. Antonio Spadero sj, editor in chief Civilita Cattolica and Paulo Ruffini, Director of the Vatican Dicastery for Communications, agree with A.I on ‘X’: Pope Leo and the College of Cardinals are in schism with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. There is no denial or comment also from Fr. Antonio Spadero sj, who has been monitoring these reports of mine on ‘X’.
Fr.James Martin sj, Crux, America, Massimo Faggioli, Austin Ivereigh, Hannah Brochus and Edward Pentin have been alerted to these reports- the column on those who follow show.
A.I predicts a coming schism in the Catholic Church from the Left. Since Vatican Council II is no more liberal.
I contacted Bishop Joseph Strickland via X .He has issued a pastoral statement on Vatican Council II but has not stated that LG 14 (baptism of desire) and LG 16 (being saved in invincible ignorance) refer to invisible cases in 2025-2026 for him.
The Holy See Press Office, Reuters, AP, CNN, the New York Times and the BBC are in a wait-and-see position.
No one is saying that A.I is wrong or that there cannot be a schism because of A, B or C reasons.
Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez who has been mentioned often in these reports, did not comment at his Press Conference yesterday.
OUR LADY CO-REDEMPTRIX ‘ DEVELOPS’
Over the centuries we know that Our Lady has been described as Co-Redemptrix and Dispenser of all Graces, she existed with the Divine Will, it was always within Her. Her Heart was joined to Jesus. Graces from Jesus flow through Her, in her role as Mediatrix of all Graces, born without sin. She is the Mother of God. This cannot be contradicted. She has been given a Special Role for these end times, a warrior’s role, ‘who is she who cometh fair as the moon bright as the sun, terrible as an army in battle array’. Neither can Cardinal Fernandez correct what is common knowledge - that LG 8, 14, and 16 are hypothetical and invisible always.Even King Edward and the Protestants who have a problem with Our Lady, would tell Fernandez that they cannot see or meet someone saved with the baptism of desire (LG 14) in London in 2025-2026.
So Ad Gentes 7 is not contradicted by LG 16. The Athanasius Creed is not contradicted by LG 14.AG 7 is aligned with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and LG 8, 14, 16 , UR 3, NA 2 are not exceptions for AG 7, EENS or the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Roman Missal at the Latin Mass.
So Pope Leo and the cardinals agree with that layman in Rome who has no academic degree in philosophy and theology. LG 14 and 16 are always hypothetical .I may not be a theologian but of one thing I am dead-sure - LG 14 and LG 16 are always hypothetical-24 hours a day.
It means the New Ecumenism is false .UR 3 refers to a hypothetical case. So it does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX on an ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church only.
There cannot be a development of doctrine by confusing what is implicit (LG 14, LG 16) as being explicit in 1965-2025. This is being dishonest.
John Henry Newman a doctor of the Church said doctrines develop until they become dogma. Then there is no development. EENS cannot develop by projecting invisible cases of the baptism of desire as being visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS and then claiming that it is not always necessary to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation (1949 LOHO). This is a rejection of the dogma EENS defined by three Church Councils which did not mention any exceptions.This is CDF /DDF/ Holy Office heresy and schism.
We do not know of any exceptions in real life. So the DDF /CDF/ Holy Office made an objective mistake in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (LOHO). They repeated the mistake at Vatican Council II when the 1949 LOHO was referenced in Lumen Gentium 16.It was placed in the Denzinger with the mistake. It was repeated in the Catechism of the Catholic Church by Morandi and Di Noia of the CDF. In a public communication they wanted Brother Andre Marie micm, Prior at the St. Benedict Center, NH to accept invisible cases of CCC 847-848 as being visible exceptions for CCC 845-846 ( outside the Church no salvation).The same mistake was repeated by Pope Benedict and Cardinal Ladaria in two papers of the International Theological Commission. So a New Theology was brought into the Church. It says outside the Church there is salvation, known salvation in particular cases. This was irrational, dishonest and non traditional. It was schism with the founders of the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.
So when Cardinal Fernandez issued a statement on Our Lady Co-Redemptrix, it is part of ‘the Church seeking a deeper understanding’ of this issue. A ‘development of doctrine ‘. It could change in future just like Pope Leo's understanding of Vatican Council II. The Council is rational for Paulo Ruffini, Fr. Antonio Spadero and Andrea Monda. – Lionel Andrades